Birth [Certificate] Control

20 Sep

ObamaBC1Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of The Constitution of the United States declares in part,

“No Person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President; . . . .”

Thus, the Presidency is the only constitutional office that requires the holder to have been born in this country.

The question of whether or not Barack Obama was born in the United States  determines whether he is or is not eligible to serve as President of the United States.  Stories have circulated since early A.D. 2008 that Barack Obama was born in a foreign country and therefore isn’t eligible to be President.

Polls conducted in 2010 suggested that at least one quarter of adult Americans said that they doubted Obama’s U.S. birth, while a May 2011 Gallup poll found that 13% of American adults (23% of Republicans) continued to express such doubts.

On April 27th, A.D. 2011, the White House responded to growing doubts about Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to hold the office of President, by releasing physical copies of the President’s long-form birth certificate and posting its digital image on the White House website.  This alleged birth certificate reaffirmed Obama’s claim that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Conspiracy theorists quickly dissected the digital image of the alleged birth certificate (BC).  That analysis quickly proved that the digital image was not a single, flat image or photograph of Obama’s BC.  Instead, the digital BC was a multi-layered image that had been “photo-shopped”.  If so, the “long form” birth certificate produced by the White House is an overt fraud.

Since then, Obama has sometimes joked about the birth certificate controversy.  However, so far as I know, he has never denied or even explicitly addressed the specific issue of whether the digital BC presented on April 27th, A.D. 2011 was a fraud.

How could he?  The document is clearly “photo-shopped” and fraudulent.

Once that technical fraud is admitted, we’re left to wonder:

 1) Why didn’t Obama ever provide a “real” birth certificate?

2) Who is responsible for creating and presenting the fraudulent birth certificate?  And,

3) Why wasn’t the person responsible for presenting the fraudulent birth certificate (and thereby causing President Obama great embarrassment and diminished credibility) identified and charged with perpetrating this fraud?

The technical evidence that the digital image had been “photo-shopped” wasn’t the only evidence of the birth certificate fraud.  As seen on the following three questions (supplied by others), even some of the details of the content of the alleged birth certificate appeared fraudulent:

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?

 2. The Obama BC lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961 and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. The BC also shows that, at the time of Obama’s birth, his father was 25 years old, and that Obama’s father had been born in “Kenya, East Africa “. Unfortunately, “Kenya” did not even exist until A.D. 1963—two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.    How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist?  (see, )

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital“. This can’t be because, in A.D. 1961, the hospital(s) in question were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home,” respectively. The name did not change to “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name did not exist until 1978? (See,  http://http/

The evidence that Obama’s “birth certificate” was fraudulent seemed compelling.

However, I never felt comfortable with that “conspiracy theory”.   I assumed that, being the President, Mr. Obama would have tasked the CIA, NSA or some governmental agency familiar with forging documents with the job of creating a fraudulent birth certificate for President Obama.   I couldn’t imagine how the CIA (or any similar government agency adept at forgery) could have produced such an obviously forged “birth certificate” for the President.

It made no sense to me that the CIA (etc.) would produce such an inept forgery for the President.  Therefore, I’ve never felt comfortable with the “forged birth certificate” conspiracy theory. I wondered if the “forged birth certificate” argument was itself nothing but a fabricated conspiracy theory.

Then, yesterday, when a friend sent me the list of three questions I copied above, I saw the problem with my doubts about the “forged birth certificate”:   My assumption (that the birth certificate had been produced by the CIA, NSA, etc.) was false.

The pro’s never forged Obama’s birth certificate.  Obama didn’t trust the pro’s to know that he had no legitimate US birth certificate so he didn’t trust the pro’s to create a fraudulent birth certificate.

Instead, the fraudulent BC was forged by some amateur who thought he was slick enough to use PhotoShop without being detected.

What amateur would Obama dare to trust to create a forged birth certificate?

One of his basketball buddies?

His wife, Michelle?

Or himself?

Michelle might’ve been sufficiently familiar with PhotoShop to create the fraudulent BC.  However, I’ll bet that Obama, himself, forged his own birth certificate.   In the wee small hours of the morning, Obama tapped away at his laptop, creating a digital image of his own birth certificate.   When it was finally completed and “polished,” he presented it to the world.

Why didn’t anyone in the Obama administration analyze the BC to see if was real?

Because it was supplied by Obama, himself.  Therefore everyone in the White House automatically assumed the BC must be legit.   If the almighty President Obama said this was his legitimate birth certificate, well, it just had to be, right?  Who would question the President?  Surely, Obama must’ve known his own birth certificate, right?

