RSS

Somethin’ Funny’s Goin’ On

10 Aug

96859d1230781101-funny-strange-random-pics-drawing

The Manta.com website includes a database of over 63 million US and foreign companies.  That database info is provided by Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B).   Manta.com will provide preliminary information on each of these millions of companies for free.  If you want more “in-depth” info, there’s a fee.

But since this article is about “funny” stuff, and paying fees isn’t fun, let’s run a few free searches and see what we can find.  You might be surprised.

For example, if you type “Government of the United States” into the Manta.com search engine, you’ll be whisked to a list of “7,666 matching US companies”.

The first “company” on the list is:

“Government of the United States (US Government) HQ

“the u.s. Capitol Washington DC”

The “HQ” stands for “headquarters”.

If you scroll down the list of other companies below the “Government of the United States,” you’ll find “branches” like “Executive Office of the United States Government” (6 entries), “United States Department of the Air Force (US Government),” “The Navy United States Department of (US Government Naval Reserves),” and “United States Court of Appeals For The 11th Circuit United States Courthouse”.

Apparently, the Navy, Air Force and Courts are “companies”.

That’s kinda “funny,” doncha think?

If you click on the “Government of the United States HQ” link, you’ll see another website page with some fairly detailed—and possibly bewildering—information.

For example, you’ll see that this “Government of the United States” has its address at:

“the u.s. capitol

“Washington, DC 20515-0001”

Its phone number is “(202) 224-3121”.  Business Hours are “24/7”.

You can click the “map” link and see a graphic indicating that this “Government” is located on “Capitol Hill” (same place as Congress) in Washington DC.

None of that seems particularly surprising (other than the idea that our “Government” might be a “company” and/or a conglomerate of “companies”).  But the Manta.com report does begin to seem a little strange under the heading “About Government Of The United States” where we read:

“government, owner archbishop deric r. mccloud of basilica shrine michigan and 4th ne street washington,dc”.

Say whut? Does that abbreviated text really indicate that the owner of the “Government Of The United States” is an archbishop named Deric R. McCloud?  Who could be dumb enough to think (or even mistakenly write) that the “Government of the United States” was owned by an archbishop?

A:  Apparently, Dunn & Bradstreet was dumb enough.

And just in case you think we can’t be talking about the “Government of the United States,” take a gander at the “Additional Information” heading and you’ll read (as of August 6th, A.D. 2010):

“all receipents [sic] of federal funds that have any kind of criminal case or felony federal, state, local or served time in prison federal, state, benefits terminate 7/26/10 by barack obama administration.”

The reference to “barack obama” shows that this entry for “Government of the United States HQ” does, indeed, describe the very same “Government of the United States” that we all so love and admire.  (Don’t forget that this “Government” and all its various “branches” are being reported by D&B to be individual, private companies.)

OK, OK—maybe this article isn’t really all that “funny” (ha-ha!), but it’s still pretty “funny” (strange).

•  Go back to the top of the “Government of the United States” page and click the “More Info” tab.   Under “Employees (Estimated)” you’ll read:

“2,768,886

At this location

“3”

2.7 million federal employees sounds about right.  This enormous number of employees confirms that we’re viewing information on the “Government of the United States”.

But if only “3” of those millions of employees are “At this location” (the “HQ”) who are the “chosen 3”?  And where, precisely is “this location”?  Capitol Hill?  Yes—but where on Capitol Hill?  In the Senate chamber?  The House of Representatives?  If there are only “3” people at the HQ, that HQ might be as small as some cloakroom.

Curiouser and curiouser.

Under “State of Incorporation” you’ll read “Information not found”.  This could mean that this “Government of the United States” was never formally “incorporated”.  Or it might mean that the information concerning that incorporation is intentionally concealed.

However, we can see a clue to the possible date of incorporation for this “Government of the United States” under the heading “Years in Business” which reads “223”.  If the “Government of the United States” began 223 years ago, there should be a constitution or charter to mark its creation at that time.

This is A.D. 2010, so “223” years ago would be A.D. 1787.

But that’s odd.

Why?  Because our current “Government of the United States” should have been created by “The Constitution of the United States” and therefore could not have existed prior to the ratification of the Constitution.

In A.D. 1787, the Constitutional Convention completed the final draft of the Constitution on September 17th.  That proposed Constitution for a new “federal government” was then submitted to the Congress that already existed under the Articles of Confederation (ratified in A.D. 1781).  The Confederation Congress quickly “approved” the proposed Constitution under Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation and then sent it out to We the People for ratification.

Article VII of the Constitution declares, “The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.”  I.e., the Constitution (and resulting federal government) could not become effective and operational until it was ratified by at least nine of the States of the Union.

Thus, while the Constitution may have been “approved” by the existing Congress in A.D. 1787, it could not have been established and ordained by We the People until ratified by at least 9 States.  But the 9th State (New Hampshire) didn’t ratify until June 21st, A.D. 1788.

Wikipedia article “Unites States Constitution” reports:

“Once the Congress of the Confederation received word of New Hampshire’s ratification, it set a timetable for the start of operations under the new Constitution, and on March 4, 1789, the [new, federal] government began operations.”   [Bracketed insertion mine.]

Since the Constitution created the federal “Government” and could not have been ratified by We the People before A.D. 1788 (when the 9th State ratified), D&B’s report that the “Government of the United States” began “223” years ago (A.D. 1787) can’t be true.  The earliest that the Constitution could’ve been deemed ratified and operations was A.D. 1788—222 years ago.   Similarly, given that the new federal “Government” was not actually operational until A.D. 1789, the D&B report that this “Government” has been “in business” since A.D. 1787 also seems mistaken.  Under this criteria, the earliest that the federal Government might become operational was A.D. 1789—221 years ago.

Big deal, hmm?

Who cares?

Aren’t I merely making a mountain out of data entry error mole hill?  Didn’t the D&B clerk responsible for the data entry simply write “223” when she meant “222” or even “221”?

I doubt it.  If I’m right, it is a “big deal”.  Here’s why:

In A.D. 2008, I first learned about the Manta.com reports that suggest our government is some sort of conglomerate of “companies” and “branches”.  When I first read the D&B “Government of the United States” report two years ago, Manta.com had a different website format.  In that earlier format, Manta.com reported that “Government of the United States” started in “1787”.   (Today, they report “223” years in business.)

In 2008, when I first saw “1787,” I knew that either: 1) the D&B data entry clerk made a mistake; or 2) the current “Government of the United States” is somehow presumed to have started at least one year before the Constitution itself was ratified and two years before the resulting federal government became operational.

If so, whatever currently passes for our “Government of the United States” is not based on the authority of We the People, but on some other “authority”.  Thus, this is a potentially “big” deal.

I also knew that if the D&B clerk didn’t make a data entry error, that the Manta.com website might be changed to eliminate evidence that today’s “Government of the United States” is not be the same “Government” created by the Constitution ratified by People in A.D. 1788.  So, in A.D. 2009, I downloaded and retained complete copies of about 25 Manta.com website pages for safekeeping.

As I’d anticipated, the Manta.com website has since been modified and some information found two years ago has been changed or “disappeared”.

For example, where Manta.com used to report that the “Government” began in “1787,” it now reports that it’s been in business for “223” years.  That’s not a big change.  It’s still possible that the numbers “223” and “1787” simply reflect some persistent data entry calculation error.  But given the differences between “1787” and “223,” the probability of a mere data entry error is reduced.  It therefore seems increasingly possible that the current D&B report on “Government of the United States” may correctly declare that that “Government” started the year before the Constitution was ratified by the People.

If so, as crazy as it sounds, it is therefore conceivable that there might be two editions of our “Constitution”:  1) one approved by the Confederation Congress in A.D. 1787; and 2) another, ratified by We the People in A.D. 1788.  The text of both of these “editions” of the Constitution would be identical, but the underlying authority would be completely different.

