Cloud Warriors Fighting Artificial War?

29 Mar

The Matrix

The Matrix (Photo credit: hensever)

A persistent theme on this blog is the hypothesis that “they” (the rulers/elitists/treasonous-whores-in-the-cathouse-on-the-Potomac) have created an artificial reality (“this state”) to supplant the reality of “The State” (of the Union).  Under this hypothesis, “this state” (“OREGON”) is deemed to be a fictional territory while “The State” (“The State of Oregon”) is deemed be an actual member-State of the perpetual Union styled “The United States of America”.

It’s my belief that, insofar as we are presumed by government to have traversed from “The State” into “this state,” we are also presumed to have voluntarily surrendered most of our rights and our standing as one of the people and beneficiaries of our state and federal constitutions.  Within “The State,” We the People are the sovereigns.  Within the territory of “this state,” Congress is the sovereign as per Article 4.3.2 of The Constitution of the United States (A.D. 1788)–and We the People are reduced to the status of subjects (at best).

This hypothesis undoubtedly seems to be bizarre to most people and too fantastic to be true.  They might be right.

But I remain obsessed by the hypothesis and can’t seem to bring myself to doubt its general veracity.

So, it occurred to me today, that if the Powers That Be have actually created an alternative, fictional “reality” of “this state” for us to inhabit, then it shouldn’t be surprising if we also have fictional wars.

The idea of fictional warfare sounds absurd–at least at first.

But the news media is abuzz with stories about the “cyber-warfare” that’s currently being waged between nations like China and the US.  This cyber-warfare is being at least partially waged in the “cloud” of computer data that now occupies “cyber-space”.

So, knowing that such questions might raise doubts about my sanity, I still ask:   Is the cyber-warfare fought in the computer “cloud” an expression of an artificial war being fought between two or more fictional “territories”?

(For my next question, I will ask “How many angels can do the booga-loo on the head of a pin?”)

In fact, I don’t expect that the answer to my question about “cyber-warfare” taking place within the fictional territory and/or cyber-space “cloud” will necessarily be Yes.

Still, the parallel between the “The State/this state” hypothesis concerning an artificial territory and cyber-warfare with the “cloud” strikes me as too intriguing to ignore.

Cyber-warfare (even it takes place in quasi-fictional realm of “cyber-space”) is intended to affect an adversary’s physical reality.  With the adept use of some computer keyboard strokes in the US, the “cloud warriors” might be able to cause a coal-based generator to burst into flames in Beijing.  Likewise, affecting the physical reality of a hacker in China by bombing him and his computer, might prevent him from initiating a program that could cause havoc in America’s computer “cloud”.

Therefore, it seems a little crazy and a little bit possible to suppose that, within “cyber-space,” the fictional “this state” seems relevant to physical reality, and physical reality is likewise relative to the fictional territory of “this state”.

Is “cyber-space” a “place,” a grey area, where both the actual (The State) and the fictional (this state) “realities” can co-exist to some degree?

(Or is it more likely that I’m merely in need of a “tune-up” from my shrink?)

So, whatcha think?

Is a proposed association between “this state” and cyber-space completely ridiculous?  Or the idea sufficiently fascinating to be at least partially true?  Are the cyber-wars waged in cyber-space manifestations of artificial war between two fictional entities?


Tags: ,

33 responses to “Cloud Warriors Fighting Artificial War?

  1. Jerry Sparks

    March 29, 2013 at 2:38 AM

    The Apostle Paul was Extremely well educated. When he was in Court (< of that time) A Judge(of that time) said; Paul, your much learning has driven you mad. Paul was eventually "beheaded" & I believe this style of execution was done to be a lesson/warning to others not to get to smart/intelligent. We know where the brain is located. A judge said to me,Constitution, Bonstitution. Utter that word one more time & I'll hold you in contempt & sentence you to 30 days. It was a court of no record,i.e.,Magistrate Court. There is no record kept of anything IT does. But,I T does have "contempt power." This is the type of court most of us start out in, via FORCE. There is NO APPEAL available either. You can, however, get a "trial de novo." This is starting as tho nothing has ever transpired,30 days in jail notwithstanding.

    • homelessholocaust

      March 31, 2013 at 5:06 AM

      to tonyclifton

      do you really believe the Children of israel were “Jewish” ?

      Well, you ass-hat, your question is SOPHISTRY & SEMANTICS. Any JEW knows how you NAZI-FAGGOTS Twist everything to suit your INBRED HATRED. For Your Faggot Information, there were 12 Sons borned to JACOB/ISRAEL, “Judah” Was the INHERITOR of the PROMISE/ BLESSING due to REUBEN & LEVI going off and WIPING OUT in a GREAT SLAUGHTER, a Whole City of People whose King had KIDNAPPED THEIR SISTER, DIANNA, AND RAPED HER REPEATEDLY. Our Great And Powerful G-D denied them the BLESSING due to Spilling of Innocent Blood. You Might Notice, FAGGOT YANKEE DOG, all you GOYIM lust Continually to Murder, Kill, Destroy & Shed the Blood of “The Jews,” Christianity is NOT a Religion, but was Created by a Roman Emperor as a “TOOL” to “FACILITATE THE GENOCIDE EXTERMINATION of JEWS. ” Everything else you MAY believe is LIES, Window Dressing, christianity is merely a Tool To Exterminate Jews. After thousands of years, a More Hateful % Virulent JEW HATE Splinter Group broke off, MARTIN LUTHER’s so-called “Protestant” christrenanity.


      I had made up my mind to write no more either about the Jews or against them. But since I learned that these miserable and accursed people do not cease to lure to themselves even us, that is, the Christians, I have published this little book, so that I might be found among those who opposed such poisonous activities of the Jews who warned the Christians to be on their guard against them. I would not have believed that a Christian could be duped by the Jews into taking their exile and wretchedness upon himself. However, the devil is the god of the world, and wherever God’s word is absent he has an easy task, not only with the weak but also with the strong. May God help us. Amen.


      He did not call them Abraham’s children, but a “brood of vipers” [Matt. 3:7]. Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, “He has a demon’ [Matt 11:18]. Our Lord also calls them a “brood of vipers”; furthermore in John 8 [:39,44] he states: “If you were Abraham’s children ye would do what Abraham did…. You are of your father the devil. It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham’s but the devil’s children, nor can they bear to hear this today.


      Therefore the blind Jews are truly stupid fools…


      Now just behold these miserable, blind, and senseless people.


      …their blindness and arrogance are as solid as an iron mountain.


      Learn from this, dear Christian, what you are doing if you permit the blind Jews to mislead you. Then the saying will truly apply, “When a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into the pit” [cf. Luke 6:39]. You cannot learn anything from them except how to misunderstand the divine commandments…


      Therefore be on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which sheer self­glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and men are practiced most maliciously and veheming his eyes on them.


      Moreover, they are nothing but thieves and robbers who daily eat no morsel and wear no thread of clothing which they have not stolen and pilfered from us by means of their accursed usury. Thus they live from day to day, together with wife and child, by theft and robbery, as arch­thieves and robbers, in the most impenitent security.


      However, they have not acquired a perfect mastery of the art of lying; they lie so clumsily and ineptly that anyone who is just a little observant can easily detect it. But for us Christians they stand as a terrifying example of God’s wrath.


      If I had to refute all the other articles of the Jewish faith, I should be obliged to write against them as much and for as long a time as they have used for inventing their lies­­ that is, longer than two thousand years.


      …Christ and his word can hardly be recognized because of the great vermin of human ordinances. However, let this suffice for the time being on their lies against doctrine or faith.


      Did I not tell you earlier that a Jew is such a noble, precious jewel that God and all the angels dance when he farts?


      Alas, it cannot be anything but the terrible wrath of God which permits anyone to sink into such abysmal, devilish, hellish, insane baseness, envy, and arrogance. If I were to avenge myself on the devil himself I should be unable to wish him such evil and misfortune as God’s wrath inflicts on the Jews, compelling them to lie and to blaspheme so monstrously, in violation of their own conscience. Anyway, they have their reward for constantly giving God the lie.


      No, one should toss out these lazy rogues by the seat of their pants.


      …but then eject them forever from this country. For, as we have heard, God’s anger with them is so intense that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse and worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them!


      Over and above that we let them get rich on our sweat and blood, while we remain poor and they such the marrow from our bones.


      I brief, dear princes and lords, those of you who have Jews under your rule­­ if my counsel does not please your, find better advice, so that you and we all can be rid of the unbearable, devilish burden of the Jews, lest we become guilty sharers before God in the lies, blasphemy, the defamation, and the curses which the mad Jews indulge in so freely and wantonly against the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, this dear mother, all Christians, all authority, and ourselves. Do not grant them protection, safe­conduct, or communion with us…. .With this faithful counsel and warning I wish to cleanse and exonerate my



      Let the government deal with them in this respect, as I have suggested. But whether the government acts or not, let everyone at least be guided by his own conscience and form for himself a definition or image of a Jew.


      However, we must avoid confirming them in their wanton lying, slandering, cursing, and defaming. Nor dare we make ourselves partners in their devilish ranting and raving by shielding and protecting them, by giving them food, drink, and shelter, or by other neighborly


      Therefore we Christians, in turn, are obliged not to tolerate their wanton and conscious blasphemy.


      Accordingly, it must and dare not be considered a trifling matter but a most serious one to seek counsel against this and to save our souls from the Jews, that is, from the devil and from eternal death.


      What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct, now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blasphemy. Thus we cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear of God we must practice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves. Vengeance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

      First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated in the past unknowingly ­ and I myself was unaware of it ­ will be pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

      Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will bring home to them that they are not masters in our country, as they boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they incessantly wail and lament about us before God.

      Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them. (remainder omitted)

      Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb. For they have justly forfeited the right to such an office by holding the poor Jews captive with the saying of Moses (Deuteronomy 17 [:10 ff.]) in which he commands them to obey their teachers on penalty of death, although Moses clearly adds: “what they teach you in accord with the law of the Lord.” Those villains ignore that. They wantonly employ the poor people’s obedience contrary to the law of the Lord and infuse them with this poison, cursing, and blasphemy. In the same way the pope also held us captive with the declaration in Matthew 16 {:18], “You are Peter,” etc, inducing us to believe all the lies and deceptions that issued from his devilish mind. He did not teach in accord with the word of God, and therefore he forfeited the right to teach.

      Fifth, I advise that safe­conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside, since they are not lords, officials, tradesmen, or the like. Let they stay at home. (…remainder omitted).

      Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them and put aside for safekeeping. The reason for such a measure is that, as said above, they have no other means of earning a livelihood than usury, and by it they have stolen and robbed from us all they possess. Such money should now be used in no other way than the following: Whenever a Jew is sincerely converted, he should be handed one hundred, two hundred, or three hundred florins, as personal circumstances may suggest. With this he could set himself up in some occupation for the support of his poor wife and children, and the maintenance of the old or feeble. For such evil gains are cursed if they are not put to use with God’s blessing in a good and worthy cause.

      Seventh, I commend putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow, as was imposed on the children of Adam (Gen 3[:19]}. For it is not fitting that they should let us accursed Goyim toil in the sweat of our faces while they, the holy people, idle away their time behind the stove, feasting and farting, and on top of all, boasting blasphemously of their lordship over the Christians by means of our sweat. No, one should toss out these lazy rogues by the seat of their pants.


      But what will happen even if we do burn down the Jews’ synagogues and forbid them publicly to praise God, to pray, to teach, to utter God’s name? They will still keep doing it in secret. If we know that they are doing this in secret, it is the same as if they were doing it publicly. for our knowledge of their secret doings and our toleration of them implies that they are not secret after all and thus our conscience is encumbered with it before God.


      Accordingly, it must and dare not be considered a trifling matter but a most serious one to seek counsel against this and to save our souls from the Jews, that is, from the devil and from eternal death. My advice, as I said earlier, is:

      First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss in sulphur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire. That would demonstrate to God our serious resolve and be evidence to all the world that it was in ignorance that we tolerated such houses, in which the Jews have reviled God, our dear Creator and Father, and his Son most shamefully up till now but that we have now given them their due reward.


      I wish and I ask that our rulers who have Jewish subjects exercise a sharp mercy toward these wretched people, as suggested above, to see whether this might not help (though it is doubtful). They must act like a good physician who, when gangrene has set in, proceeds without mercy to cut, saw, and burn flesh, veins, bone, and marrow. Such a procedure must also be followed in this instance. Burn down their synagogues, forbid all that I enumerated earlier, force them to work, and deal harshly with them, as Moses did in the wilderness, slaying three thousand lest the whole people perish. They surely do not know what they are doing; moreover, as people possessed, they do not wish to know it, hear it, or learn it. There it would be wrong to be merciful and confirm them in their conduct. If this does not help we must drive them out like mad dogs, so that we do not become partakers of their abominable blasphemy and all their other vices and thus merit God’s wrath and be damned with them. I have done my duty. Now let everyone see to his. I am exonerated.”


      My essay, I hope, will furnish a Christian (who in any case has no desire to become a Jew) with enough material not only to defend himself against the blind, venomous Jews, but also to become the foe of the Jews’ malice, lying, and cursing, and to understand not only that their belief is false but that they are surely possessed by all devils. May Christ, our dear Lord, convert them mercifully and preserve us steadfastly and immovably in the knowledge of him, which is eternal life. Amen.

      From Luther’s Works, Volume 47: The Christian in Society IV, (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971). pp 268­293

      • Jerry Sparks

        March 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM

        @ >Christianity is NOT a Religion
        Well it’s obvious Homeless that you are one of the “true jews.” What are the follwers of Christ called or what in your opinion should they be called,namewise? I do not mean the “so called followers.” Also, the united States of America WAS blessed more than any Nation on earth but now is into being the most cursed for rejecting knowlege,i.e. that which brings cursings v. blessings. My 2nd question is, how/why our original country become so blessed IF “Judah & his offspring” were the inheritors of the “blessing?”
        P.S I am of the Hebrew bloodline.

      • Jerry Sparks

        April 1, 2013 at 5:22 PM

        @ > do you really believe the Children of israel were “Jewish” ?

        Only one child,Judah,I believe WAS & IS,i.e.,CALLED Jewish. OR, if I am wrong, what are the children of Judah,called,or known as? Judah was/is a son of Jacob/Israel. When you,homelessholocaust,when speaking,say, Judah, doesn’t it “sound” like JEW-DUH? Help me out here. I don’t want to STAY ignurnt.

      • Jerry Sparks

        April 5, 2013 at 10:58 PM

        Beauty is skin deep but ugly goes clear to the bone, right homeless holocaust ?

  2. rmiglobal

    March 29, 2013 at 2:52 AM

    There’s no war in cyberspace. It’s a complete illusion and YOUR government is staffed by Actors acting out scripts. Sure they kill people for real on the other side of the world but on US soil, they specialise in fictional friendly persuasion. Waco Aurora Sandy Hook, all of them drills using Actors to help people learn helplessness.

    They got to you mate. If you think you might be crazy, perhaps you’re ready to break free ;-)

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 3:17 AM

      What is “your” definition of, cyberspace?

      • rmiglobal

        March 29, 2013 at 3:27 AM

        Anywhere Anonymous operates

      • bandit

        March 29, 2013 at 3:44 AM

        a framed existence built around the element silicon.

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 2:35 PM

      You,mate, define cyberspace as, Anywhere Anonymous operates
      Then you,mate,are saying everything is an illusion ?? B.S.

      • rmiglobal

        March 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM

        It’s all about entertainment

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM

      March 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM
      @ >It’s all about entertainment

      Oh, now I get it.

