RSS

America’s Finest

23 Aug

Two more tributes to the policy of hiring cops with low IQs.

Our laws are being enforced by moronic brutes who don’t have brains enough to understand the laws they enforce. All these morons are capable of understanding is brute force. Allowing these morons to enjoy official or good faith immunity is like allowing 16-year-old boys to freely get drunk and drive a Ferrari. These people don’t have brains enough to be entrusted with the job of being police officers.

If there aren’t at least some intelligent police officers in every police department, there’ll be no one around to restrain the rest of the morons from committing crimes.

•  Kill one

video   00:02:25

•  Grope two

video   00:05:48

 

Tags: , , , , ,

9 responses to “America’s Finest

  1. Christian

    August 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM

    ha ha this reporter is so naive “lets get rid of assault rifles!” If you think this is bad wait until America is disarmed.

     
  2. Charles

    August 23, 2013 at 10:50 AM

    Recently a local PD started an advertising campaign looking to recruit new cops. The pitch is, “Can you 10 pushups? Can you lift 80% of your body weight once? Can you run a mile and a half in 16 minutes? If so, you can be a cop!” There was no mention of understanding probable cause or the 4th amendment…

     
  3. Joseph S Haas

    August 23, 2013 at 12:44 PM

    Ah, so the Police Gloves are now used to transfer fecal matter from one suspect to another!? Re: the second video at 4:23-minutes of for “To Serve and Protect” who? Answer: The C,O,P,s.

     
  4. Joseph S Haas

    August 23, 2013 at 1:46 PM

    N.H. police morons? no; conniving bastards!

    Hey Scott, scott.frye at dos.nh.gov for The Dept. of Safety, Division of N.H. State Police

    You got an answer to this: ” Our laws are being enforced by moronic brutes ” ? Of this from Alfred Adask, of The http://www.antishyster.com/ I think is his website too as I used to get his monthly reports back in the mid 1990s and when our Dick Bosa of Berlin, N.H. was the “Renegade Republican” running for President of when I met Al at The ‘Barley House” in Concord as Dick’s un-official campaign HQ’s.

    You ought to straighten him out of that you don’t “enforce” any RSA Ch. 594:14 summons http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIX/594/594-14.htm by us private prosecutors http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2002/0209/marti098.htm and http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nh-supreme-court/1454325.html but RSA Ch. 642:3,I(e) “Hinder Prosecution” http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/642/642-3.htm by a lateral appeal to the A.G.’s Office (Paul Broder’s “Public Integrity Unit” of that Bozo paul.broder at doj.nh dot gov for Dept. of Justice (so-called, of actually an in-justice, of being in-correct and refusing to correct past wrongs done by such!) who thought we lived in the 1st Judicial “District” * and so said that the Federal transfer to Maine of two of our N.H. Article 12 inhabitants http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html I(Ed & Elaine Brown) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_and_Elaine_Brown was supposedly NOT in violation of the 6th Amendment, even though preliminary hearings are a PART of the trial!) that continues to investigate forever to issue no Report ever, as in the Article 51 duty http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html for the governor who you “protect” from DOing her job of the reduction of that Congress woman by Section 2 of the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution ** since we here in New Hampshire and ten (10) other states do not elect our judicial officers. ** ” when the right to vote at any election for the choice of . . . Judicial officers of a State, . . . is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, . . . the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.” [ Of see also to revise The Reapportionment Act of 1929 to get at least 4 Federal Reps. per state.] Of you RSA Ch. 643:1 “refrain” http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm from enforcing a paper upon her Article 41 Excellency in Procrastination Governor Margaret “Maggie” Wood Hassan and “Official Oppress”er too, and so she and you plus your Captain Mark.Armaganian at dos.nh dot gov laugh all the way to the bank every other payday Friday. * We live in the First Judicial “Circuit” . And none of our inhabitants are supposed to be controlled over by any OTHER laws, like the U.S. Codes never N.H. Article 1 “consent”ed to, http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html and especially when enacted by too many M.O.C.s (Members of Congress), as like in football of too many players on the field of to get the ten-yard penalty, of thus too many M.O.C.’s to get the penalty too! The reduction! So next time: Please DO your job! And be a good “public servant” to serve the papers to the correct individual you were Article 32 instructed by me to do. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html Of four of the five Executive Councilors http://www.nh.gov/council/ witnesses to your non-performance of duty, the District #2 one of adding in quantity of himself by a new baby boy of his rather than doing quality work that day of he “defer”ed over to the A.G. of my comment that he do his job of to “counsel” the governor to do her job, of wanting a 2nd opinion before he makes a decision? No, he and them just continue the investigation too of providing no report so that no decision can be made and so they too refuse to allow for law enforcement to do their job, of thus ought to get only half their pay as fulfilling only half of your motto, of they too protect the governor from DOing her job! Shame on you and the Capt. and ALL five Executive Councilors who ought to be given a deadline of what? Not Article 14 “prompt” nor RSA Ch. 91-A:4,IV http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/91-A/91-A-4.htm to supply a Report “within 5 business days” but times #____to #___ weeks or month (!?) lest they ought to be Article 63 impeached too, http://www.nh.gov/constitution/council.html as well as the governor by Articles 17 + 40 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/house.html over to the Article 38 trial http://www.nh.gov/constitution/senate.html in the Senate. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/constitution.html JSH cc: The governor and council. And others, including three State Reps. of one Retired from there and as a former State Trooper who quit with 1/3rd of the State Police in the 1960s when it changed FROM that of from Law Enforcement Officers TO that of Revenue Agents.