Under the Constitution ratified by People in A.D. 1788, the enacting authority and national sovereigns would (consistent with the principles of the “Declaration of Independence”) be We the People. As individual sovereigns, We the People would enjoy the “republican form of government” guaranteed at Article 4 Section 4 of the federal Constitution.

However, under the possible Constitution “approved” by Congress in A.D. 1787, the enacting authority and national sovereigns would be the Congress.  If Congress were the constitutional sovereign, our form of government would be an aristocracy of 535 men and women.  Worse, under such aristocracy, you and I would be presumed to be subjects or even slaves.  If the Constitution “approved” by Congress in A.D. 1787 were in effect today (rather than the Constitution ratified by the People in A.D. 1788), you and I can’t be free.

Yes, this conjecture sounds like another howling conspiracy theory.  But even so, since the Constitution wasn’t ratified until A.D. 1788 and the resulting government didn’t become operational until A.D. 1789, D&B’s report that the government began “223” years ago and/or began in “1787” can’t be accurate.  So, it seems at least “odd” that an entity as professional a D&B would make such a peculiar error.

It’s also curious that D&B describes the “Government of the United States” as a company and “HQ” over a number of other “branches” (like the Army, Navy, Air Force and courts) that are also deemed to be “companies”.

Somethin’ funny’s goin’ on here.

•  If you’re up for even more funny stuff, enter “Nancy Pelosi” into the Manta.com search engine.  You’ll be taken to a list of “2 matching U.S. companies”:

1) “United States House of Representatives (Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi) BRANCH” at her San Francisco address; and

2) “Representative Nancy Pelosi (Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi) BRANCH” at her Washington DC address.

Click the #1 link, look for the heading “About United States House of Representatives,” and you’ll read:

“United States House Of Representatives is a private company categorized under Legislative Bodies, National and located in San Francisco, CA . . . .”

Whut th’ . . . ?!

The US House of Representative is “a private company”?!  And it’s “located in San Francisco, CA” (the home of the Speaker of the House)?

More?

Look under the heading “United States House of Representatives Business Information” and you’ll read:

“United States House Of Representatives also does business as Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.”

The House of Representatives not only “does business” but does so “as Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi”?  Is “Nancy Pelosi” something like a trademark, alter ego or registered agent for the “private company” we call the “House of Representatives”?  Is she the CEO and/or D/B/A for the House of Representatives, Inc.?

Incidentally, the 2009 edition of Manta.com’s report on Nancy Pelosi (that I recorded and saved) declared that the US House of Representatives was “also traded as Nancy Pelosi”.

Also traded as?! What does that mean?  Are we talking about packages of bubble gum that include government “trading cards” featuring photos of the House of Representatives and Nancy Pelosi?  Or is the House of Representatives and/or Nancy Pelosi some sort of stock?  If so, who’s buying, who’s selling?  Who owns that “company”?

Enter “US Social Security Admin” into the search engine.  Scroll down a bit and you’ll read:

US Social Security Admin is a private company categorized under Federal Government-Social and Human Resources and located in West Branch, MI.”

So-So Security is a “private company” . . . ?  That’s not located in Washington DC, but rather in “West Branch, MI” . . . ?  I don’t know what that means, but I can’t help but laugh.  Somethin’ funny is goin’ on here.

•  Try “Internal Revenue Service”.  Manta.com will produce “41,632 matching U.S. companies”.  Some of these are clearly private entities that have no governmental pretense, but many or most are “governmental”.

If you click the link to “Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Dst Council,” you’ll read “Internal Revenue Service is a private company categorized under Federal Goverenment-Finance and Taxation and located in Portland, OR.”

Click the “Internal Revenue Service, Andover Service Center . . . . Andover MA” link and you’ll read that Internal Revenue Service is a private company categorized under Federal Government-Finance and Taxation and located in Andover, MA.”

Two different locations indicate two different “private companies”.

These reports (and scores more) suggest that each individual IRS office may be a separate “private company”.  Therefore, if you’re contacted by an IRS office in Austin, Texas, you may be dealing with one “private company”.  If you’re subsequently contacted by another IRS office from, say, Provo, Utah—you might be dealing with a completely different “private company”.

What’s your obligation to talk to several different “private companies” about your income taxes?  Are there privacy concerns in sharing your tax information with several private companies?

And given that there are at least several score (and perhaps several thousand) “private companies,” operating as an “Internal Revenue Service,” who are you really paying your income taxes to?  H&R Block?

•  There are a host of additional “private companies” that you might want to research.  I collected website pages for about two dozen in 2008 and 2009.  I’m not sure how many of those can still be found, but if you can find ‘em and if you read closely, you may be fascinated.  Search for: “United States Court of Appeals,” “District of Columbia,” “George W Bush,” and “Supreme Court of the United States”.  All were listed by D&B as “private companies”.

You may find other D&B reports that are similarly fascinating or bewildering.  What does D&B have to say about the CIA or Homeland Security?  Inquiring minds wanna know.

•  What’s it all mean?  I’m not sure.  Perhaps D&B is merely guilty of gross negligence when it comes to entering data on governmental entities.

Or, maybe the entire structure of what currently passes for “government” is actually a conglomerate of “private companies” run by an aristocratic Congress that’s owned by . . . who?  The world’s bankers?

If so, the true nature of the “Government of the United States” might not be that of a “republic” or even a “democracy,” but rather a combination of governmental and corporate interests (“private companies”) that’s usually described as “fascism”.  If so, we no longer have “government of the People, by the People and for the People” but instead have “government of the people, by the Congress, and for the Corporations.”

Whatever the explanation, somethin’ funny is goin’ on here.

Today, when it comes to government, an appearance of reality appears to have been substituted for reality.  Our government is not what it appears to be; not what it professes to be—and that’s not funny at all, is it?

Written at arm’s length and at my political choice of venue within The United States of America,

Alfred Adask

About these ads
 

79 responses to “Somethin’ Funny’s Goin’ On

  1. Jim

    August 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM

    Check out franchise courts from Black’s newest ed.. Seems accurate? Justice been berry berry good to the attorneys.

     
    • mAximo

      August 18, 2010 at 2:35 PM

      In the US, the legal system is anti-attorney, compared to Canada, which
      still follows the “free system of English laws” as called for in the
      Declaration of Independence, but suspended in the Colonies under King
      George, and replaced by a Roman system. Things were not reversed after
      independence, but had been perpetuated by Masons in order to keep the
      legal system compatible with that of Spain’s colonies, which Hamilton
      wanted to occupy after the British had surrendered. Under Spain’s
      system there is no separation of attorney and state, unlike in Canada,
      where attorneys are not allowed to be officers of the court. King
      George turned all lawyers into officers of the Crown, not unlike how
      clergymen became licenced, and likely for the same reason. After being
      forced to become barristers, they had to make an oath of allegiance to
      the King as officers of his courts (because there was no separation of
      powers, never mind no Constitution). Just as there can be no freedom of
      religion, if your religious agent must be a licencee of the government,
      there can be no free system of law, if your legal agent must be an
      officer of the court. Thanks to King George, bar members obtained a
      monopoly on the practice of law, which they were loathe to give up
      after independence. So bar members had a common cause with the Lodge,
      which isn’t suprising as it could only help their careers by joining.
      Consequently, we’re as easily merged with Mexico now, as before with the
      formerly Spanish territories in the southwest as well as with Puerto
      Rico–now a “free associated state” where they have the only other
      state-run bank outside of North Dakota.

       
  2. Drew

    August 10, 2010 at 8:14 PM

    Good write-up and good digging Al… In the UK “Alistair Darling”, plays it just like “Nancy Pelosi”!… (like a trademark) see D&B.

     
  3. Bob

    August 11, 2010 at 1:49 PM

    Al,

    Great analysis and research.