  3. John TWB

    March 29, 2013 at 3:44 AM

    The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue
    By Paul Andrew Mitchell

    Comprehensive, detailed compendium on the tricks that the international banker-owned IRS, politicians, and media have perpetrated on We, The People; … starting at its foundation with the flagrant disregard for the jurisdictional differences between “The United States” and “The United States of America.”

    The Federal Zone is a phrase that the author uses to describe the jurisdictional area of “The United States”: the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, etc. but not the 50 sovereign States of the union, “The United States of America.” Thus, “the United States” is not to be confused with “the United States of America”. Think about this every time you sign something saying you are a US citizen or a US person. The constitutional jurisdiction of the Federal government is surprisingly limited.

    The Federal Zone: a book review by Martin A. Larson

    OUR WORLD IN CONFLICT: Who’s Eligible for Tax?

    I have recently received a large amount of material from
    various scholars who maintain ordinary Citizens in the private
    sector are not required to file forms 1040 or pay personal
    federal income taxes.

    Many of them base their position on the question of
    jurisdiction and hold that, since the States are sovereign and
    independent entities, their Citizens are “non-resident aliens” in
    respect to the federal government situated in Washington, D.C.

    The most complete and detailed dissertation on this subject
    is an extensive work entitled “The Federal Zone,” by Paul Mitchell.
    He says the term “United States” has three different and distinct

    It may be the name of a sovereign occupying the same
    position as do other sovereigns in the family of nations;

    It may designate the limited territory over which the
    federal government has exclusive jurisdiction; and,

    It may be the collective name for the 50 States, which are
    united under the Constitution.

    The book offers 12 highly detailed and documented chapters
    in order to establish Mitchell’s thesis that each and every one
    of the 50 States is a separate sovereignty. Whenever the term
    “United States” is used in the Internal Revenue Code, it means
    the limited area in which the federal government has exclusive
    jurisdiction. It does not include the territory occupied by the
    50 States.


    Chapter 14, called “Conclusions,” tells the reader the land
    over which the federal government has jurisdiction consists of
    the District of Columbia, the federal territories and possessions,
    and the enclaves within the States which have been purchased with
    the consent of the State legislatures. The author calls these
    the federal zone. Here, Congress is not subject to the same
    limitations as exist in the sovereign States.

    This makes the laws governing taxation within the federal
    zone entirely different from those outside of it. The
    Constitution rules within the States, but Congress rules within
    the federal zone, the author contends.

    The most important difference between the two lies in the
    area of taxation.

    According to Mitchell, the “United States”, as that term is
    used in the Internal Revenue Code, refers to the area over which
    Congress has exclusive legislative authority. If you are not a
    citizen residing within the federal zone or an employee of
    government, then you are alien in respect to the United States,
    i.e. you are a non-resident alien. Non-resident aliens, under
    the Internal Revenue Code, are exempt from all U.S. laws and
    regulations, Mitchell argues.

    Further, according to this theory, non-resident aliens are
    required to pay taxes only on income from sources within the
    federal zone. Thus, employment within the federal government
    produces income which has its source within the federal zone.
    For the same reason, dividends paid to non-resident aliens on
    stocks or bonds issued by U.S. corporations also have their
    source within the federal zone and are, therefore, subject to
    federal taxation.

    Income derived from sources outside the federal zone is not
    taxable by the U.S. government, Mitchell says.


    The federal government has used what is called legal
    presumption to impose taxes on millions of Americans who are
    actually legally exempt, says Mitchell. By means of clever and
    constructive fraud, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has
    extended its power of taxation far beyond the scope authorized by
    its own law. However, when an otherwise exempt Citizen signs a
    1040 and pays the tax indicated thereon, the presumption is that
    he knows what he is doing and thereby volunteers to become a

    A completed, signed and submitted 1040 is a voluntarily
    executed commercial agreement, which can be used as prima facie
    evidence that a non-resident alien has knowingly and
    intentionally subjected himself to federal taxation. This
    principle is explained in Morse v. United States, 494 F.2d 876,

    The author offers a model affidavit of 5,000 words, which is
    to be used by Citizens in explaining to the IRS why they no
    longer make any return or pay any tax to the federal government.

    Congress has collected trillions of dollars from
    unsuspecting Citizens by persuading them they are inside its
    revenue area when, in fact, they are outside. This is deception
    on a grand scale, if what Mitchell says is true or can be
    defended in court.

    It is indeed stunning to realize how carefully crafted
    definitions such as those for “State” and “United States” are
    found in IRS instructions intentionally so complex that no one
    can understand them. This indicates that they are carefully
    prepared to accomplish what is perhaps the greatest fiscal fraud
    ever perpetrated upon any people in the history of the world.

    Read the book here:

    • Jerry Sparks

      April 1, 2013 at 5:43 PM

      Hello John TWB

      What we may think,believe,& say, is not what the “Courts” believe,think & say,e.g.
      Re: > “non-resident aliens”

      United States v. Hilgeford, 7 F.3d 1340, 1342 (7th Cir. 1993) – the court rejected “shop worn” argument that defendant is a citizen of the “Indiana State Republic” and therefore an alien beyond the jurisdictional reach of the federal courts.”


      United States v. Bowden, 402 F. App’x 967 (5th Cir. 2010) – in denying an appeal of a sentence for tax evasion, the court rejected the taxpayer’s argument that he was a sovereign and not subject to the laws of the United States.

