“Man or other Animals” Drug Laws–a Jewish Conspiracy?

Jump to Comments

As I’ve reported here for the past two years, in A.D. 2005 I was sued by the Texas Attorney General’s office for participating in the manufacture and distribution and sale of a “controlled substance”.  That “controlled substance” was colloidal silver–an inexpensive antibiotic that consists of distilled water and silver ions.  The AG’s office wanted to fine me (and each three other living defendants, two corporations and one trust)  $25,000 per day.  That’s a $9 million fine per year for each defendant.

I read the relevant Texas and US drug laws and was shocked to discover 26 separate instances of “man or other animals” drug laws (some Texas, some federal) that were premised on the presumption that all men are “animals”.  I knew instantly that this presumption was a violation of the Christian faith in that Genesis 1:26-28 declares that on the 6th day God created man in His image and gave man dominion over the animals.  Thus, the government cannot define me or any other man made in God’s image as an “animal” without violating my right to freedom of religion.

Once we advanced that argument as our defense, the Texas AG’s office–which had invested six years and most of $500,000 in prosecuting this case–dropped the case.  They simply disappeared.  We haven’t heard from them in almost two years.

The “man or other animals” drug laws constitute the foundation for the “war on drugs,” the modern police state, the prison-industrial complex and evidence of GENOCIDE being perpetrated against the American people by our own government.  I’m not going to explain that insight here, but you can read more about my analysis of the “man or other animals” drug laws by clicking on “man or other animals”  at the top of the list under the “Categories” section at the right hand column on the home page of this blog.  You’ll find about six articles that offer my best explanations to date.

However, in the aftermath of the “man or other animals” insight, a number of my blog’s readers or listeners to my radio program (10PM (Central) Tues, Wed, Thurs wwfar.com & 3.215 shortwave), I’ve received a number of email pointing attributing the “man or other animals” drug laws to the Jews.  As you probably know, the Jewish has an historical predilection to regard non-Jews as “goy” (animals).  Based on this predilection, some readers have argued that the Jews must’ve wrote the “man or other animals” drug laws.

Here’s a recent email that mildly advances that argument:

“Alfred,

“So great to see you have a web presence again!
“In your articles man or animals, you seem to not to realize the attitude and approach
calling men animals comes from the talmad that perverts the purpose
of calling men animals that is indeed in the Bible. “Cast not your pearls before swine
nor give that which is Holy unto dogs.” Jesus called the woman who wanted her
child healed a “dog”. She said true Yahweh but even the dogs get the scraps that fall
from the masters table.  The Talmadists not knowing that they identify themselves by rejecting the Yahshua the the annoited they are “Goats”
“That’s my two cents
“Yahweh bless all your efforts
“Russ”

I’m always grateful for any any blessing, but I disagree with the idea that the “man or other animals” drug laws can be blamed on the Jews.  My response to Russ explains my reaoning:

Hi Russ,
Thanks for your email and compliments.
The idea of calling other men animals is not unique to the the Talmud–it is one of the three phases of genocide.  I.e., once you “dehumanize” a particular group by defining them as “animals,” “insects,” or “vermin,” you can kill them all–not just combatants–but women, children, elderly, babies–just like you might wipe out a nest of rats.
However, I do not attribute the “man or other animals” drug to the Jews.  Why?  Because, so far as I know, these drug laws apply to everyone–including the Jews.  While I understand that Jews might regard Gentiles and Christians as “animals,” I cannot believe that the Jews would define themselves to be animals.  Yet the drug laws make no exception for Jews.
I conclude that the “man or other animals” drug laws are the product of something Satanic that despises both Christians and Jews (and probably even Muslims).  Remember, the idea that man alone is made in God’s image and given dominion over the “animals” is first seen in Genesis1:26-28.  Therefore, God implicitly declared that no man made in God’s image can be an “animal”.  That verse precedes the both the Jewish and Christian faiths.
The Jews’ later claim that the Gentiles were “Goy” (animals) would seem to violate Genesis 1:26-28 as would any other act of genocide–including the “man or other animals” drug laws.
To claim that all men are “animals” (as the drug laws do) seems to me to attack the Jews every bit as much as Christians.
Therefore, I do not attribute these laws to any “true” Jews.  There may be some people in positions of power who are atheists or Satanists who are masquerading as “Jews”.  But I can’t imagine how any true “Jew” would declare himself and his people to be “animals”.
The “man or other animals” drug laws are not “Jewish” in origin–they are Satanic.
Thanks again for your email.
Al

For me, it’s fairly obvious.  Even if the Jews still regard the Christians as “goy” (animals) the Jews don’t regard themselves as “animals”.  I can’t imagine any true Jew causing a law to be passed that would define even the “Chosen People” as “animals”.  Therefore, I conclude 1) that the Jews are not behind the “man or other animals” drug laws; 2) that the authors of the “man or other animals” drug laws are either atheists, paganists or Satanists.

I’d bet on Satanists.

2 Comments

Filed under "Man or Other Animals"