Defending Children

16 Jun

We provider better protection for politicians--POLITICIANS!!!--than we do for our own children.

We provider better protection for politicians–POLITICIANS!!!–than we do for our own children.


Posted by on June 16, 2013 in 2nd Amendment


Tags: ,

19 responses to “Defending Children

  1. jacob

    June 16, 2013 at 2:13 PM

    yes, I am a family man, father of five, who lost all sons and daughters to the evil divorce court business, and I love children. it saddens me that there exists such evil people in Wash; DC who run and participate i child -sex; and places like in Dever, Colorado where like Navarre where nadette Dohrnlittle Ones are sacrificed to Satan; have you read/listened to the reporters/investigators at about Chicago Univ/Northwestern U/Bill Ayers/Weatherunderground /Bernadette Dohrn being involved in offeses against children? And we pray to the Father saying “God Bless America”? I doubt He’s listeinng….jacob

  2. Carlton

    June 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM

    Yeah, these “gun free zones” are downright illogical. They’re counterproductive, in fact.

    I say we get rid of them. Agree?

    The only practical way I know about for accomplishing this goal is to vote the right people into the relevant legislatures. Then, follow through by keeping the pressure on these representatives to make sure they do what they were hired to.

    Anyone with an alternate, and realistic, suggestion on how to actually SOLVE this “gun free zone” problem, please post it here.

    • NDT

      June 16, 2013 at 3:35 PM

      1. Keep the law of the land (It’s not what Wikipedia tells you it is).
      2. Re-establish the common law hundred.

  3. Christian

    June 16, 2013 at 3:27 PM

    It should be titles “Sitting Duck Zone”

  4. Yartap

    June 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM

    If the government refuses to protect your kids and family, what is YOUR next move? Who is responsible for YOUR kid’s safety? Stop asking government to do YOUR job!

    • Carlton

      June 16, 2013 at 6:35 PM

      Right you are, Yartap.

      And, in order for us to protect our children, these “gun free zones” have got to go. This is the obvious conclusion of the graphic in the original post.

      Therefore, the obvious and urgent question is:

      Exactly what real world steps do we take to get rid of these “gun free zones” so that we can protect our children without risking a confrontation with the police and going to prison?

      Any suggestions?

  5. Michael Kivinen

    June 16, 2013 at 11:23 PM


    America has aloud it self to be ruled by criminals against the people, but if you notice most all other nations are also of one mind and one agenda, man was warned, and now you want change, well its too late.

    Sheep don’t rule, only criminals in high places do. Fools and the sheep must pay the price of not heeding the warnings. Your dead in the dust as well as your children are sacrificed due to your own failure of ignorance to what was, to what is and what shall be. Yes’ it not good is it.

    If you stand with guns or take the law into your own hands you are no better than the ones in power, but as a community joined you have the right of justice to protect your community even if the Government fails to protect, don’t fight at the top level, change and take control at the bottom level of town or state control, but leave the federal as they can not be removed. A community of a town has rights over and above any state or federal government where as any local state and federal control has acted against the people without direct consent of the people and the people have the right to elect a new council and leadership in accordance with the people wishes. Democracy rules where as the boundaries are and they start with local towns, cities, and then state. Once combined its by the wishes of the people to replace all those that have not complied with the people of that state and are immediate replaced. Peaceful take over cant be stopped when its by the consent of the majority over the few who continue to refuses and act in corruption against the wishes of the many. When a governor of a state sides with the federal government that state has the right to close its borders, eject its governor, and elect another governor. States have the right to join in common mutual benefits and a common goal to benefit all, until all states are one to then eject the federal government from office, which is the major cause of the problems. Justice must be reinstated over and above all and political criminals brought before the courts and pay for the crimes against the people of America.

    Of course this will not happen, as the people have not the balls nor the intelligence to instigate their right of true justice. Hell is on earth and people in high places have made it so now for the many. Its not God Bless America, Its God Curse America for its crimes. Remember this,

    ” You live by the Gun, You die by the Gun” The Sheep without a Sheppard, and the Wolves in power shall rule. Welcome to your New World Order for you all helped to make it. Its Death by ignorance. Bleat !Bleat !

