The following email exchange explains how it may be possible to stop the Obama administration’s mandatory health care plan. The explanation suggests another application on the “man or other animals” strategy that’s I’ve already presented on this blog.
Dear Alfred Adask,
Congress, in the coming weeks, intends to impose a mandatory health plan upon us that will eliminate most of our private health care options. I believe there is only one message with enough punch to slow this steamroller.
If their mandatory health plan is so good then the first people in—should be the Members of Congress. The first plank in the new health plan should be that it replaces the privileged plan the Members of Congress have set up for themselves.
Can you crank something out for the media today that puts this simple issue on the top of the pile?
The public will love it.
Mike Ford
. . . .
Hi Mike,
I don’t have anything to “crank out” on health care right now, but insofar as
1) health care necessarily includes “drugs”; and
2) I know that the drug laws are based on the premise that all men are animals rather than men made in God’s image and endowed by their Creator with “certain unalienable Rights,” then
3) it’s all but certain that the health care laws are based on the premise that man is an animal.
I’ve dealt with and defeated that premise in a case where I (and six others) were each sued by the Texas Office of Attorney General for $25,000 per day ($750,000/month; $9 million/ year). I have a number of documents posted on my blog (http://adask.wordpress.com) under the category “man or other animals” that explain how I used a “freedom of religion” strategy to defeat the presumption that man is an animal and thereby defeat the OAG’s case. The OAG had invested six years and roughly $500,000 in this case, so running them off was no small achievement.
If the proposed health care law were closely read—especially relative to definitions and whichever Title of the US Code where the law would be “codified”—you could probably find evidence that the proposed law applied only to animals—not men made in God’s image and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. If such evidence were found, it should be fairly easy to implement the “man or other animals” strategy to challenge and defeat the proposed health care laws.
Do you have a copy of the proposed health care law?
Do you know where it may be ultimately codified in the US Code?
If I had that information, I could probably craft a “man or other animals” challenge that might be lethal to the mandatory health care law.
Al
