RSS

President Obama–Stop “Helping” Us!

20 Mar

[courtesy Google Images]

[courtesy Google Images]

A recent article in The New York Times (“Obama Will Seek Broad Expansion of Overtime Pay”) reports that,

 “President Obama this week will seek to force American businesses to pay more overtime to millions of workers, the latest move by his administration to confront corporations that have had soaring profits even as wages have stagnated.

“On Thursday, the president will direct the Labor Department to revamp its regulations to require overtime pay for several million additional fast-food managers, loan officers, computer technicians and others whom many businesses currently classify as “executive or professional” employees to avoid paying them overtime, according to White House officials briefed on the announcement.”

The rationale for this increase is probably the belief that if people’s incomes rise, they spend more and theoretically stimulate the economy.

But, on the other hand, if corporate labor costs rise, either corporate profits fall and/or prices go up.  If prices rise, the economy tends to slow.

So what will happen?  By raising some employee’s incomes, will we stimulate or slow the economy?

Answer:  That’s the wrong question.

Of course, raising or lowering any individual’s income makes a difference to that individual.  But, one way or another, Obama’s plan to raise the income for some corporate employees will be achieved by lowering the incomes of other corporate employees and/or raising costs for consumers.  It’s like squeezing a balloon.  We can make the balloon bulge larger at one end if we squeeze the other end smaller.

But in the end, we still have the same amount of air in the balloon.

The only way we can really stimulate our “balloon” economy is by increasing the amount of “air” in the balloon.

From a national or economic perspective, it doesn’t make any difference if we raise some employees’ incomes by lowering other employees’ incomes.  We still have the same sized “balloon”—the same total income for the entire economy.

I recognize that there may be a moral obligation to redistribute wealth so as to favor the poor at the expense of the rich.  But I also recognize that the primary solution to economic problems is not to simply increase some people’s incomes at the expense of other people.

The solution is to increase productively so there’s more “air” in the economic balloon.

The fundamental problem is not that some people are paid too much and others are paid too little.  The fundamental problem is that we don’t produce enough goods and services to allow everyone to have a decent income.

If so, then who/what is the biggest cause for our stagnate or declining productivity?

A:  Government

Last year, I reported on a study by two economists who calculated that American productivity was being crushed by government regulations.  Their study concluded that if today’s level of government regulation was the same as in A.D. 1949, the median income per household would rise from $53,000 (today) to over $300,000.

In other words, government regulations have reduced your potential income by about 80% over the past 65 years.   In the name of “regulation,” government has prevented our “balloon” economy from growing as large as it might’ve.

So, let’s just suppose that the “several million additional fast-food managers, loan officers, computer technicians and others” (who President Obama proposes to help by raising overtime pay) were living in an economy that was regulated at the same level as A.D. 1949.  They wouldn’t need Obama’s assistance.  They might already be earning four times as much as they’re currently paid.

In truth, we want a lot of the regulation government has enacted. Our food and drinking water needs to be pure.  Our automobiles need to be manufactured so as to be safe to drive.

So, if we had to choose . . . if we could choose . . . I’d bet that Americans might vote to keep, say, half of the existing governmental regulations.  But I’ll also bet that Americans would vote to eliminate the other half of today’s regulations.

If the regulatory burden were cut by half, and if the two economists’ study on the effect of government regulations is true, then we might expect our incomes to be at least double what we currently earn.

How many problems do Americans have that couldn’t be solved if their incomes were doubled?  Not many.

Implication:  If President Obama really wants to raise Americans’ incomes, if he really wants to “stimulate” the economy, all he needs to do is cut government regulations by half.  Do that, and this economy will roar like a lion.

But does President Obama really want to raise Americans’ incomes?  Does he really want to “stimulate” the economy?

Obama’s actions—and those of the past few presidential administrations and congresses—suggest that their real objective is not increased American wealth or a stronger economy.  Instead, their objectives appear to be increased power for the government and diminished wealth and fewer rights for the American people.

Want to help the economy, Mr. President?  Get off our backs.   If we don’t have to carry you and all the other parasites who populate our bureaucracies, if we don’t have to be restricted in our own freedoms to ensure the prosperity of major multi-national corporations, financial institutions that are “too big to fail,” and the New World Order—we can support ourselves just fine.

Our nation and our individual prosperity is being destroyed by our own, unlimited government.  If anyone wants a chance at rising prosperity and the American Dream, they’d better grab hold of the fundamental idea of the Constitution of the United States:  LIMITED government.

Put the constitutional limits back on government, and our incomes can once again become the envy of the world.

