RSS

Rocky LXVII

09 Feb

“Rocky” is a boxing saga of popular films all written by and starring Sylvester Stallone, who plays the character Rocky Balboa. The films are, by order of release date: Rocky (1976), Rocky II (1979), Rocky III (1982), Rocky IV (1985), Rocky V (1990) and Rocky Balboa (2006). The film series has grossed more than US$1 billion at the worldwide box office.

Technically, “Rocky Balboa” could’ve been named Rocky VI (Rocky 6).

Well, here’s “Rocky LXVII” (Rocky 67).  It’s a lesson in the fact that most fights are won by intimidation, but sometimes the intimidation doesn’t work and you really have to fight.  When that happens, intimidation doesn’t count for much.

video      00:02:45

 
27 Comments

Posted by on February 9, 2014 in Humor, Video

 

Tags:

27 responses to “Rocky LXVII

  1. moon

    February 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM

    Who said this?

    Never introduce an issue you don’t want to explain.

     
  2. Lyndon

    February 9, 2014 at 7:20 PM

    In common law we call this “accord and satisfaction”. We all have infinite right to self-defense.

     
  3. JustARegularPatriot

    February 10, 2014 at 10:53 AM

    Link not working. :(

     
    • Adask

      February 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM

      I just tried it an it worked for me.

       
    • charles

      February 10, 2014 at 5:07 PM

      JARP, there’s a bunch of script that has to be running to for that link to work. If you’re running any kind of script blocking software like “Noscript,” you’ll need to temporarily turn it off for the video to work.

       
    • Jethro

      February 10, 2014 at 5:30 PM

      As charles pointed out, the link may not work on a mobile device that doesn’t run Flash. Works ok on a desktop.

       
  4. citizenquasar

    February 10, 2014 at 2:47 PM

    I had to do that once on a bus in Dallas.

     
    • J.M.

      February 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM

      @ I had to do that once on a bus in Dallas.
      I’m presuming you,citizenquasar, mean, you had to defend yourself against the N word & gave the N word his come up pance. Same here. I was put off the bus & I just thought, thank God & Grey hound, the N word is gone. God hearted Black people agree with me. N words don’t

       
      • J.M.

        February 10, 2014 at 6:09 PM

        Ohh, forgot to say that the driver of the bus was a N word. Apparently RED & BLACK colors were offensive to the N WORD driver & being applied from a WHITE brush was just more than he could put up with. Decent God fearing Black people agree with me.

         
  5. Barbary

    February 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM

    Alfred, every now and then you have to pander. I get it. It’s the life of the blogger trying to stay popular. A portion of your audience just loves to see a black man get beat, even he is already pathetic and beaten by life. Who knows what words were exchanged in this altercation. But it satisfies some deep fantasy doesn’t it? Your gonna lose your following that thirsts for an authentic conservative voice if you keep posting this kind of rot. It’s beneath you.

     
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 3:09 PM

      .@ > A portion of your audience just loves to see a black man get beat, ……

      Apparently you have a hearing defect. I heard the N WORD say he was going to put his foot up the white man’s ass. Did you happen to see that the white man WALKED AWAY? Did you see the N WORD go to where the lily white honky cracker moved to?
      What is so wrong about showing realities that happen?
      I don’t want or like to beat up on anybody. But in this particular, The N WORD WANTED MY SEAT. He already had a seat. IF he did not, I would have let him have my seat. The N WORD DID get in the first blow because I would not exchange seats with him, THE N WORD. I did see stars. BUT it was the ONLY strike he got in. On the other hand, I was in a situation one time where 5 N WORDS ambushed me. Some decent Black people came to my rescue & IF they had not, I don’t think I would be typing these words. It would have been an honor & a PRIVILEGE for me to have been Booker T. Washington’s shoe shine boy So, I hope you understand where I’m coming from

       
      • Barbary

        February 13, 2014 at 6:16 PM

        Booker T’s shoe shine boy no less. How big of you. I think this what 2-bit psychologists call distancing. Your “N word” and your “decent Black people” epitomized by Booker T are separated by circumstance. When you think of Booker T, remember that there but for the sake of circumstance goes another “N-word”…but somehow I have a hunch that you already do think like that and in probably in the most uncharitable way. Funny how many people who claim to be individualists immediately fall on the crutch of categorizing (N-word) as soon as they are personally challenged. Here is a man of a certain age and race who experienced violent conflict with another man of a certain age and race. Yes, in America racial reality nuances everything. But you relinquish your deserved triumph when you characterize your opponent as an “N-word”. Why he’s just an “N-word” after all, not nearly the person you are…you already got him beat. What if this incident had happened to you on a bus in Moscow? You’d have to examine the immediate cause of the conflict; you wouldn’t have the convenience of falling back on the distancing bromide of race.

         
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 3:15 PM

      A portion of your audience just loves to see a black man get beat, ……..
      He was not a black man, he was a NIGGER,aka N WORD

       
      • Barbary

        February 13, 2014 at 6:19 PM

        I’m so glad that somebody made you the arbiter of who is a nigger and who is a black man. Thanks, I can sleep easy tonight. Will call on you tomorrow whenever I need clarification in my dealings with darkies. Cheers!

         
    • Adask

      February 13, 2014 at 3:23 PM

      Well, thanks for the criticism, I’ll try to do better in the future. Next time, I’ll show a video of some proud, young African-American playing the “knockout game” by sucker punching some old white guy or some white woman. Will that suit you?

      In fact, blacks have been getting away with violence against whites for several decades. We are told that the residual burdens of slavery are so great that the poor, oppressed blacks are still constantly discriminated against, based on the color of their skin. In other words, Whitey deserves to be punched, shot or killed for discriminating against the poor, mistreated blacks.

      But that’s not true to any significant degree. In fact, given that there couldn’t be a Kenyan in the White House if Whites were constantly discriminating against blacks based on the color of their skin.

      Is there discrimination against blacks? Yes. But it’s not based on skin color. It’s based on levels of intelligence and testosterone. Read “Race, Evolution, and Behavior” by J. Phillipe Rushton. Rushton points out that when you compare the white, black and Asian races, blacks have the lowest IQs and the highest testosterone levels; Asians have the highest average IQs, and the lowest testosterone level, and whites fall somewhere in between on both counts. The testosterone levels control fertility rates and predisposition to aggression and violence. Blacks are the most fertile of the three groups, Asians are least fertile, whites fall somewhere in between. Blacks are the most aggressive and violent, Asians are the least aggressive and violent; whites fall somewhere in between.

      The black’s first problem is that that average sub-Saharan negro’s average IQ is reportedly about 30 point lower than the average white’s. The average African-American’s IQ is reportedly 15 points lower than the average whites. The 15 point gap isn’t cultural. It’s genetic. The gap in America is only half that of Africa because most African-Americans are part white. (Which raises another interesting question: Who is actually black in this society? Is a light-skinned “black” really black or is he mostly white, or what?)

      Blacks don’t tend to do poorly in school because they’re discriminated against. Most of them do poorly because they lack the intellectual capacity to do well. The primary problem with black education is not cultural, it’s genetic. Most blacks don’t do well in school because they can’t.

      Rather than deal with this truth, we’ve been encouraged to “pretend” that the reason the poor, innocent blacks don’t do well in school is because the residual legacy of slavery. We (whites) have been encouraged to believe that the way to end racial discrimination is this society is hold modern whites (who’ve never had slaves) accountable to modern blacks (who’ve never been slaves) for the crime of slavery which ended 150 years ago. But the truth of the matter is that blacks are not discriminated against because they are black. They are discriminated against because, on average: 1) they lack sufficient intelligence to participate in a highly technical society or economy; and 2) they excessively predisposed to violence by their high testosterone levels.

      More, these observations are not the opinions of some “racist”. They are the opinions of an “objectivist” who is capable of looking at data and studies and calling a spade a spade.

      Blacks are constantly portrayed as victims. Based on that false portrayal, blacks feel “entitled” to collect welfare, refuse to study in school, condemn blacks who do study as “too white,” engage in violence, refuse to work, abort (according to some reports) over 50% of the children conceived in the African-American community, predate criminally on whites and especially other blacks, engage in disproportionate number of crimes, prostitution, and drug use.