      I have MANY cases where the courts have repeatedly called everything we can come up with, frivolous,specious,spurious,immaterial,irrelevant,& without foundation & merit,etc. Here are 2 more.

      United States v. Drachenberg, 623 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2010) – the court affirmed the conviction of Drachenberg for tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the United States and rejected his argument that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction because he was not a citizen of the United States. AND,

      United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1193 (1994) – the court rejected the Gerads’ contention that they were “not citizens of the United States, but rather ‘Free Citizens of the Republic of Minnesota’ and, consequently, not subject to taxation” and imposed sanctions “for bringing this frivolous appeal based on discredited, tax-protester arguments.”

    • Jerry Sparks

      April 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM

      John TWB,
      Here are 2 more,

      United States v. Ward, 833 F.2d 1538, 1539 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1022 (1988) – the court found Ward’s contention that he was not an “individual” located within the jurisdiction of the United States to be “utterly without merit” and affirmed his conviction for tax evasion.

      Kay v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2010-59 – the court imposed a $500 penalty under section 6673(a) for raising frivolous arguments in the proceeding, including that the petitioner “was not born a [U.S.] taxpayer” and that the United States may not tax him because “the United States is a corporation” to which he holds no “allegiance.”

      Got plenty more if you are interested

      • Adask

        April 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

        There is one lesson in the cases you’ve sited: If you are going to a trial court to fight the IRS, you’ve already made one or more mistakes that will probably probably guarantee your conviction. If you’re going to court against the IRS, you’ve already been guilty, and the court hearing is merely a formal sentencing hearing.

        If there are any arguments or strategies that will succeed at defending you against the IRS, they must be applied very early on in your confrontation with the IRS and succeed during the “administrative” phase of your conflict. You must “beat” them before they ever get you into a court. By entering the court room, you concede that you are subject to that court and whatever laws that court recognizes.

        I can’t say that it’s true, but I’m inclined to believe that the strategy I devised based on procedural due process can stop many, perhaps all, IRS prosecutions before they get to court. So far as I know, procedural due process is the one right that the courts will enforce, no matter what.

        Procedural due process consists of: 1) Notice; and 2) Opportunity to be heard.

        You don’t want the “opportunity to be heard” (a court, or more probably an administrative, hearing) because: 1) the judges pay no attention to whatever defendants say; and 2) defendants are found guilty about 98% of the time during that “opportunity”. The “opportunity to be heard” is really an “opportunity to be sentenced”.

        I believe that defendants can avoid the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced” (the second part of procedural due process) by controlling the notice (the first part of procedural due process). Based on my research, I’ve learned that modern Notices (virtually every piece of paper sent by the government to the defendant is a “notice”) need not be “complete”. That is, if the IRS sends you a notice, that notice need not contain reference to every relevant law or fact–it need only be sufficient to put the defendant “on inquiry”. I.e., their Notice creates your right to ask questions concerning the law and/or facts that underlie their Notice.

        If you make any statements in response to the IRS Notice, it is presumed that only a fool would make statements before he knew all the relevant facts and law. It is presumed (and this is a real stretch) that you are not a fool, and therefore you must have have received sufficient notice to justify taking you to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced” where you will be found guilty about 98% of the time. For example, if you declare that you are a sovereign, the IRS will thank you very much because, by your statement, you have just authorized the IRS to take you to the “opportunity to be heard”–where you’ll be found guilty about 98% of the time. If you merely respond by the IRS notice by saying “Go to Hell you demon-possessed whores!!!,” the IRS will thank you because you made a statement. Your statement is presumed to be evidence that you have sufficient notice to warrant taking to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced.”

        If you go completely silent and make no response whatsoever to the IRS notice, it will again be presumed that you must have sufficient notice and the IRS will be thereby have signaled your willingness to go to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced” where you’ll be found guilty 98% of the time.

        You can’t make statement and you can’t go silent in response to a notice without signalling your willingness to go to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced” (which has much in common with the “place of wailing and gnashing teeth”).

        If you can’t make statements and you can’t go silent, what defense remains? Exercising your “right of inquiry” which appears to have been created by the IRS’s own notice. I.e., if the IRS sends you a notice, that notice creates your “right of inquiry” (right to ask questions about the facts, laws and even presumptions that are inherent in or implied by their Notice).

        For every right, there must be a correlative duty. For every duty, there must be a correlative right. Your “right of inquiry” creates their correlative duty to answer your questions. This is the central and powerful principle. If I’m entitled to a “right of inquiry” (to ask questions), they must be obligated to answer my questions. If I can ask questions, but they don’t have to answer, I have no right of inquiry. There is no right without a correlative duty.

        If you doubt that their Notices create your right of inquiry, look at the bottom of their notice–it will read something like, “If you have any questions, please call 1-800-***-****. Their notices carry an express recognition of your right to ask questions–not make statements; not go silent; ask questions.

        The problem is that the IRS wants you to ask your questions over the telephone. The problem in phone questions is that these oral exchanges create no evidence that can be used in court. That’s why I never call on the phone. Instead, I write my questions on paper and send my questions by means of registered mail to the IRS. By means of registered mail, I am creating admissible evidence that I have exercised my “right of inquiry” in response to the IRS Notice. If the IRS doesn’t respond with answers to my questions, they will have denied me the first element of procedural due process: sufficient Notice. By failing to answer my questions about facts, law and presumptions, they deny me the first element of procedural due process (sufficient notice) and are thereby estopped from taking me to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced”–where I will be found guilty about 98% of the time.

