European Stabilization Mechanism leads to Aristocracy

Image via Wikipedia

Here’s a 4 minute video that describes the terms of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) treaty among the nation of the European Union (EU) that is reportedly scheduled to replace the existing European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF).

Lots of acronyms, hmm?  EU, EFSF, ESM.  They’re confusing.  Hard to remember and keep straight in your mind.  The average American may not be interested in the ESM or EFSF—after all, those institutions are intended to deal with EU problems, so why should Americans care?

Americans should care because, as you’ll read, North America may soon face problems similar to those of Europe, and be similarly tempted (or terrified) by our own “American Stabilization Mechanism” (“ASM”) to solve those problems.  If you understand the strategy being used now, by the New World Order with the ESM in the EU, you may be able to later recognize same strategy if they try to create an “ASM” for North America.

There are only so many moves on the board.  There are only a relatively few fundamental strategies.  What they try in Europe, they will probably try here, too.

 

Rick Perry is Finished

Image via Wikipedia

Here’s a video interview of the editor of Rolling Stone magazine on the subject of Texas Governor Rick Perry.  It offers evidence that Rick Perry is a money-lovin’, treasonous S.O.B. who’s had “this state” up for sale throughout his terms as Governor.  Unless the allegations in Rolling Stone magazine can be absolutely refuted, Perry’s shot at the White House is done.

Good.  The sleazy S.O.B. may belong in prison–but, like most or the rest of the candidates (including Obama) he certainly does not belong in the White House.

Thank God for the internet . . . and investigative reporters.

video:  00:05:14

http://www.hulu.com/watch/294793/decision-2012-rolling-stone-on-perry-expose

 

The Mark of “ADASK”?

Image via Wikipedia

I’m somewhat fixated on the concept of “definitions”.  If you haven’t already seen my article “Definitions:  The Law of the Law” at http://adask.wordpress.com/2011/10/24/definitions-the-law-of-the-law/#more-10319) you ought to read it as an introduction to this article.

 

•  Title 1, Section 215 of the Arizona Revised Statutes lists 46 definitions.

Definition # 37 declares:

 

 ”Signature” or “subscription” includes a mark, if a person cannot write, with the person’s name written near it and witnessed by a person who writes the person’s own name as witness.

This 30-word definition is complex and confusing.  I see this confusion as emanating from the fact that the words “person” and “person’s” each appear twice in the 30 word sentence.  The word “person” (more or less) appears four times in the same sentence.

 

“North Carolina Police Warned To Put Their Personal Property Into Someone Else’s Name !”

Image by e_calamar via Flickr

This might be the single most important email I’ve ever received.

It’s just an email.  It might be a hoax or a mistake.  But I think it’s true.  If it is, the whole damned governmental system is in jeopardy.  It just might be time to break out the Champagne!

It appears that a North Carolina court has ruled that the “police” are actually working for private entities (private companies) and are not associated with The State of North Carolina.  This ruling conforms to ideas I’ve advanced on this blog and on my radio show for several years.

Because the purported “police officers” are working for private companies, they are not entitled to official immunity.  Thus, police officers are being warned to put all of their personal property into someone else’s name since it might otherwise be lost in the event that a “police officer” is sued for assault or some other kind of lawbreaking.

If the police are working for “private companies,” so are most of the judges, prosecutors, and local regulators and bureaucrats.  That means they are all throwing their weight around without any real authority or personal immunity.  

 

$20,000 Gold?

Image by GoldMoneyNews via Flickr

Mike Maloney is the author of the world’s best selling book on precious metals investing. Since 2003 he’s advocated gold and silver as the ultimate means of protecting wealth from the games played by our governments and banking sector. In the video presentation (below) he lays down his ‘most likely’ scenario for the global economy over the next decade, including short term deflation, followed by big or even hyperinflation. He defines inflation/deflation, the difference between currency and money, price vs value, ‘Wealth Cycles’, gold and silver accounting for the expansion of fiat currency, gold and silver supply and demand, the differences between the today’s bull market and that of the 1970s, The Debt Collapse, and more.

No one can know for a fact, how high (or low) the price of gold will be at some time in the future.  Mr. Maloney’s prediction of $20,000 gold may or may not take place.   Nevertheless, Mr. Maloney makes a very common sense, easily understood presentation of fundamentals about gold and silver and presents a very rational basis for his predictions.   Gold might not be going to $20,000 an ounce.  Maybe it’s only going to $5,000 . . . or maybe it’s going to $30,000/ounce.  But Mr. Maloney’s presentation makes a powerful argument that gold is inevitably going significantly higher and can be expected to rise by at least 100% and could rise by 1,000%.   His presentation is a primer for anyone trying to understand our modern monetary system and the rationale for investing in precious metals.  Although this presentation is about a year old, it’s a great presentation.

video    01:29:27

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tj2s6vzErqY#!

 

Bank Runs Control Banksters

Image via Wikipedia

A relatively new idea is circling the internet: bank runs.  I.e., We the People can control “them, the banksters” by simply withdrawing our savings in a coordinated manner.  We can collapse the whole damned banking system by simply closing all of our accounts on the same day.  The banks can’t withstand a determined “run” on the banks.