On the other hand, if we allow government to keep growing in power and regulatory breadth, I will guarantee that 90% of the American people are headed into an impoverished, third-world future.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

49 responses to “President Obama–Stop “Helping” Us!

  1. katmanwon

    March 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM

    Why do you continue to support the corrupt, fascist, ultra vires corp. masquerading as govt. that employees U.S. citizens, artificial entities, STATE BAR UNION MEMBERS, et.al. & WARS on the world? The devil eats their own.

    OK I know you DO NOT support the UNITED STATES INC. – but clearly the united States of America does NOT have authority, jurisdiction over the RT.

    IFF you claim to be a man on the land or sea – welcome to the Republic of Texas.

     
    • J.M.

      March 20, 2014 at 2:32 PM

      katmanwon,

      Are you familiar with a woman in the Republic of Texas, > Barbara Ann Martins? If so, do you know how to bring up the transcript of her or the case re: her position about her Citizenship status? If so, will you post the link to same? Thanks

       
  2. Sam Kadasky

    March 20, 2014 at 2:23 PM

    Whose responsibility is it to limit government?

    And how do they go about doing so?

     
  3. Gary Lee, [Russell], sui juris

    March 20, 2014 at 5:49 PM

    it’s a NO BRAINER: the responsibility for limiting government lies with the people, and originally, through the people’s representatives. Unfortunately, those representatives have been usurped by the current employees (congress) of the United States, Inc, located in the District of Columbia, and they serve their masters, the corporate owners of the private corporation, the United States. We the people have allowed this to happen, whether through apathy, ignorance, propaganda, or whatever, WE have allowed this to occur. WE can stop it by simply STOP funding the private corporation United States, its private corporate collection agency IRS, and its regional corporate collection agencies, the STATE TAX BOARDS. ALL of these collections are fraudulent, and if people would just WAKE UP, the power has ALWAYS been with the masses. We outnumber their armies, ALL of them, all put together, and WE wield the power, if you can just get the sheep, who would rather be comfortably enslaved, than inconveniently free, to get off their lazy, dumb asses and WAKE UP.

     
    • J.M.

      March 21, 2014 at 9:34 PM

      @ > It’s a NO BRAINER
      No brains & hard hearts & so blind. We have an immoral government for immoral people, Fits well. We are reaping what we have sewn. When I say, we, I too am guilty, or WAS guilty of bringing on what we have, at least to some degree. Think you might be? A yes, no, or don’t know answer will suffice. Do I expect an answer. No.

       
  4. Gary Lee, [Russell], sui juris

    March 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM

    I believe the government’s position is simple: the more people make, the more they pay in taxes. Period. I don’t think GovCo gives a sh*t about “stimulating” the economy, they only care about how much more they can take from us, by taxation, foreclosure, confiscation,or whatever means. Higher pay equals higher taxes paid. That doesn’t seem that complicated, and anyone foolish enough to believe that ANYTHING o’POS is doing is for OUR benefit, is seriously delusional. They are a fascist, self-serving corporate entity, no different from the “governments” that have failed before them (Romans, British, French, Spanish, NAZI, USSR, pick one) and this one will fail also. NEVER have the people had such an opportunity to be educated as to what was happening to them as they have now, courtesy of the internet and people like Alfred, Mary Elizabeth Croft, Richard MacDonald, Dave Champion and the hundreds more who are trying to make us aware of what is happening this time BEFORE the GovCVo has the opportunity to again exterminate millions of innocent people. The mere fact that, in spite of all this available education, there are still millions of idiots willing to be enslaved because it is ‘inconvenient’ (interrupts their American Idol or DWTS, NFL or basket ball games or whatever) means that those of us who WILL be free, just have to work a little harder for ourselves, and forget about trying to save the masses. I believe your God said ( I have no idea of the exact wording, but about a hundred of you on here will know : ) ) he will help those who help themselves. 3% accomplished the American Revolution. 3% of us now is one hell of a lot of people standing up for their freedom. GovCo is NOT the solution, not through the bogus elections or any other means. WE the people are the solution, and always have been, since the very beginning, as repeatedly noted by Jackson, Madison, Jefferson, Washington. We have become a society of “waiters”, waiting for the private, fascist, corporate GovCo to “save” us from itself. Ain’t gonna happen. WE have to stand up for ourselves, or get ready to pack your sh*t to load in the boxcar….and we KNOW where that train is going……

     
    • moon

      March 20, 2014 at 8:55 PM

      Help? Does anyone else find the wording in this Craigslist ad interesting?