    How on earth can GOD bless anyone or nation or even people when such crimes are committed against his children. Who dares to LIE and use his name in vain for their own gain?

    Truth hurts and cuts like a sword, but it’s the truth, and only the ignorant, the deceived and liars reject truth. Which one are you?

  6. palani

    June 17, 2013 at 6:56 AM

    “America has aloud it self to be ruled by criminals against the people”

    Actually America fails the reality test. There has never been a nation “America” recorded as existing in the history of Man. “Mafia” might stand a better chance of being regarded as a nation than “America” however “Mafia” has no associated territory while “America” is perceived as being a land in which People live. As long as people choose to live in fiction then they choose the associated principle to live by color of law. One such fiction of “America” is that politicians can fix problems; however, the sense of the word “fix” here is “make as solid”. So politicians identify and define problems, many that they themselves have created, so as to solidify them for the purpose of addressing solutions to the problem. They have identified health care as such a problem and the solution proposed is Obamacare. They have identified gun violence as a problem and have proposed the solution of gun control. They have identified release of chemical weapons in Syria as a problem and the solution is to provide weapons to bring down the Assad regime. Politicians have NEVER seen the need to define the existence of “America” though so I expect you will not find a solution to this problem soon.

    • Martens

      June 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM

      @palani >Actually America fails the reality test. There has never been a nation “America” recorded as existing in the history of Man.

      The Supreme Court makes reference to “American citizens” in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793). This I would call a record of the existence of a nation called “America”.

      @whom it may concern

      I tried to post here yesterday, but it never showed up.

      The NSA’s revenge?

      • palani

        June 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM

        @Martens …”The Supreme Court makes reference to “American citizens” in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793). This I would call a record of the existence of a nation called “America”.”

        Four instances of ‘American’ in this case cite.

        1. … single star in the American Constellation will ever suffer its lustre to be diminished by hostility against the sentence of a Court

        2….no such remedy could, under any circumstances, I apprehend, be allowed in any of the American States

        3…the instances may rarely occur, when a State may have an opportunity of suing in the American Courts a foreign State

        4….the cause, by which that influence was produced, never extended to the American States.

        There is no instance of “American citizen” mentioned in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793).

      • Martens

        June 17, 2013 at 2:10 PM

        @palini >There is no instance of “American citizen” mentioned in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793).

        My mistake, I remembered it wrong. The phrase they use is actually “citizens of America”.

        “No such ideas obtain here; at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called), and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” – Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)

  7. Anthony Clifton

    June 17, 2013 at 8:00 AM

    language police on patrol with ARMORED SWAT VEHICLES…with those IED detection devices

    “I think people have gotten the idea that there’s an Orwellian state out there that somehow we’re operating in. That’s far from the case,”

    On the bright side, every hour of every day more people are coming to the conclusion that nothing coming out of the mouths of the PIP’s –

    (psychopaths in power – PIP™)…. is true.

    How this awakening will turn out remains to be seen. . .

    cui bono inquired the dodo of Pogo . .

  8. Peg-Powers

    June 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM

    I found that “amar” or “amari” means or refers simply to the lands or peoples in the “west” or near the western sea (mar = sea, as in marine life). (Ameri – ca or can). America is comprised of south, central and north America. Has anyone else researched this matter?

    • Yartap

      June 18, 2013 at 7:56 PM

      America is a continent.

      • Adask

        June 18, 2013 at 9:56 PM

        Actually, it’s two continents: North America and South America.

      • palani

        June 19, 2013 at 5:46 AM

        American is a nationality [according to the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual].

  9. Anthony Clifton

    June 19, 2013 at 6:42 AM

    America, like Texas is an idea ….

    which emanates from the westward expansion of the Children of Israel who were manifesting manifest destiny unbeknownst to most of them…

    Texas legend Wayne Martin said it best…

    “When you reject TRUTH you place yourself in JUDGEMENT”…



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s