Obamacare can’t identify Obama

25 Dec

Last weekend, Fox News’ Ed Henry reported on President Obama’s application for Obamacare in a 46-second video clip:



In that clip, Mr. Henry said:


“We learned today from the White House. Initially, they said he enrolled for what they called a bronze plan, paying about four hundred dollars a month in premiums. But, then they came back to us and said – Well, wait, he didn’t actually enroll. They said his staff did it and that’s because of his unique circumstance as Commander in Chief. That his personal information is not in particular government data basesSo could not actually verify his identity, oddly enough. So, he had to do it in person this weekend, but he was in Hawaii, not in Washington. So he was signing up for the DC exchange. So his staff did it.”

Apparently, the computers and software used to apply for Obamacare are designed to prevent fraud by comparing some details (name, SSN, address, etc.) of the identity claimed by each applicant against data stored on a host of government computers.   In essence, the Obamacare application software is intended to track certain “personal information” in order to confirm that the applicant is who he says he is

So, it’s “odd,” indeed, that the healthcare program we’ve come to call “Obamacare” can’t actually confirm the identity of the one man (Barack Obama) who is credited with the general design and enactment of that program.

The Obamacare application only asks for “personal data” that’s so ordinary that it’s known to and easily claimed by virtually all of 310 million Americans.  (Obamacare does not ask for today’s “launch codes” or for a list of targets on today’s drone assassination list.)  So, it’s “odd” that such “ordinary” information (name, date of birth, SSN, etc.) can’t be found for President Obama.  And, what happens if President Obama drives a car and is stopped for speeding?  If the traffic cop runs Obama’s ID, will the computer come back with a “No Such Person” notice?

It’s almost as if President Obama is not one of the 310 million Americans tracked by government computers.  Almost as if Obama is “foreign” to the United States.  Or, could it be that Obamacare is only for the 310 million subjects and/or “animals” in this country–but not for sovereigns like the President?

It’s also interesting that Obama’s “staff” applied for Obamacare on behalf of President Obama.  Do you suppose it might be legal for my “staff” to make my application for Obamacare?  I mean, if the Obamacare application software seeks to verify each applicant’s ID in order to prevent fraud, you’d think that only the actual applicant should be able to make the application.  If Obama’s “staff” can sign him up for Obamacare, how does that differ from some stranger applying for Obamacare on behalf of Obama?  If Obama’s staff can sign him up for Obamacare, can his staff also draft and sign Executive Orders on Obama’s behalf?  Can Obama’s staff also sign legislation on Obama’s behalf?

I’d be interested learning how the Obamacare law can both: 1) allow persons other than the actual applicant to sign up for Obamacare on the applicant’s behalf; but also, 2) prevents fraud and identity theft, etc..

I’d also like to read the parts of Obamacare or whichever other parts of the United States Code that explain the legality of deleting (?) all “personal information” from government computers about the President or, in the alternative, of electing a man to public office whose identity can’t be confirmed by government computers.

We live in “interesting times”.  We also live in “odd” times.  So, it probably shouldn’t be a surprise that Obamacare can’t identify Obama.  Still, if it’s not surprising, it’s at least amusing.

“Oddly enough,” it’s even remotely possible that Obamacare might prove to be the means by which the “birthers” prove that Obama wasn’t born within the several United States and is therefore ineligible to be President.



Posted by on December 25, 2013 in Identification, Illegal Aliens, Obama, Video


Tags: , ,

16 responses to “Obamacare can’t identify Obama

  1. sherayx

    December 25, 2013 at 10:26 PM

    Reblogged this on SherayxWeblog.

  2. Yartap

    December 25, 2013 at 11:46 PM

    Obamacare can’t identify Obama; neither can E-Verify identify him.

    • kanani

      December 26, 2013 at 8:48 AM

      Obama’s staff should have used the president’s real name. Barry Soetoro.

      That would have worked.

