Various pills (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Big Pharma is not here to help you overcome disease. Instead, Big Pharma is here to entrap you–even addict you–into becoming a drug-dependent, life-long customer.
video 00:06:59
http://www.youtube.com/embed/wIWuEAFlg1Y
$205 Million drug money seized by the Mexican Police and the Drug Enforcement Administration in Mexico city — largest single drug cash seizure in history (2007) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
If you Google “Mexican Drug Violence,” you’ll find over 4 million hits. The headlines on the first page tell a grim story:
• Mexico’s drug violence epidemic moving closer to capital . . . dallasnews.com – The spread raises fresh concerns that Mexico’s new administration is unable to combat the drug cartels.
• Mexico drug wars; graphic pictures . . . . http://www.telegraph.co.uk . . . . Mexican authorities have turned to bizarre rituals including voodoo as they attempt to win the …
• At least 26 dead in latest round of Mexican drug violence. http://www.rawstory.com – At least 26 people were killed in Mexico in the past 24 hours in apparent drug-related crimes . . . .
• LA Times (“Mexico Scrambles as Violence Threatens Tourism Zones”) the violence that has claimed an estimated 70,000 lives since December 2006.
Adask at the “gates” of Hell’s Canyon, Idaho
I was recently interviewed by Stephen Roberts on “Cancel the Cabal”. During that video interview, I explored the concepts of sovereignty and the “sovereignty movement,” as well as potential applications of the 1st, 2nd and 9th Amendments, and “MOOA” (“man or other animals”) in relation to drug laws, the war on drugs, police state, big pharma, and American medicine.
The interview lasts almost two hours. It’s too long to be an “interview,” but it might reasonably be described as a “mini-seminar”. Most won’t have the time to listen to the entire presentation. But it’s actually a pretty good general introduction to a number of concepts, so, if you’re inclined to listen, here’s the link:
Image via Wikipedia
I’m an alcoholic–but I haven’t had an alcoholic beverage in 35 years. I used to smoke 2 or 3 packs of cigarettes (when I was drinking), but I haven’t had a cigarette in 34 years. I don’t drink iced tea or soft drinks. I’ve had one Coca Cola in the past 20 years. I don’t drink anything but water. I tried a few drugs when I was in my teens and twenties, but I’ve never spent a dime buying illegal drugs. My drug of choice was always alcohol.
I don’t do drugs. Except for a few experiments when i was a kid, I never really have.
I make these statements to establish that I do not recommend that anyone use any drugs–unless compelled to do so by medical necessity. I don’t want any of my readers to suppose that the video below is intended to advocate drug use.
But the following video makes a compelling case for the benefits to found in eating cannabis as a raw vegetable rather than smoking (heating) it so as to become a drug.
Image via Wikipedia
Alex Jones
Makes perfect sense.
video
00:05:18
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqeGDDAu3yw&feature=related
Image by the|G|™ via Flickr
A friend sent a link (below) to a video describing our “brave, new pharmaceutical world”. He also commented on the drug business:
“There are 2 kinds of dope dealers. There are those that work out of the streets of slums and wear Air Jordon tennis shoes. There are those that work out of offices and wear white coats.
“The difference is that the ones with the Air Jordons are unlicensed, don’t take Medi-Care or insurance and only sell for cash. They don’t pay taxes either. The ones with the white coats have licenses, pay taxes, charge more for their dope, seldom take cash and collect most of their sales from the government and insurance companies.
“Soma must be the generic name for Progenitorivox.”
Image via Wikipedia
A Montana judge had to dismiss charges against a man caught with marijuana. Why? Because the judge couldn’t find a jury willing to convict.
Our government imposed a prohibition on alcohol with the 18th Amendment in A.D. 1919. The result was enormous profits in booze, an increase in alcohol use, and an increase in violent crime. That prohibition was repealed by the 21st Amendment in A.D. 1933.
I’m told that the real reason the government ended the prohibition on alcohol, was not to reduce the increased use, profits or crime that resulted from prohibition. The reason prohibition died is because jurors refused to convict bootleggers, booze smugglers and the operators of speakeasy’s.
Once the people, when called to serve as jurors, simply refused to convict the alleged “criminals,” there was no longer a reason to prosecute, and the underlying law became void and of no effect.
Image via Wikipedia
Dr. John Rengen Virapen claims to be a former executive for Eli Lilly & Co. He claims to have worked in the pharmaceutical industry for 35 years. He admits that his hands are as dirty as the remainder in the industry. He describes the pharmaceutical industry as “evil” and claims that pharmaceutical companies kill more people than all the wars of the world.
Five years ago, I discovered the “man or other animals” definitions of “drugs” and medical “devices” in the United States Code and Texas Code. (See, “Man or Other Animals #1” and/or “Man or Other Animals #3–Genocide“.) These definitions indicate that the government regards us all as “animals” rather than “men made in God’s image” (Genesis 1:26-28) and “endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” (“Declaration of Independence”)
So far, the earliest instance of the “man or other animals” declaration that I’ve found is in Section 6 of the A.D. 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act. That means that the Government of the United States has regarded, you, me, your parents and mine, our children, etc. as nothing but animals, livestock, for over a century.
Image by Nat. Media Museum via Flickr
For several decades, the $300 billion pharmaceutical industry was extremely prosperous. Investing in pharmaceutical stocks was considered wise.
Today, pharmaceutical stocks have lost their luster. Part of the reason can be seen in an article in the New York Times:
“Health Insurers Making Record Profits as Many Postpone Care. The nation’s major health insurers are barreling into a third year of record profits, enriched in recent months by a lingering recessionary mind-set among Americans who are postponing or forgoing medical care. . . . so far this year, insured hospital stays actually decreased in some instances. . . . Significant increases in how much people have to pay for their medical care . . . sharply reduced benefits, . . . [and] raising deductibles and co-payments [have caused] people to reach deeper into their pockets.”
In other words, even insured medical care has become increasingly expensive for average Americans. As a result, especially in a time of economic stagnation, people can’t afford health care deductibles and therefore postpone or do without health care. Those who don’t have health insurance aren’t going to the doctor except for emergencies. Even those who have health insurance are less likely to go to the doctor because the deductibles are too expensive. Health insurer profits are therefore increasing because health insurance costs are falling.
Image via Wikipedia
Did Mexican drug cartels trigger the A.D. 2008 recession by withdrawing their laundered money from major U.S. banks? Without access to drug money, did the banks become illiquid and trigger the recession?
Max Keiser says Yes.
The implications of the banking system’s (and the economy’s) dependence upon laundered drug money are fantastic.
Video 00:08:11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPGWc0eNfpE
Worth listening to more than once.
Here’s the orignal article from the UK Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs
