BBC Guilty of Aiding Terrorists in 911?

Building 7: Going, Going, Gone.

This is an amazing report.

On September 11th, A.D. 2001 (9/11) four commercial aircraft where high-jacked.  One of those aircraft allegedly crashed into some farmland on Pennsylvania, but the remaining three allegedly struck three buildings:   the two Twin Towers at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.    The Pentagon was severely damaged; each of the Twin Towers were collapsed and utterly destroyed–but amazingly, a fourth building (the 43-story, Building 7 at the World Trade Center) also collapsed even though it was not struck by any aircraft or significant debris from the adjacent Twin Towers.

Why Building 7 collapsed has never been adequately explained in any official report.

Adding to the Building 7 mystery is the fact that, 20 minutes before Building 7 actually collapsed, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reported the collapse had already happened.

 

CIA Officer Explains New World Order’s Demise

“Central banking is an evil cancer. . . .  There aren’t enough guns to kill us all–and Halliburton can’t build enough prisons to hold us down.”

video   00:10:58

 

Military Internment Camps in U.S to be Used for Political Dissidents

video    00:03:37

 

Anonymous: “A Call To Arms” and a Declaration of War

video        00:08:20     I’d thought that Anonymous was primarily a bunch of computer geeks with a libertarian philosophy.  This video indicates that Anonymous is far more conservative than I’d supposed.  Anonymous apparently understands and embraces fundamental values on which The United States of America was founded.

 

Obama: “Guns Make Us Less Safe”

December 19th:  Gun Appreciation Day

Participate!  Organize a Rally in Your Community

 

 

(I regret that the photos and text are fuzzy.  But you get the idea)

 

2012 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

About 55,000 tourists visit Liechtenstein every year. This blog was viewed about 460,000 times in 2012. If it were Liechtenstein, it would take about 8 years for that many people to see it. Your blog had more visits than a small country in Europe!

Click here to see the complete report.

 

My 1,000th Post

English: Bulldog (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Two weeks ago, I hit the 1,000,000th “view” on this blog.  I.e., this blog has been visited 1 million times in the past four and half years.

Today, this blog entry is my 1,000th post.  That averages out to about 18 posts (articles) per month over 4.5 years.  But the number of posts has increased over time to where I currently average about 25 posts per month.    I’ve posted articles dealing with 188 “Categories” and fielded over 10,000 comments (an average of 10 comments per post).

Given that I’ve had a little over 1 million “views” for 1,000 posts, that implies that, on average, each article posted on this blog is viewed by 1,000 readers and/or commentators.

My 1,000th post is a bit of a milestone.  It’s a tribute to my obsessive determination to “say something”.

It’s not “big time”.  But it’s still pretty good.  I’m pleased and looking forward to the next 1,000 posts.

As Peter De Vries said, “I love being a writer. What I can’t stand is the paperwork.”

 

One Million “Views” on this Blog

Time to Celebrate! (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Yesterday, this blog received its one millionth “view”.

That’s not truly a huge number, but I’d bet that only the top 1% of blogs worldwide reach one million views.

It’s a milestone worth noting.

It’s also worth noting that I’ve published 991 posts on this blogs, dealing with 185 categories of ideas, and resulting in 9,172 comments (so far).

I’ll probably also publish my 1,000th post (article) within the next week or so.

I thank all of my readers for making such numbers possible and even a little meaningful.

 

Next Year

Crystal Ball (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Most people who try to read books on economics come away with a single thought:  these economists must be really, really smart ‘cuz I can’t understand a word they say.

The world has thousands of economists.  All study the past, but the ultimate object of economics is to predict the future.  If we know what the economy is about to do, we also know how to invest and therefore make a fortune.

But there’s a problem.  No matter how incomprehensibly bright economists may be, they’re not very good at their fundamental job:  predicting the future.

For example, in the past decade,

1) Only a handful of economist predicted the financial crash of A.D. 2007-08.

2) Since A.D. 2008, most economists have predicted a sharp “V”-shaped sustained economic recovery that has, so far, failed to appear. Conversely, the vast majority of economists failed to predict the economic stagnation that’s persisted since A.D. 2008.

3)  Most economists failed to predict the sharp decline in global trade that’s becoming a global depression.

 

 

Adjournment Sine Die

English: US Congress on Capitol Hill, Washington DC (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

For the past 15 years or so, I’ve been aware of an argument within the “patriot” community that runs something like this:

Seven southern States of America walked out of the Second Session of the Thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, A.D. 1861.  In so doing, the Constitutional due process quorum necessary for Congress to vote was lost and Congress was adjourned sine die, or “without day.” To some, this meant that there was no lawful quorum to set a specific day and time to reconvene.

Some people argue that once Congress adjourned “sine die” in A.D. 1861, it permanently ceased to exist and could never again be lawfully reconvened. Therefore, they argue that any alleged “Congress” since A.D. 1861 is illusory and fraudulent and any laws passed since A.D. 1861 are unconstitutional, null and void.

I don’t believe that “sine die” argument has much weight.  Why?