That’s why Obama’s birth certificate (like his presidency and his illusions of personal competence) was so easily exposed as fraudulent:  Obama is innately incompetent.  He’s in way over his head.  Therefore, it appears that Obama played the fool by trusting a fool (probably himself) to forge his own birth certificate.

As Bugs Bunny would say, “Whadda Maroon!”


Posted by on September 20, 2013 in Fraud, Government as Gangsters, Lies, Values


Tags: ,

25 responses to “Birth [Certificate] Control

  1. Steve

    September 20, 2013 at 7:38 AM

    If Obama applied for a replacement certificate at some stage, would it be plausible that the certificate was updated to show the current location names?… And the concern of photoshopping, more information would be needed as to which areas were tampered with. As it stands, it may of just been the resolution was changed or colour saturation to give a better image online. Or maybe someone close to the president felt it would be beneficial to “correct” the outdated information.
    But in the end, does it really matter?

    • Jetlag

      September 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM

      It is likely that whoever forged the copy of Obama’s birth certificate intended for the forgery to be discovered.

      There’s an established science dedicated to detecting faked images like this. Someone who’s been through law school, and pretty much anyone in DC politics, would know about it.

      On the other hand, the producers of The Savage Nation and similar P.T. Barnum productions can assume the suckers in their target audience are ignorant of such things.

  2. palani

    September 20, 2013 at 7:39 AM

    The story becomes more interesting when you dig into the idea of ‘natural born’ a little further. In the vernacular at the time this concept was written ‘natural born’ meant ‘out of wedlock’. Perhaps this concept was a reaction by the founders to the idea of titles of nobility being handed down as an inheritance only to legitimate heirs and they are instead making a statement that when it comes to politics we are all bastards. When the chips are down perhaps they wanted the chief executive to be an acknowledged bastard. If that was the goal then we have no complaints.


      September 20, 2013 at 10:29 AM


      • Tony

        September 21, 2013 at 10:50 AM

        What do you mean by “bastard?”

  3. Peg-Powers

    September 20, 2013 at 9:29 AM

    Every state issued Dept. of Commerce birth certificate I have ever seen requires the full name of the “Father” and the “Maiden Name” of the mother. What is OBVIOUSLY missing is mention of the MARRIAGE of the two. It never mentions the married name of the mother. Every government form is crafted by attorneys using deception upon the people. With no proper marriage on that record, we are ALL presumed to be declared as de facto BASTARDs and WARDS OF THE STATE (commercial slaves)!

  4. Howard R Music

    September 20, 2013 at 9:35 AM

    The theory that the president’s father was actually Frank Marshall Davis, a communist and pornographer that his mother had an affair with, could be the reason the birth certificate was forged. Who wants the world to know your mom was a floozy? Obama certainly favors Davis. But, perhaps the nude photos of his mother, and Davis were photoshopped as well. Who knows?

  5. Mangus Regnant

    September 20, 2013 at 10:43 AM

    Wherever and however any Official Document by any State is produced, stating therein, the official record for registration, always remains the same facts, at the time of registration.

    Any alteration of this facts germane to both time and place or circumstances, would be considered perjury on and of the record.

    The only time any Official Records may reflect differently, than previously provided, would be when the facts are discovered as a typographical error.

    But in the instant matter in question, the polite considerations for typos and correcting such administrative errors, has long passed.

    But, having stated the obvious, whether you, me or whomever, wishes to believe in the integrity of any document in question, please remember, the sovereign operating directly or under suzerntiy may Stand to state a claim for which any relief is sought, is immediately declared lawful by this very fact,….a despotic tyrannic sovereign always assumes your ignorance if bliss…lol.

    And these assumptions will remain as long as ignorance rules!

    For these reasons alone, many of us are moving toward reasonable self-determination ( How one proceeds and by what formality, is each to their own abilities.

    Any success towards such endeavors must predicated upon Nature’s Law and Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason, that all walks of life are equally entitle, when seeking and assuming their separate and equal State among the Powers of Creation. To any and all who strive in honorable endeavors to live by the Comity adopted toward exercising reasonable of self-determination, we welcome you universally, as our Breathren! And, hopefully, remaining Good Neighbors in the support and maintenance of universal peace

  6. Adrian

    September 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM

    It’s simple as A,B,C,OBAMA is the CEO of a corporation.HE doesn’t need a”Constitution” to have that job.
    Further more,look into history,some of the first CEO of UNITED STATES,were British subjects.
    The word constitution means,an assumption of debt.
    As a matter of fact,none of you are part of that compact.
    HE is as commonly known as a niger. HE does what nigers do.
    A natural born is one born by his own will,unlike one born thru C section or alike.
    The “Constitution” is a fraud.

  7. Jethro!

    September 20, 2013 at 12:20 PM

    Al, your theory is intriguing. A problem I can see with it, though, is that Barry is so devoid of any real world skills (has he ever done any actual work?) I have to doubt he would have even rudimentary Photoshop skills to pull off a forgery. Even learning Photoshop basics takes time, and for a politician, time learning real skills is better utilized consolidating one’s power or ripping off others. And don’t forget time for basketball and golf.

    • Adask

      September 20, 2013 at 1:00 PM

      That’s why I leave some wiggle-room for the possibility that Michelle (or maybe her voodoo mama) might’ve been the mastermind behind the scheme. And it might’ve worked, too, if all they did was hand out paper copies of the BC. But when the posted the digital image, and viewers quickly detected that the digital image was in “layers” rather than “flat” (as it would be the original BC had simply been scanned), the fraud became too obvious to deny, researchers dug into the content in the document, etc. and the scheme was exposed.

      The foundation for my theory is simple: I cannot even imagine how the CIA, NSA, etc., could’ve been asked to fabricate a phony BC and done such an incompetent job. If I’d been in Obama’s shoes and saw myself betrayed by the CIA, etc., there’d be a couple dozen dead CIA honchos floating face down in the Potomac.

      The only way that BC makes sense is if it were created by amateurs. If that’s true, what amateurs would Obama dare to trust with such a secret? Only himself or maybe his wife.

      And there are a couple more implications in this story.

      If Obama tried to create his own BC, why didn’t he call on the CIA,NSA, etc.? Could it be that he didn’t want his “master” to find out that Obama hadn’t been born in the USA? Is it possible that whoever selected Obama, groomed him and promoted him to President didn’t know Obama’s real citizenship before he pushed Obama into the Presidency?

      If Obama’s “master” didn’t know Obama was born outside the US, that tells us that the “master” is far from infallible.

      If the “master” didn’t know that Obama was born outside the US, that indicates that Obama deceived his “master”. Oooo, I’ll bet they would’ve had “words” over that failure to disclose Obama’s real citizenship. How’d you like to be the “master” who was deceived by your own puppet?

      On the other hand, if Obama and his “master” both knew Obama was an alien long before the push for the White House began, why didn’t didn’t they think to create a new BC back in A.D. 2006 or 2007 and plant it back in the Hawaiian registry long before anyone raised the BC issue? Their failure to foresee the BC problem and solve it long before it was publicly perceived is evidence that Obama and his “master(s)” aren’t that smart.

  8. Lopaka Brown

    September 20, 2013 at 2:41 PM

    Question: What if history proves that the Hawaiian Kingdom was never lawfully or legally annexed and incorporated into the United States? Where is the treaty of annexation? There is none. If this is true and the facts proves that it is true. Will that disqualify Obama?

    You can find the truth and facts at this website:

  9. Peter

    September 20, 2013 at 3:05 PM

    Obama has some Jewish blood running through veins. He’s connected or otherwise he would not hold the office of president.

    • Anthony Clifton

      September 21, 2013 at 6:47 AM

      where do so-called “Jews” come from…?

      and is there any evidence or proof in the Historical record that all 12 tribes enumerated in
      Genesis 49 & Deuteronomy 32…. “turned into” [BECAME DE Facto] the Khazar
      “Ashkenazim” proselytes to Talmudic Judaism….
      which was “codified” {written down} barely 200 years before the Khazars
      were proselyted ?

      and for Americans with a MAMZER as chief “Zionist Porch Monkey”…er um teleprompter reader/pretender….why would History and Etymology really matter anyway…with Ed Schultz
      & Rachel Maddow there to “report” all the news that the “JEWS” approve for the gullible braindeadgoy….anyway ?

      seems like the multi-cultural moshpit {mental-physical-spiritual} “Jewtopia” is where most people
      feel comfortable expressing their opinions that are politically correct…24/7

      obviously what is needed is a serious dose of truth and some ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY

      enforcers to MENTALLY/SPIRITUALLY COMBAT “political correctness”….
      or more accurately NO JEW WORSHIPPING on the land !!!

      See TOMMY WALLER – [Jew Worshipper]

      Tommy Waller

      Recently, a troublemaker distributed libelous materials accusing Tommy Waller, an American
      “Judeo-Christian”, of being a missionary. This despite the fact that Tommy has been actively recruiting Christian volunteers for TALMUDIA for ten years, and not a single Jew claims that Tommy or any of the thousands of people he has brought here have tried to undermine their TALMUDIC BAD faith.

      Therefore, I feel it is incumbent upon me to speak on his behalf.