It’s uncertain whether a significant bank run will take place in the next several months.  But, the idea is powerful.  Despite all of the influence (bribery) that the banks exert over Congress and the White House, We the People can shut ‘em all down any time we decide to act in concert to cause a bank run.  We truly hold the power.

While a bank run might not take place in the foreseeable future, the power of bank runs is so explosive that it’s inevitable that we will see major banks at some future date.  Sooner or later, the people will become so fed up with the banking system that they’ll “pull the plug” and participate in nation-wide bank runs.

Bank runs are the nuclear option.  Make no mistake–a nationwide bank run on all banks will collapse the banking system and the economy.  This is no game.  If a nation-wide bank run took place, lots of people might die in the ensuing chaos.

 

Definitions: The Law of the Law

Image via Wikipedia

I’ve observed for several years that definitions are the “law” of the “law”.

For example, when the Bible commands “Thou shalt not kill,” does that mean “thou shall not kill anyone”?  Or does it mean “thou shalt not murder members of your own community, nation or race—but you can kill all the foreigners that you want?”

As Bill Clinton once observed, when it comes to knowing what a law means, “It all depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is.”  In other words, the meaning of every law depends on the underlying definitions of every word used to comprise that law.

This implies that if you’re charged under a particular law and you can successfully refute the presumed definition of just one of the key words in that law, you may be able to defeat the charges.

 

Max Keiser: Gaddafi’s Stolen Billions; Bankers are Financial Terrorists

Image via Wikipedia

According to Russia Today, “International bankers have reportedly wasted billions of dollars invested by Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi. The Financial Times says giants like Goldman Sachs were dealing with the dictator’s investments when it needed to plug a hole during the economic crisis. Most of the money has been lost [read, "stolen"], but with what’s going on in Libya any repayment seems unlikely.”

Max Keiser implies that at least one reason (perhaps the reason) for invading Libya was to allow the global bankers to steal the Libyan “sovereign wealth fund” (which allegedly held billions of dollars).

Keiser is so freakin’ angry that he suggests that the only way to deal with the global bankers is behead them; that the only solution is a revolution by common people to overthrow the world’s banking system and most governments that support that system.

If Keiser is right, his information implies that Gaddafi was a fool.  It’s common knowledge that Gaddafi has been portrayed by the West to be some crazed villain for at least 20 or 30 years.  But there’s plenty of emerging evidence to show that Gaddafi has been “secretly” conspiring with western politicians for at least a decade.  Gaddafi was secretly providing intelligence to western powers concerning the Middle East.  Based on his secret efforts to assist the West, Gaddafi apparently thought he was one of the “insiders” who could play with the “big boys” (global bankers).  It turns out that he was just a mark all along; that the bankers had been setting him up for five years to be robbed and killed.  If Gaddafi hadn’t invested the billions of dollars in Libya’s sovereign wealth fund with global bankers, those bankers might not have been able to rob him, and might therefore have not incited the Libyan invasion.

There’s a lesson there for anyone who wants to associate with global bankers.  If the “big boys” invite you to dinner, don’t be surprised if you turn out to be the main course.

video   00:06:04

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUkNnQE-9B4&feature=player_embedded

 

The Fiat Money Game

Image via Wikipedia

Modern banking has a fundamental problem: Bankers lend fiat currency used as principal in a loan, but don’t also loan the required interest into circulation. Because the interest isn’t loaned into circulation, it’s technically impossible to repay all loans and the interest on those loans.
The requirement that loans be repaid with interest guarantees that some borrowers must fall into bankruptcy and lose whatever collateral they put up for their loans.
Most people are unaware of the ever-present impossibility of fully repaying all loans (including interest) because that reality is concealed beneath the turmoil and complexity of modern banking. Virtually no one appreciates that the fiat currency “game” is impossible for all to win.

 

The United States of America vs the United States

Image via Wikipedia

I received a comment elsewhere on this blog that asked for an analysis of the difference between “The United States of America” and “United States”.  I replied as follows:

As I understand it, the word “constitution” signifies a document that originally creates, incorporates or “constitutes” some new entity.  We say “The Constitution of the United States,” but the same text might just as easily have been entitled “The Charter of the United States” or “The Incorporation Papers of the United States”.  As I understand it, the instrument entitled “The Constitution of the United States” is the document that “constituted” the entity named “United States”.

Note that even though a document that performs the function of  ”constituting” or creating a new entity, that document need not be expressly named “The Constitution of [That Entity]“.  It could have an name that never used the word “constitution” but still performed the function of “constituting” a new entity.

We’re all familiar with the federal “Constitution”.  There’s a problem with that document.  The author’s never attached an explicit title at the top of that document and so there’s some confusion about its proper name.  Some think that document is properly named “The Constitution of the United States”.  Some say, “The Constitution of The United States of America.”  Others say, “The Constitution for the United States of America”.