Barack Obama is a persistent, accomplished, narcissistic, shameless, and pathological liar.
I watched the collection of lies on the following video, looking for instances when I might be able to tell from Obama’s facial expressions, body language or demeanor that he’s lying. In almost every instance, I have to admit that he’s too slick for me. The man is equally convincing if he tells the truth or if he tells lies.
I can’t tell when he’s lying.
I wonder if he can tell when he’s lying.
I knew a woman once who was the best “salesperson” I’ve ever seen. She really could sell ice to Eskimos and sand to beach bums. I knew her pretty well. I eventually realized she was such a superb salesperson because she had absolutely no concept of the difference between truth and lies. I tried to explain the difference and she gazed at me with her head cocked, like the old RCA Victor dog, trying to understand but totally incapable of doing so. For her, truth was whatever worked. Whatever the potential purchaser wanted to hear, that’s what she told him. If she was caught in a lie, she smiled broadly and moved quickly and shamelessly to another lie. She never displayed the least sign of guilt or even awareness that she was lying.
Obama reminds me of her.
Change even Obama can believe in.
A former Obama supporter changes her mind.
In and of itself, this video is not profound. Some of it is almost silly. But as a leaf in the breeze, the video offers a clue as to which way the political wind is blowing among American youth. If this video is representative of the political perspective of America’s youth, Democrats are headed for a lot of trouble in next November’s election. So is big government.
I think the tide’s beginning to turn. I think America has had just about enough of the treasonous whores in the cat-house on the Potomac and just about enough of the police state where cops can kill with impunity. I think that unless “big government” can somehow install and maintain an overt dictatorship within the next two years, the election of A.D. 2016 may mark the end of the line for “big government”. A.D. 2016 may even present an opportunity for the creation of a new, third party dedicated to the fundamental, spiritual principles (like Liberty) on which this nation was founded.
Actor Steven Seagal recently spoke at the Western Conservative Conference. He warned that America was in deep trouble and touched on the possibility of President Obama’s impeachment. Judging by the seemingly mild audience response, either the Conference, itself, was not too large–or even the “Conservatives” were taken aback by the extent of Seagal’s “political incorrectness”.
The content of Segal’s speech wasn’t profound. We all know the facts that he referred to. But Seagal’s speech was still another important “leaf in the breeze” that tells us which way the political wind is beginning to blow in this country. There are Americans who are furious about the path Obama has chosen for this nation. Those Americans tend to give Obama a pass in that he’s still entitled to some “affirmative action”–and no one wants risk accusing Obama of treason and wind up being accused of racism.
Still, I believe there’s a fury out there that animates 20% of the American people–maybe more. This fury is unseen and unstated, but it’s there, waiting silently for some candidate or some political party who will call a spade a spade and fight to push this country back onto the right path.
I’m not talking about conservatives fighting for big business or liberals fighting for big government. I’m talking about candidates who will fight against big business, big labor and big government and fight, instead, for the Liberty of each individual man and woman. There’s a fury out there that’s waiting to support a candidate who will fight for the small American rather than the big institution.
Here’s a video that advances a conspiracy theory about President Obama’s “real” name and possible link to a Muslim cult. The video offers allegations and inferences that are fascinating, intriguing, unsettling–and possibly based only on coincidence (albeit very strange coincidence). This is the sort of story you’d expect to see featured in one of tabloids we see in the grocery store check-out lanes.
Responsible journalists shouldn’t write or publish stories like this one. But they do.
Why? Because President Obama has not yet provided evidence of his birth and early years. If Obama provided such evidence, “conspiracy theories” of the sort seen in this video would disappear.
Show us a birth certificate, Barry, that isn’t forged and we’ll believe you and all of these conspiracy theories will disappear. But until you produce a real birth certificate, the conspiracy theories will proliferate.
Point? The reason for conspiracy theories about President Obama’s birth is because Obama won’t tell us the truth. Thus, Obama, himself, is not the victim of conspiracy theories about his birth–he is the cause.
If, under the Constitution, the President has the unilateral power to declare war, but he nevertheless waits for “authorization” from Congress, the President is surrendering constitutional power from the Executive Branch to the Legislative branch. That surrender of powers is arguably treason to the Constitution.
If, under the Constitution, only Congress has the authority to declare war, then President Obama’s claim that he can unilaterally declare war is a lie, and more, an unconstitutional attempt by the President to usurp powers intended only for Congress. That usurpation of powers is arguably treason to the Constitution.
Whether or not our government attacks Syria is an interesting question. But whether Obama has the unilateral power to declare war without congressional authorization is a vital question of constitutional law.
Over the next few days or weeks, we’ll hear a media hullabaloo about whether the US. government should or should not, will or will not, attack Syria. But the real issue won’t be the attack on Syria so much as the attack on the Constitution. We’re going to learn if Congress will permit Obama to act unilaterally and in violation of the war-making power granted by the Constitution–or if Congress will put Obama “in his place” as subject to the Constitution and not allow him to become an overt dictator.
If Obama can’t or won’t unilaterally declare war on Syria, he will probably set a precedent to prevent him from unilaterally declaring war on other countries–including Iran.
Here’s a short video on the issue: