Fraudclosure Affidavits

NYTimes October 14^th:

“Mortgage Mess May Cost Big Banks Billions. After scratching their heads for weeks over how much the foreclosure mess will hurt banks’ bottom lines, investors calculated the potential costs—and sent bank stocks plunging. . . .The share price of Bank of America fell 5.2 percent . . . JPMorgan Chase sank almost 2.8 percent.”

Apparently, the foreclosure problem is not a “crisis” or a “scandal” or even a “racketeering enterprise”—it’s merely a “mess,” hmm?

But, OMG!, the banks’ stocks fell a whopping 5.2% and 2.8%? Whatever will we do? Gee, if the foreclosure “mess” starts to hurt the banks’ “bottom lines,” it almost sounds serious.

 

American Hero

Image via Wikipedia

This video is a promo for a movie scheduled to be released in November.  I don’t know anything about the movie.  I don’t recommend or condemn it.

But this 3:40 promo is very good.  The only thing I don’t like about it is the last 30 seconds when we find out that the first 3 minutes are a commercial.  By themselves, those first 3 minutes offer a very moving and inspiring idea:  that’s it’s time for you to become an American Hero.

I couldn’t agree more.

00:03:40 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLlF5YMf7Yc

 

Suicide Bankers = Suicide Bombers

 

Image via Wikipedia

 

Very nice insight on the Max Keiser Report.

The banks that are “too big to fail” are “wired to blow up” the entire financial system and domestic economy if we don’t give them more money.  In this regard they are fundamentally indistinguishable from “terrorists” who strap explosives to their bodies and try to intimidate the public into doing their will.

The comparison between banks and terrorists is not just an analogy or a metaphor, but illustrates a fact.  The banks that are “too big to fail” threaten that, unless we give them “free money” and more power, they will self-destruct and thereby cause enormous harm to the people.  In essence, if the banks don’t get their way, some people may die, and most people will become impoverished.  In this regard, the threats of the “too big to fail” banks are terroristic.

00:01:40 video:  http://maxkeiser.com/2010/10/26/keiser-report-suicide-bankers-suicide-bombers/

 

Favre is Finished

 

Image by DavidErickson via Flickr

 

Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre is currently implicated in a scandal wherein he allegedly photographed his private parts and sent copies of the photo’s to one or more females (other than his wife) that he wanted to seduce.

The whole thing is such a stupid story.  It’s like a Greek tragedy about a nearly perfect hero finally destroyed by a single, fatal flaw.  Favre, one of the most extraordinary quarterbacks to ever play the game–and a shoo-in for the Football Hall of Fame–has essentially trashed his life, reputation and future prospects by stupidly photographing his own penis and sending out one or more copies by email.  What the freak was Favre thinking? Apparently, Favre took too many shots to helmet and suffered some permanent brain damage.

Since this scandal developed, I’d wondered, even hoped, that the NFL and media could somehow keep a lid on Favre’s phallic faux pas.  In the end, he seems to be just a good ol’ boy who doesn’t deserve this abuse.

However, the following 1 minute video from Saturday Night Live tells me that Favre’s career is over.  I won’t be surprised if he resigns from the Vikings (or manages to suffer a career-ending injury) before this season ends.

Up ’til now, Favre might’ve escaped the public’s wrath as a tragically-flawed Greek super-hero.  Now, thanks in part to SNL, Favre’s been reduced to the status of a Greek cartoon character.   He’s become the NFL’s Pee Wee Herman.   Public figures can survive tragedy, but not ridicule.  Favre is finished.

1 minute.  http://www.hulu.com/watch/187730/saturday-night-live-brett-favre-wrangler-commercial

 

Virtually All US Presidents Have a Single Common Ancestor?

 

Image via Wikipedia

 

If you like conspiracy theories, you’re going to love this.  According to a TV news report that sounds legitimate, a 12-year old girl has traced the genealogies of all US Presidents to a single English king: King John Plantegenet.

Reportedly, King Plantegenet was the English monarch who signed the Magna Charta. (see image)  It’s interesting that King Plantegent reportedly signed that document at the point of a sword.  (I.e., he was threatened with death by a group of barons if he refused to sign.)

I can’t help wondering if his descendants are still pissed, still trying to repeal the fundamental precepts of the Magna Charta and regain their “rightful place” as our monarchs.  Similarly, I can’t help wondering if–since the only way to compel King Plantegenet to recognize the liberties of ordinary men was at the point of a sword–then perhaps our modern government will likewise recognize our liberties only at the “point of s sword”.