    Did you notice the contact email on Manta?

    dericmccloud@hotmail.com

     
  4. Charles Torello

    August 13, 2010 at 12:21 PM

    Way back in the 1,787th year of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, is it possible that the men who agitated to establish a more powerful federal government, and needing more money to do this, agreed to incorporate “The Government of the United States” as a condition for obtaining a loan given to them by British and European banks? If so, did the Founders who accepted this clause do so because the lenders would only lend upon the condition that the Founders accepted that courts of equity or admiralty would administer the trust between borrower and lender? And if so, then, does it not seem the Government must naturally deal with the People similarly – using equity and admiralty proceedings against them, proceedings which don’t respect the ancient and due processes of the Common Law? I mean, how they gonna’ pay back their creditors? F U! Pay me!

     
    • adask

      August 13, 2010 at 1:19 PM

      I don’t know what happened back in A.D. 1787. I’m inclined to believe that the Founders were pretty much on the up-and-up. But maybe they made some mistakes. Maybe they left some loopholes.
      I’m concerned about what’s happening today. I’m concerned that today’s politicians have found and exploited some of those earlier “loopholes” and thereby justified treason against the American people.
      But regardless of whether corruption tainted the Founders or our current “leaders,” none of it could’ve happened if the American people (then and now) weren’t so damn ignorant, apathetic and trusting that they allowed the treason to perpetrated against them.
      The road back to liberty starts with personal education.

       
      • Follow

        August 16, 2010 at 1:18 PM

        I heard the constitution of the United States was incorporated in England 6 months before the constitutional convention took place. That would explain the 223 years! I heard this on a call by someone that said they seen the document along with a few others. The founding fathers incorporated the constitution in England!

         
      • adask

        August 16, 2010 at 2:21 PM

        I’ve heard a bunch of things. What I’ve heard could fill a barn, what I can prove would fit in my wallet. I would be skeptical about the idea that the Constitution was first incorporated in England until I saw some evidence to support that theory. Do you have any such evidence, or only rumor?

         
      • Follow

        August 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM

        Here is the link where I heard the guy say the constitution of the united states was recorded in London England 6 months before the constitutional convention. He says HE has seen it. I’m sure you could contact the radio station to get in touch with him to provide any proof.

        He comes on at about the 11:45 minute mark and at about the 16:12 minute mark talks about it.

        http://www.4shared.com/audio/Y1fPrJcV/20100811_2-2_RAPs_Kelby_Smith_.html

         
    • Farrell Montgomery

      September 7, 2014 at 7:48 PM

      The nonratified copy of the constitution was delivered to London, so to Register the newly re-organized Virginia Trading Company as The United States, with the new headquarters to be called District of Columbia.
      Those founders that wanted a total break from British East India Company(which took over the British Govmnt in 1774) were killed, where as those that cooperated with a corporate re-organization with “local leadership determination” were allowed to live.
      That is why British soldiers stayed in Boston another 12 yrs after agreeing to a cease fire with General Washington. Also, that is why our courts today are run by B.A.R. members instead of upholding Natural Law, which is the Constitutional Law our Nation was openly advertised as being founded upon.(Not this equity law that’s a commercial carry over from Rome and Babylon.)

       
  5. prowlland

    August 16, 2010 at 10:10 AM

    “Government of the United States” was owned by an archbishop?

    Because it is owned by the vatican. They claim they own all the land masses in the world.

     
    • mAximo

      August 18, 2010 at 12:16 PM

      Biblically speaking, God owns the planet. However, Vatican City has been
      corrupted enough to worship the same divinity as the other 2, such that
      all 3 city-states are now on the same page in their drive for the
      “divine world government” spoken of by Cornwallis to Washington (which
      would indicate that both were on the same page as Masons). Thus, The
      City of London creditors who foreclosed on the US in 1933 might want to
      have a Vatican City official as the trustee in bankruptcy for the City
      of Washington. The site of DC was chosen because it is 77 degrees west
      of The City, in a border state that happened to be Catholic, whose main
      hill had been called Rome by its former owner, a Pope by the name of
      Francis. Pope Clement’s ban on the Jesuit order in 1773 didn’t apply to
      Protestant countries, where many Jesuits sought refuge, esp. in Catholic
      strongholds such as Quebec, Ireland and Maryland. One would expect many
      of them to have joined the Lodge. In Catholic countries they merely
      rebranded themselves, as Illuminati, etc. Even though Washington might
      have been right that the Illuminati hadn’t infiltrated the Lodge, the
      Jesuits certainly had, who later convinced Masonic financiers to finance
      Napoleon to force the Vatican to re-instate the Jesuit Order. It would
      be interesting to know if the Archbishop is a Jesuit or member of any
      lodge.

       
    • Aibi

      August 19, 2010 at 10:51 PM

      Not just the Vatican but also the Church of England (plays both sides by being Catholic and Protestant!), the head of which is currently Queen Elizabeth and governed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. This connection seems to explain why all but one US president has/had ‘royal’ bloodlines to the British monarchy.

       
  6. joe martin

    August 16, 2010 at 12:41 PM

    Unless the original incorporation charter papers can be located and carbon dated, or verified through some time-date process, it may be possible that a corporation was simply concocted along the way somewhere in time.
    This is one of those things where somewhere, someone or persons know something on this and they need to come forward, even if it’s just person(s) in possession of long kept documents.

     
  7. Ann

    August 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM

    Let me drop this little bomb on you…when your Birth Certificate was filed at the county level, it was also sent to NY to be traded on the stock market. We’re all worth MILLIONS/TRILLIONS but will we ever see that money??? Doubt it. As long as we allow this debaucle to continue, the longer we are slaves to a Corporation that has no interest in We The People. The exact same reason that Congress feels no obligation to listen to what WE want. Looks like it’s time to dismantle the Corporation and go back to Common Law!

     
    • Marie

      August 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM

      Would make sense why they would want the illegals children born on US soil to be US citizens, would it?

      I am all for Common Law. Common Law make common sense to me.

      We pay a lot of penance in the form of taxes and hidden taxes called fees. What I call extortion fees. Something is made illegal to do, UNLESS you pay the extortion fee, in the form of taxes, fees or licenses.

      I can not fix a sink in my widowed neighbors rental property, to be a good neighbor, because I am not a licensed plumber and paid the fee and or licenses, even though it is just the sink drain trap to be replaced. The repair might not be done correctly and the tenant would be harmed. So the neighbor pays a plumber $150 and hour to do what I could have done for $5.00. Does not make sense?

      Common Law, if I harm someone, I pay, if I help someone no license or fee required.

       
  8. Deric McCloud

    August 16, 2010 at 1:24 PM

    This is so fake. Anybody can create a company profile on Manta.com without verification. Look at the profile for Deric McCloud, he owns big companies and governments everywhere. Obviously a prank. Manta.com is for small businesses to promote themselves.

     
    • adask

      August 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM

      If Manta.com is a fake, they’re engaging in FRAUD. That’s a crime. If some “anybody” created a “company profile” of the “Government of the United States,” “Nancy Pelosi,” the “House of Representatives” and many of our state and federal courts, that “anybody” went to LOT of trouble to fabricate fraudulent entries. If I had to guess, there may be several thousand entries on Manta.com that implicate state of federal governmental entities. Why would “anybody” go to the effort of making some many fraudulent entries? Where’s the pay-off? Why hasn’t the government objected to the resulting confusion? Why hasn’t government prosecuted the resulting fraud?

      And most of all, why would Manta.com–who SELLS D&B company profiles for 60-70 million companies–allow the validity and credibility of those reports to be compromised by “anybody” who wants to file fraudulent reports?

      If the word got out that thousands of Manta.com’s company profiles were fraudulent, the credibility of Manta/D&B reports would be jeopardized, fewer people would buy those reports, and Manta.com might be ruined.

