Category Archives: Despotism

“PERSONS or other animals” in Wisconsin statutes

"Persons" are "animals"?? [courtesy Google Images]

“Persons” are “animals”??
[courtesy Google Images]

If you follow this blog, you know that I’m somewhat obsessed with demonstrating that: 1) the government has defined all men and women to be “animals”; 2) by defining us as “animals,” government deprives us of our most important rights; 3) that this deprivation of rights constitutes a violation of our Freedom of Religion and an act of genocide against the American people.  (See, and especially,

I’ve also presented inferential evidence that the word “consumer” may signify an “animal”.

So, I’m delighted to have received the following email which presents evidence that even the word “person” signifies an “animal”–at least in Wisconsin. But I’ll bet that, as more people research the statutes in their own state, they’ll find that “person” = “animal” in other states, probably most states, maybe all states.

If it turns out to be true that the word “person” usually signifies an “animal” in state or federal law, it will be even more evidence that a spiritual war is being waged by gov-co against the American people.

Here’s the email:

Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , , , , , ,

Italian Riot Police Remove Helmets and Join Protestors

Nightmare for fascists: Italian cops side with protesters.  

When will we see the same in the U.S.?  In fact, when will we see American soldiers side with American dissidents and protesters?

The government is not a unilateral enemy. Some government employees are thugs. Some recognize the crimes they’re being called on to commit, and are losing their taste for unbridled power. Only a handful of government employees refusing to “just follow orders” could be enough to precipitate a revolt even within the ranks of government, itself. Once the cops refuse to function as knee-breakers for the mob that runs this country, that mob will be on the way out.

video 00:01:07


Tags: , , , ,

Message to Police: Will You Shoot the People to Obey the Politicians?

video   00:07:45


Posted by on December 10, 2013 in Despotism, Fascism, Police State, Tyranny, Video


Tags: , , ,

Military “Litmus Test”? Will you Shoot Americans?

According to the following video, Dr. Jim  Garrow was recently contacted by a high ranking military official who implored him to reveal the truth about a “litmus test” that is being proposed by the Obama administration to the military, asking the question “will you shoot Americans if they won’t give you their guns?”

I have mixed feelings about this video.  On the one hand, it’s well done; Dr. Garrow seems sincere and reasonable.  On the other hand, the video strikes me as a possible instance of fear-mongering.

I’m not posting this video as an absolute truth.  I’m posting as a possible truth, even a probable truth.  I’m posting mainly to see what the readers of the blog think about this video.

video     00:10:28

Would the US Military shoot Americans?

It wouldn’t be the first time.

Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on December 6, 2013 in Despotism, Fascism, Military, Treason, Tyranny, Video, War


Tags: , , ,

“It won’t be long before the people storm this chamber and hang you . . . and they’ll be right!

Godfrey Bloom is an Englishman and Member of the European Parliament (MEP).  Here’s brief video of Mr. Bloom addressing the European Parliament and speaking truth to power.

video   00:01:23


Posted by on December 5, 2013 in Despotism, Fascism, Government as Gangsters, Tyranny, Video


Tags: , , , , ,

Adask on Sovereignty II

"Prof. Adask" [courtesy Google Images]

“Prof. Adask”
[courtesy Google Images]

In my recent video presentation “Adask on Sovereignty,” I argued that the Founding Fathers created a nation where each of the people were deemed to be an individual “sovereign”.  That individual sovereignty was achieved by virtue of having received our “unalienable Rights” from God—as declared in “Declaration of Independence”. 

I supported this argument, with text from the A.D. 1793 Supreme Court case of Chisholm vs. Georgia which declared in part that after the American Revolution, the American people became “sovereigns [plural] without subjects”.

If my argument is right, We the People are individual sovereigns and the government is our public servant. If my argument is wrong, We the People are subjects and the government is our master.  The argument is important.

In the aftermath of the first article (“Adask on Sovereignty”) a number of readers disputed my argument based on the fact that the Supreme Court also described the people are “joint tenants in the sovereignty”.  According to these readers the definition(s) of “joint tenants” prove that the Supreme Court did not declare the people to be individual “sovereigns” (plural) but instead confided all sovereignty to a single “collective” of which we are each a member, but only as subjects—never as sovereigns.

Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Liberal Paradise



“Stealth Socialism”

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) [courtesy Google Images]

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL)
[courtesy Google Images]

Conservative Byte posted an article entitled “Dem Rep Praises Rise of ‘Stealth Socialism’ In America”.  According to that article,

“In a recent interview with Salon, outspoken progressive Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) hailed the rise of what he called “stealth socialism” through America’s recent monetary policy decisions.”

What does Congressman Grayson mean by “monetary policy decisions”?

He means “central planning” by the Federal Reserve System.

“Central planning” is a term that was popularized by the former Soviet Union—until it collapsed under the weight of “central planning” in A.D. 1991, ceased to exist, and plunged the people formerly ruled by “central planning” into a decade of chaos, poverty and violence.

Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , , ,

Stupid Is as Stupid Does

Detroit Spent Billions Extra on Pensions

Detroit:  the Consequences of Stupidity [courtesy Google Images]

Detroit: the Consequences of Stupidity
[courtesy Google Images]

The city of Detroit filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy on July 18, 2013. It’s the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in U.S. history, estimated to be $18–20 billion.  Current and former employees of the city of Detroit have been particularly distraught over the apparent loss of their pensions.   However, according to Dealbook,


“Detroit’s municipal pension fund made payments for decades to retirees, active workers and others above and beyond normal benefits, costing the struggling city billions of dollars and helping push it into bankruptcy, . . . .

“The payments, which were not publicly disclosed, included bonuses to retirees, supplements to workers not yet retired and cash to the families of workers who died before becoming eligible to collect a pension, . . . .

  Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , ,

Rand Paul: “I have a bill in Congress that says we should read the bills before we pass them”

The reason we vote to elect one man or another to Congress is that we believe that our particular candidate has a system of values pretty much like our own.  Therefore, when our candidate is in Congress and a new law is proposed, he will vote for or against that law just like we would because his system of values is just like ours.

However, if your candidate doesn’t even read the bills he votes for or against, what difference does his system of values make?  We could just as easily vote in a child molester, a serial killer or a chimpanzee.  Their system of values makes no difference if they don’t read the laws they vote for or against.

More, if your congressman doesn’t read the laws he votes for or against, how does he know how to vote?  Because he doesn’t actually read the bills, he’s not making up his own mind, so who does?  Who tells your congressman or senator whether to vote for or against a particular bill?  The Psychic Hotline?  The Daily Horoscope?  Voices in his head?  Or could it be some particularly powerful individual or institution in Congress?

Whoever tells your congressman how to vote, it’s not you or me or the people of your district.  Whoever tells your congressman how to vote on legislation he has not even read is the person or entity that your congressman truly represents in the Congress.

A congressman who votes on bills he hasn’t even read is controlled by some entity other than himself who does his thinking for him.

video   00:04:07


Tags: , ,


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 958 other followers