RSS

“Reckless, Irresponsible and Stupid”

16 Oct

I hadn’t heard of TV talk show host Dylan Ratigan until today when I first saw his A.D. 2011 rant on a YouTube video.  I don’t have many heroes, but judging from this video Mr. Ratigan is a possibility.

I’ve understood and argued for several years that the root of our problems with government is political campaign laws that allow Congressmen to take bribes from special interests.  Mr. Ratigan drives that point home brilliantly.

video   00:04:46

 

Tags: , , ,

9 responses to ““Reckless, Irresponsible and Stupid”

  1. Michelle Christensen

    October 16, 2013 at 11:54 PM

    I’m glad to see, I’m not alone!

     
  2. Pat Fields

    October 17, 2013 at 12:45 AM

    Right to gift any money to anyone is a private right of Self Determination regarding one’s Private Property. It would be better, in my humble estimation, to enforce (out from original jurisdiction) the true 13th Amendment to the true Federation Trust Constitution. The simile, adopted by the government of the District of Columbia in 1871 (MINUS this genuine, standing Amendment), is only valid through derivation, thus if the enforcement action is meticulously put forward, DC’s municipal reliance on its ‘charter’ should fail by inferior standing.

    “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress (in its OWN Federation Trust capacity), accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” [Journal of the Senate]

     
    • Tony

      October 17, 2013 at 9:40 AM

      Pat,

      Certainly agree on the 13th. Regardless, when you refer to “private right of Self Determination,” do you assign such a right to corporations?

       
      • Pat Fields

        October 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM

        Tony, it’s my deduction that government has no intrinsic or constitutional authorization to extend sundry aspects of its charter to any subsidiary entities … in the first place. The only proper corporations are municipal trusts by specific leave of the Sovereign (American People). When government undertakes involvement in business enterprise, it departs from its privileged immunities and those of its officers tasked with management enter the same conditions of liability as any other private operator, which has been the expressed position of the courts.

        All that aside, I would have to say that such organizations, even if otherwise arranged under a Common Law Business Trust structure, nevertheless run afoul of its maxims suppressing the influence of ‘combinations’, on grounds that they’re coercive against Free Will. So, I have to side with those who decry ‘pooled contributions’ from groups of ANY sort, to political candidates (despicable enough in itself) as fundamentally unlawful.

         
  3. Johannan Bernays

    October 17, 2013 at 6:31 AM

    Well, all the Framers of the Constitution were Esquires, a Title of Nobility, below Lords, but still Titled. The “Citizen” spoken denotes a “Unlanded Commoner” I reckon. John Adams , or perhaps another, (Adask Knows!) said “The Constitution Protects the Landed Genteel from the Herds of Common Men” lest they rise up and think they, too, should be “Land Holders!” John Jay & Ben Franklin (as all the Rest) were the Suers for Peace with King George, and Scottish Rite Freemasons, Exalted Masters.

    The Virginia Land Company, whom the KING has Appointed “Geo. Washing, Esq>”as “Head” of, streched from Maile to South Georgia…

    Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America
    Book by David Hackett Fischer,

    Explains how the Pope & King selected certain Types to Colonise certain Geographical Regions.

     
  4. medicis

    October 17, 2013 at 11:33 AM

    No articifical entity may make a claim in common law. Only men and women can make a claim.

     
    • Pat Fields

      October 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM

      Exactly correct, medicis.

       
  5. Magnus Regnant

    October 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM

    Greetings breathren & good neighbors,

    Aside from the video rave reviews, the commentary provided by ‘Pat Fields’ is well stated, for those comprehending the status of constitutor.

    What remains privy to ‘We the People of the United States, The United States of America & the Crown, is the cryptology key, which unlocks the capitonym’s specific to each body, oath or office, whether profit, honor or trust, as such appertains to the delegated powers or exercise expressly granted or reserved therein.

    And reasonably deducing from steadfast rightly devising both the quantum Grand Unification Theory via Nature’s Law and Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason and assuming amongst the Powers of Creation, set about to create a result structured in essence and dynamics as an empirical manifestation of the result, espoused by empirical Natural Order from that observed, which both pursues and preserves all walks of life equally peacefully.

    That being so, the ability of both creative polity and steadfast comity betwixt all walks of life individually and at the same time collectively, predicated upon four freedoms expressed in our concordat universal declaration on the four freedoms of all walks of life.

    Forth-from which, arises our neighborly exhortation of reasonableness, toward all walks of life seeking self-determination,…..to wit:

    Pursue & preserve men of good will as good neighbors, predicated upon the self-evident truth that all walks of life are created equal with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty and their pursuit of Happiness (Happiness entails, allodial to the acquisition and conveyances of property or the accepted standards of weights and measures in reasonable exchanges germane).

    Once any find themselves unitively similarly situated, it behooves reasonableness to preserve the natural order of good neighborly customs and usages. Thereby, like ourselves we exhort each to create what polity & comity serves betwixt any juxtaposed living body (corpus), which treats with and preserves via variation by agreement, the exercise of self-determination reasonably and honorably, what each are naturally endowed as unalienable natural absolute rights to which Nature’s Law and Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason entitle each, from each individual action & their first sovereign act of acceptance, predicated upon these self-evident truths, and, enthroned upon all walks of life once entering creative existence from their crowning nativity.

    Our humble solutions, to wit:

    Link: http://www.seagov.net/

    These solutions and exhortations are provided specifically for possible reflections and peaceful recourse, that any may reasonably deuce from the well spring of empirical wisdom, which gave arise to these solutions and exhortations.

    When and how reasonableness pursues happiness with all walks of life, is a sovereign decision for every reasonable individual. Hopefully, as we pass from each eternity upon life’s eternal stages thereof, may we ever be accounted worthily extant, in our act and steads or stands, as men of good will unitively in pursuit of Happiness as good neighbors seeking all walks of life similarly situated.

    Most graciously,….’In Honor We Trust,’
    Arthur

    P.S.: Please forgive any syntax or grammatical errors.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s