      If Manta.com is for “small businesses” to promote themselves, what, exactly, is the “small business” that’s trying to promote itself under the name “Government of the United States”?

       
      • Deric McCloud

        August 16, 2010 at 2:45 PM

        Perhaps the company database they have is real. I understand the history of how the operations of our government have transitioned over to corporations with the same names as government entities.

        However, this Deric McCloud guy seems strange. Here is his Manta profile. http://www.manta.com/people/t0m1xyr42

        Check out the companies he supposedly owns. I played around in Manta.com and you can “claim” businesses in their database that haven’t been claimed yet, although it violates their terms of use. So maybe this guy is just trying to be funny claiming big businesses and government entities.

         
    • The Real McCloud

      August 21, 2010 at 11:07 PM

      That profile you posted was just created on May 13th of this year. It’s possible someone did the same research and though it would be funny to make up a profile on Manta.com. Or maybe it’s a coincidence and it’s his real name and he’s not real. Regardless, We the People need answers.

       
  9. Follow

    August 16, 2010 at 2:48 PM

    This is interesting! Right when Obama took office a new corp is registered in London England.

    Here is the link to search their data base:

    http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/1eb485b2f9ca1fdb887cfc66a5bba810/wcframe?name=accessCompanyInfo

    Name & Registered Office:
    BARACK OBAMA UK LTD
    13 VULCAN ROAD
    WIGAN
    LANCASHIRE
    WN5 0RQ
    Company No. 06797143

    Status: Active
    Date of Incorporation: 21/01/2009

    Country of Origin: United Kingdom

    Company Type: Private Limited Company
    Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
    9999 – Dormant Company

    Accounting Reference Date: 31/01
    Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED)
    Next Accounts Due: 21/10/2010
    Last Return Made Up To: 21/01/2010
    Next Return Due: 18/02/2011

    Last Members List: 21/01/2010

     
  10. Terri

    August 16, 2010 at 11:02 PM

    adask, terrific reporting! You should look into Dr. Dale Livingston, a lawyer who is working on a legal case called The Nation That Never Was. Here’s the latest call from this past Friday http://download3.freeconferencepro.com/rec/1255527221-20100814020932-100814.wav

     
  11. adask

    August 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM

    Yep, it’s a puzzlement.
    It’s possible that someone in England is also named “Barack Obama” and the entry may be innocent.
    But notice that President Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20th, A.D. 2009 and that the “Private Limited Company” named “BARACK OBAMA UK LTD” was incorporated in England on the following day: January 21st, A.D. 2009.

     
  12. Bamboo

    August 18, 2010 at 4:36 PM

    I’m wondering if this isn’t all a fluke of electronic data interchange formats for which they failed to take into account entities such as Governments who do engage in business? Its not uncommon to stuff data into a slightly unrelated field if there is not one specifically matching the need. You see this kind of thing all the time in B2B electronic commerce in EDI, UN EDIFACT and XML data interchange formats. D&B is an integral component of all B2B information data interchanges, as they use the DUNNs number as the identifier for the entity doing the transaction. Perhaps there’s no conspiracy at all there, but just a lack of knowledge of B2B data structures?

    Also, in regards to the 223 years thing. Didn’t congress meet once a year? Could the date discrepancy have to do with the time it was written versus when it was finally passed?

    As to the Catholic Bishop, I have no explanation.

    There is a provision in California laws dating back to Spanish rule that allow for a type of corporation called a Corporation Sole. This is an entity primarily invented for Catholic Church Dioceses where the presiding Bishop is the owner of the corporation which holds church assets such as land. Its still in California law, but relatively unknown for it can only be used by churches with a hierarchical structure. I do not know if there is such a corporate entity in DC or Maryland.

     
    • adask

      August 18, 2010 at 7:10 PM

      I don’t know what the explanation is. That’s why I titled the article “Somethin’ Funny’s Goin’ On”.

      But one of two things is true:

      1) D&B has made a kind of “generic” data base classification error wherein everything–including hundreds or thousands of “governmental” entities–are classified as a “private companies, even if that classification is KNOWN to be mistaken. But, recognizing the importance and large number of governmental entities, why wouldn’t D&B create a proper classification for such entities? Why would D&B classify the House of Representatives or the 11th District Court as “private companies”? Simply so they can SELL more “corporate reports”? If the House of Representatives is not a “private company,” doesn’t D&B’s SALE of “corporate reports” claiming otherwise constitute MAIL or WIRE FRAUD?

      2) D&B’s reports are correct and therefore not subject to charges of fraud because the House of Representatives and the 11th District Court ARE “private companies”.

      Which of those explanations for this “anomaly” strikes you are more probable?

       
    • The Real McCloud

      August 21, 2010 at 11:09 PM

      @Bamboo There are no coincidences.

       
  13. Al Winters

    August 18, 2010 at 11:34 PM

    Al; All I can say is if the truth will set you free it can also drive you crazy trying to locate which is true and which is another rabbit hole.

    Great job and awesome report….

     
    • adask

      August 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM

      Yep. This system will damn near drive you nuts.
      Just remember to say No! to the voices. I do.

       
  14. Dwight Sleight

    August 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM

    I am appalled that people know these things but yet no one has the courage to go public. I am 65 and due to a crooked partnership I stand alone with no money. No way of earning any money and am left with only one way out. Suicide solves earthly problems then I am stuck having to deal with my creater. But my chest isn’t big enough for prison numbers. All my life I have paid into the system and when you say we are worth millions maybe trillions I wouldn’t have to worry where to get my next meal. Only those who know these things and convince the Tribunal council its time to come clean and live in a world that the constitution was written for. I pray that some one would stand up for truth and get rid of Obama and his cronies and begin a new United States of America and divide the money of the land As Our God would have it. To stop all wars and live in the land in peace and freedom. God Bless Those who would stand up to a crazy power hungry President. He is worse than Richard Nixon ever thought of being and even Hitler

     
    • Super Neutrality

      August 20, 2010 at 9:31 AM

      Hey Dwight

      The only solution to mankind’s problems, be they financial, political or religious, can be summed up in one simple word:

      Armageddon.

      This is when God finally intervenes and takes back power from the Satanic Cabal and hands it to his son, Jesus Christ, who is the messianic ruler of God’s Kingdom Government.

      That will be the only time when all fraud will be removed, as Armageddon will destroy all vestiges of Satan’s rulership.

      The Bible makes it clear that Satan is the ruler of this world.

      2. Cor. 4:4
      If, now, the good news we declare is in fact veiled, it is veiled among those who are perishing, among whom the “god of this system of things” has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the illumination of the glorious good news about the Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine through.

      1. John 5:19
      We know we originate with God, but the “whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one”.

      Matt. 4:8-10
      Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and he said to him: “All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.” Then Jesus said to him: “Go away, Satan! For it is written, ‘It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.’

      The text in quotes are the highlighted bits – Satan rules this world, alright, and the evidence is clear to see. However, note what it says here:

      Psalm 110: 1-7
      The utterance of Jehovah to my Lord [being Jesus Christ] is:
      “Sit at my right hand
      Until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet.”

      2 The rod of your strength Jehovah will send out of Zion, saying:
      “Go subduing in the midst of your enemies.”

      3 Your people will offer themselves willingly on the day of your military force.
      In the splendors of holiness, from the womb of the dawn,
      You have your company of young men just like dewdrops.

      4 Jehovah has sworn (and he will feel no regret):
      “You are a priest to time indefinite
      According to the manner of Melchiz′edek!”

      5 Jehovah himself at your right hand
      Will certainly break kings to pieces on the day of his anger.

      6 He will execute judgment among the nations;
      He will cause a fullness of dead bodies.
      He will certainly break to pieces the head one over a populous land.

      7 From the torrent valley in the way he will drink.
      That is why he will raise high his head.

      The simple truth is, without Divine Intervention, then Satan will have won and we would have all become his slaves, in which case life is certainly not worth living. However, there is hope and we are living at the time when we will see that hope come to fruition.

      The darkest hour is always just before the dawn. Hang on in there, kid, and keep your integrity above all else. They can take everything else away, but they cant take away your integrity. And your integrity is the investment you need to interit the earth after Armageddon.

      The Satanic Cabal thinks it is ushering in a “Brave New World”. Don’t be fooled – it is a counterfeit of God’s Kingdom.

      The whole world will be fitly united under one righteous government that actually cares for its people, and that government will be headed by Jesus Christ, as promised by the sacrifice he gave 2,000 years ago. This will come to pass and, although this contr0l-system is looking like it’s winning, they will be in for the shock of their lives.

      Firstly, the world empire of false religion will be destroyed at the hands of these political rulers, but it will be an expression of God’s judgement against the vile misrepresentation of God’s principles and holy name. – See Revelation 17 and 18.

      Secondly, the entire world financial system will collapse. – Zephaniah 1:18 says “Neither their silver nor their gold will be able to deliver them in the day of Jehovah’s fury.”

      Thirdly, and in quick succession, the remaininig vestiges of Satan’s world will be destroyed, including the political system and any who support the Great Lie that we can do a better job independently of God. – Revelation 19:19-21 says “And I saw the wild beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to wage the war with the one seated on the horse and with his army. And the wild beast was caught, and along with it the false prophet that performed in front of it the signs with which he misled those who received the mark of the wild beast and those who render worship to its image. While still alive, they both were hurled into the fiery lake that burns with sulphur. But the rest were killed off with the long sword of the one seated on the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth. And all the birds were filled from the fleshy parts of them.”

      God made the earth perfect for mankind to enjoy life on earth forever in paradise conditions. We rebelled and have almost brought the place to ruination. God will take back his rulership and will evict the unruly tenants who have done nothing but oppress their fellowman.

      When Satan challenged God’s right to rule back in the garden of eden, God had to step back and let him prove his point, bearing in mind that he had to respect man’s free will to choose. Otherwise, he would have made man as a robot, programmed to do the right thing, and that is neither loving nor wise. God has respected man’s right to free will. But now the time has come when justice will prevail and those keeping their integrity to him will inherit the earth, as promised in Psalms 37: 11.. Whether we get there by surviving Armageddon (via overground) or by resurrection back to life (via underground) – if we love what is right and do our best to keep his word, despite the imperfections inherited from Adam and Eve’s sinful rebellion, then rest assured we WILL be there.

      And that’s what they dont like. “You’re either with us or against us”, they say. Good – thanks for making it clear for us. But it’s the other way around, because they fail to realise they are in the minority. Sure, they rule with Satan’s power. But the timer is almost up and they haven’t reckoned with the awesome power of the majestic angels (one angel is reported to have destroyed 185,000 people in one night – how much power does God have at his disposal when employing millions of angels against the dark forces at Armageddon? After all, he did create the universe and all the power in it – it will be a piece of cake)

      I hope that is of some encouragement to you.

      Be of good courage and lift up your head, because mankind’s deliverance is getting very near. Just make sure you are on the winning side and keep your heart clean. This world is a dirty place but it will be made clean again.

      The last days of this system are almost done.

       
      • Freedom4All

        October 6, 2011 at 4:10 PM

        Super,
        I felt a need to reply to your very thorough post.

        While I understand your flow of thought, it is easy for anyone to develop an answer to any given situation by stringing together a series of bible passages that seem to be related, but are not. Yes, Satan is the god of this world. All you have to do is look at those who serve him, knowingly or unknowingly, and you will see that they carry out Satan’s agenda: to kill, steal and destroy. There is nothing new here. Even a casual study of history will notice that the things happening in America today have happened over and over again throughout history.

        While I know that you might take this as an attack on you, I was only led to comment because you were responding to Dwight’s post asking why people who know this do not stand up against it. Basically your answer was:

        “The only solution to mankind’s problems, be they financial, political or religious, can be summed up in one simple word:

        Armageddon.

        This is when God finally intervenes and takes back power from the Satanic Cabal and hands it to his son, Jesus Christ, who is the messianic ruler of God’s Kingdom Government.
        That will be the only time when all fraud will be removed, as Armageddon will destroy all vestiges of Satan’s rulership.”

        In all humility, I believe the above comment, albeit given in love and sincerity, is one of the main reasons we are in this situation. I personally believe that the Church in the United States shoulders the bulk of the blame for where we currently are politically. And what have they done to make me think this? Absolutely NOTHING! As someone who has been trained and has served in ministry for over 20 years, I have observed many things over that span of time that has led me to this conclusion. They have disengaged from society and are “waiting” for Armageddon or the Rapture to set things right.

        I think you did a good job of showing what the bible says about Satan and his rule of this world’s systems. But I “personally” believe that a Dispensational Pre-Millennial eschatology is the main culprit, and your post lends some credibility to my conclusion. While your reference to Armageddon is probably a “post-millennial” position, most of the pop eschatology today has been popularized by Hal Lindsey and the Left Behind Series. The church is sitting around waiting for Armageddon so they can get on with eternal life. But I have a couple of questions for you:

        1. Have you come to this conclusion yourself, or were you taught it?
        2. What if you are wrong in your interpretation? (This, to me, is very serious)
        3. Have you ever considered the Preterist position on eschatology? Have you ever heard of it? (If I can spend 4 years in seminary and not hear of it, the average Christian has no idea what I am talking about).
        4. If the church truly believes this and is waiting to be raptured, is there no consideration for all those who will be “left behind”?
        5. In reference to Dwight’s question: Why does the church not stand up and expose evil? After all, they have absolutely nothing to lose. If they are imprisoned or killed for it, well then they can get on with eternal life since they are waiting around for it anyway.

        I cannot begin to tell you the depth of heart searching I have done over this. I have spent the better part of the last 4 years researching this and it has led me to a total and complete paradigm shift. In all of my years of studying the scripture, when it came to eschatology, I could not come to a satisfying interpretation of all of the “time passages” Jesus refers to in the Olivet Discourse recorded in Matt 24, Luke 21 and Mark 13: “this generation will not pass away until all these things are fulfilled”, “you will not have gone throughout all of Israel before I return”, etc. Theye’re all there for the reading. In fact, if you do a little more research you will find that philosophers, like Bertrand Russell, rejected Christianity for this very reason. They said that if Jesus made those statements and the rapture (or Armageddon) is still future, then Jesus was a false Prophet and a liar. I now have another question for you:

        6. How do you answer such a charge? To be intellectually honest, you must honestly consider his claims.

        Of course you could cite 2 Cor 4:4 (as you did above) and say that he was not a believer and could not understand the scriptures. I would agree with you on that point, but it still does not respond to his charge. If the plain reading leads an unbeliever to conclude that Jesus is a liar because none of the things came to pass in that generation, then where does the plain reading lead the believer? Yet another question:

        7. What if Jesus was not lying and the things He talked about came to pass “in that generation”?

        I know the emotional response you will have with this question; I have been wrestling with it for 4 years now. After you collect yourself, THINK of the ramifications! You would think that the world would hold Jesus up as the greatest prophet who ever lived simply for his prediction of the destruction of the temple. To say that “not one stone will be left upon another” was akin to saying that the Twin Towers will be brought down by an airplane. Up until 9/11, no one thought that was possible. He specifically warned them NOT to go into the city for protection (which was the natural response of people when a Roman Army has surrounded you). If fact, He told them to sell everything they had (which we see them doing in Acts). He was telling them to divest all interest in Jerusalem as it will be destroyed (kind of a 1st century insider trading tip). All of this is reinforced in Revelation telling them the things that “must SHORTLY take place”.

        I KNOW this seems radical and off base, but you will be happy to know that this WAS the mainstream eschatology up until the late 19th century. If you do the research, you will find out.

        I am of the opinion that unless the Church comes to grips with eschatology, America is doomed! Why do I say that? I say that because the Church is sitting inside her elaborate buildings watching her elaborate programs put on by professionals why complaining about the way things are. Usually the complaints have to do with the effects on their earning power. The Christian’s “Hope” has been replaced with pessimism. They no longer live for the “Hope set before us”, they instead lament and wait for it all to be destroyed. How’s that for hope? Since Christians have cast aside their hope, the hope and change mantle is being picked up by someone else.

        8. IF this has any merit, then what does it affect?

        My opinion is that it changes EVERYTHING! Just do a short mental exercise and think of all the things in your life this would change IF it is true. This has the potential to be a cataclysmic world view paradigm shift. I know what I am talking about because I am in the midst of one. I am starting a small group comprised of friends from a variety of church backgrounds to help me sort this out. Basically, I am purposefully placing myself in the minority and asking them all to prove me wrong. Actually, I am begging them to prove me wrong. I have yet to find anyone who could give my anything more than the canned response they hear every Sunday from the pulpits of America. Most American Christians do not take the time to research it for themselves or don’t do it because they feel they can’t without proper training from an institutional seminary. But they will defend it!

        Why am I doing this? Because it has EVERYTHING to do with the times you and I live in. If all I am to do as a Christian is to sit back and wait for Armageddon or the Rapture, then what purpose does God have me here for? To wait?! You might respond with evangelize everything that walks, and that is fine. I just don’t see much of that going on anyway. People will give money for a professional to do it, but most will not even engage others. I spent years doing that here in America as well as in South America. People gave for me to do that, and I am grateful. But my issue is; since America is my mission field now, how should I therefore live? This IS my struggle. Your comments show that you see and know that something evil is happening in America. But if your eschatology tells you Armageddon will set things right, your waiting condemns millions to a technological hellish nightmare never before released on earth. I know what you will say, that kind of evil is spoken of in Revelation. To which I ask, are you sure? You NEED to be sure!

        If you will go back and read your New Testament with this in mind:
        1. Jesus really did mean that the generation He lived in would see His return
        2. The return was in judgment of Israel (read His scathing rebukes of religious leaders sprinkled throughout the gospels)
        3. Jesus came “only” for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Why, because judgment was coming to them and He was giving them time to repent
        4. Read the parables with this judgment in mind and they will make perfect sense to you. In fact, you will be amazed at the simplicity of what He was saying
        5. Remember that Jesus was addressing people who lived in Israel “at that time.” The things He told them were spoken within a geographical, cultural and linguistic culture. An understanding of those things is essential to a correct interpretation. If you don’t know what He meant by what He said and if you do not know what His audience understood Him to mean by what He said, you will never get a correct interpretation. You will only come up with something that makes sense to you given your cultural and linguistic preferences. The danger here is, of course, a high rate of changing interpretations given the social and political context any reader finds himself in. And history has shown that most people, in times of distress, think they are living in the last days. You and I are no exception. Time has proved all who preceded us to be wrong, how will our interpretations be seen in the future in light of what is happening? Simply pay attention to modern day endtimesologists as their interpretations are always changing with the change of geopolitical events.

        I have to warn you though. If you honestly study this and honestly face your own emotions (you will be amazed at how strong they are) regarding the eschatological truths you have held, you will start to understand. But you will have to walk through a valley before you can start up the other side, and everyone will oppose you.

        In conclusion, my study has led me to conclude that the Church’s only course of action is to oppose the evil where ever it is. We need to lift the basket off our candlestick! We need to regain our saltiness! We need to EXPOSE and CONFRONT the evil that has permeated our government. Of all people on the face of this earth who should stand for genuine freedom, Christians should be in the lead! It is the very heartbeat of our Lord! You cannot read the gospels and come to any other conclusion. Some say that Romans 13 tells us to submit to government as they are ordained by God. That is true, but they are ordained by God for those “who do right.” You tell me what is right: sit around waiting for Armageddon, or confronting evil? I’m of the opinion that there is a higher authority than government, God. You cannot convince me from scripture that Romans 13 means we should submit to government no matter how tyrannical. That interpretation contradicts the whole of scripture. Let’s see . . . there’s Moses, Daniel and his 3 friends, Judges, and all of the New Testament. Peter and John certainly did not let the ruling authorities tell them what to do. Their question to the rulers speaks volumes; “should we obey God or man?” Thousands of 1st century Christians went to their death opposing Rome. Maybe they never got the chance to read Romans 13!

        I’m sorry for the length of this post; I have tried to narrow down years of research and study. Since I cannot find many who are even willing to discuss the matter, you get a brain dump. . . . sorry! There is no personal vendetta I have here; I simply want Christians to think about what they believe and weigh what their response will be when our tyrannical government comes a knocking. If not for yourself, do it for all the people you believe will be left behind. They will thank you for it. I believe that this can be the Church’s greatest hour. The only power a tyrant has over people is the fear of death. If Christians REALLY believe the scripture, death is a non-issue. If God is our Sovereign, who can stand against us and prevail? We may not get to see it in this life, but I assure you there will be millions who will!

         
  15. nina homley

    August 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM

    I have followed all the links in this very interesting and informative article. I cannot find the ownership, however, and wonder if you have to register on the manta website in order to have access to this info. Please advise as I wanted to send it on to others, but would only if I could send links to confirm. Thanks,

     
    • adask

      August 19, 2010 at 3:32 PM

      If you search for the “Government of the United States HQ,” you’ll see four tabs at the top of the page: 1) Company Profile; 2) Reports; 3) Map; and 4) Web Results. If you click on the “Reports” tab, you’ll see that Manta sells 3 reports written by D&B that range in price and “completeness” from $120 to $210. All of the other links will also offer the various reports about their particular “private company” but I don’t know if the prices vary. I’ve never downloaded any of these reports. But if you wanted to download and pay for one of these reports, you might find the answer concerning “ownership”. However, I would be surprised if the “government” admitted anywhere in a public document that is was not only “privately owned” but also admitted who the “owners” were. Such information would truly be the most astonishing political discovery of the past 50 years. Revolutions might follow. Heads might roll.

       
  16. Vox

    August 19, 2010 at 3:38 PM

    Why would this be new news? And Why are any of you surprised? This is not a revelation. Go to your state’s Secretary of State Website and search the name of the City that you live in and it will return the Corporate Charter for the City you reside in. All cities and governments are Corporations. And Corporations are formed to make a profit. This is not news. It’s like your name. Whether you are the litigant or the defendant in a legal pleading your name will always appear in all caps JOHN SMITH because it refers to the fictitious entity that your parents created using your birth certificate and indebted to the state. The courts do not recognize you as a sovereign or free person they recognize you as a business entity that they own. You are considered a division of their corporation and you are wholly owned by them. They have invited you to “their” court to make a decision as to what needs to be done about your division, whether it should be liquidated, dissolved or all it’s profits sucked out by the parenet corporation. Folks! Wake up! Wipe the slumber from your eyes!

     
    • regularguy

      August 19, 2010 at 7:55 PM

      Is there an alternate reality that you can create for yourself once you’ve become aware of the truth of the situation?If yes,do you know how?Is anyone offering the solution?Everyone says”wake up”,well OK,now what?what does that mean?Is there some course of action that one can take to fix whatever it is ?

       
      • adask

        August 19, 2010 at 8:51 PM

        The first step in solving any problem is DIAGNOSIS. If you can correctly diagnose a problem, almost anyone can solve it. What we may have in the “Somethin’ Funny” article is part of a diagnosis of the problem.

        Let’s suppose that “Government of the United States” is (as D&B reports) a “private company”. OK–Walmart is also a “private company”. Can Walmart force you to do business with it? Can any private company force you to do business with it? If not, should it be possible to avoid doing business with the “private company” called “Government of the United States” by simply refusing to consent to do so?

