Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. “DUSTIFICATION”
The video below deals with the destruction of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center on 9/11/01.
The first 6 minutes of this video are haunting.
The next 8 minutes of the video are mind boggling.
Dr. Judy Wood observes that although the Twin Towers fell, the actual mass of debris found in piles at the bottom of the Towers does appear to match the mass of the component parts of the Towers when they were still intact. Dr. Wood observes that much of the mass of the towers simply turned to dust–while the towers were still in the air.
I.e., the Towers might’ve been expected to fall in chunks, and when the chunks hit the ground, the chunks might turn (at least partially) into smaller chunks and dust.
But instead, Dr. Wood claims that much of the mass of the Towers is not found at the bottom of the Towers because that mass had already been reduced to dust while the Towers were still “in the air”–and then blew away in the breeze.
Dr. Wood claims this “dustification” process is unprecedented. Never seen before. She expressly claims that the Towers were reduced to dust by some sort of “free energy” device. She doesn’t say so, but she at least implies that the Twin Towers were disintegrated into dust by some sort of ray gun.
This is the first video on 9/11 that I’ve seen that actually scares me. Dr. Wood makes some compelling arguments and observations. I think she might be right. IF the government has some sort of secret “ray gun” capable of knocking down two particular buildings, we might be in some very serious danger.
But does such “free energy” device really exist? I’m skeptical. The Twin Towers started to disintegrate from the top down. That implies that any “free energy” device able to disintegrate a building from the top down should be located somewhere above the building. If so, is this “free energy” device located in a satellite? An aircraft?
Again, I’m skeptical.
But. Dr. Wood makes a very intriguing case that much of the mass of the Twin Towers was simply but inexplicably turned into dust that blew away rather than falling “straight” down to base of the Towers. What “dustified” the Towers while they were still in the air?
Ashes to ashes and dust to dust.
This video is worth you time.
video
00:14:58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuTp7HkpW7U&feature=related
NH
August 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM
Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition – has a terrific follow up rationale to Dr. Wood’s research. I believe the truth may lie somewhere within their research.
xxWesxx
February 23, 2013 at 3:32 PM
Learn how nukes work; then pitch a theory about them. You look foolish claiming ‘evidence’ of them that defies how they work.
NH
August 12, 2012 at 4:44 PM
Longer version…it starts out dry and slow, but I assure you, it shall get you thinking…
NH
August 12, 2012 at 4:50 PM
Nascar sheet metal cars hit steel guardrails and steel chain link fence at approx. 210mph and bounce off. We’re asked to believe aluminum planes traveling approx. 320mph penetrate solid concrete and steel structure, cause a “roadrunner” type penetration, and push through the other end intact? LOL
xxWesxx
February 23, 2013 at 3:34 PM
320 mph? So we are just gonna make up figures now to support our theories? They were travelling closer to 600 mph, and no, they did not cut steel like many believe; they blew the bolts out, pushing panels out of their way; hence to block shaped patter of the entry hole. You think this is impossible? Water can cut steel given enough force. Learn physics; then debate it.
NH
August 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM
Note to Congress:
All we take with us when we die is our integrity…nothing else…
That’s all we’ve got…
So grow a pair of testicles and stand up~
NH
August 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM
Hero: Paul Wellstone U.S. Senator from the state of Minnesota is a hero. He had the courage to try and expose 911. On October 25, 2002, Wellstone, along with seven others, died in an airplane crash in northern Minnesota, at approximately 10:22 a.m. He was 58 years old. The other victims were his wife, Sheila; one of his three children, Marcia; the two pilots, his driver and two campaign staffers. He had testicles. He is a hero. Say that name every time you come in front of a croud. If more heroes are honored, more will be heard, and more will come forward.
NDT
August 12, 2012 at 7:03 PM
Like the 2002 Bali bombing, the energy signature shows that the official story of the destruction of the twin towers is patently false. As well as the energy required to dissociate the concrete, a significant amount of energy was required to keep the site hot for weeks afterward. Witnesses described parts of the site as being like a foundry, with rivers of molten metal flowing.
Randy
August 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM
@NH: No offense, but I believe the angle of attack is different in the 9/11 situation than in a NASCAR hitting the wall. The planes were at around 90 degrees whereas a NASCAR car usually hits about 5 to possibly 60 degrees. Something to consider anyways.
