RSS

MSM & Gov-co’s Attempt to “Lynch” George Zimmerman

25 Jul

This video at least implies that if it weren’t for US Attorney General Eric Holder’s insistence, George Zimmerman would not have been tried for the death of Trayvon Martin.  We can reasonably assume that Eric Holder’s insistence was based on President Obama’s insistence.  If so, this implies that the top two “players” in the federal justice system are willing to instigate criminal prosecutions based on black racism.

video     00:10:19

 
21 Comments

Posted by on July 25, 2013 in Race

 

Tags: , , , ,

21 responses to “MSM & Gov-co’s Attempt to “Lynch” George Zimmerman

  1. Christian Gains

    July 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM

    I saw this video days ago, and found it QUITE revealing (tho, NONE of this info came forward at the trial). Also, the defense team did SUCH a MARVELOUS job of UTTERLY debunking EVERY ONE of the prosecutions’ accusations, AND CLEARLY depicting Trevon EXACTLY as he was, [thug, thief, and druggie], that, the JD’s attempt to further investigate George, is an indictment of BOTH their racial hatred, AS WELL AS their arrogant ignorance of juris prudence! But!

    ALL that all of this TRULY demonstrates, is that our Nation has begun an Imperial spiral downwards to destruction…as has, ultimately, EVERY Empire!

    Now, ALL that we have NEED for is PREperations, to weather the coming collapse, and chaos, that those dimwits in D.C. are RAPIDLY motivating for!

     
  2. Adrian

    July 25, 2013 at 1:22 PM

    Racism is the wepon of choice for the Globalists,divide and conquer.
    Too many colored humanoids in America today.This mud race of humanoid is what is destroying
    our society.It is against the natural principles.If man was borne free,look at what has became.
    This is not natural selection,this is “devil’s work”.

     
  3. Martens

    July 25, 2013 at 1:45 PM

    As the title of this post implies, the media and the government appear to be working together on this tense drama in the national psyche.

    And since the only predictable outcome of any importance is yet another division in the social fabric of America, it’s reasonable to assume this is their common objective.

     
    • Christian Gains

      July 25, 2013 at 2:31 PM

      No REASON to doubt that as the ULTIMATE GOAL of these Socialists…

       
  4. JOE L'AMARCA

    July 25, 2013 at 2:36 PM

    AT LAW FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS A REACTION !! BILL ! YOU FORGOT THE REACTION OR REMEDY TO TAKE CARE OF THE CRIMINALS !
    A COURT ACTION OF ( LEX TALIONIS ) IS TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST THE WRONGDOER .
    IF YOU WANT TO BE A NATURAL INDIVIDUAL UDERTHE MOSAIC LAWS OR INTERNATIONAL LAWS .
    THE TERM OF LEX TALIONIS DERIVED FROM THE TEN COMMANDMENTS WICH LEADS US TO UNDERSTAND THE 12 JURRORS OF MY PEERS OR VICINITY , NOW THATS A LAWFULL TRIAL . BUT IF YOU WANT TO USE THE ARTIFICIAL WORD FOR KANGAROO COURT SHOOT ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL TELL YOU HOW WE CAME WITH THAT TYPE OF court ??

     
    • Christian Gains

      July 25, 2013 at 2:39 PM

      I’d LOVE to learn about THAT Joe, so, send it on! THANKS!

