9/11: Follow the Money

Most 9/11 “conspiracy theorists” believe that the 9/11/2001 attacks were caused by elements of our own government.  These “conspiracy theorists” generally assume that the primary objective of the 9/11 attacks was to lay a political foundation for the future enactment of laws favorable to fascism such as the “Patriot Act”.  Up until now, I believed most such “conspiracy theorists” were correct.

However, the video below implies that future enactment of pro-fascist legislation was only a secondary objective.  Instead, the primary purpose for 9/11 may have been to destroy evidence of a pre-existing $240 billion dollar loan (that would allegedly come due on 9/12/2001)and many of the creditors who issued that loan.

I don’t know what the truth is, but it makes more sense to me to suppose that 9/11 was intended to “cancel” a preexisting loan than to implement future fascism.

One of the surprising, some might say gratifying, results of 9/11 is the number of government (FBI, Naval Intelligence, IRS, Military) and corporate “insiders” who might have deduced the cause and perpetrators of 9/11 but who died in those attacks.  Presumably, many of these government “insiders” were treasonous whores who thought they were “connected” and therefore would be safe because they worked for the gangsters who claim to run this country and the world.

 

Dustification

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. “DUSTIFICATION”

The video below deals with the destruction of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center on 9/11/01.

The first 6 minutes of this video are haunting.

The next 8 minutes of the video are mind boggling.

Dr. Judy Wood observes that although the Twin Towers fell, the actual mass of debris found in piles at the bottom of the Towers does appear to match the mass of the component parts of the Towers when they were still intact.  Dr. Wood observes that much of the mass of the towers simply turned to dust–while the towers were still in the air.

I.e., the Towers might’ve been expected to fall in chunks, and when the chunks hit the ground, the chunks might turn (at least partially) into smaller chunks and dust.

But instead, Dr. Wood claims that much of the mass of the Towers is not found at the bottom of the Towers because that mass had already been reduced to dust while the Towers were still “in the air”–and then blew away in the breeze.

 

Will The Real Terrorists, Stand Up Please!

Another “audience” that does not object:  President George Bush introduces the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, October 2, 2002. The resolution was passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law two weeks later. White House photo by Paul Morse. Image obtained from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/images/20021002-7_d-iraq10022002-th-1-515h.html. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One man’s bureaucrat is another man’s terrorist.

While our government constantly reminds us that its attempts to stop Muslim (and now, “domestic”) terrorists are all “honorable,” our drones terrorize innocent foreigners with the threat of sudden and unexpected death, we have condoned torture, and American cops, prosecutors and judges celebrate and use the prospect of being sodomized in prison as a device to terrorize suspects into plea bargains.

Here’s a video of a US government spokesman accusing Al Qaida of violence and terrorism.  He’s interrupted by a young woman determined to speak out against violence and terrorism committed by the US government.  The woman is forcibly removed.  More importantly, the audience does not object. The woman tries to speak the truth to the apparent authorities–but the audience doesn’t want to hear it.  I wonder how many members of that audience understand that, by their silence, they’ve not only assented to their government’s terrorist acts against foreigners, but also to their government’s terrorist acts against other Americans and even themselves.

 

New Video on 9/11

Image via Wikipedia

9/11 witnesses speak of explosions in the World Trade Center.

video

00:12:30

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-Of50l77YQ&feature=player_embedded

 

Building 7–No “Pancake” Effect

Image by Whiskeygonebad via Flickr

For the past decade, I’ve heard that the collapse of the two World Trade Center towers and the collapse of Building 7 was allegedly caused by a “pancake effect”.  I.e., the supporting structure under the 40th floor fails (due to fire or being struck by an aircraft, etc.) and the weight of the 40th floor falls onto the 39th floor.  The sudden impact of the weight of the 40th floor falling onto the 39th floor, causes the support system under the 39th floor to fail.  This results in the combined weight of the 40th and 39th floors to fall onto the 38th floor, causing the 38th floor’s support structure to fail, etc., until the entire building collapses under the falling mass of the higher floors.

The net result is a building that collapses from the top down.

 

9/11: An “Official” Conspiracy Theory

Image via Wikipedia

According to Joseph Goerbels, former Reich Minister for Propaganda for Nazi Germany, if you tell a lie big enough and repeatedly, the public will believe it.  Judging from the mainstream media’s 10th anniversary “memorial” to 9/11, Goerbel’s theory is alive and well and working in the USA.

While, even now, 9/11 invokes the tears of the survivors, families of the 3,000 victims, and sympathetic Americans–it is unclear how many people (especially in government) care enough about 9/11 to search for the truth and indict those truly responsible for all those deaths.

Somebody murdered over 3,000 Americans and nobody in our government is looking for the actual perpetrator.  It’s enough to make you want to puke.

The real “conspiracy theory” is not the one that alleges Bush & Cheney masterminded 9/11.  The real “conspiracy theory” was the crap published by our government that placed the entire blame on Osama bin Laden.

Here’s a 00:04:56 video that does a brilliant job of concisely exposing the absurdity of the “official conspiracy theory” for 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=player_embedded#!

Here’s another video of Jesse Ventura being interviewed by Barbara Walters on The View about conspiracy theories in general, and the destruction of Building 7 at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001, in particular.   The fact that Ventura is being interviewed on The View is evidence that the “conspiracy theories” that are currently disparaged by gov-co are gaining traction.  More and more people are coming to suspect that the government’s version of history is merely an “official conspiracy theory”.

00:09:08

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/096290-2011-09-12-jesse-ventura-explains-why-wtc7-is-the-key-to-9.htm?From=News

 

No Good Deed . . . .

Cover of Behold a Pale Horse

William Cooper was a former military intelligence office, the author of Behold a Pale Horse, public speaker, radio talk show host, and fierce government critic.

On June 28, A.D. 2001, Mr. Cooper reported on his radio show that a relatively obscure Saudi named Osama bin Laden was being set up to be the “patsy” for an upcoming false-flag attack on the United States.  Cooper didn’t know if the attack would be chemical, biological, or nuclear, but he predicted that it would be significant, it would be precipitated by our own government, and would take place within a few weeks.

On September 11th, A.D. 2001 (11 weeks after Cooper’s orignal prediction), the “9/11″ attack was launched on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.  That attack was subsequently blamed on the instantly famous Osama bin Laden.   However, subsequent evidence and logic (especially with regard to Building 7) suggest that bin Laden played no part or, if he was involved, was only recruited to unwittingly play the role of “patsy”.

On November 5th, A.D. 2001, (8 weeks after the 9/11 attack) William Cooper was killed in a gun battle with police.

video  00:03:22

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phKiT2-94XU&feature=player_embedded

 

Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

Image by Whiskeygonebad via Flickr

Here’s a 15 minute video explaining that the World Trade Center Building #7 must’ve been imploded on 9/11 A.D 2001.  If Building 7 was imploded, the technological and logistical problems required to wire the whole building with explosives would’ve been too great to be achieved by Osama bin Laden and two dozen of his “merry men”.  If bin Laden isn’t responsible for destroying Building 7, is he responsible for destroying the “Twin Towers”?  For the attack on the Pentagon?

Are we to believe that bin Laden is responsible for destroying the Twin Towers and attacking the Pentagon, while some other entity is responsible for destroying Building 7?  Were two sets of “terrorists” acting “coincidentally” on 9/11?  Of course not.

Whoever imploded Building 7 must also be responsible for the Twin Towers and Pentagon attack. If bin Laden could not have imploded Building 7, then bin Laden could not be responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers and attack on the Pentagon.

 

War Without Reason

Image via Wikipedia

If you’d like some insight into why we invaded Iraq (or Afghanistan), here’s an amazing excerpt from an interview of 4-star General (and former Rhodes Scholar) Wesley Clark.

The except is amazing because Clark makes admissions that I wouldn’t expect from a man of his stature.  Sure, he must have been in a position to know the truth, but few people achieve real power unless they can suppress the impulse to tell the truth.  General Clark has apparently forgotten his insider’s “vow of silence”.

Clark claims that even though we didn’t actually invade Iraq until A.D. 2003, the decision to do so was made within two weeks after the “9/11″ attack in A.D. 2001.  This implies that the whole “Saddam-has-Weapons-of- Mass-Destruction” pretext for invading Iraq was known to be a lie for most of 2 years before the invasion and “Hunt for WMDs” actually began.

Hundreds of thousands of people have died and the course of world history has been dramatically changed.  The former perception that the US is the world’s only “super-power” has been badly eroded.  Why?  Well, according to Clark, we invaded Iraq, world history changed, etc.,  simply because our government couldn’t think of anything else to do.  Clark implies that we invaded Iraq without reason.

 

911: The Truth Will Out

Image via Wikipedia

For years, Geraldo Rivera disparaged the opinion that 911 was “an inside job” perpetrated by our government.  But, to his credit, Geraldo has “thought again” and come to accept the possibility that the fall of Building 7 (and, by implication, the entire 911 attack) was, in fact, an “inside job” presumably committed, or least concealed, by our own government.