      FEMA disaster inspectors needed! Great pay!

      The BISCO (Building Inspection Services, Inc) Team is currently recruiting for Area Managers, Assistant Area Managers, and Inspectors nationwide to perform inspections during a Presidentially-declared disaster under the FEMA Individuals and Households Program (IHP). If you have experience in, or knowledge of, construction or building inspections, we would like for you to join our Team.

      We are excited about the new nationwide FEMA contract that includes innovative processes and procedures for FEMA inspections. Please join our Team by responding through craigslist. Instructions will follow. We will never ask you for payment of any type. If you want to actually be rewarded for a good work ethic then don’t miss this opportunity! If you are not a person that is self-motivated or you like your minimum wage then this probably isn’t for you.

      post id: 4384387189

       
  5. Dave

    March 20, 2014 at 7:12 PM

    It seems to me that most of OUR problems stem from voting these same people into office time after time .The remedy is NEVER VOTE FOR AN IMCUMBENT . Bring in new blood every 2 and 4 years regardless of what they do while in office ,do not fall in love with these people as they are there for their own interests not yours

     
    • EDOMS THORN

      March 20, 2014 at 7:53 PM

      YEP! They are self-serving for the most part. And most of them get in there by promise’s to the voters that elect them out of selfish motives.

      Didn’t BrObama tell the voters, …”Let me help you, help me”?

       
      • J.M.

        March 20, 2014 at 8:37 PM

        Shalom E.T.

        First I hope you got my message on the other thread where you talked about your “new computer” & Sammuel (what in Sam hell) or however it’s spelled. Strange you say what you did about Barbara Martins. I can type in her “ID” & her webpage comes up & certain things listed on it but I cannot find any case that I KNOW she was involved in. I once HAD the case. It was very interesting, to say the least. I can bring up her, > “My Petition for Declaratory Judgment”, but for some unknown reason(s), I cannot bring up the actual case in U.S. District Court. Her case went ALL the way to the “top Court.” She did not file the case there, in U.S. District Court anyway. It was MOVED there FROM a “State Court” where she did file, by the U.S. attorney. I keep forgetting THEY don’t even honor their OWN rules UNLESS it is to their advantage, & IF NOT, they claim “Sovereign Immunity” & all that B.S. IF they are “servants” how can they claim “sovereign immunity.” It IS EXACTLY as Justice James Wilson SAID in Chisholm v. Georgia. I hope you got my response, E.T. on the other thread. Yes, it does upset me that some people are not even courteous enough to respond to ANY question about his/her own message. BUT, SEE, what I just said could be taken by you, E.T. to mean I am saying this about you. What I am trying to say, is, When I ask a question to 99% of the posters about their message, 99% won’t respond in any manner.

         
      • J.M.

        March 20, 2014 at 8:46 PM

        E.T., I’m speaking of Barbara Martin, Houston, Fort Bend County, Texas. I think I said Martins when I should have sad, Martin. I just typed in, a minute ago, Barbara Martins, & a web page full of practically NAKED women appeared.

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 20, 2014 at 11:00 PM

        J.M. Yes I read your response to “My computer” issue thanks. I did not see the need to respond you did not ask a question, just gave me you condolence’s about the DEATH of my computer. HERE is my email address again >>> lazarusliveslong@hotmail.com IF you want to try again…
        I just found this link below. Is that “YOUR” Barbra? It does appear to be. That COULD be the BABS that I was asking you about, she is a courageous woman and did like what I talked about on talk radio in the 1990’s (that is True Israel Identity issues) I heard he call in on the “Alex Jones Show” one day about three years ago.
        http://www.angloisrael.com/chosenrace/‎

         
    • Tony

      March 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM

      “He who votes decides nothing.

      He who counts the votes decides everything.”
      – Josef Stalin

       
      • Adask

        March 21, 2014 at 1:22 PM

        And he who learned “new math” can’t count anything.

         
      • moon

        March 21, 2014 at 10:57 PM

        Seems to me that voting is a joke as long as Diebold voting machines are doing the counting.

         
      • Sam Kadasky

        March 21, 2014 at 11:45 PM

        The higher the voter turnout, the harder it is for the bad guys to get away with election fraud.

        This is because election results are independently checkable by statisticians working for private entities, to within a certain margin of error. There’s a whole science to this independent checking, the reliability of which increases with voter turnout.

        High voter turnout is thus a countermeasure against the criminal element seeking to seize further control of the government.

        Low voter turnout, on the other hand, plays to the strengths of the bad guys, which is why they go to such lengths to encourage this negligent behavior.