        This strategy (even if valid) is probably much easier said than done. The “Government of the United States” probably has a host of snares in place which virtually everyone uses daily (like SSNs, DLs, bank accounts, and Federal Reserve Notes) that create the presumption that you have “voluntarily consented” to do business with the private company “Government of the United States”. If it were true that said “Government” really is a “private company,” we’d probably have devise a document, probably an affidavit filed into the county record, that essentially expressed your determination NOT to do business with “Government”/private company.

        Then you wait to see what happens the next time the Gov-co tries to hassle you. Does your document work or not? Must you sue Gov-co to make it work? Will merely raising the issue be enough to make Gov-co tuck tail and run–rather than face the issue in public?

        We don’t have a solution yet. But we seem to be developing a better diagnosis of the problem. That’s a big step forward.

        Don’t lose patience. This is a process, not an event.

         
  17. Walt

    August 19, 2010 at 4:00 PM

    adask –
    Your article is very timely. I just viewed a video produced by John Harris from across the pond, that details D&B information on British ‘companies’. It may very well answer some of your questions! Watch and enjoy – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0IM7Hobd_k

     
  18. 99percentspace

    August 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM

    See John Harris “It’s an Illusion” on YouTube. He’s been talking about this for years… Public OFFICERS, law enforcement OFFICERS, chief executive OFFICERS…
    Learn the difference between YOU and YOUR PERSON and how you are but a corporate slave.
    Wake up, slaves. Time is running out…

     
  19. Mike

    August 19, 2010 at 6:14 PM

    The country has never been for the people, and was for the People (who signed their fortunes and lives to it). The King of England still owned America after the revolutionary war (sham) as can be seen by reading the Treaty of Paris (look what else the king claims to own and other titles). Next thing, research the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 which actually sets up the corporate structure. The United States is a private company and is still owned by the King (researched opinion) and all of the crown’s property may be owned by the Vatican (pope). Start with the above treaty and act of 1871. Once you have read those, come back to this article and read it again. It will make more sense. If you take the time to read the Law of Nations, you will understand your place in this world as a citizen=subject=slave. Welcome to the truth.

     
  20. EmBee

    August 19, 2010 at 7:08 PM

    There are great audio interviews with The Informer who discusses this indepth. I am so grateful to read this article which corroborate The Informer’s info!
    I guess the myth is now busted! The joke’s on us. ugh.

     
  21. EmBee

    August 19, 2010 at 7:11 PM

    P.S.
    The Informer can be found on Against The Grain Press Dot com and on Beyond the Grassy Knoll podcast archives.

    http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

    http://thinkorbeeaten.com/theknoll/index.html

     
  22. eggaday

    August 19, 2010 at 9:42 PM

    great article. I’d be curious to look the corporations up on Edgar at the SEC website, if it still functions, or yahoo biz, cnn biz, greatreddragon, somewhere …
    and see what companies have ” beneficial ownership” of these corporations.
    I looked up a whole bunch of the financial crisis companies, Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco, remember those????
    and I looked up Gm, Chrysler, and every single bank that got bail out money.

    I found a common denominator.

    I actually had heads up on that denominator, because of a personal / public problem with a specific certain company that no one ever mentions… it’s the one and only ” too big to fail”.

    they owe 5% of every single company, including fannie and freddie, that took money….

    check out the beneficial ownership of all these entities and bingo, you’ll be right on the culprit.

    I got a dime to a doughnut, it’ll be the same common denominator I came up with for the financial crisis~

     
  23. Juan Valdez

    August 20, 2010 at 9:22 AM

    Your article and all related information and most ‘feedback’ comments from others, is completely to the point and ‘spot on’. The System is a conglomerate of international and ‘domestic’ corporations built on the ‘triad’ or ‘tri-lateral’ concept of the (sacred Illuminati geometry) of the 4 sided pyramid or ‘tetrahedron’. The District of Columbia being but one of the 3 ‘sovereign city states’, incorporated to do business for those who ‘know’ and who own and control all. The DoC is the ‘enforcer’ and the basis for the financial ‘unlimited credit’ source to run their international debt-as-money slave grid. The FRN/FRn ‘US Dollar’ is military scrip ‘currency’ and also banruptcy scrip ‘currency’, a ‘monad’ financial instrument by virtue of Nixon’s 1972 E.O. classification, and since Sept. 13, 1982, not even ‘legal tender for all debts public and private’ by virtue of repeal of HJR-192, which was the ‘law’ passed by then Congress of 1933 making the administrative / commercial / admiralty-maritime-martial law effective within the several states of the united States of America, occupied territories of THE UNITED STATES / THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…..

    In effect their debt as money scheme has caused the ‘central bank system’ to become Principal and ‘Secured Party Ceditor in fact’ to the ‘DEBTOR’ nations that have succumb to their banking scheme, but only as long as the undisclosed ‘conversion’ ‘extortionate of credit’, multiple frauds, etc. are not disclosed or otherwise protested and rebutted.

    IT IS ALL IN FRAUD, but fraud is acceptable in contract ‘admiralty’ ‘law’ as long as the underlying presumptive conclusion(s) and prerogative authority of the ‘sovereign’ compelling the official fraud is allowed to stand.

    When researching the D&B incorporation status of US ‘government’ agencies and ‘offices’, I found that THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is in-fact incorporated and listed as such, domiciled in London. I did not take the time to go into the D&B files on that company, but I believe that I also located listings in London as well for THE UNITED STATES.

    PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THIS RESPONSE WITH MY E ADDRESS.

    “S”

     
    • Ruby

      January 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM

      Can you back up your information as to the “UNITED STATES of AMERICA” being a municipal corporation domiciled to London?

      Preferably, if you could verify the claim by say the U.S. Security Exchange Commissions,.. or relevant verifiable proof to show the evidence connection of Corporation-2-London.

       
  24. Elda McMann

    August 20, 2010 at 2:39 PM

    Note how well all this fits with the Mayan Calendar and the assumed prophecies.

     
  25. Benjamin

    August 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM

    What a whole bunch of nonsense. “We Teh Peeps” never ratified shit. The Constitution was voted on only by state governments, never by Teh Peeps.

     
  26. Bonnie

    August 20, 2010 at 5:51 PM

    “Is Nacny Pelosi some sort of stock? Who owns that company?”

    Maybe Pelosi is a clone owned by “Anomynous”?
    That may be the reason she jumped up all the time that Bush was giving a speech.. I haven’t yet, seen her with this one.
    I wonder who owns the Vatican? Or pope Benedict? And how about israel?

     
  27. Bonnie

    August 20, 2010 at 5:54 PM

    How about the U.S. Census? Who owns that?

     
  28. befree

    August 21, 2010 at 12:28 AM

    Note the all capitalizations listing, they’re all unincorporated associations or governmental subdivisions……there is NO charter of incorpoaration for any of these entities……FOIA the Secretary of State in your state, there’s nothing, but be sure to ask for the “company” in all CAPS! The original incorporated counties of the states are all lower case including the treasury not “……..COUNTY TREASURER” or auditor not “……..COUNTY AUDITOR” and a copy can be had for a nominal fee. We have a dual system of government both public under the original Constitution and the Bill of Rights and private law under the 14th amendment, HJR 192, and the Social Security trust (through Health and Human Services) and creates a conflict of laws. It is the people that have walked away from the Constitution and contracted with these associations through the trust and their private international laws. It is voluntary, yes, we can walk away, our ignorance has bound us. The people have financed their own destruction through the welfare-warfare state from our charitable donations to the SS trust just like the people in Germany did under Bismarck and we all know what happened to Germany. The IRS was created through the Social Security Act in 1935 Title Vlll and it is only being in the trust that we are compelled to pay income tax which is also voluntary. No trust….. no taxes, fees, licenses, registrations, building permits, etc. created by this phoney state. The IRS, FBI, CIA, DHS, HHS etc. and all the other alphabet agencies exist within this jurisdiction. For more see http://www.truthinlaw.net

     
  29. Jiggs

    August 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM

    There’s a lot of PO’d slaves out there who are “waked up.” Unfortunately the Byzantine labyrinth of legalese “We the Screwed” are forced to negotiate to find daylight is so arcane and complex we’re paralyzed into inaction. Thank gawd for independent citizen researchers for at least attempting to show us the way. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

    So far, though, no generic, one-size-fits all “magic words” to set the captives free. Pity.