       
      • JOE L'AMARCA

        July 25, 2013 at 3:57 PM

        THE ENGLISH EXPLORER WENT TO AUSTRALIA USING SIGN LANGUAGE ASKED THE ABORIGINES THROUGH MANY SIGNALS AND MOTIONS WHAT IS THE NAME OF THAT ANIMAL THAT WAS HOPING AROUND DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND, THE FIRST THING THAT CAME TO MIND IN ABORIGINES WAS KAGROO , MEANING i DONT KNOW OR UNDERSTAND ! THEY CAPTURED ONE OF THESE ANIMALS AND BROUGHT IT BACK TO THE KING AND THOUGHT TO BE CALLED A KANGAROO WICH LATER PERFECTED THE LANGUAGE AND TURNED OUT TO BE THE SAME AS THE COURT SYSTEM THAT WE HAVE TODAY , ONLY THE CRIMINAL IN THE BLACK ROBE DOES NOT ADMIT THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEFENDANT , HE ONLY CARE HOW TO ORDER PENALTY OR PUNISHMENT .
        WHEN ONE CALLS HIMSELF A PATRIOTT LOOK OUT HE DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT MOSAIC LAWS .i WILL ADVANCE 20 YEARS OF RESEARCH FOR YOU , YOU NEED A BLACK LAW 4TH .EDITION DICTIONARY AN OLD BIBLE CONCORDANCE AND A COPY OF THE U S CONSTITUTION . ONE WITHOUT THE AMENDMENTS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL .
        THE U S CONSTITUTION CONTAINS 7 ARTICLES OF CONFEDARATION AND TEN ARTICLES OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND THATS IT , OUR FOUNDING FATHERS OUT OF THIRTEEN PROPOSALS THEY EXCEPTED TEN OF THEM .. THREE WERE REJECTED .
        WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE COMES TO YOUR HOUSE, CAPITAL OR WHERE EVER IT MAY BE .AND HANDS YOU A PROPOSAL OF CERTAIN DOINGS OR FACT OR ANYTHING AFTER EXCEPTION IT IS A CONTRACT THAT YOU NOW HAVE . THUS THE U S CONSTITUTION IS A TWO PART CONTRACT , PART ONE IS THE ARTICLE OF CONFEDARATION AND PART TWO IS THE ARTICLES OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS .
        11TH PROPOSAL WAS REJECTED BECAUSE IT WAS IN CONFLICT WITH ARTICLE 3 SEC 2
        TODAY THAT 11TH PROPOSAL IS THE 11TH PROPOSAL THAT WAS REJECTED AND TODAY IT IS STILL IN CONFLICT WITH THE U S CONSTITUTION AND GUESS WHO RATIFYED IT ?
        THE SAME CRIMINALS IN THE BLACK ROBE THAT HAVE STOLEN THE RESPECT OF THE BIBLE THAT THEY USE TO WALK IN THE COURT ROOM WITH UNDER THEIR ARM ! TODAY THEY LEFT THAT OUT AND TODAY YOU STAND TO RESPECT THE JUDGE NOT THE BIBLE . THEY WANT TO GET RID OF 93% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION IF YOU ARE GUARANTEED BY THEIR god YOU ARE SAFE BUT IF YOU HELP ME EDUCATE HUMANITY THEN THERE IS HOPE THAT MOTHER NATURE HAS SUCCEDED TO SAVE OUR PEOPLE AND EARTH .BUT BY BEING GREEDY LIKE THE 93 % THAT THEY WANT TO GET RID OF YOU ITS WORKING GET RID OF 88 BOX , USE THE NET PROPERLY ( TO HELP OR EDUCATE ONE/ANOTHER . THE PERSON THAT SHARES HIS WEALTH WILL LIVE IN HARMONY WITH NATURE THERE IS ENOUGH FOR ALL LIVING ORGANISM .
        OH YES ONE MORE THING FORGET THE WORD AMENDMENT IT SEEMS THAT IT WOULD PROTECT YOU IF YOU ELECTED YOUR FAVORITE CANDIDATE THE AMENDMENT PROPOSER , IT ONLY BENEFITT’S THE KINGS AND QUEENS AND THEIR CARETAKERS/300 MILLIONS . THE ICE CAPS KEEPS THE EARTH IN PROPER BALANCE ONCE THE ICE MELTS AT BOTH POLES IT WILL CLEANSE ITSELF AGAIN AND YOU OR ANYONE ELSE CANT BUILD A FREEZER BIG ENOUGH TO EXPERIMENT WITH MOTHER NATURE

         
  5. kennywally

    July 25, 2013 at 5:43 PM

    Does anyone else find it interesting that these dirtbags wish us to believe they are incompetent dolts that know their job and what to do at the same time? I suppose that the fact that martin was busted as a burglar and was known prior to these guys pushing for prosecution, I find it hard to believe they didn’t know that! Right?! Too bad we can’t solve the problem like one would with a bad cat. [ was thinking burlap sack and something else…] I just turn a deaf ear to them as they deserve no respect at all. They are consistently insane, omit truths, spin to their agenda, and pit one group against another and on and on it goes.

     
  6. kennywally

    July 25, 2013 at 6:41 PM

    My earlier comment was for the typical NEWZ story, not this one, which was done fairly well by Bill Whittle, who has shown as much contempt for the dirtbag stories by typical talking heads out there, courtesy of the defacto corporations as I have for them.

     
  7. Felipe

    July 25, 2013 at 10:25 PM

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/court-officer-fondles-woman-has-her-arrested/

    “A major investigation is under way in Las Vegas after a court officer is accusing of sexually molesting a woman, and employees and managers allegedly covered up the assault.

    Video has just surfaced of Monica Contreras, who went to family court with her 2-year-old daughter in August 2011.”

     
  8. Adrian

    July 26, 2013 at 2:09 PM

    Guys,you all fail to understand that America does not have a government.We are dealing here with the Organized Crime,ZIONIST MAFIA. You want your liberty back,you have to take a bite out of the
    crime.
    Talking is cheap,action is the name of the game.One of us must zap one of them.
    There is only one law around,the law of the land: from dust to dust.

     
    • Adask

      July 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM

      OK–if “talk is cheap,” when do YOU stop talking and start “dusting”?

      In fact, talk is not “cheap”. “Talk” is the necessary first step to establish (or refute) the moral foundation for taking action of the sort you advise. We can’t just start shooting people without some serious discussion as to if and why those people should be shot. Admittedly, “action” may become necessary. However, “action” without preliminary “talk” is at best amoral and just violence for the sake of violence–and should not be condoned.

      “Action” without preliminary “talk” is an attribute of thugs.

       
      • Adrian

        July 26, 2013 at 2:58 PM

        It’s been alot of talk for the last over 200yrs.Nothing has been done.America it’s been sistematicaly
        eradicated.Every genaration has been duped into inactivity and subjugation.
        The final solution is up in the air.

         
      • Christian Gains

        July 27, 2013 at 12:07 PM

        Al, you’ve got a “COINTELPRO” here…inciting violence so as to give certain Alphabet’s the “plausible deniability” to take your site down…”word to the wise: AVOID the devoid!”…NEVER respond or give credence to such violence laced gibberish….

        Al you’re ABSOLUTELY CORRECT in you’re insistence to calmly, and intelligently discuss and determine the genuine reasoning and the moral, and ethically right response to ANY infringement of our Constitutionally guaranteed NATURAL RIGHTS!

        At this particular junction in History, it is MOST ASSUREDLY NOT the time to either propagate, or envision vocally, or instigate in ANY manner, a violent action. Violence is UTTERLY out of the question! Intelligent & reasoned responses are the order of the day…

         
  9. Adask

    July 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM

    I used to hold “Citizens For Legal Reform” meetings in the 1990s. Every so often, someone would attend those meetings and espouse violence. They justified that violence by saying all is lost and there’s nothing else that can work to regain constitutional government.

    I never trusted such people. I never knew for sure, but I always suspected that the proponents of violence were “agent provocateurs”. I guessed that their purpose was to either inflame the audience or perhaps attract anyone in the audience who secretly agreed that violence was the only way. If they could attract someone in the audience who secretly agreed that violence was the only way, whoever was attracted might be encouraged and persuaded to engage in some violent act that would ultimately discredit the group and get him thrown in the slammer.

    So far as I know, we never had a incident of violence associated with members of the meeting’s audience. So far as I know, the proponents of violence never committed any violent acts themselves nor did they succeed in “recruiting” anyone else to engage in violence. So, it’s entirely possible, that there were no agent provocateurs at my meetings and my suspicions to the contrary were groundless.