Mathew
August 12, 2012 at 9:42 PM
Who can get most, if not all, news networks in the world to run ridiculously fake footage of hollow aluminum airplanes flying through several inches of steel without so much as decelerating? And these cartoons aired everywhere in close to real time, the same day at least. Does the US government have this kind of pull? Seems unlikely.
Yartap
August 12, 2012 at 9:54 PM
Note: The two planes that hit the World Trade Towers flew at recorded and documented speeds of over 500 mph. Commercial airliners cannot do those speeds at ground level, only planes with such needed modifications can do this.
The Towers produced the effect of a Pyroclastic Blast (volcanic ash flows; super heated) exhibited by melted tires on vehicles around the Towers and witnesses testimony.
BYU’s Dr. Steven Jones (look him up on YouTube) studied dust from the Towers site and found “Super Grade Nano Thermite”(produces temperatures ranging from 2400 degrees to 3500 degrees) in all dust samples. He said that this would explain the Pyroclastic Blast effects and concrete turning into dust. He also said, it was just not Nano Thermite but of a grade that is above military grade and must have been produced at a facility with all the needed equipment to produce such a super grade.
The government’s agency for finding out: “Why the Towers fell?”, NIST, tried to publish the “conclusive reason” as due to fire, but the public forced them into a corner to finally conclude that, “They do not know the reason for the Towers’ failures.” Most of the public is not aware of their final conclusion.
This is the first time in history of steel structure buildings that the main reason given for the public’s consumption, was “That the builds felt mainly due to fire which caused structural failure.” No fire has ever brought down a steel structure building in the history of such buildings, let alone, three buildings in one day. History shows that some steel structure fires have lasted longer than 23 hours, without structure failure.
Steel of thicknesses greater than 3/4,” when exposed to fire, will start to bend at 1200 degrees and may fail (break) at temperatures ranging from 1250 degrees to 1500 degrees. Carbon based jet fuel (kerosine) burns at a maximum temperature of 800 degrees. Other materials inside a building, with conditions right (i.e., ample oxygen and material supply), can bring the combined temperatures up to 1000 – 1200 degrees over a long period of time. It was witnessed that the fire in the Towers produced “black smoke” which indicated an “oxygen starved fire.” And it was reported by one Fire Department crew that they were getting the fire under control inside one Tower.
The fires under the Towers burned for over 3 months after failure, and causing clean-up worker’s boots souls to melt.
Yartap
August 12, 2012 at 10:32 PM
I’m sorry! I forgot…. also…..
The WTC’s interior core steel columns were 22 inches x 55 inches wide “Box Columns” with 5 inch THICK walls, plus inside the hollow area of the column a 55 inch centered steel rib 3 inches THICK ran the length of the column.
The WTC’s exterior core steel columns were 16 inches x 36 inches wide “Box Columns” with 5 inch THICK walls, plus inside the hollow area of the column a 36 inch wide centered steel rib 3 inches THICK ran the length of the column.
In the construction design of the Two World Trade Center Towers, as the columns got to greater heights the Thickness of the columns were decreased proportionably until the top inside and outside columns were reduced down to a 2 inches thickness for each Box Column with rib inside.
The Cross Bracing to the massive columns was done with I-beams of 2 inch thickness and on the inside to cross brace the core columns, these I-beams were 24 inches wide and on the outside to cross brace the columns the I-beams were 36 inches wide.
FOLKS!……..IT’S GOING TO TAKE A LOT OF “FIRE” TO MAKE THEM FAIL!
Randy
August 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM
Exactly, an extremely hot fire. : )
Judson
August 12, 2012 at 11:12 PM
You forgot to write thouse coloms were “ALL” spechialy heat treated and harden. The guy who did “all” the heat treating was on costtocostam.com a about 2-3 years ago talking about how long it took to heat treat and let cool down to harden each of the colloms, and he did them all! They had to be harden and very strong to hold up all that weight.
Yartap
August 13, 2012 at 1:08 AM
Sorry gang! I must have made a slip on my typing….and miss lead you about super nano thermite……….. meant to type….
Thermite burns at a temperature of 2,500 to 4,500 degrees F.
And Nano Thermite burns at temperatures of 9000 degrees F.
And Super Grade Nano thermite burns at ?????