      Out of an abiding faith in the uniqueness of the MAMZER “Jewish people” {who are not actually Israelites} and in the PRETEND Divine mission to settle the Land, Tommy has rallied support for TALMUDIA {a stool sculpture deity cult compound} from Zionist Psychophant Congressmen and Senators. The head of the Shomron Regional Council, Mr. Gershon Mesika, told me that Tommy’s activities have been very influential. Each year, through the summer, he organizes groups of psychophantic “JEW” worshippers who are in fact NOT Christians who love JEWISH TERRORISTS who hate Jesus to volunteer in TALMUDIA. As he is a big believer in Synagogue of Satan family values, many of the volunteers come with their entire families, including the young and the elderly. In recent years, at the request of the Regional Council, the Har Bracha settlement has hosted the volunteers on a hilltop near our community. From this base, the volunteers set out to work in vineyards and orchards throughout the Shomron.

      where the spirit of TRUTH is there is LIBERTY !!

      KNOWING THE TRUTH…..really makes a difference in the decision making dept….!

      Identifying The “Establishment” . . . {money changers & Pharisees}

      There are those who obey God’s Law and those who don’t. Those who obey are the Lawful. Those who disobey are outlawed by God. God has specified the outlaw’s punishment. The Phineas priests administer the judgment, and God rewards them with a covenant of an everlasting priesthood. However, the Phineas priest must know what the game is if he is to play.

      The atrocity committed against the South was a business affair. It was provoked by the bankers, the operators of the usury system who financed John Brown, and also by the radical abolitionists who wanted to confiscate and free the slaves without compensation, a blatant case of theft of private property. The war was incited by their media. By them the South was damned and its people earmarked for death. The whole time, it was the banker-directed media which smoothed the descent into the Reconstruction holocaust.

      The weak defense the Southern people managed to scrape together for protection was scattered, like a man defending against a thousand stinging killer bees. They fought one bee at a time rather than setting fire to the bee hive. They did this because they didn’t know that their tormentors came from a single source. . . .

      there is no intent to be cryptic or to obfuscate the need to properly define the ISSUE that

      so-called “JEWS” cannot be Israel…

      knowing that 100% of so-called “Jews” are NOT Israelites helps to understand the nature and character of the synagogue of satan tormentors supplied by the Almighty to CHASTISE His chosen people…Israel.

      which is more than tangentially related to the issue of the BIRTH CERTIFICATE….


      in the days of my youth one could hear the laughter of children…

      and people singing Happy songs…

    • nooralhaqiqa

      September 22, 2013 at 10:21 AM

      His mother is Jewish. You need no more than that.

  10. Yartap

    September 20, 2013 at 11:26 PM


    OK – let me put my two cents in.

    I cannot believe what I’m hearing from you all. Ya’ll are whole lot smarter than me. Wake UP!

    Have any of you studied the LAW about what it takes to be President? This focus upon his birth certificate is taking you away from the real issue: the meaning of the Law. This birth certificate issue is nothing more than smoke and mirrors to divert your attention away from the Law, which moves your focus away from this real issue of Law:

    In order to be Prez, BOTH parents must be citizens of the United States and naturalized BEFORE the time of one’s birth in order for that one to be eligible to become President.

    End of Story!

    I don’t give a damn about Obama’s birth certificate – true or not. I don’t give a damn about the Davis theory (tho, it may make him eligible). Obama Lite (Barry Jr.) publicly claims that his father is Obama Dark (B.H.O., Sr.). Thus, Junior cannot be President because Senior is/was and still is a British/Kenya subject.

    Now – move along, no naturalized or nationalized parent to see hear! Oh! – but wait – look at that fake birth certificate! What is he hiding? Do you think he was born in another country? Why want he tell us?


    Even if you look at Barrack’s fake, layered and photo shopped birth certificate and believe it is true; it proves that Barrack cannot be President, because the father claimed is a British/Kenya subject.

    Yes, the gov-co, courts and media are dumbing us down. Open your eyes and think! Damit!

    Sorry – for the ranting!

    • Adask

      September 21, 2013 at 10:10 AM

      Do you mean “Open your eyes and think! Damit!” Or do you mean “Open your eyes and think what I [Yartrap] think! Damit!”

      Thinking almost necessarily implies disagreement. To think is not to merely believe what everyone else believes. To think is necessarily an expression of some disagreement. Thinking might cause you to disagree with President Obama. Thinking might also cause you to disagree with me.

      Thinking might also cause me to disagree with you.

      All that disagreement is OK with me because I encourage people to think. However, I don’t ever tell people that they must think as I think; that they must believe whatever I believe; I merely invite them to consider what I think and then make up their own minds. I want them to keep thinking rather than automatically believing.