        Therefore, if 1) you are astute and able to ask relevant questions in response to any notice the IRS sends; and 2) the IRS is unable or unwilling to answer your questions on the record–then the IRS will have created evidence (by refusing to answer your questions) that they have refused to provide you with the first element of procedural due process. Without that first element, they can’t proceed to the second (the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced”). If so, they may simply drop its enforcement efforts against you.

        But it’s important that you start exercising questions as quickly as possible to the IRS notices. Ideally, you should ask question in relation to the very first notice the IRS sends to you. If you respond with statement or silence to the first 4 IRS notices, and then start asking questions in response to the 5th notice, your conduct may be sufficient for the court to presume you’ve received sufficient notice and are therefor eligible for the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced”.

        I’m not saying that asking questions for the first time in response to the 5th notice is necessarily lethal to your defense. Your questions might still work to prevent a prosecution. But, one the IRS has invested a lot of time and money in preparing to prosecute you, they are unlikely to be as willing to just turn you loose as they would be if you responded to their very first notice with questions. If you ask questions early on–before the prosecution takes on any real momentum–your odds are higher that they might drop the case rather than try to answer your questions.

        For more insight into my theory, see this blog’s general category “Notice” and especially, CP59.

        It’s by means of this strategy that you might be able to avoid going to the “opportunity to be heard/sentenced”.

  4. Doug

    March 29, 2013 at 5:07 AM

    People’s “faith” is always being tried, tempered, trampled, tampered with or even taken from them. Most everything we “believe” is real – ain’t !

    I hated it when Santa Claus became a figment of my imagination (better called faith). Truth is, any and all fraud, (like INTEREST ON A NOTE), increases itself exponentially over time. The acceptance of and practices associated with LEGAL FICTIONS may make some things possible that wouldn’t be otherwise … but whether or not those otherwise impossibilities are good for mankind is debateable. Legal fictions are really fraud just like lobbyists are really bribing public officials. These are facts that we tend to believe in because we’re advantaged by them even though they’re frauds.

    The real point of my post in response to Al’s article is that I wanted to say that the CYBER-WAR of significance in our day is the fake bankruptcy of the entire world and austerity measures that allow the biggest liars and murderers on earth to impose poverty on the balance of humanity by telling them repeatedly that trillions of dollars of debt caused by Wall Street Bankers and various other international thugs must be paid, by gas station attendants, waitresses and any other IDIOT that will do it or maybe we’ll just raid what you “believe” is your bank account. Hahahahahaha !!! [Just like the courts – the banks and the money (current commercial paper] belong to THEM]. “This STATE” and everything in it belongs to them and they can do whatever they want in that place. The only passive defense is to LEAVE BABYLON.

    Ya can’t make this stuff up. A virtual international bankruptcy is being foisted upon a gullible (really stupid) world-wide populace that “believes” whatever poop-aganda they’re FED. The earth is providing everything necessary for mankind day after day, year after year, millenium after millenium, yet mankind “believes” the paper pushing pencil-necked, Ivy League trained thieves that they “elect.” Ha hahahahaha !

    All of that international so-called debt is simply a delete key away from non-existence. All of this fake debt was placed there by criminal bankers and Wall Street con-men. Their ability to do this relies upon “commercial paper” as does the incredible war machine that kills millions annually. The entire commercial system had its beginnings in Babylon.

    The difficulty in explaining our intolerable condition is that there are so many falsehoods that people accept without thinking because of the indoctrination that’s been imposed upon them and the so-called laws that create nation STATES, corporations, strawmen, human resources, fiat currency … the frauds are nearly infinite.

    The fact of the matter is that our entire existence in this material world is made up of more nothingness than somethingness … so I guess it’s not such a stretch for everything else to be an illusion, is it ?

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 2:55 PM

      @ > The entire commercial system had its beginnings in Babylon.
      Then Babylon had its beginnings in Eden. Anyway,I’m FED up with it. Doug,I hope you stay on this blog. Hopefully sooner or later what you say will SINK in to some others. BUT,as far as an illusion goes, I suffer from the reality of it painfully.

    • Jerry Sparks

      April 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM

      @ > A virtual international bankruptcy is being foisted upon a gullible (really stupid) world-wide populace that “believes” whatever poop-aganda they’re FED.

      I disagree & I’m not stupid because Alan Greenspan said we can always PRINT more PAPER.This applies to ANY economic situation. NO PROBLEM,Doug. (<:

  5. Mike

    March 29, 2013 at 7:05 AM

    Your hypothesis strikes me as equal to “a manner prescribed by law” in which they exploit these two restrictions.

    Texas Declaration of Rights
    SEC. 25. No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in the house of any citizen without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war but in a manner prescribed by law.

    Arkansas Declaration of Rights
    27. Slavery

    Standing armies

    Military subordinate to civil power.
    There shall be no slavery in this State, nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for
    crime. No standing army shall be kept in time of peace; the military shall, at all times, be in strict
    subordination to the civil power; and no soldier shall be quartered in any house, or on any
    premises, without the consent of the owner, in time of peace; nor in time of war, except in a
    manner prescribed by law.