         
  6. Toland

    March 20, 2014 at 8:49 PM

    “Whose responsibility is it to limit government?”

    Limiting government is the responsibility of the people. Who else? Government is not going to limit itself, obviously.

    “And how do they go about doing so?”

    In general, we limit our government by taking practical steps in the real world. Government is NOT limited by We the People merely consuming media products about, and reacting emotionally to, the oversized nature of government.

    One practical step toward limiting government is to put people in office with that specific mission. If, on the other hand, only big-government supporters get politically active, then only big-government candidates will get hired to fill government offices.

     
    • moon

      March 21, 2014 at 5:58 PM

      Toland, you’re still over complicating the issue. Opt out. it’s much quicker. Didn’t the early American revolutionaries, in essence, simply opt out of British control? Guess what…it’s back…the control. Opt out.

       
    • Sam Kadasky

      March 21, 2014 at 11:49 PM

      “Limiting government is the responsibility of the people. Who else?”

      Correct answer.

       
      • moon

        March 22, 2014 at 1:25 AM

        Sam Kadasky, I agree with you in saying “correct answer” concerning responsibility. However, what’s your basis for this (even if statisticians are reliable):

        …election results are independently checkable by statisticians working for private entities, to within a certain margin of error. There’s a whole science to this independent checking, the reliability of which increases with voter turnout.

        High voter turnout is thus a countermeasure against the criminal element seeking to seize further control of the government.

        Low voter turnout, on the other hand, plays to the strengths of the bad guys, which is why they go to such lengths to encourage this negligent behavior.

         
  7. J.M.

    March 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM

    I believe this is it but I do not know if this link works
    angloisrael.com/…/barbara-martin-vs-us-positive-identification.pdf‎

     
  8. J.M.

    March 21, 2014 at 6:15 AM

    E.T. Yes, that’s her. I wish a few people would read the transcript between her & the Judge. By the way, what did you think of my understanding of the “birth of Cain.?” Agree, or disagree?

     
    • EDOMS THORN

      March 21, 2014 at 1:28 PM

      Hello J.M. In response to your question about CAIN, I must address the subject of “Bible inerrancy”. MOST Bible Scholars and Theologians agree that ALL of the many versions of the Bible have OMISSIONS and ADDITIONS and ERROS in them, but The Plan For SALVATION is found in them ALL. And I agree with them.

      Concerning “CAIN”. In Christian usage, that is known as the “Serpent Seed Doctrine” or “Duel Seedline” In ancient Hebrew Writings it is referred to as “The Theory Of ORIGINS” By using google you can learn more about this and HOW many come to believe it.
      When I was researching for the article “The SYNAGOGUE Of SATAN: EDOMS Playground” I had found several Link for the Hebrew writing, but lost it when my computer was ASSASSINATED.
      http://www.edomsthorn.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/thesynagogueofsatanedomsplayground

      The PEOPLE of Jesus day, and Jesus himself, knew who those Edomites were. JESUS said this of those Impostors;

      Matthew 23:31-33 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

      S.C. 1081 GREEK ‘gennēma’ is Greek for ‘generation’
      1) that which has been born or begotten
      a) the offspring or progeny of men or animals.

      Jesus used “Generation” THREE times in discribing those EDOMITES. The biggest reason that God Condemned EDOM was because of the fact the EDOM married into the seed line of CAIN.
      Gen. 26:34-35 ”And Esau, was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite:
      Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebekah.”

      I KNOW the flood was supposed to have wiped them out, but consider this. The sons of NOAH all had wives when they boarded the Ark, and I believe that Hams wife was of the seed line of CAIN. WE do not know what has been omitted concerning Cain, but I believe that things were.

      We should also know that SATAN is called Serpent, Viper, and Dragon, ALL of which are REPTILES.

       
      • J.M.

        March 21, 2014 at 7:17 PM

        E.T.,
        @ Hello J.M. In response to your question about CAIN, I must address the subject of “Bible inerrancy.

        This gives me the chance to say something I have wanted to say for a long time. The Good LORD DOES have TRUE servants in this wretched world. He, the Good LORD has revealed to me his “time plan” & very few know anything about it. Unless this time plan is understood by anyone who would be reading anything I say, I will be thought of as off my rocker, which most people think I am anyway. It is a matter of being “called” to understand. Everyone will be called during this time plan. Some will die without being called, but, once again, we would have to know about the resurrections. Most people think there are only two. ANYWAY. It does not make sense that IF IF IF there exists a Creator & Sustainer of the Universe, & IF the Holy Bible IS his “Instruction Book” it does not make sense that he would allow it to become so innerant that people have to look to other sources to find out how to know what truth is. I hope to make this clear, however. The Bible in pertinent part says to STUDY & hold fast to that which is good. There are many commentaries, Strong’s Concordance, etc. I personally believe we have the COMPLETE WORD of “God.” When I study, I am showing my “God” that I truly do want to understand HIS WAY of understanding. As I study, I come across something,e.g., that just rings out within my heart & soul as being the the answer, The lights come on for example. I have found that Wesley’s Notes, per the scriptures, have the ring of what is good.This is for me tho. I believe as I said before, how Cain was conceived. I am also aware that for the most part, the things “God” says for us to do, we don’t do, & what He tells us to not do, for the most part, we do. I will hold on to how I am trying to study to show myself approved unto “my God” & my King. If it turns out to be the wrong decision, I will just have to, die for it. You show me your song, I’ll show you mine.

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 21, 2014 at 8:41 PM

        J.M. I don’t know why, but every time I bring up the FACTS about “Bible inerrancy” and the conclusions that true Bible Scholars and Theologians have come to, it is ignored for the most part. Doesn’t it matter that the facts are, that there has been some tampering or ADDITIONS and Omissions in the word of God? Now it is either accidentally out of ignorance or willfully for the purpose of confusion or to hide pertinent information. The word “GENTILE” is just one example. A Latin word (Gentile) in the English Translation of a Hebrew and Geek text? There was no English word that could have been used? I have found errors in my use of the Strong’s Concordance. But even with all of those ‘problems (as I said) the plan of salvation is found in ALL of the MANY VERSIONS of the Bible. And researching the ‘MEAT’ is what these things are about.

        As for looking to “other sources” we do that more than you think. We KNOW that Jerusalem was ‘sacked/raised’ by the Romans from other sources. WE know that EDOM was in control of Jerusalem in Jesus’ day from other sources. Etc, etc.

        Proverbs 18:1-2 Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh and intermeddleth with all wisdom. A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself.

        Ecclesiastes 12:11-12 The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd. And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.

        So my friend, my interest in these or ANY matter is not a problem, and anyone’s lack of inerest in same, is not a problem.

        Proverbs 18:13 “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him”.

        I think that it is better to keep silent about thing that have not been researched and PROVEN. OR a least do not POO-POO something while in ignorance.
        1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.

        I get ridiculed and told I am wrong, or even worse called a liar or Heretic by many WILLING IGNORant Proverbs 18:2 …”FOOLS”… and that is to their Shame.

         
  9. J.M.

    March 21, 2014 at 9:04 PM

    E.T.
    @ > Doesn’t it matter that the facts are, that there has been some tampering or ADDITIONS and Omissions in the word of God?

    Let’s stay friends. Maybe I am not understanding you. I am always open to be corrected. I don’t get puffed up when ANYONE except Echo Ears tries to correct me. He isn’t correcting me, he is ridiculing me & belittling “God.” ANYWAY, E.T., You say, > Doesn’t it matter that the facts are, that there has been some tampering or ADDITIONS and Omissions in the word of God?

    Why did “God” allow this to happen, if this is true? What is your source of knowledge that this is true? For example, there has been some tampering or ADDITIONS and Omissions in the word of God? I’m not saying you, E.T. are wrong. Tell me how you know there has been some tampering or ADDITIONS and Omissions in the word of God? Don’t tell me what the source(s) said or SAY, just tell me the source(s) & I promise you, I will study the sources & see for myself. Thanks, E.T.

     
    • J.M.

      March 21, 2014 at 9:19 PM

      P.S.
      E.T., You showed a lot of scriptures. How am I to know they are not additions? See what I’m trying to say?

       
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 21, 2014 at 10:07 PM

        YES. Yes I see what you are saying. You are saying that you would rather be a “smart A$$” than have an adult conversation. AM I correct?
        Or is it that you are PRETENDING not to understand what I am saying to avoid having an adult conversation? Pretending is the same as lying don’t ya’ know…

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 21, 2014 at 11:07 PM

        The topic of “Bible inerrancy came up in MY world in the mid 1980’s.

         
    • EDOMS THORN

      March 21, 2014 at 10:30 PM

      SORRY… I did not see this. I didn’t get notified in my email about this post.

      I’d say you MAY want to seek …”other source’s” for that info. The same with anything that is of interest. DO you think I made that up about Bible Scholars?
      I showed you the LATIN word “GENTILE” DO you think that is what should be used?

      I am on my way to bed now, but consider this. If a person is GIVEN a 1,000 dollars it does not have the same ‘value’ as if they had to work for it. I think that applies to knowledge. I do not mind showing people things. That is what I do. BUT I want people to do some research ALSO> The information I shared with you tonight can be easily researched using KEY words that I provided.
      I will come back tomorrow and go in to the Bible enerrancy issue further.

      AND I would rather be friends too. Just give thought to what I have written here.

       
      • J.M.

        March 21, 2014 at 10:47 PM

        Edom THORN,
        @ > I’d say you MAY want to seek …”other source’s” for that info.

        I SAID GIVE ME THE SOURCES TO RESEARCH !!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS?

        You, E.T. SAYING there ARE ADDITIONS, OMISSIONS,TAMPERING, IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR ME TO GO ON. I NEED SOMETHING ELSE IN ADDITION TO WHAT YOU JUST SAY. CAN YOU GIVE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AS TO WHY YOU E.T. SAY there ARE ADDITIONS, OMISSIONS, and, TAMPERING !!!!!!!!!

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 21, 2014 at 10:56 PM

        I SAID GIVE ME THE SOURCES TO RESEARCH !!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS?

        Why do you YELL AT ME?

        KEY WORDS! LOOK!!

        “Bible inerrancy”

        SEE? LOOK!!

        …”Concerning “CAIN”. In Christian usage, that is known as the “Serpent Seed Doctrine” or “Duel Seedline” In ancient Hebrew Writings it is referred to as “The Theory Of ORIGINS” By using google you can learn more about this and HOW many come to believe it.

        SEE the quotation marks? That is for you to do some research…

        We KNOW Jesus had bowel movement don’t we? That was OMITTED AYE?

         
      • J.M.

        March 21, 2014 at 11:37 PM

        E.T.
        I said before,> E.T., Maybe I am not understanding you. I ALSO said, Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, > “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.” E.T., I asked you IF you believed this? Why didn’t you answer by saying, YES or NO ??? I am not yelling at you by using ALL CAPS. I thought maybe you could SEE better, my question, by using ALL CAPS. Just answer the question, YES or NO.

         
      • J.M.

        March 21, 2014 at 11:42 PM

        E.T.,
        @ > We KNOW Jesus had bowel movement don’t we? That was OMITTED AYE?

        AYE, BUT, IF it was NOT omitted, it would just be something else to deny by the super duper intelligent & they can give numerous reasons as to WHY it just ain’t so.

         
      • J.M.

        March 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM

        @ ! showed you the LATIN word “GENTILE” DO you think that is what should be used?

        I don’t know. How many languages are there? Tell me the definition of Gentile in each language. I do not want you to think I am yelling at you by asking you this question by having to ASK this question in ALL CAPS. What does hotheaded mean? I ask you to answer a question for me simply answering yes or no, & you, E.T. refuse to do that. You could have answered by saying you don’t know. BUT, IF I had asked you to answer, yes, no, or, don’t know. you would have taken that to mean I was insulting your intelligence. What does the word, humble, mean, in English? What does the word HOTHEADED mean, in English? You could be right, E.T. Maybe whoever inherits the Kingdom of “God” will be those who know a lot & not how humble they are. I’m trying to do the best I can with what little I know. BUT, what little I know is more important, in my estimation, from knowing a lot like a lot of people do. Know what I mean> SEE what I’m saying?

         
      • J.M.

        March 23, 2014 at 6:05 AM

        E.T., you say,
        @ >AND HERE is one that I found in the early 1980′s, because I have known since the third grade that “WORDS HAVE MEANINGS”

        ok E.T. What does Yes, mean??? What does No, mean???

        Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, > “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD.” E.T., I asked you IF you believed this? I asked you if you would answer yes or no. Why didn’t you answer by saying, YES or NO.

        ok E.T. What does Yes, mean??? What does No, mean since “WORDS HAVE MEANINGS”? E.T. You are too DEEP for me. I asked you before a long time ago to try & explain things to me as tho I am 5 years old. It’s NOT you E.T. IT’S ME. You are too deep for me & I KNOW what you say is simple for you to understand. E.T. IF I was as intelligent as you are I would understand easy like you do. Why are you upset with me, E.T., for not being smart/intelligent like you are? I can’t help it. We ALWAYS seem to understand each other CLEARLY unless it is something to do with the Bible, so may I ask you this? Why is it, that NOW, when I click on the link you provided for Barbara Martin, the only thing that appears is, a page that says, NOT FOUND ? I clicked on the link you provided a couple of days ago, & her webpage appeared. Now it will not. Do you have any idea as to why?? PLEASE don’t misunderstand, IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT. I would like to understand why her webpage or site or whatever it’s called will no longer come up. Page NOT FOUND is what pops up, that’s all.