      When you implicitly demand that I and others on this blog must “Open your eyes and think [as you do]! Damit!” you seem to implicitly demand that I and the others only believe whatever you think–and thereby stop thinking for ourselves.

      Do you see the irony. The man who demands that we all “think” is implicitly demanding that we all stop thinking and merely believe him.

      I doubt that you could find many people who patronize this blog who don’t “think”. Your statements to the contrary are offensive.

      I know that I’ve been thinking about the kind of issues seen on this blog for 30 years. During that 30 years, I’ve probably spent 30 to 60 hours every week, tying to “think”. I’m almost embarrassed by how little I’ve accomplished with all that “thinking”. Still, I am more than a little offended to have someone imply that I should now “start to think”.

      If you think that your thinking is so sublime that we should all think (actually stop thinking and instead believe) as you do, why not start your own blog–or better yet your own church–where you could expound on your perfect thoughts and all the rest of the idiots would simply believe whatever you thought was true?

      I’ll tell you what I think. I think the world is full of people who can “think” well enough to come up with insights and yet have never thought about how important it is to learn how to communicate those insights to others. Those who are satisfied with only thinking can live alone like mystics on a mountain top. Those who think and want their thoughts to “make a difference” must also learn how to communicate. There are those who think. There are also those who think and communicate.

      I think that insulting the intelligence of your audience is a poor strategy for communicating your ideas. Generally, if you’re going to insult people by implying that they don’t think, the only thought that you’re likely to inspire in your audience is that you’re some kind of jerk who need not be listened to.

      I think that if you want to think all by yourself, that’s fine. But if you want to think in a way that influences others, you not only have to think about your ideas, you must also think about your audience.

      Your previous comments lead me to think that you don’t think very much about your audience. I think that’s a huge mistake.

      I think that insofar as you don’t think about your audience, that may be a fundamental cause for your frustration at being unable to effectively advance whatever ideas you think are true.

      Watcha think?

      • Yartap

        September 21, 2013 at 11:50 PM


        I agree with you. In communicating with others, “A spoon full of sugar does makes the medicine go down easier.” Al, I’m not as well spoken nor have a great knowledge and scholarship in communicating as you; so, relying upon your abilities and your chastising, I believe, I did not communicate properly. For this, I apologize.

        And Al, I would never “demand” that any one should think as I think. Far from it, I am a man, who believes in “Free Will.” Apparently, I have failed again to get that across in my past blogs, too. My intent was to lead the readers to different waters for a different perspective. Yes – I did it ranting, but will they drink? Probably not, because of my ranting.

        But Al, I was not “implicitly demand(ing),” and I did begin by saying that “Ya’ll are whole lot smarter than me.” What do YOU think that means? I’ve learned a lot by this Blessed Blog, and I look forward to the education given to me by you and others who write.

        Leave this Blog? Leave you, Al? Start my own blog? NEVER! I’m hear with you – today and tomorrow. Now, if you ask me to leave – I will respect your wishes. After all – this is YOUR blog.

        It’s apparent to me, that you and maybe others did not understand my intent and purpose in my writing and thoughts. So, let’s start over……………..

        I submit to you, for your consideration and thought, a reason why the Obama birth certificate and the conspiracy behind it are nothing more than a way/means “given” to the American people by others (Obama’s masters), so you will lose sight upon more “important” and the real reasons and issues as to why Obama is not qualified to be President.

        I believe, that the birth certificate is a diversion (smoke and mirrors) away from the true reasoning. The true reasoning is the historical Congressional writings and Law: To fulfill the Presidential requirement of being a “Natural Born Citizen,” of Article I, Section 2 for the U.S. Constitution; both of Obama’s parents had to be 14th Amendment “naturalized Citizens PRIOR to his birth. It is/was a noted Congressional maxim about the President that: A son’s allegiance should and will follow his father’s country or allegience. This has been known by past Congresses that a difference is made between a “natural born” Presidential Candidate and a 14th Amendment “natural born” or “naturalized citizen.” But, Barrack’s father is/was and still is a British/Kenya subject. Therefore, Barrack H. Obama, Jr. Is not eligible to be President.

        We all know and must know that, over time, the masters are subverting the meaning of the Laws; and they use this damn thing called “a democracy and equality” to do it. They are always subverting the Laws to see “just how much the American people will take” and to see “just how dumb the American people are becoming.” So what do the masters do? They pull out the ole Chester A. Author lying, lying and lying to become President with a new twist – they place in your face an easily found fraudulent birth certificate for your fuming, which has junior’s claimed father on it, which many cannot see makes him ineligible. Not because it is a fraud – it is because Obama publicly claims Senior (a foreigner) as his father and his grandparents confirmed. The reason for the fraudulent document is for your distraction away from the historical maxims of the LAW which make him ineligible. This is what the masters want, and are getting.

        If Obama, his masters, CIA, FBI or gov-co were to give out a truly authorized hard copy issued from what ever state of his birth certificate, the only next move for you to prove his ineligibility would be to seek out the historical Congressional meanings and understandings for becoming President. The people seeking out the true meanings in the Law – This the masters do not want – AT ALL!

        And the masters said, “No – we’ll create a fake birth certificate will keep their minds busy. We don’t want the people to bring into a court the historical Congressional precedent of requirements. The people may start teaching others about that. We want them to bring in that fake birth certificate which proves basically nothing about eligibility, because it’s a fake, it only establishes a “question” about eligibility. While the people are focused upon Obama’s fake birth certificate, we will quietly end-swing them with our congressional whores for the kill by using John McCain…………”

        Even John McCain and Patrick Levy were in on it, too. McCain’s eligibility was questioned. He was born to two “natural born” American citizen-military parents living in the Panama Canal Zone, his place of birth. So, Levy’s congressional committee held hearings and used 8 USC 1401 to declare McCain eligible. But, we must note that this law only decides the people who are “CITIZENS [e.m.] of the United States.” It is based and applies upon the 14th Amendment. We must further note that McCain’s eligibility was based upon 1401(c) which requires that BOTH parents must be CITIZENS of the US, and have lived at least one year in the States or a possessions, PRIOR to the birth of the person in question (Senator John McCain). The master’s purpose for using McCain was to create the acceptance as the law, the allusion that there is NO DIFFERENCE between the historical Natural born Presidential Candidate requirement and a 14th Amendment Naturalized citizen. Further, to see the absurdity of this melting together of the two natural born, section 1401 says that anyone born in the States is a “natural born” citizen (only requirement). So Juan, cross the border and have your child born in the US and one day – the child can become President, if McCain can be eligible.

        So Al, I respectfully disagree that the masters are dumb. Everything is going according to plan. While We the People were watching Obama, it was Congress and John McCain placing the knife into the American’s heart. I guess they will try to get a person with dual-citizenship elected President, next.

        Al, was that better?

      • Adask

        September 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM

        If I understand correctly, Texas Senator Ted Cruz was born to at least one US parent, but born in Canada, so he still carries dual citizenship: Canadian and U.S. Plus, his name “Cruz” (Cuban) is Hispanic. Thus, if someone were interested in establishing a North American Union, Cruz would have citizenships that appealed to both Canadians and U.S., plus an Hispanic surname that would appeal to Mexicans. Interesting combination, hmm?

        I think respectful disagreement is good, but it’s not an absolute requirement. Insofar as thinking is inherently evidence of some sort of disagreement, disagreement is OK. However, intentional insults aren’t necessary. There are too many blogs and websites where people hang out so they can act like little kids and say “bad words” and personal insults. That sort of thing impresses me as childish. I’d like to see this blog maintain a little higher level of “disagreement”. I don’t want it to stuffy and overly formal, but I don’t want it to be malicious.

        I never thought your previous comments were malicious. But I didn’t think that they clearly thought out in terms of the audience.

        It’s all about the audience. Not the writers, speakers or performers. We go to concerts, supposedly to hear our favorite musicians. But the crowd noise is so enormous that we can barely hear the music. If we really liked a particular group’s music, we could buy their latest CD and listen to it at home. We’d hear the music perfectly. But we really don’t go to the concerts to see the musicians. We go to see the crowd. We go to see the audience. There is something awesome about seeing tens of thousands of people in the same room. Without the audience, the musicians are nothing. Imagine the Beatles or Rolling Stones playing to an empty house. If you were the only person in the audience, you’d get tired of the concert and possibly leave before the band had played all their songs.

        Frank Sinatra understood and deeply respected the audience. He wouldn’t put the pants to his tuxedo on until just moments before he went on stage. Once he put the pants on, he would not sit down and risk wrinkling his trousers. He did that out of deep respect for his audiences. Sinatra understood that he was nothing without an audience.

        I also try to respect my audience. I try to never waste their time–at least not with whatever articles I write. I understand that I and this blog are nothing without my audience. This doesn’t mean that I’m willing to lie or deceive to acquire and hold an audience. I don’t respect the audience to lie to it. But I am grateful for every man or woman who reads even one of my articles. So I try to keep this blog sufficiently “comfortable” and even “respectful” to keep whatever audience I can attract.