75yerthj8nws5yuhd
August 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM
@Yartap “Note: The two planes that hit the World Trade Towers flew at recorded and documented speeds of over 500 mph. Commercial airliners cannot do those speeds at ground level, only planes with such needed modifications can do this.”
No airframe of that size and shape can be pushed anywhere near 500 mph at sea level without shaking to pieces, with or without modifications. Do a search for such an aircraft plausibly resembling a commercial airliner, you won’t find it. Thus they took the time and trouble to make computer-generated cartoons. This in addition to the previously mentioned fact that the real versions of those planes could never disappear through several inches of steel support columns like a high diver passing into water.
Adask
August 13, 2012 at 1:58 PM
I don’t understand your email clearly. Are you alleging that the aircraft that seemingly hit the Twin Towers were computer generated on video tapes of the twin towers but did not actually exist in fact? If so, how do you explain the onlookers on the ground who were watching the Twin Towers? Didn’t they actually see holes in one or both of the Towers? Didn’t they actually see flames and smoke pouring out of the buildings? Computer-generated graphics might explain what was seen by everyone who ONLY saw the 9/11 event on TV or over the internet. But no amount of graphics on a video recording will be visible to people who actually SAW the event take place.
Am I misunderstanding you email?
Mathew
August 13, 2012 at 2:30 PM
Yes, I am saying it is physically impossible for commercial airliners to do what we’re told happened on 9/11, and therefore computer generated fakery was used. There is a documentary worth watching called September Clues which analyzes the several mistakes the fakers made which gives their game away, including grossly inconsistent flight paths for the same plane at the same time from different camera angles. They also look at the witnesses shown on TV that day. Some of them shout about an explosion but make no mention of a commercial airliner having just flow into the building to cause it! The others (well over 20 of them) who claim to see in person what we were shown on the boob tube are, by an amazing coincidence, all highly placed employees of the news companies themselves.
Explosions, holes, flames and smoke in buildings do not require commercial airliners to make them. These things did happen.
“But no amount of graphics on a video recording will be visible to people who actually SAW the event take place.”
Except nobody did see the event take place, and no amount of false testimony supplied by the fakers themselves can make a commercial airliner, or anything resembling it, fly at those speeds at sea level or penetrate several inches of steel, It’s impossible. Fortunately for aircraft engineering, no credible evidence from 9/11 suggest otherwise.
Yartap
August 13, 2012 at 4:04 PM
75yerthj8nws5yuhd,
I concur with you, but the information comes from Pilotsfor911Truth.com, who claim that the information came from the FAA ground radar data. We should all know that the information did not come from the “flight data recorders,” because all 8 recorders from both planes were lost, as claimed by officials (another first in flight history). But, there does exist a man who claims that 3 of the 4 flight recorders were found from on of the planes. Who are we to believe?
There does exist video evidence for both planes that shows a possible missile was fired from each plane before impact. This would explain the easy entrance of the planes into the buildings.
Then there is the Pentagon, the evidence shows that a big commercial airliner hit and then the evidence shows that it did not. So, let’s not go there. But, rather…..
On TV, I witnessed the Twin Towers come down. I have been in the construction field my entire life and have worked as an architect and building contractor. I have designed and built steel frame buildings. Not knowing the design or construction details of the Towers. When I saw the Towers fall, I said to myself to justify the collapse, “They must have installed implosion devices as a safety feature for some great reason, maybe such as this.” Because, I knew the planes did not cause the collapses, but rather, explosives caused this. The speed with which they fell is the indicator for explosives. But, the timing of setting off those explosives? Why so soon?
I kept watching the replays of the collapses. And I realized that these buildings were not “imploded,” but rather, “EXPLODED” (pushed out). We can forget the planes or sophisticated holographic projection. THE BUILDINGS CAME DOWN DUE TO EXPLOSIVES INSIDE THE BUILDINGS!
Next, I witnessed Building 7 come down later that afternoon. It was a classic “implosion.” Its almost free-fall speed of coming down is its indicator of the use of explosives, too.
So, I’m not focused on what caused the buildings to fall, I know what caused the buildings to fall. I’m looking at “Who benefits from this tragedy!”
75yertj8news5yuhd
August 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM
Yartap, the FAA radar outputs were fabricated, as were NORAD’s. This is documented even by official sources because there was a training simulation that day which, by an astounding coincidence, just happened to involve hijacked airplanes crashing into buildings in NYC. If you doubt the impossibility of the official aviation fantasy, try finding any airframe whatsoever of that approximate design able to go 500 mph at sea level. None exists. It would instantly break up in midair.