The idea that a 12-year old girl could’ve done this research seems too fantastic to be believed.  But if this is a hoax, someone went to a lot of trouble.  The girl’s allegation sound fantastic–but plausible.

Kid power, hmm?

00:01:45  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRD5BmgveuU&feature=player_embedded

 

Mainstream Media (MSNBC) Video on Rising Public Awareness of “Fraudclosure”

 

Image via Wikipedia

 

MSNBC:  ”This crisis is all about fraud . . . .  There were millions of acts of fraud. . . . this corrupt banking system . . . .”

Fraud is criminal.

The Fraudclosure scandal involves the institutionalized theft of millions of American homes and the injury and/or destruction of millions of American families.

When “fraudclosure” is fully understood.  Banks will fail.  The federal government and the Federal Reserve will be implicated, tainted, and discredited.  Given that Ron Paul has already moved to “End the Fed,” the coming revelations concerning “fraudclosure” may be sufficient to finally precipitate the Federal Reserve’s demise.

This is a bigger scandal than the JFK assassination.  Bigger than Viet Nam.  During the old Savings & Loan scandal, over 1,000 individuals were prosecuted for fraud and/or criminal activity.  Fraudclosure will dwarf the S&L scandal.  When “fraudclosure” is fully understood, heads will roll.  Lots of ‘em.

13 minutes:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/39836703#39836703

 

Capitis Diminutio–more on the All-Upper-Case Name

 

Image via Wikipedia

 

Here’s a well done video from someone else who’s also persuaded that the all-upper-case name identifies some entity or capacity other than that of a living man made in our Father YHWH Elohiym’s image and endowed by his Creator with “certain unalienable Rights”.

I don’t absolutely agree with everything in this video.  I’m sure that the video’s author doesn’t absolutely agree with everything I believe, either.  At least one of us–and probably both of us–have more to learn.  But for the moment, we both agree that the all-upper-case name “may be hazardous to your (political) health.”

The point is that the all-upper-case name theory is being increasingly explored and advocated by other people.  The “lunatic fringe” (of which I’m a card-carrying member) is growing thicker every day.  And sometimes, the “lunatic fringe” becomes the “cutting edge”.

7 minutes:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5I21wE-h_g

 

More on the All-Upper-Case Name

 

Image via Wikipedia

 

For at least 15 years, I have subscribed to the theory that the names “Alfred Adask” and “ALFRED N ADASK” usually signify not only two different entities–but two kinds of entities.  I know that that “Alfred Adask” is the proper name for a living man (me).  I strongly suspect that the name “ALFRED N ADASK” signifies some sort of estate, account or legal fiction–something other than the living man “Alfred Adask”.

Some people think that theory is nonsense and I don’t much blame ‘em.  After 15 years of embracing that theory, I still can’t prove it.  But on the other hand, after 15 years of advancing that theory, no one has (to my knowledge) disproved that theory.

Here’s an email from one of my radio and/or blog audience that questions the theory.  My email reply follows.

 

Pledges of Servitude?

Image via Wikipedia

A friend of mine (Rick) is facing charges for four traffic tickets.  He sent a copy of his defense to me.  It’s pretty good.  It’s not exactly what I’d do, but nothing is.

But I did notice one omission that struck me as potentially important:  In challenging the gov-co’s authority, Rick had denied that he’s a slave or subject to involuntary servitude (as prohibited by the 13th Amendment) but he neglected to deny that he had entered into a voluntary servitude (a fiduciary relationship) with the court, plaintiff, prosecutor, state, real party in interest, or even to the actual defendant “RICK DOE” (rather than “Rick Doe”) etc.

I can’t prove it, but I strongly suspect that the system relies on the presumption that each living man or woman (“Alfred Adask”) has knowingly entered into a voluntary servitude as fiduciary for the government, the plaintiff and/or the defendant identified by the all-upper-case name (“ALFRED N ADASK”).

I sent Rick an email reply that outlines some of my notions in greater detail–especially relative to pledges.  My understanding of “pledges” is rudimentary but growing. My email reply follows:

 

JFK Speech on Secret Oaths & Secret Societies

Image via Wikipedia

A fine speech that condemns national secrets and implicates international conspiracies.  In retrospect, JKF’s grasp of globalism back in A.D. 1963 was almost prophetic–and totally unappreciated by the American people.

It’s no surprise that truly open government of the sort JFK advocated would result in assassination.  That’s probably why Obummer promised to run an “open” and highly “transparent” government when he ran for the presidency, but has instead provided only greater governmental secrecy.

5:24  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeYgLLahHv8