RSS

The Longest Standing Problem in Astro-Physics

02 Feb

Dark Matter [courtesy Yahoo Images]

Dark Matter
[courtesy Yahoo Images]

Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist, cosmologist, author, and science communicator. He is currently the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium. He’s intelligent, humorous, likable and a little bit smug.  So far as I know, he’s an atheist.  Therefore, he’s troubled by a particularly difficult and long-standing problem:  “dark matter“.

Gravity is presumed to be a consequence or characteristic of all matter.  Every gram of matter results in a fixed and knowable amount of gravity.  Scientists have measured the total amount of both gravity and matter in the universe and found a problem. The total amount of gravity appears to be about 25 times greater than the perceivable quantity of mass and energy should produce.

Scientists have been aware of this discrepancy since the 1930s but unable to offer a “scientific” (Godless) explanation.  Scientists (who often doubt the existence of God and disparage the value of religion) have essentially dismissed this problem under the heading of “dark matter”.  Their belief in their own understanding of mass and gravity is so strong that they blithely ignore the fact that their system of belief can’t perceive or account for 95% of the mass and energy of the universe and continue to insist that their system of belief remains undeniably valid.

If I come up with a theory of something that’s right 90% of the time, people will say, “Gee, that guy Al is pretty smart.”  If I come up with a theory that’s right even 65% of the time, people will congratulate me for my logic.  But if I devise a theory that’s wrong 95% of the time, people will snicker and say I’m an idiot.  And if–despite acknowledging that my theory fails 95% of the time–I not only continue to believe in my theory but even insist that everyone else should also believe in it, people will call me a fool or a lunatic.

But that’s just what some scientists do.  They can’t even perceive 95% of the universe, and yet they insist that that their ignorance is merely a mystery rather than evidence of flaws in the fundamental premises of their “science”.

My point is that a belief in”dark matter” and “dark energy” (which we can’t perceive but only infer) is no more “scientific” than a belief in God.  More, the highly intelligent and well-educated scientists who disparage spiritual religions based on the existence of an unseen God, nevertheless believe that 95% of the universe is composed of unseen matter and energy.  Thus, such scientists are guilty of practicing their own “physical” religion.  (By ridiculing a spiritual faith while embracing a physical faith, such scientists make me wonder if I’m not witnessing yet another evidence of spiritual warfare.)

What follows is a brief video of scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson discussing the mystery of “dark matter”.  At one point, he says we shouldn’t even call it “dark matter” . . . we should call it the “dark force”.  On reflection, he jokes, “No, we shouldn’t have any name for it. . . . we should just call it . . .  ‘Fred’.”

Ha. Ha.  How witty.

But, in my opinion, maybe we should just call it “God“–or, at least, God’s kingdom.

Whenever anyone talks about the 95% of the universe that can’t be perceived and is therefore labeled “dark matter” and/or “dark energy,” I’m reminded of Genesis 1:1-5:

1  In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2  And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

3  And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

4  And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

5  And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

 I understand Genesis 1: 1-5 to indicate that in the beginning, our Father YHWH ha Elohiym existed in a plane of reality that Moses (the probable author of Genesis), described as “darkness“.

3,400 years ago, Moses described the plane of existence that preceded the creation of our modern universe as “darkness“–and today, brilliant scientists describe the 95% of the universe that they can’t perceive as “dark matter“.  What an interesting coincidence, hmm?  (In both cases, when Moses said “darkness” and modern scientists say “dark matter,” we aren’t necessary talking something that is dark in the sense of “black”. We’re talking about something that can’t be directly perceived by mortal men with their normal endowment of five physical senses.)

Then God said, “Let there be light” and for the first time there was “light” of the sort that you and I can perceive. Insofar as light emanates from the stars and sun, and modern planets and matter may also emanate from the stars and sun, when we talk about “light,” we’re at least implicitly talking about the creation of all perceivable matter. Ultimately, we perceive the matter composing this universe with the light of this universe.