        So, while I recognize that not everyone in this blog’s audience is thinking at the same level, we should try to treat each other with respect. It’s not as if there are 50 million people reading this blog every day. If there were, we could probably afford to insult a few of ’em every day. But people at our “end” of the political spectrum are fairly rare, so we may have a duty to treat each other with as much respect as is consistent with trying to find a bit of truth. I don’t mean that we have to kiss each other’s backsides. But we need to understand that we are a small army and unlikely to grow if we allow a bunch of infighting. Don’t we already have enough enemies without making more of the people who visit this blog?

        So I don’t see the point to insulting each other. For me, it’s just bad business. It happens from time to time. I’ve insulted audience members–but only if they really piss me off with their disrespect for the audience or for me.

        So, my long-winded message to you, Yartrap, is simply a request that you, too, “think” a little before you make comments that might be taken as insults. I’m not suggesting you abandon your own ideas or your passion. I’m just saying that it’s a good idea for all of us (including me) to think about what the audience may be willing or able to understand whenever we make a comment–especially when we’re ready to rant.

      • Eric W. Madsen

        September 22, 2013 at 12:38 AM

        Hey Al,
        I just discovered, yesterday, that you are now doing this blog. I have, from time to time, since you stopped publishing The Antishyster, looked for you on the internet to no avail; then yesterday, while I was doing a Team Law conference call (see:, a caller made comment about your post here today. Respectively, that is what brought me here today—and, it is good to see that you are still thinking and publishing.

        Now, the reason I posted this response, as a reply to your comment on this topic, is the thing that gets me about all of this thinking and opinion making people do gets all of us right where you noted 30 years of this has taken you: “I’m almost embarrassed by how little I’ve accomplished with all that “thinking”.” The same goes for all of us that have been in this work of helping people learn the truth about the world around us. The thing is, as long as people just think and talk and share ideas, beyond experiencing the opinions of others—nothing happens!

        That is exactly why, from the beginning, at Team Law we have been helping people learn how to learn the law; so, they could learn to apply it.

        On the specific topic of Barack Obama’s qualification to serve in office, the facts and law are well defined and clear (see:, he does not qualify for the office. But, that fact will never change the fact that he is right now serving as the Corp. U.S. President. Thus, writing more articles to address that fact will not resolve the problem. The only thing that will, without a revolution (and its destruction of our way of life), is learning and applying the law.

        Of course, that only works if you first learn the law. For example, when Obama first started running for office, and people started bringing court actions against his candidacy, we reminded people that there is no law against anyone running for office; only a law that forbids Congress from seating anyone that does not qualify. Thus, all of the court cases brought against Obama’s candidacy failed for lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim—In law, the courts really had no other choice but to so rule.

        Team Law covered the lawful process for contesting Obama’s election yet until he was running for his second term, no one followed the process prescribed in law. Then, after his election for a second term, Zane Grey followed Team Law’s first “Call to Action” (see: using quo warranto. Though that action had little chance of success, it setup Phases II (Notify Congress) and III (Operation Clean Sweep; see:

        Imagine a simple process that no one in government can avoid that anyone can follow and that has the potential of sweeping clean the entire legislative and executive branches of government. Still it will only work if people apply it.

        Of course, the primary enemies of the people are their own self-inflicted: ignorance, apathy and the belief in the futility of any course of lawful action. All such beliefs are merely foolish excuses to avoid the responsibility of taking the appropriate action in law.

        From the beginning, instead of simply expressing opinions, Team Law has been successfully helping people learn how to learn and follow the law precisely. Following that process, we have reseated almost all of the original jurisdiction governors in their seats. Still, that process has taken 20 years and this year we hope to finally accomplish that task!

        My point in sharing all of this with you, Al, is two fold: (1) to reintroduce myself to you [my old friend]; and, (2) to give you something you can actively do to remedy the problem of Barack Obama having been seated as President. We need all of the help we can get to find at least one person from each Congressional District that is willing to send a simple fax/letter/e-mail to the Attorney General [see:

        Respectively, I look forward to hearing from you soon—time is of the essence!

        Sincerely, Eric W. Madsen, Trustee of Team Law.

    • lloyd

      September 27, 2013 at 11:54 PM

      Yartap you are so right on both of your comments!! Obama’s birth certificate has always been nothing more than a diversionary tactic.
      And Ted Cruz isn’t eligible either. This from an ABC interview: “My mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware. She’s a U.S. citizen, so I’m a U.S. citizen,” Cruz said.
      “I’m not going to engage in a legal debate. The facts are clear,” he added. “I can tell you where I was born and who my parents were. And then as a legal matter, others can worry about that. I’m not going to engage.”
      And he is a lawyer. From his wikipedia page: “Cruz served as a law clerk to J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in 1995[36][3] and William Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States in 1996.”
      “Cruz has been named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America.”
      And a little more from his wikipedia page: Cruz’s wife is currently head of the Southwest Region in the Investment Management Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and previously worked in the White House for Condoleezza Rice and in New York as an investment banker.
      I wonder what he will be like as President?