    Nevertheless, whenever anyone starts using my meetings, or my blog, to advocate violence, I am instantly suspicious that that that advocate is a government agent of some sort. That’s why, when one of the previous commentators advocated that “words” were ineffective and that there was no hope other than through violence, I asked him when HE would personally start committing acts of violence. He didn’t answer that question. All he had were his own “words” to advocate that OTHERS–but not him–should engage in violence.

    I don’t trust such people as far as I can throw them. They are either fools or hypocrites or government agents.

    I recognize that the day may come when violence is necessary. If it becomes necessary, I might follow someone who advocated violence–provided that this advocate was leading the violence and risking his own life. But whenever someone advocates that I or others engage in violence–while he does not–I am instantly suspicious and I will not follow such persons.

    I see that you share my suspicions, Christian. I’m glad that you do.

    This is a blog for people who believe in reading, writing, and trying to understand the “words” and how to frame them in a way that might be politically effective. This is a blog for people who do not believe that all is already hopeless. This is a blog for people who think that we might yet save this nation by merely sharing and standing up for ideas that might inspire the majority of Americans to restore constitutional government. I admit that such hopes seem improbable. At best, it will be extremely difficult to inspire such hopes in the American body politic. The chances that we’ll succeed in such hopes aren’t high.

    So what?

    Win, lose or draw, it’s the right thing to do. As we seek the “words,” we may not only educate ourselves, but also educate any “agent provocateurs” who happen to visit this blog.

    Also, I’m not saying that the previous proponent of violence is definitely some government agent. He may be nothing more than a young man who is compelled by the nature of youth, to be more prone to “action” than to thought. But, whatever he is, he needs to rethink his predisposition to violence and his willingness to advocate violence in an open forum like this blog.

    I guarantee that virtually anyone who advocates violence on the internet can be quickly identified by the Powers That Be. You’ve gotta be either a government plant who has no fear of being identified–or simply stupid–to openly advocate violence and suppose no one will identify you. Therefore, while it may be true that the previous advocate of violence isn’t really a “bad guy”–I see no reason to suppose that he’s really a “smart guy”.

    He be (at best) ignorant. This is not a time to follow fools. God knows that if I were inclined to follow an advocate of violence, I would not choose to follow a man whose conduct implied that he was an idiot.

     
    • Christian Gains

      August 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM

      Well, now, (since Snowdon’s revelations, [& in my case, LONG before him]), we KNOW that you’re methods are the MOST VALID, and PROBABLY the ONLY one left, for effective potential correction of the direction our Nation is willingly being led.

      And, THAT willingness — on the part of the “silent majority” {that was ONE thing “Tricky Dick” Nixon got right}, — is what we MUST END! Possibly, hopefully, if we speak eloquently enough, often enough, LOUD enough, those who ARE awakening, may very well begin to do the same…

      As anyone, who has studied ACTUAL & FACTUAL History knows, IDEAS are FAR MORE DANGEROUS than guns & ammo…BUT! They take FAR LONGER to effectively impact the body politic; but, then again, once those ideas take hold, the end of “the Empire” is not far behind, (and THAT’S when the guns & ammo take over, while the normal “purging” of the poisons of the body politic is performed).

      Violence, (to have ANY decent, character VALUE), MUST be ABSOLUTELY, UNAVOIDABLY NECESSARY — UTTERLY the LAST RESORT, and NOTHING to be desired, only utilized because there is NO OTHER means available!

      I have never experienced physical combat or conflict, but I have known several “operators” (whose lives were committed to the HIGHEST LEVEL of learning and applying, when necessary, violence), and NOT ONE of them encouraged, or advised me, to seek ANY violent resolution, UNLESS there REALLY WAS NO OTHER OPTION. These men were Rangers, S.F., SEALs, and Delta OPS, and they ALWAYS taught: “violent conflict should ALWAYS be your choice of LAST RESORT, NEVER yield to the desire to kill…ONLY kill when you have NO OTHER CHOICE…if you can ‘break contact’, and still finish your mission, THAT is ALWAYS the FIRST, & PREFERRED option”!

