You can reach Alfred Adask, a living man made in God’s image and endowed by his creator with certain unalienable Rights in care of:
alfredadask@yahoo.com
or, answering machine (w/o 911 capability)
214-390-2580
or, by mail addressed as follows:
Alfred Adask
c/o 2921 Robin Hill Lane [75044]
The City of Garland
The County of Dallas
The State of Texas
The United States of America
8 Comments
August 4, 2008 at 7:46 AM
RE: Title 28 Section 297
Al-
I never heard of it before but did some searching and here is what I found:
http://art1sec10.org/u_s__defined.htm
http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=1365
Seems the distinction is between the sovergn states and the district of Columbia (which is the united states)
November 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM
great shows the last 2 nights.
Maxx
November 21, 2008 at 11:57 AM
hi,
i need to correct you on what you wrote: By itself, inflation (rising prices) may be annoying , but it’s fundamentally harmless.
this is not true. inflation is NOT rising prices. inflation is the result of too many $’s in circulation – it is what causes high prices!
this IS important.
your average joe, who does NOT have an understanding of economics would define it as you have done.
please do some research and get it right before you write it for others to read.
dawn
November 21, 2008 at 8:09 PM
Like most words and concepts, “inflation” can be defined in more than one way. Clearly, inflation does result in and is characterized by “rising prices”. This rise in prices is usually caused by increasing the supply of currency in circulation. I don’t see either “definition” or description as more or less accurate than the the other.
December 5, 2008 at 4:30 PM
Dear Brother Alfred -
Following, are two very helpful resources, for your journey of Truth-realization, within.
1) http://www.embassyofheaven.com .
2) Do a YouTube search for “Joel S. Goldsmith”; listen to the spiritual talk with the heading of: Joel Goldsmith 1965 (in parts a, b, & c).
You are welcomed to fellowship…
Sincerely yours in Christ,
Brian
April 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM
There were a couple of implications in the remarks you made last night. If the 1990s patriot – tax revolt – legal reform etc movement was deminished by the PTB opening the credit spigot:
1 Will they do it again since the talk radio airwaves are bubbling with anti-gov raving?
2 What if they try but can’t push the string?
April 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM
They are already “opening the credit spigot”. That’s what all this $12 trillion “bailout” is all about. In the 1990s, they only had to open the credit spigot a relatively small amount to allow for 1) the stock market bubble, and later 3) the housing bubble. They only had to opent the credit spigot for the “great unwashed. However, the same problems that were beginning to manifest almost 20 years ago, could only be temporarily avoided by easing credit in the mid-1990s. Those problems that were beginning to manifest in the 1990s have not merely been delayed by easing “consumer” credit back about A.D. 1996, they were allowed to GROW behind the scenes until they reached the point where the stock market bubble burst, the residential housing bubble burst, and now the whole damn financial system is at risk. Now, instead of making more billions of dollars in credit available to de common folk, they’re making trillions of dollars in credit available to the rich and financial institutions.
The implication is that no matter how much credit they make available, sooner or later they are going to run out of NSF checks, the illusion will be shown to the a lie, and the whole, fiat monetary system may suffer a catastrophic failure.
May 21, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Greetings Alfred:
Have a look at this document and tell us what you make of it regarding what accepted for value means:
http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/a4v.pdf