She’s Goin’ For It.

08 Apr

Watch the faces of Bill Clinton, daughter Chelsea, and Hillary herself. They are full of glee.  They all know what Hillary intends to do.  They even think she can win.  Barring the unforeseen, Hillary will run for President in A.D. 2016.

video     00:01:50


Posted by on April 8, 2014 in 2016 Election, Video


Tags: ,

22 responses to “She’s Goin’ For It.

  1. moon

    April 8, 2014 at 7:22 AM

    Al, I’m going to pass on watching this video. Hate is something I don’t engage in and don’t hate Hillary…however, just about everything about her is repulsive to me. Pure sadistic evil is a term that might apply to her, in my opinion. I won’t absolutely pass judgement on her, since Henry posted the “Judge not” verses, but I want to see her face or hear her voice as little as possible. Bill, ironically, is a bit more tolerable for some reason…I can hear a 5 second clip of him without heaving.

    • J.M.

      April 10, 2014 at 6:17 PM

      @ > Al, I’m going to pass on watching this video.

      You don’t have to watch it to get to the end of it. BUT, I do think you will like the Jessie Ventura Video, & you can click on that video which shows up at the end of the video you don’t want to watch. I passed up on the Hillarious video too. I admire Jessie Ventura. He is a straight shooter. The audience seemed to admire him too. Give it a shot. You can always decide it is not your cup of tea at anytime while you are watching it.

  2. Bobby G

    April 8, 2014 at 7:47 AM


    • moon

      April 8, 2014 at 8:06 AM

      Depends on what your definition of “it” is.

      • J.M.

        April 13, 2014 at 4:17 AM

        @ > Depends on what your definition of “it” is.

        RIGHT !!! Absolutely right. Least this is how I “see” IT. know what I mean?? I know you do. No response is necessary.

    • J.M.

      April 13, 2014 at 8:45 PM

      Bobby G
      April 8, 2014 at 7:47 AM
      Bobby G
      March 24, 2014 at 6:49 PM

      @ > J.M. Good points. I have learned that we (me included) sometimes take the bible literally. If you really put it into perspective, the bible is merely a book of storys and heresay. Who can prove any of it is even factual? How can we know 100% that “God created the heavens and earth”? Can that statement be proven? Sure, there are some truths in the bible, but there are some things that are incorrect, false, etc. Any thoughts J.M.

      Bobby G, Does it really matter ?

  3. moon

    April 8, 2014 at 9:26 AM

    Al, rather than watching this video, I’ve been considering your last nine articles, including this one, collectively. The word conspiracy comes to my mind…without the word theory attached. Then, the term “opt out” is always on my mind and seems to be on some others’ minds as well.

    If I recall correctly, Indiana has decided not to use the Common Core Curriculum. Home schooling and alternative education avenues are a happening thing now. Several states, it seems, are refusing to go along with Obama Care, plus not enough signed up for it to be anywhere near feasible. More and more folks are carrying cameras and recording “police” activity, then, if necessary, going to “court”/court or not participating in administrative process at all. Gun dealers have been very busy as have survival food suppliers, including heritage seed distribution. Opting out of the so called “income” tax, property tax, and other taxes is escalating. It seems to be hip to be an activist these days, activisting in positive directions.

    The Diebold voting machines will aid Hillary and/or Romney (I’m not fond of him either), but when the slaves develop minds of their own, they take responsibility for their own actions and the so called “masters” become obsolete.

  4. Adask

    April 8, 2014 at 9:51 AM

    I agree that there’s an increasingly overt confrontation between the “people” and the “government”. How that confrontation will be resolved remains to be seen. Will the government pull in its horns and begin to serve the people’s interests rather than the interests of big government? Or will the government choose to start expending the 2 billion (?) rounds of ammunition it’s purchased? And then what? Will the people begin to expend some their own ammunition–or will they cower and surrender their firearms?

    I believe that the conflict between government and the people is growing. I expect some sort of very over confrontation to take place in the next 1 to 3 years. Will that confrontation take place in the next two elections? Or will it take place on the streets?

    We shall see.

    • moon

      April 8, 2014 at 8:57 PM

      Now that I’ve mentioned Romney, it’s obvious that I don’t keep up closely with wide world of sports (by the way, is he still in the SEC?). I suppose I’ve tried to forget about Jeb. In my opinion, if Ron Paul isn’t running, the “presidential” race will be pointless. It would appear, citizenquasar, that I’m one of the Ron Paulies. That certainly wouldn’t, however, qualify me as one of the Rand Paulies. Enough about sports.