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 23, 2014 at 10:41 AM

        J.M.

        What is your problem? Are you still having reading comprehension problems? First of all, you asked for more information/FACTS about “Bible inerrancy” and I told you I would come back “tomorrow” and I did, and THEN, I told you that I would respond to the other matters “AFTER” you read and RESPONDED to my comments on Bible inerrancy.

        I wanted you to deal the post concerning “Bible Inerrancy” so it would not get lost in the conversation. I put time into it and I deserve to be responded to. AS I told you, MANY will not respond to to that TOPIC, and MOST will not acknowledge YES or NO if they are even aware of the FACT that there was even a DEBATE on the subject among TRUE Bible Scholars and Theologians. You have not answered that question. ARE YOU AWARE OF THAT FACT?

         
      • J.M.

        March 23, 2014 at 7:06 PM

        Edoms THORN

        Why is it, that NOW, when I click on the link you provided for Barbara Martin, the only thing that appears is, a page that says, NOT FOUND ? I clicked on the link you provided a couple of days ago, & her webpage appeared. Now it will not. Do you have any idea as to why?? PLEASE don’t misunderstand, IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT. I would like to understand why her webpage or site or whatever it’s called will no longer come up. Page NOT FOUND is what pops up, that’s all.

        Are you still having reading comprehension problems, EDOMSTHORN?

         
      • J.M.

        March 23, 2014 at 7:09 PM

        EDOMS THORN,you ask,

        @ > Why do you YELL AT ME?

        How am I yelling at you? Please explain how I am yelling at you?

         
  10. moon

    March 22, 2014 at 1:07 AM

    J.M., let EDOMS THORN get some rest. He said he’d be back tomorrow.

     
    • J.M.

      March 22, 2014 at 1:50 AM

      ECHO EARS,
      @ > let EDOMS THORN get some rest. He said he’d be back tomorrow.

      Why don’t you just go ahead & ban me & then you will get some rest too. So will a lot of “others”
      Do you, ECHO EARS have some kind of “control” over this blog & so much so that Alfred cannot ban me? IF SO, just answer yes, & I will ban myself.

       
      • moon

        March 22, 2014 at 1:59 AM

        The only control I have responsibility for is me. Do you want to “ban” yourself?

         
    • J.M.

      March 22, 2014 at 4:22 AM

      WHO are you to tell me what to do? By whose authority are you telling me this?

       
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 22, 2014 at 10:23 AM

        The topic of “Bible inerrancy” came up in MY world in the mid 1980′s. In my mind you have NOT acknowledged whither you are aware of that or not. YOU DID NOT ANSWER WHEN I ASKED IF YOU THOUGHT I MADE IT UP.

        I do not want to clog up Al Adask’s comment section with to much information. The ADULTS that are interested will DO the research. The willing IGNORant Proverbs 18:2 “FOOLS” will remain in their IGNORance. Here are a few things that are mistranslated/ADDED/OMITTED.

        I provided the FACTS (with links to the origin) concerning the word …”JEW”… in the link above about the Synagogue Of Satan.

        The meaning for the words JUDAH/Judahite and JUDEAN have been “altered” to “FIT” the modern misuse of the word JEW. Jew is the ‘bastardization’ of the word JUDAH. The simple addition of the word, ‘JEWISH’ is a perversion of the Original TEXT. The addition and use of the word ‘JEW’ is for confusion and deception, as with word GENTILE!

        Hebrew word is; …”S.C. 3063 “Yehuwdah” …”The name of Five Israeli Also of the tribe descended from the first, and of its territory: Judah”…
        S.C. 3064 “Yehuwdiy ‘patron from 3063; a Jehudite (i.e. Judaite or Jew), or desc. of Jehudah (i.e. Judah):-Jew”…

        In Zechariah 8:23 “Thus saith the Lord of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you.” …” it is S.C. 376 + 3064 Which is “Man” of “Judah”…

        In the New Testament. The word Jew mentioned in. John 4:22″ …for Salvation is of the Jews”. is RIGHTLY translated from the GREEK S.C. 2453 it is; “Ioudaios”, pronounced ee-oo-dah-yos and means “JUDEAN; AS A COUNTRY i.e.belonging to Judea” ‘FROM’ S.C. 2448 and 2455″….
        THAT is ALL that is found in the Strong’s Concordance from 1980. Nothing omitted and nothing added!

