RSS

Jeff Berwick: US Economy Headed for Collapse

20 Mar

“This is the most dangerous time in human history for capital.”

video    00:09:49

 
 

Tags: ,

17 responses to “Jeff Berwick: US Economy Headed for Collapse

  1. Jerry Sparks

    March 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM

    Re : Jeff Berwick
    Your own government is going to be your biggest enemy. Going to be ? what about IS,NOW,TODAY.
    Still,to me,Jeff has the best “intelligent solution”yet presented. Once again, Jim Wickstrom tried to do, in this U.S. i.e., what Jeff plans to do in Chile (<?) but that community was bulldozed into smithereens.

     
  2. Anon4fun

    March 21, 2013 at 11:39 AM

    “Turn on, tune in, drop out” revisited.

    “People of America, disinvest! Disinvest in your country politically, disinvest in your country socially, disinvest in your country economically. In fact, move out altogether. On all fronts, flee the field (or fight so unintelligently that you only hurt your cause), so that international usury (to whom I have sold out and betrayed you) can take over unopposed.”

    The counterculture looks a little different this time around, in Phase II of the NWO’s conquest of America, but the agenda is the same.

     
    • Jerry Sparks

      March 21, 2013 at 2:50 PM

      Matthew 10:23
      When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. Truly I tell … When you
      are persecuted in one town, flee to the next.

      I have never seen an answer from you yet A4f that shows you have been persecuted at least to the extent you had no choice but to keep on the move/flee,etc. This is about all I have done because I had no choice other than to flee into another place as written in Matthew 10:23.
      People fall in love with the ol homeplace & I am no different but you either go along with the status quo or you’re made an offer you can’t refuse. Also, I said Jeff Berwick has given the best solution YET.Remember “the city that “God” loves?” He also says to flee from it too when it’s about to hit the fan.But it’s not the “places” that are bad, it’s the bad people there who are calling the shots.A man said, walk a mile in my Brogans.Another said I have & & would do it again if my legs were not shot off, making stand.Disabled Vets understand what I’m saying.The dead vets? that’s another matter.

       
    • Jerry Sparks

      April 5, 2013 at 2:52 PM

      A4f,
      You need to be harried by this benevolent guhmunt although I know you are in no hurry to be harried.

       
  3. Jerry Sparks

    March 21, 2013 at 3:19 PM

    Anon4fun,& palani
    NEW YORK (AP) — “Police brass were not concerned with whether patrol officers were saving lives or helping people, they were focused on one thing: numbers, said a New York City police officer testifying in a federal challenge to some street stops.”

    “Adhyl Polanco said his superiors told him that he needed 20 summonses, five street stops and one arrest per month. It didn’t matter whether the stops were done properly, he said.”

    (I wish palani had been one of those 20, & one arrested.it would be over with because palani knows how to put an end to that sort of hanky-panky by gov-co.

    A post by John MacHaffie on 3/8/13 > “Not too long ago the new department of homeland security armored vehicles hit the streets of America. The vehicles are massive and are built for nothing short of all out war.
    Now the RCMP is rolling out their new armored personnel carriers according to a Navistar Defense Canada press release.

    The RCMP version comes with multiple gun ports, and can carry a full tactical team.
    As we watch countless police forces around our nation and even our national police force the RCMP totally militarizing, we must stop. Take a step back and ask is this really necessary? Do we need or want military vehicles in the hands of local police? And most of all. When do we start calling Canada a total police state?”

     
    • The People Are Too Stupid

      March 26, 2013 at 3:04 PM

      >> As we watch countless police forces around our nation and even our national
      >> police force the RCMP totally militarizing, we must stop. Take a step back and
      >> ask is this really necessary? Do we need or want military vehicles in the hands
      >> of local police? And most of all. When do we start calling Canada a total police state?”

      Agreed, but your solution doesn’t have legs. It doesn’t make any difference whatever for us to ask ourselves whether arming our govt and police to the teeth “is really necessary.” The collective programmed brain of the people will not — cannot — obey such commensense injunctions. They can’t think. They won’t think. So this is not an answer. Unless you or we can do better than “we have to ask ourselves if it’s really necessary,” we’re fooling ourselves. Let’s come up with a dozen original ideas for how to persuade the idiot masses to care. Make that a hundred original ideas. The govt owns the majority’s brain, eyes, and ears. We cannot fix anything unless we come up with ingenious, brilliant little ways to get a foot in the sheeple door, to wedge their eyes open a bit despite themselves, etc.

       
      • Jerry Sparks

        April 1, 2013 at 6:38 PM

        @ >The People Are Too Stupid
        I’m not > A post by John MacHaffie either. I’m dumb as a post tho

         
  4. Anon4fun

    March 21, 2013 at 3:42 PM

    Jerry Sparks:

    The actual verse goes a bit differently than how you quoted it.

    Matthew 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.

    This was an instruction by Jesus to his apostles. Its effect was clearly limited to the lifetimes of those he instructed, because there would not even be time for them to go to all the cities of Israel.

    It has nothing to do with giving 21st century Americans an excuse to surrender their nation to the covetous designs of world usury.

     
    • Jerry Sparks

      March 21, 2013 at 4:16 PM

      @ >This was an instruction by Jesus to his apostles. Its effect was clearly limited to the lifetimes of those he instructed,

      It’s the end result that matters in all things,at least to me.The disciples “fleeing” did not prevent their end result,so I don’t understand what they were fleeing from, if its like you say Anon4fun. Besides you apparently do not believe the following scripture as I do either;>”All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable {5624} for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”: ALL scripture includes BOTH old & new “Books of the Holy Bible.” If I said “this or that” includes the old & new testaments you, by the way you have been with me, will say I am wrong there too. It should be Covenants, not testaments.You seem to feel that most of the scriptures do not apply to us today, only those of “yesterday.” We are on different trains,that’s all.

       
      • Anon4fun

        March 21, 2013 at 8:20 PM

        >>You seem to feel that most of the scriptures do not apply to us today, only those of “yesterday.”<<

        You seem to assume – without support from scripture itself, but rather based on the traditions of men – that scripture applies today as it applied to its original audiences. This is negligent scholarship and ignores a very relevant factor to the meaning of the written word.

        I suggest relying on what the Bible actually says rather than on third-party reports about what it says from, more often than not, NWO propaganda shills with plans for your future.

         
    • Anthony Clifton

      March 26, 2013 at 5:18 AM

      which actually happened in 1860…unless you digress to the Missouri Compromise of 1850

      Define : Israel – as in LOST SHEEP

      see Revelation 3:9….[Obadiah & Matthew 13]

      Talmudia & Khazars are Not “Israel” [Gen 49. Deut. 32 & Rev 7]

       
  5. Jerry Sparks

    March 21, 2013 at 10:15 PM

    Anon4fun
    @>You seem to assume

    I do not knowingly “assume” anything. I do PREsume somethings until the evidence proves otherwise.You stick with your scholarship, & I’ll stick with my heartship But I still think I can learn a thing or two from you cause even a blind hog can root up an acorn every now & then

     
    • Anon4fun

      March 21, 2013 at 10:55 PM

      Maybe you don’t knowingly assume anything. But it looks like you assume a few things anyway, considering the difference between what you say and what is actually in the scriptures.

      Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

      The scriptures are about your searching them for the truth, not about the “heartship” of what you have been lead to believe is in them.

       
      • Jerry Sparks

        March 22, 2013 at 12:18 AM

        What is the difference in assuming something v. presuming something?

         
      • Jerry Sparks

        March 22, 2013 at 12:31 AM

        Anon4fun
        Oh,you mean as/like the Bereans,I presume,or am I ass-u-ming this/that. I do that/this I am a Berean & I’m Hebrew too.I don’t think you know what I mean by “heart.” It seems you are saying that for the most part & generally speaking, the “Holy Bible” is a history book. Let’s stay civil now, Anon, but not 4 fun. Let’s stay civil for real.Is this/that ok? Only you & I know what the this/that is in regards to.This/that generation. Let me ask you this way. Is the Holy Bible only relevant to you as a history book, at least for the most part?

         
  6. Anthony Clifton

    March 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM

    it would appear the lying pen of the scribe motivated by filthy lucre from the moneychangers and the plot twisters called pharisees have sought to supplant sleeping beauty with the ugly step sisters

    http://www.israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/KnowEnemy.html

    see also THE CURSE OF CANAAN by Eustace Mullins..

     
    • kanani

      March 27, 2013 at 8:50 AM

      Secrets of the Jesuits by Edmond Paris

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s