You’re right about the buildings’ collapse. EVEN IF planes loaded with a substance that burns hot enough to melt steel (which jet fuel can’t do) were magically able to bust through the outer steel framework and enter the main structure of the buildings, this would still not explain how the twin towers came down with near-perfect symmetry at free fall speed. Such a feat requires technical know-how and weeks of preparation to make happen by design.
PS: 75yerthj8nws5yuhd = Mathew. I made an error :)
sue
August 13, 2012 at 2:25 PM
I am familiar with Dr.Woods theory. She has an extensive web site…Dr Woods did say that the DEW..Directed Energy Weapons may have been NOT HAVE BEEN THE ONLY DEVICE used to destroy the twin towers. But one of SEVERAL COORDINATED ATTACKS made to create the illusion that the ‘planes’ brought the towers down. An impossibility for jet fuel and agrees with the reports by police, firemen and maintenance men of bombs in the basements going off. Many have queried her as to Who or what country may have this technology and she declines to say. She is a Forensic mechanical engineer investigator and is highly qualified to analyze the evidence. Very interestingly enough, she also said that there were similarities in the destructive debris and pattern to the OKLAHOMA CITY, MURRAH BUILDING explosion(s) ie; of DEW destruction in addition to explosives.
One last point many have not taken into consideration is that the ‘planes’ were seen and ‘heard’ by some but not by all observers including on site news crews. The impression that jumbo jets ‘with no visible passenger windows’ may have been produced by highly sophisticated holographic projectors from several hundred miles out of southern Manhattan may be more than a possibility. This is not an impossibility and could very well be the source of the visual sightings of ‘jets’ by some people. Unless you have been living in a cave, holographic technology is used regularly by the news media amongst other applications in plain sight on a regular basis for years now. We can be well assured that the several militaries of developed countries have access to very sophisticated holographic machinery. You may be able to count the countries on one hand but there are several nonetheless.
Yartap
August 13, 2012 at 5:39 PM
75yerthj8nws5yuhd,
I totally agree with you. I’m just pointing our all the mis-information, and illogical reasoning. But, the reality is this: Somebody blew up those buildings, the planes don’t matter or count. Let’s move on, and find the criminals. Let’s talk about “Who benefitted?”or “Who are the winners and who are the losers?”
Kai
August 13, 2012 at 6:21 PM
no one BLEW up the towers…
Yartap
August 13, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Kai, are you implying an Act of God? That is a possiblity.
Thanks Kai.
Kai
August 13, 2012 at 6:17 PM
Adask – skeptical? the way you got treated and your skeptical on their black ops? Tesla is not on anyone’s radar…and he actually created the radio not marconi, yada yada yada…
They are a few thousand years ahead now…the entire crisis we are going through is those people in control of all that stuff and the people who can’t access it, but sold us out (99.9% of all of them) are deathly afraid to start pushing this tech into the mainstream…
Guess what, too late :)
http://theintelhub.com/2012/01/14/nasa-acknowledges-cold-fusion-low-energy-nuclear-reactions/
Cold Fusion happened nearly a century ago…all PTB would lose if it comes out.
Do the math…
sem
August 14, 2012 at 8:57 AM
Dustification goes much further the the illustration (above) of the twin towers. The greatest dustification was a natural phenomenon which brought about the ice age. Other types of dustification involve nuclear and other non-conventional (and conventional bombs), rocket-ships blasting through the ozone layer, mining (especially fracking), genetic modification of food seed…
Follow the bouncing ball and sing along:
There’s much more going on than just that which meets the eye.
PeaceOut
MVG-AVG
August 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM
I suspect that it was a display to all the world the new class of weapons that the Boyz now have in their possession .Read the book ,then make your comments.