        As used in Matthew 2:6 S.C. 2448 “Iouda” Judah
        As used in Hebrews 7:14 S.C. 2455 “Ioudas” Judah or Judas

        The word “ISRAEL” occurs 2568 times in 2294 verses in the KJV, and not one time is ISRAEL called “JEW” The Book of Romans was about Gods love for “ISRAEL” for the most part, and the word “JEW” is used 10 time there, and NOT once for ISRAEL!

        Now that is the CORRECT Translation for those that care about the truth! It appears that the word JEW in John 4:22 was NOT “JEW” and should have been “JUDAHITES” Based on what I know about EDOM and the Rothschillds creation, The ILLUMINATI and their ownership and control of the majority of the Publishing House’s and infiltration of the Seminaries, that is how we have the word JEW in our Bibles.

        Deuteronomy 5:17 “Thou shalt not kill”. comes from the Hebrew …”ratsach”… S.C.7523 MOST causal Bible students understand that the CORRECT translation is …”MURDER”…

        The word “Easter” in ACTS 12:4 comes from the Greek …”pascha”… S.C.3957 that means …”PASSOVER”… Easter is found in the KJV only. Why?

        AND HERE is one that I found in the early 1980’s, because I have known since the third grade that “WORDS HAVE MEANINGS”

        In Luke 1:3 and Acts 1:1, LUKE used the “WORD”, “THEOPHILUS” Greek …”Theophilos’… From(on-line) S.C. 2321 …”friend of God”… ALSO …”the person to whom Luke addressed his Gospel and the book of Acts”… BUT there is no reason to believe that LUKE was addressing any one person. I believe that was LUKE’S way of addressing the CHURCH.

        In my hard copy from 1980 it says nothing about a “person” it ADDS that it is from, …”Themellos” S.C. 2310 Greek …”something put down, i.e. a substruction (of a building, ect.) (lit. or fig.):-foundation.

        J.M. IF you were honest I believe that you could add some more.

        Easy on-line Strong’s Concordance.
        http://www.blbclassic.org/index.cfm

        EASY on-line KJV Bible.
        http://www.biblegateway.com/

        Facts concerning the Origin of the word “JEW”.
        http://www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/origin_of_the_word_jew.html

        More on the word “JEW” from a “JEW”
        http://www.henrymakow.com/jesus_was_not_a_jew_–benjamin.html

        The SYNAGOGUE Of SATAN: EDOMS Playground
        http://www.edomsthorn.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/the-synagogue-of-satan-edoms-playground

        I will address the other matters after I see that you have read and responded to this.

         
      • EDOMS THORN

        March 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM

        TESTING?

        I have a post to you J.M. that is “awaiting moderation”.
        I have not received any notifications in my email of any one commenting here either. Is AL taking a long nap?

        J.M. I will wait for that to be approved and you respond before I post any further. Standby…

         
  11. J.M.

    March 23, 2014 at 1:48 AM

    Chris,
    @ > Is this what you were looking for?

    Thanks Chris. Yes, in part. It did bring up ONE document. Edoms Thorn posted the link to her website that brought up everything, all her documents, but NOW, when I click on the link, all that pops up is a page that says, NOT FOUND. Also, I have tried to post comments yesterday, & all I see is, “posting comment” & hours later it still says the same thing, i.e., posting comment. I tried to send a message earlier on the last, at this time thread,Complex Chain Reactions, & IT DID post. Funny thing is, Sometimes my last post shows up, & sometimes it doesn’t. It’s there at times & sometimes it’s “NOT THERE.” I do not understand this. ANYWAY, THANK YOU for being HELPFUL. Very few are, except palani. palani is a beautiful DIAMOND. Maybe palani does not like diamonds, so this may be an insult. ok PEARL, EMERALD, RUBY, SAPPHIRE, < all PRISTINE. Thanks Chris.!!

     
  12. moon

    March 23, 2014 at 6:56 PM

    @Sam Kadasky
    March 21, 2014 at 11:45 PM
    The higher the voter turnout, the harder it is for the bad guys to get away with election fraud.

    This is because election results are independently checkable by statisticians working for private entities, to within a certain margin of error. There’s a whole science to this independent checking, the reliability of which increases with voter turnout.

    High voter turnout is thus a countermeasure against the criminal element seeking to seize further control of the government.

    Low voter turnout, on the other hand, plays to the strengths of the bad guys, which is why they go to such lengths to encourage this negligent behavior.

    Sam Kadasky, would you please post a link or links, or reference so I can research “the whole science to this independent checking, the reliability of which increases with voter turnout”?

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s