      In virtually every instance, whitey is presumed to be primarily responsible for the black’s plight. But that’s just not true. The truth is that the blacks’ biggest problem is the blacks’. They are killing each other, aborting half their babies, failing to study in school, doing drugs, living on the “down low,” engaging in pimping and prostitution as if it were something to be proud because they–average blacks choose to do so. Whitey is not responsible for black problems; blacks are.

      President Obama has done more to destroy the black’s former sense of victimization and “entitlement” than any other living man. If Obama can be President, why can’t many blacks even get a job? The answer is not “discrimination” by whites. A significant percentage of blacks can’t hold jobs because they lack the requisite intelligence to do so.

      They are not being discriminated against because of their skin color. They are being discriminated against because of their low IQ.

      None of what I’ve just said is true for all blacks. Some blacks are very intelligent. Look at Obama. He’s a pathological liar, but he’s certainly endowed with an above-average IQ. I certainly don’t pretend that all blacks are prone to violence and crime. But there is a disproportionate percentage of blacks who are prone to violence and crime. Nobody (not even most blacks) want to be around these thugs, but whitey is still supposed to shoulder blame for the thugs.

      I’m saying that modern blacks have earned whatever discrimination they feel. If they don’t want to be discriminated against, get an education, beat the crap out of your children if that’s what’s required to make them study, stop pimping, whoring, doing drugs, engaging in violence and celebrating the “thug lifestyle” in the black movies and culture–or,in the alternative, recognize that the problem is inherent in black genetics and will not go away and therefore, blacks are not “entitled” to special treatment (affirmative action) by whites.

      Just about everyone, black and white and Asian, understands that what I’ve just written is roughly correct. But nobody wants to say it because nobody wants to face the truth.

      The truth is this: the average black is as lame at the game of civilization, as the average white is at the game of basketball.

      Average blacks fail in this society because they ain’t got game.

      The reason I posted the video of the poor, innocent black thug getting the crap knocked of him by a 67-year old “white boy” is fire a first tentative shot across the bow of those who believe the “race card” can still played and should still be played. I’m not pandering. I’m telling folks that whitey is slowly getting pissed. We mostly feel sorry for blacks. But nevertheless, we’ve just about had enough of the knock-out game, and newspapers that report crime and describe the criminals without mentioning their race, politicians that pander to blacks, and blacks who think they’re entitled to more than they earn because their skin is black.

      Do you think the “Reverend” Jesse Jackson wants racism to end? Hell, no! There’s too much money and power to be gained from that lie. How many blacks want racism ended? How many blacks need racism as an excuse to justify their own incompetence.

      Modern racism isn’t whitey’s fault. It’s the fault of blacks–who, incidentally, are probably the most racist people in this country.

      I’m black and I’m proud? Really? Proud of what?

      The way things are going the blacks will have so decimated themselves with abortion, crime and drugs that there might not be any more African-Americans in this country by the end of this century.

      Have you ever seen a more self-destructive people?

      I have more I could say, but I have to get ready for a radio show. Gotta go.

      But do you still think I’m “pandering”?

      The video I posted was about one of those blacks who have a high predisposition to violence, a false sense of entitled, and a low IQ. He was too dumb to see that the 67-year old white boy was a big man. He thought he’d thump that white senior citizen and he got his ass whipped. Good! That video is not about some poor victim or racial discrimination. It’s about an average black who’s prone to violence and largely incapable of rational thought. He wasn’t a victim, he was a victimizer who bit off more than he could chew. He got his ass kicked–and rightly so. It’s not pandering. It’s justice.

       
      • J.M.

        February 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM

        Alfred,
        @ >They are not being discriminated against because of their skin color. They are being discriminated against because of their low IQ.

        The law enforcement growth agency is hiring. They do qualify for openings there

        @ > , “……………….blacks have the lowest IQs and the highest testosterone levels;…………”

        Now, I see why the black comedian, Richard Pryor, said, They aine gaun B no shawtage uhh niggas. Niggas luzzzz tuh U no what.

        The reason I posted the video of the poor, innocent black thug getting the crap knocked of him by a 67-year old “white boy”

        Pose sum mo uhh umm.

        @ > Do you think the “Reverend” Jesse Jackson wants racism to end? Hell, no!

        U B gittin messy widduh HI REV Jesse

        He got his ass kicked–and rightly so. It’s not pandering. It’s justice.
        AMEN !!! JUST LIKE THE MONEYCHANGERS GOT THEIR HINDQUARTERS KICKED BY U no who.

         
      • Barbary

        February 13, 2014 at 7:18 PM

        J Phillipe Rushton has a theory with holes so big I could drive a semi through it. He claims a hierarchy of IQ with Asians on top. He further correlated head size and hip to head ratios. If his theory holds, then Asiatic people like the Sami (laplanders) of the Arctic should be near the top of the IQ pyramid. Want to guess where their IQ scores lie? He measures cranial sizes laterally. The skull is a volume with three distinct dimensions. He speaks about DNA and the permanence/inheritability of traits that contribute to aptitude for tests like IQ; traits that are part of common genotypes. Traits like these take tens of thousands of years to alter. Knowing as we do that Native Americans came out of Asia and have the Asian jaw/skull morphology and hip width critical to Rushton’s analysis, then they should have Asian IQ’s and if not, then IQ’s generally higher than average. Is that the case? No, it’s not. I posit that IQ testing and genetic inheritance as framed by Rushton is bunk.

        As far as Blacks being the most aggressive and violent, funny how Whites have spent nearly every year since the crusades in some damn war or other. Unleashing sub-atomic violence on other people. Do you know the charnel house that is European history at all? Most of it can best be described as tribal warfare. There are no excuses; this is also an “objectivist” opinion. Do you have any idea what happened in Yugoslavia a few ticks back? Rwanda killings didn’t add up to a 2 weeks on the western front in WWII. Blacks are currently in the mid-to-early stages of hobbling together their own effective business leadership (read organized crime syndicates) like the Jews and Irish did at the turn of the 20thC and like the Italians did post WWII. This is the classic way forward for an ethnic group in America. Blacks were misled in the 60’s by their leadership who encouraged them to aspire within the American system, which was plainly never built for them. Things will change and probably much faster than you imagine.

        You are tired of Black rage, I understand. Me too. It’s old. It’s gotta go. But Persians in Iran are tired of Azerbaijani rage. They’re sick of the state coddling that minority. Romanians have had it with the Gypsies and are hunting them down. In Central African Republic, Christians have decided to take no more shit from muslim immigrants and are burning down their houses when muslims step out of line. Same story different groups. The psycho-dynamics against the minority group is a constant and each majority population winds itself up with its litany of justifications – Darwinian or otherwise. There’s nothing special about the white/black dynamic in America. It’s textbook and it’s as old as the hills. Get a grip and stay focused on bringing us hard truths liberals and big gov’t doesn’t want us to know!!

         
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 8:05 PM

      Barbary,
      Barbary you’re ANOTHER CHERRY PICKER. As Almighty God is my witness, this happened. Two black men, < let's use that term got into a scuffle & one of the BLACK MEN SAID: Shut it up nigga.The other black man said Don't you be calling me no nigga you black nigger you duh blackest nigga I evuh saw." NOW, Barbary, chew on that a while. In other words it's ok for black people to call each other niggas. I say there are niggas & there are God fearing kind hearted decent CLASSY black people or Negroes. Some of the first "black slaves" were sold in a Country called NIGER. These slaves were sold by BLACK PEOPLE. That's ok too right Barbary? And today, people are STILL called Texans, Mexicans, california girls, & on & on. The word Nigger traces back to Niger. Words have a tendency to evolve & change tone every now & then. The N word for White is Caucasian. Ask ANY NIGGER. Also, I am a featherweight. Ain't no way you gaun mess wid a Heavyweight. I just hope Alfred was not responding to me & you, OR just me. This may be the only reason why I think you responded to me instead of the Heavyweight. I believe in EQUAL but SEPARATE .Drink you milk & sleep tight. nitey nite.

       
      • Barbary

        February 14, 2014 at 4:23 AM

        No! The N-word for Whites is NOT Caucasian; it is SLAVE. It comes from the era of feudalism in Europe before general manumissions. People from east of the Caucuses were brought into the west to work on the latifundia and other estates. These people were generally referred to by their ethnic name SLAV as in slavic people from which came slave and esclave, which distinguished them from the Gauls and other nativii indentured to the land. The white slave trade was intensified by the Moors. Millions of slavic people were sold by their own kind into slavery…or are you unaware of basic European history 101.

        You are correct that NIGGER is one of the old terms for west Africans from the area around the Niger river – the linguistic root here is NGR and was once used widely in Africa. “Words have a tendency to evolve & change tone”, you’ve noticed that, good. Now examine criticially how NGR is used in America and ask yourself if you want to be a part of it. Pollack, a much more benign eponym, was once inoffensive. It has also become so freighted with memories of discrimination that today you use it around Poles at your own risk.

        Now as far as you being a featherweight, I don’t buy that at all. You’re a worthy opponent. Don’t be ducking out. I’ve had a little fun with you and look forward to taking you to task at your next ignorant outburst. If you’re mean Alfred when your refer to “the Heavyweight”, see my comments directed squarely at him and his reliance on race theories proposed psychologist posing as evolutionary biologist J Phillipe Rushton.

         
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 8:15 PM

      @ > How big of you.
      No, how little of me. I did not have much to offer GREAT BLACK MEN like Booker T.

       
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM

      Ohhhh I think I see now. Booker T Washington was a UNCLE TOM. You ain’t prejudice IS you? I bleeve you IS.

       
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 8:50 PM

      Barbary
      @ > Funny how many people who claim to be individualists immediately fall on the crutch of categorizing (N-word) as soon as they are personally challenged

      Your depth of perception is that of a piss ant. OK I will not use N WORD anymore I’ll USE NIGGA or NIGGER. A NIGGA OR NIGGER BY ANY OTHER NAME IS STILL A NIGGA OR NIGGER

       
    • J.M.

      February 13, 2014 at 9:42 PM

      @ J Phillipe Rushton has a theory with holes so big I could drive a semi through it

      I don’t need no book to explain to me the difference tween a NIGGA a.k.a. a NIGGER & a Colored Gentleman.

       
    • J.M.

      February 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM

      @ No! The N-word for Whites is NOT Caucasian;

      I SAID > ASK ANY NIGGER a.k.a. NIGGA what the N word is faw, whitey. Is U asked any niggers/niggas ? huh? is you awe ant you? Barbary, what Race U is? What yo ethnic purity is?

       
    • J.M.

      February 14, 2014 at 5:12 PM

      Barbary,
      @ February 14, 2014 at 4:23 AM
      Highly articulate response in every way. Also, 100% accurate. BUT, Isay this, based on my understanding. We both may be in error, at least to some degree. If we knew more about each other, this could very well help us to know what or what is necessary or unnecessary to say. At this stage,it appears You live in a different world than most of us do. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, OR, I TRY HARD to be such. There are some things about him I KNOW about that most people don’t. It is baffling to me that most people don’t seem to know, but I think it’s because they really don’t care, that Jesus Christ loved to be around the “common people.” One of his “recruits” was a fisherman. He made his living fishing. ANYWAY, Try to remember some messages arrive AFTER some messages have already posted. Your response to Alfred Adask came in AFTER my message re: that comment. Hey you know what? We may wind up being friends, somewhere down the road. I hope so. Are you a Yale or a Harvard Grad? I ask this sincerely & not to be “cute” etc.

       
  6. Jetlag

    February 14, 2014 at 6:43 PM

    Clearly a relevant article for this thread:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

    It begins: “The connection between race and intelligence has been a subject of debate in both popular science and academic research since the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century. The debate concerns the interpretation of research findings that American test takers identifying as “White” tend on average to score higher than test takers of African ancestry on IQ tests, and subsequent findings that test takers of East Asian background tend to score higher than whites. It is still not resolved what relation, if any, there is between group differences in IQ and race.”

    Happy reading.

     
    • J.M.

      February 14, 2014 at 8:50 PM

      @ > Happy reading.< From Jetlag
      Thank you. There are some BRILLIANT black people with with genius IQ's. I get mental blocks, but you already know that. What is the Black man's name who IS a Christian, & I think he was considering running for President? I'll see if I can somehow come up with his name. Anyway, It's Black men like him that I admire.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s