      Here, at this blog, I agree with you 110%, we MUST simply develop our REASONING, and presentation of such reasoning, and PRAY to Jesus that we can effectively “change hearts and minds”…

       
      • Martens

        August 4, 2013 at 6:32 PM

        Christian Gains wrote, “Violence, (to have ANY decent, character VALUE), MUST be ABSOLUTELY, UNAVOIDABLY NECESSARY — UTTERLY the LAST RESORT, and NOTHING to be desired, only utilized because there is NO OTHER means available!”

        Absolutely, and We the People have clearly not run out of other means, considering the couch-potato negligence with which we have managed our hired help in government.

        The default assumption is that anyone telling you to stop voting and start shooting is working for the bad guys. These two actions have no practical result in common besides the destruction of America from within.

         
  10. Christian Gains

    August 5, 2013 at 1:26 AM

    Well Martens, (WHILE I ABSOLUTELY AGREE!), you MIGHT need to reassess your council….REASON?

    Because your logic is based upon TRUST of the “SYSTEM”.

    Now, allow me to clarify my statement…You see, I do NOT place ANY faith in the present Governmental system…and…I DO NOT trust the VOTING SYSTEM. (You have to go back and read Roman History {focusing on the “dissidents” [Cicero], against the “Imperial imperatives” of the day}, to understand my reasoning).

    Why?

    Because History TELLS me that, this process, and methodology, has been used before, AND, as well, has FAILED! — [Cicero is the ULTIMATE example of a DISSIDENT with CAUSE and proof!] —

    What we’re dealing with here, is a LOT of folks who are IGNORANT, and, (AS WELL), a VERY SMALL degree of people who ACTUALLY know GENUINE History….

    AND, — the FACT that you & I NEED to SEE this realty through “SPIRITUAL EYES”! —- We’re NOT fighting a simply PHYSICAL war!

    PROOF: (Ephesian 6:12; and, II Corinthians 4 – 5) — If you FAIL to ACCEPT this FACT, then God help you in the future!

     
    • Martens

      August 5, 2013 at 4:48 AM

      I agree also, though perhaps I should clarified my meaning.

      The point is not that We the People should “trust” the system. The point is that we have no alternative than to “work” the system.

      Though representative government has its problems, it serves as a check on powers that have no interest in even appearing to abide by the consent of those they govern. Currently, the voting public and these “rulers of the darkness of this world” are competing for control of America at every level of government.

      We the People would not improve our lot by copping out of this fight and surrendering to the New World Order’s genocidal billionaires and, for example, their “Agenda 21” scheme which is only being effectively resisted by citizen action within the system.

      Despite the obvious fact that the system established by the Founders has been corrupted, it remains our best play in practical terms. Look around at the current crop of Americans. Do you think they are capable of creating something as good as the Republic set up by the Founders? It’s pretty doubtful.

      If, instead of repairing what we inherited from the Founders, we let the bad guys tempt us into throwing it all away for a utopian bowl of porridge, the only contender left standing will be the New World Order.

       
  11. Adrian

    August 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM

    The more I look around the more I realize that most of the people are nothing but useless eaters
    duped into religion.They play right into the hands of the Globalist.
    Religion,Zionism and Communism have a common root.
    Salvation is the opium of the useless eaters.

     
    • Christian Gains

      August 5, 2013 at 1:07 PM

      Adrian, Religion has NOTHING to do with FAITH, and SALVATION is a person CHOICE, that has NOTHING to do with drugs…Religion WAS a favorite tool of Lenin & Hitler….”The Spear of Destiny” by Trevor Ravencroft does a stupendous job of differentiating between “RELIGION” and actual FAITH…If you’ve not met TRULY FAITH filled, sincere Christians, (not simply “in name only”, and NOT “self-righteous do gooders”, rabidly WORKING their way to heaven), then I cannot blame you for having your opinion of “RELIGION”…yes! It IS a FALSE belief system, intended for control, or to minimize the “congregation’s” spiritual maturity.

      ALL 3 of the “ism”s are forms of “Religion” [per se’], Zionism, Communism, Socialism. No spirituality there…PURELY the wisdom of men — our present social & economic dilemmas clearly depict the value of THAT wisdom…

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s