Mvg-Avg
August 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM
One more thing ,Al i read just about everything you post .Then, if i need to take it home a hard copy is made and i read it many times . In the do you believe in “this state “essay you wrote “300 million Americans can’t be wrong”. “The truth is that 300 million Americans can be wrong”.This is probably true in regards to the 911 incident ,most everyone believes the “official ” story . NOT I.Judy Wood stated in her book to “Empirical evidence is that which theory must imitate”. There may be more to her theory than one realizes , .Here we are 10 years later and she still gets no airtime in the Patriot community shortwave spectrum ,talk about censorship. I list to alot on the black box and can only remember hearing an interview with her once in the last 10 years.That was on Coast to Coast am .Come on freedom lovers ……seek and you will find . Al your Great! We have our Prophets of old,our present day Prophets and our Prophets in the days ahead .You Al are in my opinion a present day Prophet . The book of Daniel and Revelation talk about these individuals .That is why i do supplicate to YHWH to continue to inspire and protect the wise men among us in our day ,in the Beautiful Land between the seas that the latter rain continue to pour down on us . The question i have :will the usury machine keep moving foward or may the Good Lord stop it ?
Jeff D.
August 18, 2012 at 9:02 AM
Al, I think this video is interesting with regards to possible weapons being used in conjunction with thermite explosives.
Note: Advance to 1:51 to skip lengthy production credits introduction.
http://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=QA9r9sHXs8A
Jeff D.
August 22, 2012 at 12:27 AM
Nuclear Reaction melted and vaporized the 3 towers?
chris s.
August 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM
as someone that has a shallow metalurgical background, cutting , forming , welding , this event is impossible as laid out by the gov. , period , the columns would have remained even if we , the public had bought the pancake theory, and where did all the dust come from , you do not even see that amount of dust in an ”anounced” controlled demo , until the whole structure hits the ground , all lies, every word of it .. cutting steel beams of that size is a chore, oxygen / accetyllene cutting is not actualy a thermal process, it is a chemical process, that generated large amounts of heat , there is no way a pancake scenario would have brought down the entire core, the top of the buildings should have fallen off .
and having witnessed several refinery fires , and the aftermath , with fires burning 15 times hotter , the steel remains , twisted and destroyed, but still standing , and not vaporized.
Big Irish
September 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Dustification?…can you spell…Wacko-fication?
mvg-avg
September 13, 2012 at 12:43 PM
I still say Judy Woods theory is the most logical rendition of the event I have read thus far .Most of the comments on this page are made in total ignorance of the FACTS presented by Dr. Wood in her book . I find Alex Jones has an agenda to keep certain things from the public on this subject by not allowing any discussion on the Judy Wood Theory .Alex does not cover important topics that are dicussed on this site which I believe are paramont to understand in the struggle underway.Alex needs to stop using his show as a platform to sensor logical discussion on this matter .I still say buy the book and read it your jaw will drop!!!
Jody
October 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM
I believe Dr. wood observations, one thought I had recently about the event was , I do not remember hearing anything about the passengers of the two planes that allegedly struck the towers, on the news or anywhere else.I believe many people observed evidence ( before Dr. woods) and had no paradigm with which to compare the facts and assumed it was a nuclear effect.
I live about an hour north of the towers in new york. I took a course on lead removal about 2 years ago, and out of the blue the safety instructor , out of context, starts talking about the supposed 9/11 consipracy and that he was in the buildingss before 9/11 and had noticed that the asbestos coatings had been removed from many of the steel beams >
Lex Mercatoria
November 8, 2012 at 3:38 AM
9/11 was just another in a never ending series of media hoaxes. No *authentic* imagery of whatever happened that day has surfaced in the public and there is no evidence to analyze. Dr. Wood doesn’t believe her own “research”, which has plenty of Photoshopped images to support said “research”.
There is no science of 9/11 save what one might call “cartoon physics.” The only facts of 9/11 are that the buildings are gone and all the related images presented to the public are fabrications.
xxWesxx
February 23, 2013 at 3:37 PM
I wonder what Judy Wood has to say about the “dustification” of this controlled demolition that utilizes the exact same forces present on 9/11?
Since this isn’t possible from kinetic energy, as Wood is essentially claiming must be the case; then how did it happen here? Thermodynamics and an understanding of how concrete functions/is built is in order. Wood simply doesn’t have the desire to accept reality.
xxWesxx
February 23, 2013 at 3:39 PM
I wonder what Judy Wood has to say about the “dustification” of this controlled demolition that utilizes the exact same forces present on 9/11?
Since this isn’t possible from kinetic energy, as Wood is essentially claiming must be the case; then how did it happen here? Thermodynamics and an understanding of how concrete functions/is built is in order. Wood simply doesn’t have the desire to accept reality.