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM

      Hi Mike,
      O-k. I am the “Judge” & here is what I say to you in MY COURT. “Mr. MIKE if you keep uttering this frontier backwoods gibberish I’m gonna hold you in contempt & sentence you to 30 days, UNDERSTAND SPARKY ??? Now, Mike what is your response to my benevolent offer?

      • Mike

        March 29, 2013 at 7:00 PM

        You would not say that because you would looking at a Judicial Notice of LRS 14:390. Oh Baliff.

    • Jerry Sparks

      March 29, 2013 at 9:26 PM

      Mike, ET.AL.
      If you have not seen this short video, you will like it. Here the little girl says to the Judge, adios. See what happens. It’s tragic comedy. If we don’t have any wisdom in standing firm our standing firm will lead to a downfall. Enjoy

    • Jerry Sparks

      April 3, 2013 at 11:51 PM

      >You must be impersonating a traffic judge

      I’m impersonating a TYRANT. Did you see the video about the little girl saying,adios? What’s wrong with that? NOT 1 DAMN THING. He raised her bond from 5 to 10,000 because she said adios. AND she was “free” to leave,i.e. stay in jail until she could come up with the extortion ransom THEN, he says adios to her. He is a self made reprobate tyrant bastard. Please tell me if you watched the video. I’ll make a deal with you. Watch the video IF you can, & I’ll suspend your contempt charge to time served. I feel good today. (-: < don't I have a purty smile? (-:

  6. Jethro

    March 29, 2013 at 10:11 AM

    “Is the cyber-warfare fought in the computer “cloud” an expression of an artificial war being fought between two or more fictional ‘territories’?”

    The answer would seem to depend on where the computer “clouds” are located, or whom they serve. If it’s “this state,” then yes, I believe your hypothesis is correct. It wouldn’t be much different than players employing high-tech means to defeat their opponents when playing Monopoly.

    Thanks for the observation, Al!

  7. Zeke

    March 29, 2013 at 11:36 AM

    Yes, it’s called a “currency”(fake) war and the bank is acting as the “cloud”(fake), also known as an equity (fake) court.

  8. Jerry Sparks

    March 29, 2013 at 9:14 PM

    ok SPARKY !!! I’m raising your bond to 10,000 instead of 5,000 & instead of 30 days it’s now 60, Oh Baliff !!!

  9. Christian

    March 29, 2013 at 9:24 PM

    I can see connecting a computer to the internet. Maybe even a camera to the internet. Who would connect a coal power plant to the internet? Who would connect anything that can explode to the internet? It seems so far fetched as to not be real. They must have a lot of trust in their software’s security features. I have little to no trust in windows or mac. I may be inclined to trust Linux a bit more. Anything you connect to the internet is about as secure as the next Malware, virus or security exploit. In other words don’t connect anything to the internet you not willing to loose.

  10. Anthony Clifton

    March 31, 2013 at 8:00 AM

    Remember Elijah….How About Jesus saying ” Occupy until I return..”

    does stupid ever change true…?

    just think you could purchase this poster for 50 three dollar bils…

    who has dominion on the Land ?

    300 million mass murdered in just the last 100 years…since 1913.

    WITH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT….{who owns the fog machine/lie factory}

    Revelation 3:9.

    All of that international so-called debt is simply a delete key away from non-existence. . .

    Obadiah…..Matthew 13 : 37-44 .

    Thanks for the quotes from Luther….he was spot on, bitte ?

  11. Jerry Sparks

    April 2, 2013 at 2:56 PM

    @ >April 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM

    According to Rottenstein Law Group LLP,
    What is procedural due process?
    The phrase “due process” describes the legal principle that the government must respect the rights afforded to U.S. citizens under the law. It comes from the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (and the Fourteenth Amendment, in which it is repeated), which states that “no person may be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

    What this is telling me is, the due process as provided in the Fifth Amendment (which I still say IS NOT an “Amendment” but an Article in addition) is “purviewed” through the Fourteenth Amendment which I say IS an Amendment, and NOT an Article in Addition. Let me digress somewhat re: this 14th Amendment. In reading the 14th, it’s purpose is to create an authority beyond Congress’s naturalization powers,OUTSIDE of Article 1,Section 8,Clause 4. The “original naturalization article” provides for only aliens to be naturalized. The Negroes were,at the time, native born so they could not qualify as aliens.

    The 1st section of the 14th Amendment became a “new” naturalization act. So, that Congress (39th) ALTERED the “organic law of “We the People.” Where did Congress get the authority to ALTER the organic law of “We the People?” No “necessary & proper” provision was used. Appropriate legislation replaced the necessary & proper provision in Article 1. Short. > Procedural Due Process is 14th Amendment Procedural Due Process,via “appropriate Legislation.”

    Rottenstein Law Group LLP also says, & I agree, that the Fourteenth Amendment, guarantees basic procedural due process rights in state proceedings as well as in federal ones. (AND YET),

    THE “supreme Court” SAY in the Slaughterhouse cases, 83 U.S. 16 Wall. 21 L. Ed. 394, in pertinent part(s) regarding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the following:

    “This court is thus called up- on for the FIRST TIME to give construction to these articles (Amendments 13,-14,-15). It is TRUE that only the 15th Amendment, in terms, mentions the NEGRO by speaking of his color and his slavery. BUT IT IS JUST AS TRUE THAT EACH OF THE OTHER ARTICLES (13th-14th) WAS ADDRESSED TO THE GRIEVANCES OF THAT RACE, AND DESIGNED TO REMEDY THEM (grievances) AS THE FIFTEENTH.”.