  11. Michael

    September 21, 2013 at 8:35 AM

    Only Authoritys can cite the rule of law to the sheep and use it against the sheep, but the sheep do not have the authority or power to seek justice of the rule of law against the highest authority its a one way system and justice is only severed when it suits the justice system to do so.

    Sheepole are always fleeced of their wool for sheepole can only bleat, and sheepole dont grow teeth, and only flock with the rest the sheepole. Only another power can confront a power, but the sheepole have no power to confont except to bleat, and weep, and be fleeced of their wool time and time again.

    To little, to late, so learn your fate, for you have sown the seeds of your own destruction.
    Obama was hand picked, and funded, to be your destoryer of your nation, he will declare marchel law on the nation when the central bank pulls the plug it as simply as that, the perfect crime to deal with the nation and the sheepole, divide the sheepole and conqure and eradicate the disidents, the ones with guns in their hands. Shoot to kill will be rule of law, all leaglly done by congress and the state of the Union. Civil war in the streets and dead women and childern in the streets, and detention camps where the dead, the dying and the wounded and sheepole slaugted for their own arogance, and blindness to the truth.

  12. palani

    September 21, 2013 at 7:05 PM

    The 14th amendment is an emancipation document. By emancipation I mean in the sense that a father makes a public notice that his son has reached the age of majority and he (the son) may now earn money for himself and the father will no longer be responsible for the sons debts. The son in this 14th amendment sense is a new government that is insurgent to the original government. The original government replaced retired with a debt of $346,681,016, a debt that has not budged since 1878 and by law will never budge again (if I send in a $5 note from 1862 they will not reduce the debt but will instead print another $5 note to replace the one I sent in).

    The constitution for the new insurgent government is the 14th amendment. Other features from the organic constitution prior to 1868 may be used or they may not be used. One of the features is the inclusion of blacks in the body politic. Once they are in the body politic they might even be elected to the top office of the executive branch. Prior to 1868 blacks were not even included in the body politic.

    Where might this be going? While I might look at the the natural born clause in the constitution this clause is a matter of historical interest only. Anyone might be elected or be seated in the office of president. When these politicians take office their oath is to the 14th amendment and you have to admit this has got to be the shortest constitution in the history of western civilization.

  13. smrstrauss

    October 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM

    Re: “In 1961 people of color were called “Negroes.” So how can the Obama “birth certificate” state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?”

    ANSWER: First it does not say “African-American.” It says “African.” Only African.

    The explanation is simple. In Hawaii you were allowed to use any word you wanted to describe your race. There was no checklist, and no one stood over you saying what you had to enter. There are entries in Hawaii of people listing their race as “American.” So you were allowed to use any word you wanted.

    And what was the word that African exchange students commonly used to describe their race in the 1960s? Answer: African.

    Re: 2. “… Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known then as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.”

    Answer. You are out of date with that name. Kenya stopped being called the British East African Protectorate in 1920. In that year it was renamed. What was the name? THE KENYA COLONY.

    In short, it was called Kenya (Kenya short for “The Kenya Colony”), and it was in East Africa, so the entry Kenya, East Africa is correct.

    Re: “3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. ”

    Answer: You are referring to two other hospitals. But, Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital DID exist in 1961.

    How do we know? Well, on WND’s site there are birth certificates for the Nordkye Twins, born one day after Obama in the same hospital, and what is the name of the hospital on their birth certificates? Answer: Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.

  14. Montana

    December 10, 2013 at 8:09 PM

    The Birthers/ Teabaggers have no evidence that would stand up in a court of law in the United States. To all the Birthers in internet land, its upon you to prove to all of us (the majority) that what you are saying is true. Take it to court you bunch of cowards!

    Let me be clear none of these Birther/ Teabaggers dullards have taken there “Birther Documents of facts, more like lies” and none have won a case in the “U.S. Courts”, maybe in their simple minds (if they have any) but not in our “U.S. Courts”, so unless Birthers/ Teabaggers, whatever you want to be called, win a court case, we will continue to see as dullards, liars or racist or maybe all three. Deal with the real truth baby!

    To all the Teabaggers / Birthers/ Chicken Littles that keep saying that the sky is falling, and the Unites States will fail, never count against the United States of America, we are coming back and you and your losers are wrong!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s