Pinocchio (courtesy of Google Images)
An IRS Commissioner is grilled by a Congressman. This “Comisar” may be great at “just following orders,” but I doubt that he could bluff very well at poker. It’s just kinda funny to watch this guy “tell the truth”. He’s ridiculous.
It’s even more ridiculous that he’ll probably get away with telling such obvious lies–presumably, while he’s under oath.
video 00:05:02
FBI agent being trained to shoot at paper terrorists. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, in the past 10 years, there’ve been 20 Terrorist plots against the US. Three of those plots were real but were discovered and stopped by private Americans. The other 17 were created–and then stopped–by the FBI.
The apparent purpose of these false flag operations was to deceive Americans into believing we’re under attack by foreign or domestic terrorists who are fictional. Based on the false belief that we’re being persistently attacked, Americans tend to accept and even our government’s invasions of foreign countries and our own growing police state.
If you want to fly on an airplane, you must first be x-rayed or groped based, in part, on 17 plots created by the FBI to prove the existence of terrorists who don’t actually exist.
Every government agent–right up to the President–who authorized or participated in such fraudulent terrorist attacks should be tried for treason and, if found guilty, hanged by the neck until dead.
“Government, like fire, is a dangerous servant or a fearful master.” George Washington (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
I postulate that being a good American means living in harmony with the spirit of The Constitution of the United States. If that’s true, should we ever trust government?
Absolutely not.
The reason we have three, separate and independent branches of government (Legislative, Executive and Judicial) is to keep those governmental branches fighting among themselves and thereby prevent the emergence of a single, dictatorial government that worked for its own interests rather than those of the people. The mandate for three branches of government (separation of powers) is evidence that the Founders didn’t trust the federal government.
The reason we have “checks and balances” in the Constitution is to protect the people from the federal government. The Founders didn’t trust the feds.
The reason we have the 1st Amendment right to free speech is to allow us to expose government corruption.
According to the “Preamble to the Bill of Rights,” the reason we have the entire Bill of Rights (including the 2nd Amendment) is to prevent “misconstruction or abuse” of the powers granted under the Constitution to the officers, officials and employees of the federal government.
Insofar as the Constitution was intended to allow for only a “limited” government, that Constitution was intended to protect against government’s inevitable and insatiable appetite for more power, more taxes and less freedom. The Founders didn’t trust the federal government.
I received a copy of the following graph by email. I don’t know who prepared the graph nor can I verify the numbers presented. However, the evidence “rings true” with me so I assume it’s correct. The implications are fairly obvious and significant:
1) The “wild west”–when virtually everyone had access to firearms–had a much lower homicide rate than was ever seen under any measure of “gun control”.
2) As more guns reenter society under the guise of concealed carry, the homicide rate is declining.
3) Given that the homicide rate is already declining, the government must have an ulterior motive for promoting gun control. Their current excuses for gun control are lies.
4) Guns save far more lives than they take.
The Pentagon, headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
According to Wikipedia, “WHDT is an independent full service television broadcasting in the West Palm Beach, Miami and Boston television markets.”
WHDT is not “big-time” (mainstream) TV, but it is a real, commercial TV station.
According to a biography as Amazon.com, “Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.” Dr. Garrow was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in A.D. 2009. His background suggests that Dr. Garrow is credible.
WHDT TV recently interviewed Dr. Garrow (video below). During that interview, Dr. Garrow claimed that President Obama has instituted a new “litmus test” for top military officers: Would they be willing to “just follow” orders from their superiors and/or the Commander In Chief to shoot Americans who refused to lay down their arms?
The implications of this interview are explosive but leave me with mixed emotions.
video 00:13:08
The mainstream media and politicians will only hear one side; will not report the other side. People need to realize that both blacks and whites, men and women are being “played”. Why? To divide them. Why? Answer’s obvious.
This is a powerful and insightful video.
U.S. Bullion Depository at Ft. Knox (Photo credit: cliff1066™)
On today’s radio show (Financial Survival, 4PM to 5PM East coast time), I was reading from an article by Mr. Przemyslaw Radomski that explored the possibility that there’s no longer any gold in the U.S. depository at Ft. Knox:
• ”An audit of the US gold holdings has been demanded by some for years, but the government will not allow it. The gold belongs to the American people, so why won’t they let us see it? Many think it is because it is no longer there. If that is indeed the case, do we not face a ‘financial Armageddon’?
“At first it may sound shocking, but the last audit of gold stored in Fort Knox took place in 1953. No typo here, 1953, just after U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower took office. [However,] No outside experts were allowed [during that audit] and the audit team tested only about 5% of gold hoarded in the fort. So, there hasn’t been a comprehensive audit of Fort Knox in over 60 (!!!) years.”
Obama Contemplates Four More Years of this Crap
Two years ago, President Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton were separately quoted and condemned for saying “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.” I.e., in the government’s view, a crisis (a moment when people are frightened, anxious and overly emotional) is not something to be resolved—it’s an opportunity for politicians to exploit.
This strategy is well-established. Therefore, in the midst of most modern crises, everyone starts “spinning” the facts and implications to show how a particular crisis “proves” that people should support (or reject) a particular political agenda. The actual crisis is often forgotten and supplanted by the “spinning”.
• The recent attack at the Sandy Hook Elementary School caused the deaths of 20 children and 8 adults. It was, and is, a tragedy for the people of Sandy Hook. But, thanks to electronic media and big government, that tragedy has been hyped into a national tragedy. But it’s not really a “national” tragedy. It’s (mostly) local.
Schemata of Webster Tarpley’s model of state-sponsored false flag terror operations. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
When I first looked at this video, I thought it was a spoof–maybe something from SNL.
But after 10 or 15 seconds of viewing, I realized this is not a spoof. Real people in or near positions of power and influence are openly considering why we may need a “false flag event” to create a rationale for the US gov-co to attack Iran.
I’m disgusted. Appalled. I’m not surprised, of course. But I’m actually shocked to see seemingly reasonable people openly advocating the murders of innocent people to create a pretext for murdering even more innocent people.
If I saw this speech in a movie, I wouldn’t be surprised. But seeing a man in a suit in real life openly advocating mass murder of innocent people to an audience of neo-conservatives, and not one member of that audience objected is appalling. I can only say, “God help us all”–what th’ Hell have we become?
video
00:01:55
Tragedy, Comedy are “masks” or “personae” that we where IN RELATION TO others. (Photo credit: Phil W Shirley)
“A Woman Created in His Image” posted a comment on this blog. I started to reply. The reply grew and even began to touch on a few insights I hadn’t previously considered. I thought my reply might be interesting to the general audience for this blog, so I’m posting my reply as an “article”:
Although there are multiple definitions for “person,” I understand the term to usually signify a man or woman in relation to some other man, women, men, women, institution, etc. More, when you see one “person,” you must see two. A “person” does not exist in isolation, but always in relation to that other man, woman, institution, etc. Thus, if I’m a “person” in relation to you, then you are a “person” in relation to me. Insofar as we both participate in a certain relationship, we are both “persons” whenever we engage in that particular relationship. When we do enter into that relationship, we are expected to wear a “mask” or “persona” of the “part” that we are playing.