    P.S. The N.H. local and State agents just love this transfer of fecal matter too (see below), as they allow agents of Uncle Sam to CALL their place at The Warren B. Rudman Block in Concord “Exclusive” as in 1-8-17 of not same but similar of “like” jurisdiction there too as in D.C., but that they let flow by water to the local City of Concord sewer lagoon, proving it’s not only NOT exclusive but also NOT even RSA Ch. 123:1 “concurrent” http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm since the 40USC 255 to 3112 agent has yet to file his papers with our N.H. Secretary of State but takes the RSA Ch. 123:2 exemption http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-2.htm anyway for not to be property taxed for not only just the land but the building too, since the City Assessor takes the “opinion” from the City Solicitor Jim Kennedy to that of this “custom” over-ride of the law because they had a Contract or Agreement of Payment in lieu of taxes back in the 1960s + 70s but that former City Solicitor Paul Cavanaugh, retired supposedly “lost” the City’s copy and so can’t renew because Uncle Sam doesn’t want to either file or pay either.

    Re: https://adask.wordpress.com/2013/08/23/americas-finest/#comment-34454

     
  5. Asadrew

    August 23, 2013 at 3:11 PM

    Nice point Joseph! Too true.
    Also, I may have some insight for you Al. It’s psy-ops. It puzzled and grieved me also to see violence and the lack of IQ in the officers they keep on the “force.” I say, “keep” because the ones who exhibit intelligence and caring get “let go.” I took a Criminal Justice college course on Penology, which was taught by a judge. He revealed some very interesting things that made it all make sense.

    He first said that Penologists studied the Viet Nam P.O.W.s to figure out how the Vietnamese were able to break the morale and cohesiveness of the POWs and get them to sign confessions, renounce their American loyatly, etc. Penologists admired the Vietnamese for that accomplishment. Penologists studied it to adapt it to our prison system seeking to break the “convict code.” I believe prisons are a testing ground for public policy.

    What they discovered was the Vietnamese divided the POWs into two groups. Then started treating one group really well, while they treated the other really bad…arbitrarily. No reason at all. What it did first was “confuse” the prisoners. Second, it made the harsh group “suspicious” of the favored group. They thought the favored group must be aiding and abetting the enemy. The favored group also wondered what the harsh group did to be treated so severely. They were never told “why” each group was being treated so differently. But the favored group “saw” the severity they would experience if they didn’t “comply.” The Vietnamese used that fear combined with mistrust to break down their loyalty to the “higher” ideas that bonded them together, namely, their allegiance to the United States of America.

    The result penologists came up with is the current philosophy to divide the “subjects” into fragmented groups. Favor one, be harsh with the other arbitrarily (take the disparity of how the government treats “race” violence: black on white vs. white on black, for example.) The “subjects” they want to control must be put in an “ambiguous” environment and then put forceful pressure on them to comply. The resulting fear and suspicion, combined with confusion, makes them compliant.

    So, what does this have to do with hiring dumb cops? It has to do with the law. The “law” is very clear. It is not ambiguous. In fact, it is “void for vagueness” if it is not clear enough for a reasonable man to understand it. So they lost half of the formula. They have the “force” instilling fear, but not the “confusion” they need to complete the formula. They can’t be “ambiguous” about the law.

    So they found a way around that. Leave the law “clear,” but hire dumb cops who don’t have a clue about how to enforce the “law” correctly. Then those dumb cops will “enforce” the law in nonsensical ways, because they don’t have the “sense” to do it right. It’s beautiful from their point of view, because the higher ups can stand aloof, making clear policy keeps their hands clean, but laugh at the “confusion” the dumb cops make when they go out to enforce them. The higher ups are insulated by their legal clarity. So there is no risk to them. All they have to do is “punish” the dumb cop for the misbehavior (and give them a pay raise later). But what they get in “effect” on the “subjects” they want to control is “confusion” and discontent, suspicion and the almighty fear of being treated harshly with no reasonable way to determine when and why it will be done to you. That makes the masses…compliant. They need dumb mean cops to fulfill their objectives of divide and conquer, hence…control.

    Hope that helps. It brought me peace just knowing what the hell is going on. It made no sense, which tormented me even more…until I understood…it’s all a part of the “plan.”

     
    • Yartap

      August 23, 2013 at 7:55 PM

      Asadrew,

      Very interesting points – Thanks for the info.

       
      • Asadrew

        August 23, 2013 at 10:52 PM

        Yey! I’ve read many of your posts, Yartap. From you, that is a huge complement. Just trying to contribute.

         
  6. Joseph S Haas

    August 23, 2013 at 10:53 PM

    Asa, Is there a website on this micro-managing of the POWs in these Vietnamese camps? On a search I found this blunt summary of moving from one camp to the other: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_US_soldiers_were_held_as_POWS_in_the_Vietnam_War

     
  7. Asadrew

    August 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM

    It cost me $500 to learn that. It was all worth it.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s