“[A]nd God divided the light from the darkness.”  The newly-created universe of “light” did not replace the former plane of “darkness”.  The plane of “darkness” (that predated the creation of the now known universe of “light”) did not cease to exist. Instead, the plane of “darkness” remained but was “divided” from the newly-created universe of “light”.

“And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.” That verse seems to say that the “darkness” and the “light” shared the same universe.  If so, the newly created “light” was added to the pre-existing “darkness” and both existed together as “Day” and “Night” in the same plane of existence.  But I suspect that Moses may have been merely trying to describe the difference between the original plane of “darkness” and the newly-created “universe of light” in terms that could be understood by newly-freed, largely uneducated Hebrew slaves.  If so, the plane of “darkness” and the newly created “universe of light” could be two different planes of existence.

I certainly can’t prove it and I won’t argue this is gospel, but I suspect that when “God divided the light from the darkness,” He may have divided the newly-created “universe of light” from the pre-existing plane of “darkness” in such an absolute manner that mankind (dwelling in the universe of light) would never be able to directly perceive that plane of “darkness” with their normal five senses.

If so, I believe that the “dark matter” and “dark energy” (which scientist infer from their inability to account for all the sources of the known gravity) corresponds to the plane of “darkness” (imperceptibility) that predated the creation of the perceivable “universe of light” and still exists to this day.

This implies that God lives in the realm Moses described to newly-freed Hebrew slaves as “darkness”.  I.e., God lives in a realm that mortals can’t directly perceive in the same sense that mortals can’t see in the dark.

If the current scientific estimates of the magnitude of dark matter and dark energy are accurate, and if dark matter and dark energy conform to the “darkness” described in Genesis 1:1-5, then the plane of “darkness” (imperceptibility) that is God, or is at least the realm which God inhabits, is 25 times larger than the known “universe of light”.

That proportion seems about right to me: God’s realm appears to be (at least) 25 times larger than our known “universe of light”.

More, God’s plane of “darkness” (imperceptibility) isn’t located at some distant galaxy, millions of light years away.  God’s plane of “darkness” is right here among us, next to us, and even in us in the sense of 1 Corinthians 3:16 which reads, “Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?” (I have several more verses at the bottom of this article that also deal with the immediate presence of an unseen and unseeable God in our “universe of light”.)  The immediate presence of God seems consistent with the scientific understanding that “dark matter” is not concentrated at some distant point, but is also all around us and even in us.

In any case, here’s the video of Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson describing the mystery of “dark matter”.  I can’t help believing that that mystery might be solved if scientists were willing to consider the description of “darkness” found in the first five verses of the entire Bible.

I also can’t help laughing when I see Mr. Tyson struggle to explain “dark matter” without ever touching on the possibility of God.

In fact, Dr. Tyson’s presentation doesn’t just make me smile, smirk or laugh–it cracks me up.  It kinda reminds me of an old Monty Python skit.  It’s silly to the point of hilarity. And these guys are supposed to be smart.

video     00:01:57

Finally, a few more Bible verses about God (and perhaps His plane of “darkness”/imperceptibility) being all around and even within us:

“Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.”  Joshua 1:9

“Where shall I go from your Spirit? Or where shall I flee from your presence? If I ascend to heaven, you are there! If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there! If I take the wings of the morning and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand shall lead me, and your right hand shall hold me.”  Psalm 139:7-10

“Am I a God at hand, declares the Lord, and not a God far away? Can a man hide himself in secret places so that I cannot see him? declares the Lord. Do I not fill heaven and earth? declares the Lord.”  Jeremiah 23:23-24

“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us).  Mathew 1:23

“And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper, to be with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will be in you.”  John 14:16-17

 
51 Comments

Posted by on February 2, 2014 in Belief, Bible, Creationism, Venue, Video

 

Tags: , ,

51 responses to “The Longest Standing Problem in Astro-Physics

  1. Peg-Powers

    February 2, 2014 at 2:59 PM

    How beautiful and magnificent! Thanks, Al.

     
    • Adask

      February 2, 2014 at 3:24 PM

      Hi Peggy, thanks for reading, understanding and complimenting.

      Y’know,sometimes I just write articles. They’re OK. Hopefully, they’re pretty good.

      But every so often I get to write one that pleases me, delights me, even excites me because (right or wrong) I believe I’m writing something that the Good LORD approves of and perhaps even wants me to write.

      This was one of those articles. I don’t mean that it’s perfect, but there’s an idea here that I’m sure will please and even help some of my readers in a way that’s spiritual rather than political or economic. That pleases me.

      Thanks again.

       
      • J.M.

        February 3, 2014 at 4:48 PM

        @ But every so often I get to write one that pleases me, …………”
        PLEASE !!! Keep pleasing yourself !!!! The “Father” did not say,this is my beloved son in whom I am so “proud” did he. It brings me & “others” so much pleasure when you write articles that please you.

         
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 12:16 AM

      @ >How beautiful and magnificent! Thanks, Al.
      Well said.

       
  2. pop de adam

    February 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM

    This reminds me of the fact that everything we perceive is actually only a reflection of light and shadow playing upon our retinas and how our brain interprets this effect. Bees and other insects often see flowers much differently than us due to a heightened sensitivity to ultraviolet light. We can also note how things such as radar are much further ranging than our own vision especially when it is a foggy day or at night for example. Even with vision that comforts us in the light we often are still in the dark. If there were beings existing only in and among those places without light, most people would find this concept terrifying. I’m fairly certain I’ve seen a movie predicated on this idea.

    Don’t recall where I heard this one:

    “LIght casts out darkness, darkness cannot cast out light”

     
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 10:59 AM

      Hi pop
      @ “Bees and other insects often see flowers much differently than us due to a heightened sensitivity to ultraviolet light.”
      wow, sure wish I had your depth of insight perception.

      @ >!’m fairly certain I’ve seen a movie predicated on this idea.
      have had ONE “very close” “encounter” myself. It was not scary but it was, dumbfounding

       
  3. Jetlag

    February 2, 2014 at 4:12 PM

    If you think what passes for science can’t be made up dogma for social engineering purposes, consider the Global Warming hoax and the vaccination hoax, both of which have been thoroughly debunked by actual science.

    A lot of what passes for science is really political activism in disguise. The institutions that preserve and transmit what passes for science were co-opted (i.e. bought) by the international Money Power in the early 20th century.

    Dark matter was invented to rescue a theory in crisis. What we actually observe through our telescopes contradicts the predictions of the current theory of gravity, which is an essential part of the atheistic story of the origin of the universe.

    To save their theory from the dustbin of history where it belongs, the priests of science conjured up “dark matter”, thereby fraudulently accounting for the huge amounts of missing mass they needed to balance their books.

     
    • Martens

      February 3, 2014 at 1:40 AM

      Dark matter could also be called “fiat matter”.

      Dark matter is to physics as fiat currency is to finance.

      Both “establishment science” (an oxymoron) and the Federal Reserve spin their fiats out of nothing, as needed, with no basis in physical reality.

       
      • J.M.

        February 5, 2014 at 2:22 AM

        Martens,
        It can be “called” anything, even “animal” matter. One of the many things that matters to me & I’m grateful for, is, this long standing problem is also long suffering “not willing that any should perish…….” This “long standing problem” gets no pleasure out of the death of the wicked. Odd isn’t it that this long standing problem is the answer to everything, at least to me. I believe that if these geniuses would start out with just the PRESUMPTION that there “may be” an “intelligent” “something else” existing, they would be astounded at their discoveries. But since it’s impossible for anything more intelligent to exist than they are, well, they will always have a never ending problem. UNTIL, good morning boys & girls. it’s “wake up time” time to “rise & shine” for some, at least, a.k.a Born Again time, they will seen their bodies are no longer flesh but spirit. Those “over comers” shall see this long standing problem as he is for they will BE as he is. Can you imagine what would happen if these additional “problems” would rebel like Lucifer did what would happen? But they won’t do that, rebel. The long standing problem knows from how they have lived & died what their character is.

         
      • Jetlag

        February 5, 2014 at 4:04 PM

        @Martens

        That’s right, “dark matter” is merely the name of a bookkeeping trick designed to conceal the failure of an officially sanctioned theory.

         
  4. WB

    February 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM

    As always, well put and well done. . . .

     
  5. Adrian

    February 2, 2014 at 4:51 PM

    I don’t think we should confuse reality with the poor judgement of a clown.
    There are some people out there who pretend to be scientists.
    Others pretend that they have seen GOD.
    One thing is clear: what does not appear,does not exist.
    We don’t know what Universe is but we try.
    One day at the time.

     
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 9:28 AM

      Adrian
      @ ! don’t think………………..”
      I understand.

       
    • J.M.

      February 5, 2014 at 1:04 AM

      @One thing is clear: what does not appear,does not exist.
      Please don’t ever jump off any high building. It’s not the falling that matters, it’s the sudden stop.

       
      • J.M.

        February 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM

        Adrain,
        @One thing is clear: what does not appear,does not exist.

        I clearly understand.

        Please don’t ever jump off any high building. It’s not the falling that matters, it’s the sudden stop.
        Forgot to say, “Problem” gravity is very clear about that. Seeing clearly now, Adrian?

         
  6. Christian Gains

    February 2, 2014 at 5:12 PM

    Hi Al! My first comment is in relation to this comment you made:

    “…3,400 years ago, Moses described the plane of existence that preceded the creation of our modern universe as “darkness“–and today, brilliant scientists describe the 95% of the universe that they can’t perceive as “dark matter“. What an interesting coincidence, hmm? (In both cases, when Moses said “darkness” and modern scientists say “dark matter,” we aren’t necessary talking something that is dark in the sense of “black”. We’re talking about something that can’t be directly perceived by mortal men with their normal endowment of five physical senses.)…”

    I looked up the word for darkness, and found an amazing amount of latitude for interpretation. So…I’m going to print the two words and their descriptions, so that everyone has a better take of what possibly was occurring in Genesis 1:1 – 5. Hope this helps.

    STRONG’S CONCORDANCE — HEBREW DICTIONARY Pg.50; left column
    —————————————————————————————————————————-
    Genesis 1:2 “Darkness” = #2822 ‘CHOSHEK’ [pronounced: kho-shek]; FROM #2821: (#2822 = the dark; hence (lit.) darkness: (fig.), misery, destruction, death, ignorance, sorrow, wickedness, dark (ness), night, obscurity.

    NOW: #2821 “CHASHAK” [pronounced: khaw-shak] a prime root; to be dark(as, with holding light), translate to darken — be black, be (make) dark, darken, cause darkness, be dim, hide.
    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    Now, look at all of those various options for interpreting, and you see that the Genesis 1:1 thru 5 has a LOT of variables possible. And then (especially as you consider that it APPEARS that Yahwey made the universe from LITERALLY nothing!), consider that ver. 2 statement: (here are two separate translations:{the First is from the KJV: “The earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep; And, the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters”

    Now, here you have 3 separate statements:

    #1] The earth was without form & void:

    #2] and darkness was upon the face of the deep

    #3] And, the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the water

    Doesn’t that last statement stand out as a BIG, BIG clue that there’s more going on in the first 2 verses than merely “God created…..darkness and void”.

