I Do Not Consent

04 Dec

Cropped version of Thomas Jefferson, painted b...

Image via Wikipedia

The attached video is of a school teacher (probably on Texas) instructing his class on the dangers of apathy and mindless consent to government powers.  His lesson is both impressive and surprising since it’s the kind of speech that might get a public school teacher fired.

The teacher uses the story of Jews in Nazi Germany to illustrates the dangers of mindless compliance with government orders.  I.e., by failing to instantly resist the early anti-Jew propaganda–the Jews implicitly and effectively “consented” to evermore virulent attacks and ultimately, to their own annihilation.  They were unwilling to stand up for their own reputation and freedom, and that failure ultimately led to their destruction.  They were not simply innocent victims.  They were complicit in their own destruction in that they were a people who lacked sufficient intelligence or courage to resist when resistance was still possible.  They weren’t executed simply because they were Jewish–they were executed because they would not simply speak up and fight for themselves.

I admire the video, but I quibble with its title (“NO, I WILL NOT COMPLY!”).   I’d say that the issue is ultimately not simply about “compliance” but, more fundamentally, about consent.

I’m reminded of the third sentence in the “Declaration of Independence” which correctly declares, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, driving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

In other words, in the final analysis, all governmental power flows from the consent of the governed.

Do you know why we continue to have problems with the TSA airport screening procedures (radiation and groping)?   It’s because the majority of Americans have (if only by their silence) consented to those procedures.  How ’bout the imposition of traffic tickets, income taxes, no-fault divorce, and abortions?  They’re all here because the American people are presumed to have consented–primarily by their silenceto those impositions.  Insofar as we’ve become the world’s premier police state, we’ve done so with the consent (by silence) of the American people.

But in the end, We the People are the 800 pound gorilla.  We can take this country back from the treasonous whores who profess to run it, any time we make up our minds to get up off the couch, and take the action required to indelibly impress upon the minds of our would-be rulers that We run this place, that We have never consented to our leaders’ treason, that those purported “leaders” had better adjust to this new state of affairs; that if that adjustment is a problem, then they should note that–as per the teacher in the video quoting Thomas Jefferson–“The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of tyrants.”

Jefferson wasn’t kidding.  Jefferson understood human nature and human history sufficiently to essentially say, if you folks in government think you can impose a New World Order tyranny without regard to our knowing consent, we’ll blow your damn heads off.  It’s that simple.  We’ll kill every one of you–and we have the guns to do it.

A lot of people would reject that solution as untenable.  Surely, the people don’t dare enter into violent confrontation with our purported “authorities” since we couldn’t possibly win.

Actually, if enough people stood up, we couldn’t possibly lose.  And government knows it.  As I said, We are the 800 pound gorilla.

The police are outnumbered about 300 to 1 in this country.  In the unlikely event that our government brought back all the military from overseas to help “police” America, the combined police and military would still be outnumbered about 150 to 1 in an armed nation.  Yes, the government would have an advantage in tanks, aircraft, firepower and weaponry, but they’d still be so badly outnumbered that they wouldn’t stand a chance in a shooting revolution.  Plus, many of the police and military would stand with the People.  The remaining pro-government forces would ultimately cut and run, just like the LA cops ran from the LA riots.

The problem with preventing our government from acting without the people’s consent (as expressed in our constitutions) is that very few people want to engage in violence.  Many of those who find violence attractive already work for the government.  The rest of us keep hoping (as did the Jews in pre-WWII Nazi Germany) that “somehow” things will “work out” and, ultimately, our purported leaders will be guided to support liberty rather than tyranny.  That’s a bunch of wishful thinking, but it’s still the unstated hope of most Americans.

It’s sad, but it’s not news, to see that most Americans are no more courageous or foresighted than the Jews who silently “consented” to be exterminated by the Nazis.  For the moment, America is no more the “Home of the Brave” than a pre-WWII Jewish ghetto.  We see the signs of approaching tyranny.  We hear rumors of concentration camps.  But we watch TV, crack open a six-pack, pay our taxes and hope for the best–just like any other “good little German”.


Because it’s human nature.  Because, in the end, unlike our rulers, the people tend to be decent and non-violent.  As Jefferson also observed in the “Declaration of Independence” 234 years ago, “. . . all experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”  In other words, people will naturally put up with an almost endless stream of crap from their government before they finally get up off the couch, pick up a rifle (or a pitchfork) and holler “Alright, you sonsabitchs, . . . here . . . we . . . come!