  3. Anthony Clifton

    December 26, 2013 at 7:30 AM


    Washington Journal….C-SPAN…

    is America a Police State…?

    why not ask the Davidians…

    …if you don’t have anything to hide you won’t mind Moishe with his microscope climbing up
    your …britches…or Chertoff bombarding you with cancer causing X-Rays….
    or DU spread all over your cult compound…while you be Breaking Bad.

    Knowing the Truth about the Truth hating terrorists….helps in the Mental {spiritual}
    Health dept.

  4. Julie

    December 26, 2013 at 10:33 AM

    On what basis do we now consider the president to be a sovereign? Is it just that he doesn’t acknowledge his given name? Please clarify, if you will. I have bee n under the impression that the oath of office causes the oath-taker to strip himself of even his civil rights for the sake of becoming a servant to the People. Thank you for your time. Julie

    • Adask

      December 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM

      I’m not suggesting that Obama is truly a “sovereign”. I’m merely suggesting that the government might try to justify certain powers and conduct with that false presumption.

      • Julie

        December 28, 2013 at 9:34 AM

        I see. Thank you for the clarification, friend.

  5. cynthia

    December 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM

    It can be reasonably said that only ‘legal aliens’ are ‘citizens’ and the rest only ‘citizen’ by presumption, assumption, and non-rebuttal. If you ignorantly consent to being a ‘citizen’ are you truly ‘free’? This seriously on this. If you are a ‘person’ or ‘hu-man’ are you a man? are you ‘free’? As a result, if you are a ‘free man’ then you have an imprescriptible right to privacy – en toto… right to refuse ‘system entrapment’ etc.

    • J.M.

      December 28, 2013 at 9:08 PM

      Did this reasoning, in your opinion, also apply to the signers on the documents comprising the organic law of the united States,and all Presidents of the u.S., let’s say up & until good ol honest Abe? Or, include him if you so desire. I do know that the original intent of / for the purpose of the Government, with & after Lincoln, did a 180. This Country has gone down the180 path ever since. This is my opinion & it ain’t worth much, if anything. If you respond just answer my first question. Thanks.

  6. palani

    December 26, 2013 at 2:23 PM

    His name is Steve Dunham.

    • J.M.

      December 26, 2013 at 5:17 PM

      I don’t think knowing what his name is will change anything. If I was the chief justice of the Supreme Court, I would have refused to participate in the ritual. HE is just as big a fraud. BUT, the whole G.D. system THRIVES on fraud.

      • palani

        December 26, 2013 at 7:18 PM

        @ J.M. “I don’t think knowing what his name is will change anything”

        Lessons learned from history. Ole King Louis XVI didn’t lose his head with that name. He had to be renamed before his neck could be received.

        The imprisonment and execution of Louis, 1792–1793
        Louis was officially arrested on 13 August 1792, and sent to the Temple, an ancient fortress in Paris that was used as a prison. On 21 September, the National Assembly declared France to be a Republic and abolished the Monarchy. Louis was stripped of all of his titles and honours, and from this date was known as simply Citoyen Louis Capet.

        Barack Obama will never be charged. The same cannot be said about Steve Dunham.

    • Jethro

      December 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM

      What happened to “Barry”?

      • J.M.

        December 27, 2013 at 12:47 AM

        Jethro, Hi there.
        @ What happened to “Barry”?
        I only know that in my heart I know he was right. The slogan that said, In your heart you know he is right, I agree with. Don’t seem to help much if you are right, in this world, & remember, no good deed will go unpunished.

    • J.M.

      December 27, 2013 at 4:38 PM

      @ > Barack Obama will never be charged. The same cannot be said about Steve Dunham.

      I can & will say it, i.e., the, Steve Dunham YOU are referring to WILL NEVER be charged with anything that will be adjudicated guilty as charged in ANY court in this “Federal” Union of States. The Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme court is another “too big to fail” reason. IF I am wrong, I will jump for joy & no matter how much “others” will condemn or laugh at me I will welcome same with joy & laugh with YOU / THEM. I HOPE YOU ARE RIGHT, palani. OH YES !!! I was aware a long time ago that the Black President’s Grandfather was named, Stanley Dunham, but I thought what difference does any of this obvious colored gentleman in the lumber business make.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s