    ———— ————– ————— ————— —————- —————— ——————-

    Now, here’s a translation, done by 20 Hebrew Scholars (In S. Africa), begun in 1971, and 1st printing in 1993,[21 years]. They formed the INSTITUTE OF SCRIPTURE RESEARCH (PTY) LTD.
    www.http://www.messianic.co.za/isr

    In their “DESCRIPTION OF THE PURPOSE OF THIS TRANSLATION” they state:

    “…iii restores the meaning to so many words which have become popular to use, but, do not reflect accurately the meaning of the original — for example: church, glory, holy, sacrifice, soul, etc….”

    Now, wait until you see how these HEBREW SCHOLARS translated Genesis 1:2!

    “And, the earth came to be formless and empty, and darkness was on the face of the deep.(period) And, the Spirit of Elohim was upon the face of the waters”

    Well now…This translation makes it even MORE obvious that something has gone on, that we haven’t a description of. Where did that water come from? hmmm? And, why weren’t we told? Are we missing something?

    Well I took a close look at the translation options for that first verse #1254 bara [pronounced: baw-raw] = a prime root: (absolutely) to create; (qualified):to cut down (a wood), select, feed (as formative processes); — choose, create, (creator); cut down, dispatch, do, make (fat).

    NOW, LET’S SEE WHAT DIFFERENCE SOME OF THESE WORDS COULD MAKE:

    “In the beginning Elohim {selected} {to withhold light} to create the heavens and the earth…”

    “And the earth came to be formless and empty, and {obscurity} was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of Elohim was moving on the face of the waters.”
    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    I could, of course go on, building a more complete picture, possibly, or not, but my main point here is that (as Dr. Heiser so often warns), if we do not speak, read, and understand the grammar of HEBREW, we “gringos” shouldn’t spend too much time trying to understand what is NOT said in the Scriptures. Or re-translating them.

    Obviously, there was “WATER” early on in the creative activity. Therefore, (at that point of the creation), the earth was no longer “void” or “formless and empty”.

    So, what this tells us is either, we’re missing some of the History, OR — more likely — God doesn’t think it significant to tell us ALL of His actions at that time.

    Wow! (something just jumped out at me): compare Genesis 1:1 – 2 with St. John 1:1 – 3…”In the beginning…” [same as Genesis 1:1. Then [Gen.1:1 “God created…”] [Jn.1:1 “…was the Word”]…[Gen. 1:1 “the heavens and the earth…”] [Jn. 1:1 and the Word was with Elohim, and the Word was Elohim…”]. Now we have 3 entities described in gen.1:1 – 2: “Elohim”, — “the Spirit of Elohim” — “the Word”!?! All three of the “Godhead”.

    (And, if you notice, God never touches ANYthing until He creates Adam, and then Eve. It’s all spoken into existence…created by God’s Word — Yeshuah [Jn.1:14]). Yep! Which goes to show that we NEED a broad grasp of the New Testament, to grasp MUCH of the Old Testament.

    Hope this helps…

     
  7. J.M.

    February 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM

    I laughed my you know what off !!! It was hilarious.

     
  8. J.M.

    February 2, 2014 at 6:48 PM

    I just know that whoever is born of the flesh is spirit and whoever is born of the spirit is flesh.

     
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 2:18 PM

      @ I just know that whoever is born of the flesh is spirit and whoever is born of the spirit is flesh.
      forgot to say, heh-heh,or he-haw

       
  9. Robert A. McKeown

    February 2, 2014 at 9:41 PM

    Excellent job, Al. Absolutely knocked it out of the park. I’ll be sharing this one!

     
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 6:33 PM

      @ > Excellent job, Al. Absolutely knocked it out of the park. I’ll be sharing this one!
      Yes indeed !!! A GRAND SLAMMER !!!

       
  10. Jethro!

    February 2, 2014 at 10:35 PM

    “In fact, Dr. Tyson’s presentation doesn’t just make me smile, smirk or laugh–it cracks me up. It kinda reminds me of an old Monty Python skit. It’s silly to the point of hilarity.”

    That presentation is not too unlike John Cleese explaining the brain… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQjgsQ5G8ug

     
    • J.M.

      February 2, 2014 at 10:59 PM

      Jethro !!!
      @ Your entire message on> February 2, 2014 at 10:35 PM
      Wow !!! Wish I could have said it that well. I have said before & on this blog that “God” IS an intelligent energy. That’s the “THING” they’re not understanding. AND YOU KNOW they are SHARP !!! They have Doctorates & Master of this & that degree & look at how little they know. There are some scriptures that say things as this that have no explanation to their brilliant minds are revealed to,who? I think it’s babes or close to babes.

       
  11. Yartap

    February 3, 2014 at 12:20 AM

    Genesis Chapter One,
    1 “In the beginning (TIME) God created the heaven (SPACE) and the earth (MATTER).”
    – TIME – SPACE – MATTER – ?
    2 “And the earth was without form, and void; and DARKNESS was upon the face of the deep (ABYSS; WATER; SPACE?). And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters (= DARKNESS?).”
    3 “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.”
    Is this light from SUNS; QUASARS; MOONS; NOVAS; and STARS? Because God “made two great lights in the firmament” and “He made the stars also.” in verses 14 – 19 on God’s fourth day.
    4 “And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.”
    Does this “darkness” have mass or matter? Just like the Light, is Darkness energy and/or matter?
    5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
    6 And God said, Let there be a firmament (arch of the sky; atmosphere; magnetic field) in the midst of the waters, and let it DIVIDE the WATERS from the WATERS.
    “[D]ivide the waters?” Water inside the sphere and WATER IN SPACE?
    7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
    YES! Water inside the sphere and water in space. Could this be the “Dark Matter” and/or “Dark Energy?”
    8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
    So, the dividing line (firmament) is the start of space, which has water? Heaven = Firmament = Water in Space?
    9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
    10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

    Only ionized water and water turned into a gas under high temperatures can be detected by radio telescopes. Water in a vacuum, like space, will boil and vaporizes (low temperature), and then freeze until heat is applied again to start to boiling again. Vaporized water cannot be detected by a radio telescope nor seen.

    I offer for thought, only.

    Has water ever been seen in space? Yes! The following article discusses such a discovery. But the author mistakenly calls the water as “water vapor.” This is impossible, because it is next to a high powered quasar.

    http://www.space.com/12400-universe-biggest-oldest-cloud-water.html

     
    • Yartap

      February 3, 2014 at 12:52 AM

       
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 1:07 AM

      HI DEAR Friend & Brother !!!
      @“And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.”

      Some people say, God WAS “that” light. I can just hear “God” saying, let there be me.
      “God” I would think, expects us to use our mind & brain to understand SOME scriptures. Other scriptures must be divinely revealed, & some other scriptures should be studied as & like the Bereans studied to know whether these things be true. BUT the day is COMING wheh EVERYBODY will understand. This I KNOW. Now, I’m going to read the rest of your comment. Oh, I need to say this, MUCH of Alfred’s message is very solemn. The part that was, left me, well I don’t know the right word, but I want to say “spellbound.”

       
  12. JustARegularPatriot

    February 3, 2014 at 12:05 PM

    Wonderful write up Al. Much thanks. I gain so much from your writings AND the comments. What a service you are giving to us all. It is appreciated.

    You know, there is a difference between knowledge and understanding. When these science gurus don’t have the latter their prejudice shows for all to see.

     
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM

      To: JustARegularPatriot,

      @ What a service you are giving to us all. It is appreciated.

      Freely we have received. How do we freely give back? AND not make it publicly known?

      @ their prejudice shows for all to see.

      “ALL” to see? Ohhhh if only this was true. We don’t have many JustARegularPatriot’s like you. This is another thing I would like to be wrong about. But, I just can’t “see” that I am.

       
      • JustARegularPatriot

        February 4, 2014 at 2:55 PM

        To: J.M.

        “Freely we have received. How do we freely give back? AND not make it publicly known?

        That’s just it, to me, we must not be afraid to make it publicly known.

        Joshua 1:9 “Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.”

        Every chance I get I refer people to this (and other) site(s) and various threads. It is up to them to decide what to do with it; that free will thing you know? But I will never stop.

        “..ALL to see…?”

        I understand what you are saying, and indeed you most certainly are not wrong. But still, that does not negate the fact that it IS here for ALL to see.

        All I can do, and I encourage other like minded individuals to do the same, is maintain the passion I have for this, and other sites like it, and get the word out about them and their topics. The search for and dissemination of true knowledge and understanding has been in my DNA since my younger days.

        A few other sites I gain much knowledge and understanding from are:

        organiclaws.org
        (How deeply we have been {and continue to be} deceived since the “founding fathers” time. It opened my eyes to another level.

        Famguardian.org
        (“Nonprofit Christian religious ministry dedicated to protecting people and families from extortion, persecution, exploitation, socialism, divorce, crime, and sin. Advocate personal liberty, personal responsibility, constitutional and SMALL and accountable government, sovereignty, and religious faith.”)
        Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM.org)
        (Two wonderful Christian sites )

        Sovereign Man
        International diversification & protecting life and liberty in an increasing tyrannical world environment.

        Alfred: If the above mention of like minded sites is unacceptable, please delete their mention.

         
    • J.M.

      February 4, 2014 at 3:20 PM

      JustARegularPatriot
      Thank you for responding & I apologize for not being specific. There must be expenses incurred for the “insight” freely provided on this blog. I would like to pay my fair share, as it’s called, but I do not know how to do this without “publicly” addressing this desire. I hope the following scripture will explain what I’m trying to say

      Matthew 6:1 Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

       
      • JustARegularPatriot

        February 4, 2014 at 4:15 PM

        I believe you’ll find all you need by clicking on the contact link below.

         
  13. J.M.

    February 3, 2014 at 6:56 PM

    @ “And the earth came to be formless and empty (< Courtesy of Christian Gains)

    Came to be ?? Oh No !! Well, then again, you must consider the source. When a "fool" says this, it means it's foolish to say something like that, ONLY a FOOL would say something like that. BUT, If a Scholar says this, it's very interesting isn't it. Well guess what Ladies & Gentlemen, Men & women, Boys & Girls The Holy Bible says this. The Earth BECAME formless & empty, void and A CONFUSED HEAP. And some others say, NO !!! God CREATED it, the Earth, a CONFUSED HEAP. I KNOW this is also written in the book of Jeremiah & I think it's the 3rd chapter, not sure of the chapter tho. Yes, now & then, there is a FOOL such as I.

     
    • J.M.

      February 3, 2014 at 7:51 PM

      @ “And the earth came to be formless and empty (< Courtesy of Christian Gains)
      I apologize, it's Chapter 4 Of Jeremiah, verse 23

       
      • J.M.

        February 4, 2014 at 3:36 AM

        Ain’t it funny how “pride” goes before a fall. If we only understood humility. And once again, there is a difference in understanding what being humble means, & being humble. I ask for prayer from those who “understand what I’m trying to say” to pray for me to this Being who is the “supreme problem” for scientific trigonometricas, etc., to help me become humble by whatever means necessary, yes even to death for I would rather die being humble than die being proud. This is my prayer request & I ask for prayer in this “matter” sincerely Thank you.

        p.s. I cannot respond humbly to those who refer to the “God” I am aware of who is the greatest unprecedented phenomenal being that has ever crossed the horizon of this world as a being who creates confusion. I respond with anger which I realize too late is not right. Maybe it could be understood if you can imagine an adult spitting in a little innocent child’s face. Would this make you angry? And just to stand there and watch & do nothing. I MUST do something. I just don’t how to do the proper thing. Just saying STOP IT doesn’t help. I believe if I was humble I would know how to handle anything in the right way.

         
  14. storehouseministry

    February 4, 2014 at 2:28 AM

    People are very Limited in their ability to See.

    Visible light is a very Small percentage of the Electromagnetic Spectrum.

    on a linear scale, visible Light is only 0.0035% .

    Reality is actually Much more Vast, than we are able to see.

    .

     
  15. storehouseministry

    February 4, 2014 at 2:36 AM

    People are able to Limited in their ability to See.

    on a linear scale
    of the Electromagnetic Spectrum,
    visible Light is only 0.0035% .

    Reality is Much more Vast,
    than we are able to See.

    .

     
  16. Julie

    February 4, 2014 at 7:23 AM

    Thank you, Alfred. Good points well made.

     
    • J.M.

      February 4, 2014 at 3:06 PM

      Julie,
      “I like you very much”

       
      • Julie

        February 4, 2014 at 5:04 PM

        LOL. Thank you, friend.

         
  17. J.M.

    February 4, 2014 at 6:14 PM

    Julie,
    @ LOL.
    Well, I am good for something < heh heh. Julie!!! presuming you did watch that very well illuminated enlightening video, just scroll up & look at the picture itself. I notice his eyes, then his lips, back to his eyes & so on & I laugh heartily at that, the picture itself over & over & over. Knowing what was said in the video, all I need to do is just look at the picture & I laugh so hard !!! As I said before, I read your comment everyday. Please read my prayer request message up above & I ask for your prayer in that regard. Shalom, dear one.

     
  18. Ernest Cooley

    February 4, 2014 at 6:59 PM

    There is no missing mass. Asto-physics ignores electrical attraction. There are electrical processes in play that can explain everything. Man has not yet fully decoded God’s creation.

     
    • J.M.

      February 5, 2014 at 3:41 AM

      @ Man has not yet fully decoded God’s creation.
      Well now that’s new news. I didn’t know that. Do you think man ever will, “decode” God’s creation?

       
    • J.M.

      February 5, 2014 at 3:22 PM

      @ There is no missing mass
      It’s something the en mass is missing.

       
    • J.M.

      February 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM

      @ >There is no missing mass

      Well kiss my grits. Yeah you’re right Ernest Cooley. It’s something the “en MASS is, missing

       
  19. Adrian

    February 5, 2014 at 2:15 PM

    Is good to fantasize about reality but wat it hurts is that rude awakening.

     
    • J.M.

      February 5, 2014 at 3:35 PM

      @ wat it hurts is that rude awakening.

      If you mean, what hurts, is, that rude awakening, how do “you” “know” this? Have you EVER been rudely awakened? I believe some people are IN FOR a rude awakening. But, you know what? There are people who will tell me, YOU (<me) sure are !!! Well, IF IF IF IF "God" IS the Creator & Author of confusion, I sure am, in for a rude awakening. No doubt about it.

       
  20. J.M.

    February 5, 2014 at 6:36 PM

    Jetlag,
    Re: That’s right, “dark matter” is merely the name of a bookkeeping trick designed to conceal the failure of an officially sanctioned theory.

    What is your source of your above statement? Unless, of course this is just another rhetorical question, & your no response will be understood that it is not worth answering.

     
  21. J.M.

    February 18, 2014 at 12:53 PM

    @ That’s right,

    Of course that’s right. It’s right because Jetlag says it’s right & Jetlag is never wrong about anything. RIGHT Jetlag? No response is necessary. I do say things every now & then that Jetlag say’s I’m right about.

     
  22. da13thsun

    August 27, 2014 at 6:19 PM

    Reblogged this on Da13thsun and commented:
    Sirius Sun C dark matter womb of Big Mama Amma Universe aka Creator aka GOD

     
  23. ankhwere

    October 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM

    Reblogged this on Ankhwere and commented:
    The Unseen

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s