In Jefferson’s two observations in the Declaration, we see the fundamental tension of times:  On the one hand, we know that our government is not “deriving its powers from the consent of the governed”–but routinely proceeds unjustly and without that consent.  On the other hand, “all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer” than to take violent action to “right themselves”.

Our government is betting that our human predisposition to “suffer while evils are sufferable” will prevent us from taking violent action to “right” ourselves.  Government is betting that they can impose an ever-increasing tyranny upon us just as the Nazis imposed an ever-increasing tyranny on the Jews and then on the entire German people.

So, what’ll happen first?  Will the people silently assent while government drives us deeper into tyranny?  Or will the people (“disposed to suffer” just like the Jews of Auschwitz) suddenly snap, rise up and confront government with a shooting revolution?

We shall see.

We live in interesting times, hmm?

Schoolteacher video:  00:05:55

And here’s another video on Consent as that concept applies in England.  The natives of both US and UK are growing restless.  Heh, heh, heh.

This English dissident is demonstrating that it’s possible to resist in a civil manner now–while civil resistance is still possible–and hopefully cause government to retreat before violent confrontation becomes unavoidable.



Posted by on December 4, 2010 in Consent, Government as Gangsters, Treason, Values


9 responses to “I Do Not Consent

  1. mAximo

    December 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM

    The Jews of Nazi-occupied Europe didn’t resist because Yiddish Israelites were collaborating
    with the Nazis to kill off most of the Torah-true Jews lest they thwart the obsession of JINO
    Zionists. Please click on my screen name & search for Max Warburg to see how he lobbied Jews
    on behalf of Nazi Germany, or visit for more. Tyrants like to get
    Judas goats & Pied Pipers as collaborators, if not outright traitors such as George Soros, in
    order to minimise their own losses. JINOs were definitely complicit in tricking true Jews into
    consenting to sacrifice themselves on the altar of compromise. Today we have Libertarians &
    RINOs pretending to be Tea Partiers, when they have little in common with the movement started
    by Boston T. Party. They play the tune of one-world bankers by calling for the Fed to be
    nationalised, rather than calling for the States to expropriate the shares of the national
    banks in the Fed, and to thereby make it truly federal, such that each State owns & operates
    its own Federal Reserve Branch, reclaiming its sovereign power to extend credit to the federal
    gov’t, and set its own monetary policy, as does Puerto Rico, where there’s no fall in housing
    prices nor a foreclosure crisis, because its central bank, Fomento, didn’t allow securitised
    nor subprime mortgages.

    • DrogBlog

      May 19, 2011 at 5:03 AM

      You are right.

      Zionism is linked to the Rothschilds and they finance and create all wars with their money created out of nothing and they wanted to create their terrorstate Israel together with Hitler.

    • AandO

      February 20, 2012 at 3:25 PM

      Thank You mAximo for the link. I’ll digest it later on. It appears to be the answer to the question re: Jews vs. Zionism that I have been pondering for some time.

      Also, Thank You Mr Adask for this fine piece of Truth.

  2. gary lochte

    December 5, 2010 at 10:53 AM


    The teacher is Michael Badnarik.

  3. Mark

    December 5, 2010 at 11:00 AM

    We do not consent! We will Boycott Flying COMPLETELY, until sanity returns! Please join us on Facebook:

  4. Hal Spolerich

    May 17, 2011 at 6:42 PM

    Civilians were unarmed, Nazis had the meanest military
    in the world.

    Now our body count has exceeded Nazi Germany’s
    via Operation Paperclip.

  5. Hal Spolerich

    May 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM

    Civilians (Jews etc.) were unarmed, and trusted in god to
    protect them while Nazis were the premier machine o f
    human destruction on the planet.

    US body count now exceed Nazi Germany’s thanks
    to Operation Paperclip.

  6. Winn

    October 25, 2011 at 4:35 PM

    Thanks again, Al, for provoking us to “think.” There is an excellent collection, “Withdrawal of Consent” on the below blog. It contains many excellent helps…

  7. Wayne

    June 13, 2016 at 7:01 PM

    262 million people dead at the hands of government, last century. I see no need for government, it is the anti-thesis of SELF-GOVERNING


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s