U.S. is #3 in World for Gun Deaths . . . But . . .

20 Dec



When governments prohibit guns, gun deaths rise.  

Big Bro’ kills . . . and I doubt that it’s an accident.



Tags: , ,

24 responses to “U.S. is #3 in World for Gun Deaths . . . But . . .

  1. Martens

    December 20, 2013 at 3:14 AM

    A third thing these 4 cities have in common is a high concentration of street gangs.

    Chicago, for example, has the most gang members of any city in the United States.

    • kanani

      December 20, 2013 at 7:16 AM

      A fourth thing, they are mostly blacks & Mexicans offing each other.

  2. Anthony Clifton

    December 20, 2013 at 6:26 AM

    when did those cities get their first synagogue ?

    Maybe if more Men like Phil Robertson were there maybe

    these stink holes wouldn’t be stink holes…

    so like where are all the “blessings” America ?

  3. tony rukab

    December 20, 2013 at 8:29 AM


    • Jim Madison

      December 21, 2013 at 3:23 AM

      I’m with you on this Tony. G.D. umm ALL. I have good reasons for saying this. SORRY REPROBATES !!!! IF they were not GODLESS I would have hope for them but they are too far down the pike to repent & maybe I am too for feeling this way. The Good Lord hates certain things too.

      • Yartap

        December 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM

        Hi tony and Jim,

        In a cause and effect world that we live in, I suggest to not be so fast to say that the criminals are the problem. The problem is most touchy-feely legislatures that have mored away from God’s Law.

        Deuteronomy 17: 12&13,
        12 “And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.” (And why should we do this…….)
        13 “And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously.”

      • Yartap

        December 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM

        Excuse me – that’s “moved away from God’s Law.”

      • Yartap

        December 21, 2013 at 2:55 PM

        tony and Jim,

        See this story: WOMAN, JUST OUT JAIL, ARRESTED FOR 397TH TIME

  4. Yartap

    December 20, 2013 at 9:44 PM

    I hate being critical of good intentions. But, where did they get their figure that ranks the U.S. as number 3 in murders throughout the world? According to the figures I got, the U.S. ranks 107th in the world for “murder rate” (murders per 100,000 population) and 9th for shear “number of murders.”

    • J.M.

      December 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM

      My friend, Yartap
      Re: See this story: WOMAN, JUST OUT JAIL, ARRESTED FOR 397TH TIME.

      Wow ! She has me beat on arrests, but not by much. Also, the only injured victim in ALL the times I was arrested, was me. Like, Mountain Man, I was arrested for doing things as a matter of common law right & refusing to apply for a license. By the way, ALL licenses emanate from a “Superior” Authority, did you know that? (< just kidding). Many Courts say, "A license is a grant from a Superior Authority….." hmmmm. Well here I go beginning to get upset again.Well, truthfully, upset ain't the word for it.

  5. Jetlag

    December 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM


    District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home and within federal enclaves. The decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond federal enclaves to the states, which was addressed later by McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It was the first Supreme Court case in United States history to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

    McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined whether the Second Amendment applies to the individual states. The Court held that the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. The decision cleared up the uncertainty left in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller as to the scope of gun rights in regard to the states.

    • Jim Madison

      December 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM

      Wow !!! Can you imagine where we would be if not for the 14th ?? Especially the 5th section thereof? Let’s thank our “lucky stars” for the 39th & on Congresses & their appropriate legislation.

  6. Yartap

    December 21, 2013 at 2:48 PM

    I sorry Al,

    But your falling victim to the teachings of the NWO’s and the lane-stream media’s propaganda again. I know – their propaganda does have a way of making the mind slip. But, that is their plan.

    The LiberalLogic101,com says, the U.S. ranks number 3 in MURDERS, not “gun deaths” as your title says.

    Remember: 67% of all murders/homicides (justifiable or unjustifiable) in the U.S. are committed using guns. In the justifiable murders, the police use guns 99% of the time (410 times/yr.), and the citizens use guns 77% of the time in the 310 times in 2012.

  7. Jim Madison

    December 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM

    Walk a half mile in my BROGANS. I guarantee you have not had too much experience, IF ANY, with drug PUSHERS & users. I SAID I have GOOD reasons for saying what I did. BUT, there is not any GOOD, in the reasons. Thanks anyway. I know your intentions are good but so is the road to hell.

    • Yartap

      December 23, 2013 at 12:52 AM

      Hi Jim,

      From your writing, I can tell that drugs pushers and users have been a great problem in your life. I am not saying that you should not have the feeling that you do. I concur with your feelings.