     
  30. Frank Costa

    August 21, 2010 at 2:16 PM

    THIS MAY HELP EVERYONE

    FROM DAVID ICKE’S “TALES FROM THE TIME LOOP”
    Edited for brevity
    The United States has never been free of control from London. Indeed, it was the creation of London. Britain and the British Crown has always owned, yes owned, the United States.
    In 1604, a group of leading politicians, businessmen, merchants, manufacturers and bankers, met and formed a corporation called the Virginia Company in anticipation of the imminent influx of white Europeans, mostly British at first, into the North American continent. Its main stockholder was King James I, and the original charter for the company was completed by April 10th 1606.
    This and later updates to the charter established the following:
    The Virginia Company comprised of two branches, the London Company and the Plymouth or New England Company. The former was responsible for the first permanent colony in America at Jamestown on May 14th 1607 and the latter were the so-called ‘Pilgrim Fathers’ who arrived at Cape Cod in the ship the Mayflower, in November 1620, and went on to land in Plymouth Harbour on December 21st.
    The ‘Pilgrims’ of American historical myth were, in fact, members of the second Virginia Company branch called the New England Company The Virginia Company owned most of the land of what we now call the USA, and any lands up to 900 miles offshore. This included Bermuda and most of what is now known as the Caribbean Islands.
    The lands of the Virginia Company were granted to the colonies under a Deed of Trust (on lease) and therefore they could not claim ownership of the land. They could pass on the perpetual use of the land to their heirs or sell the perpetual use, but they could never own it. Ownership was retained by the British Crown.
    The colonial lands were to be governed by two Colonial Councils, each with 13 members, but the Kings Council in London had the final say on all decisions. The sitting British monarch also chose the Governor of the American Colonies, who we would today call the President.
    The monarch, through his Council for the Colonies, insisted that members of the colonies impose the Christian religion on all the people, including the Native Americans.
    The criminal courts on the lands of the Virginia Company were to be operated under Admiralty Law, the law of the sea, and the civil courts under common law, the law of the land.
    All of the above still applies today! After the original 13 American colonies won their ‘independence’ and an ‘independent’ country was formed after 1783, the Virginia Company simply changed its name to… the United States of America.
    You see there are two USAs, or rather a USA and a usA. The united states of America with a lower case ‘u’ and ‘5’ are the lands of the various states. These lands, as we have seen, are still owned by the British Crown as the head of the old Virginia Company.
    Then there is the United States of America, capital ‘U’ and ‘S’, which is the 68 square miles of land west of the Potomac River on which is built the federal capital, Washington DC and the District of Columbia. It also includes the US protectorates of Guam and Puerto Rico. The United States of America is not a country, it is a corporation owned by the same Brotherhood bloodlines who owned the Virginia Company, because the USA is the Virginia Company!
    When Americans agree to have a social security number the citizens of the united states surrender their sovereignty and agree to become franchisees of the United States (the Virginia Company of the British Crown). So why do they do it? Because they have no idea that this is what they are doing. They are led to believe that there is only one United States and the Federal government is the rightful government.
    There is no law that says that Americans must pay federal income tax, but they go on paying because they think they have to. The Brotherhood-controlled Internal Revenue Service operates in such a terrorist manner that even most of those who know it’s a scam still pay up because they are terrified not to.
    The British Crown owns the lands of the united states and the land and institutions of the United States, including the Internal Revenue Service which collects the taxation and the Federal Reserve Board, the privately owned ‘central bank’ of America which lends the government money that doesn’t exist and charges the taxpayers interest on it.
    The Federal Reserve Board is owned by the same Brotherhood families in Britain and Europe who own the rest of America. But here’s yet another twist. Who owns the assets apparently owned by the Virginia Company? Answer: the Vatican. On October 3rd 1213, King John, as ‘King of England Corporation Sole’ claimed autonomy over all the sovereign rights of England and assigned them to the Pope, who, as Vicar of Christ, claimed dominion over the whole world.
    In return, the Pope granted executiveship to the English Crown over all these dominions. In other words, the Crown is the chief executive and the Vatican is the owner, although, of course, the true owner is whoever controls the Vatican.
    The people of America have been bled dry by this scam and continue to be so. Land of the Free? What a joke! And, people of America, your presidents and leading government officials know this.
    I said that the Virginia Company and King James I decreed that criminal courts in the colonies would be controlled by Admiralty Law, the law of the sea. What Admiralty were they talking about? The British Admiralty, of course. When a court is being run under Admiralty or maritime law, the flag in the court has to have a gold fringe around it. Look in any criminal court in the United States or the united states and you will see it has a gold fringe. The same with many other official buildings.
    Those ‘American’ criminal courts are being run under BRITISH admiralty law.

     
  31. Ronnie Smith

    August 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM

    here is how I seperated myself from the corporate United States…

    http://www.marijuanaman.com/church

     
  32. Phil

    August 23, 2010 at 12:55 AM

    Whole thing stinkx. All trickx. Does a fisherman tell the fish he is planning on hooking the fish and having him for dinner? Or does he hide the hook in a nice tasty worm?

     
  33. Jen

    August 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM

    good post..great share, great article..love to read it

     
  34. Sky

    August 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM

    I like this site… Nice design and cool images

     
  35. boB

    March 22, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    I have fifty + years trying to decipher this criminal entity. This whole Boston tea party game centered around “NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION”. It seams to me that possibly just possibly when we register to vote and DO vote we have volunteered into a contract. We have acknowledged representation therefore, they can tax our buns off. I’m sure there are many more traps than this, but this would be worth thinking on.

     
  36. Jethro

    April 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM

    It appears as though someone has modified the the Manta.com entry for “Government of the United States.”

    It says “Clint Carmichael, Owner/President, updated this company profile on 04/05/2011″. It now shows it has been in business less than 1 year. While “Barack H” is still the president of the company, they’re now in the business of “garbage collection.”

    Is this just someone being funny… or accurate?

     
  37. Adask

    April 12, 2011 at 4:05 PM

    Hard to say. The manta.com format has changed since this article was originally written. So has their content. There’s still enough info to see that “Somethin’ Funny IS Goin’ On.”

     
  38. BELOWZERO

    July 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    TICK TICK TICK. LUB-DUB LUB-DUB LUB-DUB. What a waste of a good life. Drop out for God’s sake! Stay pleasantly drunk and nearly naked some place nice. You have practically PROVED you have NOTHING not even your self. Make the most of it by being deliberately POOR.
    Verily I say unto you: THEY can not take what you do not have. When your “public servant” knocks on your door wanting something open it and puke on them!

    The system exists ONLY to extract wealth from people that WORK. STOP IT. Stop making wealth. Stop defending it.

     
  39. brdijoo

    November 7, 2011 at 8:53 AM

    I am new here but i think he is right.

     
  40. Lise.Doe

    August 14, 2012 at 11:22 PM

    Can I simply say what a comfort to find somebody that really understands what they are talking about on the web. You actually know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. A lot more people need to check this out and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you’re not more popular since you most certainly possess the gift.

     
  41. Dewayne

    June 5, 2013 at 12:52 AM

    Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to
    me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be bookmarking
    and checking back often!

     
  42. Paid Focus Groups UK USA

    July 20, 2014 at 9:27 PM

    great blog, thanks for the information. :)

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,029 other followers