    Justice Miller, speaking for the Court, also says: “Hence the 15th Amendment, which declares that the right of A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES to VOTE shall not be denied or abridged by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The NEGRO having, by the 14th Amendment, been DECLARED to be a citizen of the United States, is thus MADE a VOTER in every state of the Union. It is quite clear then, that there is “A” citizenship of the United States and “A” citizenship of a state, which ARE DISTINCT FROM EACH OTHER and which depend upon different CHARACTERISTICS OR CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE INDIVIDUAL. If, then there is a difference between the privileges and immunities belonging to a citizen of the United States AS SUCH, AND those belonging to the citizen of the state AS SUCH, the LATTER (State Citizens) MUST REST for their security and protection where they have HERETOFORE RESTED for THEY (State Citizens) ARE NOT EMBRACED BY THIS PARAGRAPH OF THE AMENDMENT” (Amendment 14, which is ENFORCED BY APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION).

    NOTICE > the LATTER (State Citizens) MUST REST for their security and protection where they have HERETOFORE RESTED for THEY (State Citizens) ARE NOT EMBRACED BY THIS PARAGRAPH OF THE AMENDMENT” (Amendment 14, which is ENFORCED BY APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION).

    HERETOFORE RESTED ? This is what I do not know how to do,at least in a way it will be honored being that I am not embraced, or supposed to be embraced by the provisions of the 14th Amendment. BUT this is where Procedural Due Process flows from. I say the stream has risen higher than its source.

    I think also if I understood what the following means it would help.

    “A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principle of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments, and rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts are prohibited from substituting their judgments for that of the agency. Courts in administrative issues are prohibited from listening to or hearing arguments, presentation or rationale.” ASIS v. US. 568 U.S. F2d 284

    See Administrative Procedure Act-Wikpedia for a thorough explanation of what this is.

  12. doug

    April 4, 2013 at 5:43 AM

    I appreciate your post. I’ll preface my comment by saying that I’ve watched hundreds of fellow freedom lovers go to jail without real due process, in spite of the CON-sti-stupid, and the oaths taken by the pettifoggers that prevent justice in our country.

    That being said, it’s important to admit that the Constitution is an artifice that ensnares more people than it frees because it tends to blind believers in it to such an extent that they lose sight of other factors relative to the matter before any court.

    I contend that the Constitution’s influence upon litigation would be absolutely eliminated and bluntly admitted except that more judge’s and prosecutor’s lives would be in mortal danger. So, the pettifoggers union (Bar Assoc.) has implemented a case by case process wherein they determine whether or not the Constitution can be mentioned or referenced as a defense based upon whether it will actually impact the control agenda being instituted across the nation. [Bloomberg’s ban on Soda Pop “saved” by the CON-sti-stupid].

    My best friend where I live is the county prosecutor. (I live in Texas). He’s well aware of our condition as a country but has a lot invested in his career. He also believes he can do more good by continuing in his role here. He invited me to speak at a local Kiwanis Club Meeting about my choosing to exit the “system” some 25 years ago. We usually have Thanksgiving and Christmas dinner with his family, occasionally babysit his grand daughter, share a square foot garden, and yesterday I helped his wife take their old pooch to be put down. All I’m saying is that even though I contend and tell him continually that he’s on the wrong side of the equation – we are good friends.

    One thing I’ve always noticed about the “Patriot” movement is that “patriots” get angry (rightfully so most times) and berate the public officers they come into contact with and make an enemy instead of an awakened American with authority to make a positive difference.

    The last thing I’d say relative to your post is that the supreme court justices have an uncanny ability to talk out of both sides of their crooked mouths. Harmon Taylor (I believe frequents this blog), an ex-attorney from Dallas, Texas, and I disagree about the judges around the country and at the supreme court. I contend that the law applied to all men and their rulings should be easily understood by all of those affected by them. I think it’s time for the double speak and sophistry to end – or – Shakespear’s admonition to kill all of the lawyers instituted.

  13. Jerry Sparks

    April 4, 2013 at 10:39 PM

    Hi doug,

    @ > My best friend where I live is the county prosecutor.
    Wow !! Best friend. Well as the saying goes, it’s not what you know, it’s who you know.(: What you say is refreshing. How I wish I could say what you did, & be telling the truth. I know several district attorneys & ALL of them are my enemies. I am a nut case,to them BUT THANK GOD,they don’t consider me dangerous, ……….at least yet..

    @ > Shakespear’s admonition to kill all of the lawyers instituted.

    Including your best friend ??? We both know betternern nat.< (: Yes, I have never stopped believing that somewhere there is a good Judge AND lawyer.You & I can be the best of friends & still not agree on "everything." I have not read everything Ruth Bader Ginsburg has ruled on, but everything I HAVE read, I liked. I had a D.A. tell me one time, in regards to a S.C.o.T.U.S. decision that it was not a "holding case" in this State. What State was he referring to? TX. or as Alfred would say, "this state." The case was never overturned either. It was just not a "holding case" in TEXAS, according to the D.A. I draw em like moths are drawn to a flame. But occasionally I come across someone like your "best friend." Still, nothing changes & you,doug, know why.A lot is invested in his/her career, AND, they have a family, on top of that. keep em cords & letturs a comin doug.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s