      My intent was to get you and tony to focus upon our government(s) and what they are doing to promote evil, i.e. from our military protecting the heroin and mary jane fields in Afghanistan, to the open borders, to welfare, to governments allowing easy-divorces, which allow women to raise most young males to become irresponsible males and not men. We do not have a crime problem; rather, we have a crime industry! And man’s laws promote this to no end.

      Jim – “The road to hell is paved with good intentions,” from man and his laws; not God’s Laws.

      Your friend, Yartap.

      • donmako

        December 23, 2013 at 3:03 PM

        Well put yet again yartap… it is the devils system thats doing it… look at the hate it brings… i just look at sitting in traffic as a prime axample. I mean wheres my george jetson car dangit… instead im stiitin in gridlock getting maddet n madder at my fellow men. Its all a game. Guard yer thoughts and feelings may they be worthy of the lord at all times… check this site out…

      • Jim Madison

        December 23, 2013 at 10:26 PM

        Well thanks my friend,Yartap,
        I think 2 wrongs do not make a right applies in this particular. Government doing & being wrong is no excuse for you & I doing wrong. The Apostle Paul says ALL of us are without excuse for doing wrong & being unbelievers. He makes it plain to at least me,WHY. Excuse this digress but I will appreciate your thoughts on 1 Corinthians 15:39. It has nothing to do with this thread but I cannot get any response to my inquiry in the thread it does apply to.Thanks my friend.
        Your friend TOO !!!

      • Yartap

        December 24, 2013 at 12:14 PM

        Joyous greetings, Jim,

        I agree. Paul and you are absolutely right.

        Merry Christmas to all!

        Your friend, Yartap

      • Yartap

        December 25, 2013 at 3:44 PM

        Joyous greetings, Jim,

        My thoughts on 1st Corinthians 15: 39:

        In order to understand the verse, we must read and look at the whole 1st Corinthians 15th chapter to understand that Paul is discussing Christ’s resurrection and our spiritual bodies in resurrection. Paul first discuses Christ’s resurrection; and then at verse 35, Paul poses two questions that men have about the dead believers rising.

        35 “But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?”

        In answering these questions, Paul describes many different types of “bodies” that God has made; from grains (verses 37-38), to flesh of creatures (verse 39), to celestial (heavenly) and terrestrial (earthly) (verse 40), and to planets and stars (verse 41). In verse 44 Paul declares that, “There is a natural body (earthly), and there is a spiritual body (heavenly).”

        Thus, we can see that Paul is just describing many types of bodies that God has created and this includes 15:39. It would be one thing if Paul had of just mentioned man and beast, but Paul gives to us four types of flesh (man, beast, fish and birds). To those, who believe that man is an animal, is may confirm their belief, by the grouping of man with animals. But, we know better.

        It was not your offering of verse 39, so much; but it was that the wonderful verse 39 lead to a much stronger 49th verse for the argument that man is not an animal.

        49 “And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.”

        We are the ONLY inheritors of His promise of eternal life. We were created in God’s image and likeness. And now, we discover that we have His earthly image and His heavenly image, too. This only confirms that man is not a beast/animal.

        Many Thanks Jim, and a Joyous Merry Christmas to you, Yartap.

      • J.M.

        December 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM

        Shalom,my friend,Yartap,
        @ My (your) thoughts on 1st Corinthians 15: 39:

        I just tried to “cut to the chase” more or less by mentioning verse 39 only. At first, I put 1 Corinthians, Chapter 15, but then the thought occurred that some might think, if he is asking me to read a whole chapter to “maybe” understand 2 words,forget it. I wish Martens would answer but so far,he hasn’t. At least that I am aware of.

        Your comment is beautiful Yartap. The best of everything to you & yours.

  8. palani

    December 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM

    My own right to self defense is limitless irregardless of any presumed legislation that is intended to place boundary conditions upon that right.

    The second amendment right to bear arms is a right to seals, flags and coats of arms despite all the rhetoric that appears to apply that amendment to firearms. The seal that I have a right to (should I be found to be a citizen of that federation) is the Great Seal of the United States. The flag is the last authentic flag of the United States and bears the stars of forty eight independent States. The coat of arms is the image of a bald eagle with a long ribbon reading “Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain”.

    If anyone wants to modify the 2nd amendment which of these three symbols are they wanting to eliminate (or is it all three)?

    • J.M.

      December 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM

      @ My own right to self defense is limitless irregardless of any presumed legislation that is intended to place boundary conditions upon that right.

      I agree & I bet Mountain Man does/will too.

      @ The second amendment right……..

      True, & I’m sure Mountain Man will agree.

      @ (or is it all three)?

      I don’t believe they “want” to, for as far as “they” are concerned, they have, i.e. modification accomplished.

  9. gloria

    December 26, 2013 at 11:08 AM

    thank you ,please check this web you will find his right on,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s