      Al, since “government” these days is a foreign invader, the alternative to opting out is slavery. In the 2012 primaries, Ron Paul carried five or six states, even with all the opposition, and was mostly ignored by the RNC. The confrontation you’re speaking of has little chance of taking place in elections. That leaves the streets, the businesses, the front yards, the back yards, the homes, the highways, the forests, the rivers and streams, etc, and mostly in hearts/minds. If it doesn’t happen in all those places, it won’t happen.

  5. EarlatOregon

    April 8, 2014 at 1:42 PM

    Blizzard of Lies
    January 8, 1996

    Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady —
    a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation –
    – is a congenital liar.

    Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made
    that she is compelled to mislead,
    and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.

    1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal
    to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading?

    We now know that was a lie
    told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor’s wife she profited corruptly,
    her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests
    through a disreputable broker.

    She lied for good reason:
    To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on,
    what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe.

    2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies.
    She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators
    that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides,
    who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department
    to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton’s cronies.

    Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators,
    that there would be “hell to pay”
    if the furious First Lady’s desires were scorned.

    The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary’s lie to authorities is now in jeopardy.

    Again, she lied with good reason:
    to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player
    who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people
    standing in the way of juicy patronage.

    3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant,
    White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster,
    she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files
    in the dead man’s office.
    Her closest friends and aides, under oath,
    have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice,
    and may have to pay for supporting Hillary’s lie with jail terms.

    Again, the lying was not irrational.

    Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm,
    wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster’s White House office,
    were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years –
    – in Hillary’s closet,
    in Web Hubbell’s basement before his felony conviction,
    in the President’s secretary’s personal files –
    – before some were forced out last week.

    Why the White House concealment?

    For good reason:
    The records show Hillary Clinton was lying
    when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L.,
    and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell’s father-in-law
    to make a sham land deal
    that cost taxpayers $3 million.

    Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence?

    Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched.
    Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel
    want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas.

    One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House
    is the discovery by the F.B.I.
    of copies of some of those records elsewhere.

    When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in “lost” records –
    – which investigators have –
    – the White House “finds” its copy and releases it.

    By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations,
    Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators.

    Another reason for recent revelations
    is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her;
    they were willing to cover her lying
    when it advanced their careers,
    but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers
    when faced with perjury indictments.

    Therefore, ask not
    “Why didn’t she just come clean at the beginning?”

    She had good reasons to lie;
    she is in the longtime habit of lying;
    and she has never been called to account for lying herself
    or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.

    No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference.
    Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice,
    the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel.

    Blizzard of Lies
    January 8, 1996

  6. EarlatOregon

    April 8, 2014 at 1:44 PM


    The Essential Left
    Marx, Engels, Lenin
    pubd by Barnes and Noble

    Ideas are far more powerful than guns.
    We don’t allow our enemies to have guns,
    why should we allow them to have Ideas?

    Joseph Stalin



    April 8, 2014 at 2:07 PM



    It is so funny how nothing sticks to the Clinton’s. Nothing they have ever done, that has been reported, has diminished their ‘Worshipers’ support. Without going into the long list of dead bodies, (34 plus, and 84 at WACO), they simply get no bad press. She (Hillary) gave 300.000 plus dollars to the communist Guerrillas in Central America in the 1980s.

    And there is this report: Hillary Clinton tied to Terrorism/Muslim Brotherhood since 1980’s

    On Benghazi, Hillary Clinton Lied and Four Americans Died

    Gotta love America. “WE” have the Freedom to be Ignorant and STUPID…

  8. Jethro

    April 8, 2014 at 2:43 PM

    No no no no no no no no no no no no no no…

    No more Clintons.

    No more Bushes.


  9. citizenquasar

    April 8, 2014 at 2:53 PM

    If she does run and I suspect she will, then she will likely win because enough stupid Americans will vote for her. Well, maybe not because Jeb Bush may be her opponent and he might have Rand Paul as a running mate in which case all the Paulies, not very bright themselves, will vote for Bush to get Paul into the number 2 spot…like that will be of any benefit to the People. This may tip the election from Clinton to Bush.

    “Bushes and Clintons and Clintons and Bushes.

  10. donmako

    April 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM

    • citizenquasar

      April 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM

      Unfortunately, no one (hardly anyone) knows what a right is. This includes the owner of this blog.

      A right is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s range of activity in a social environment and this right principle is that a man must never initiate the use of physical force inhuman interactions.

      Alfred Adask abhors such a definition, having admonished me before that this definition’s required implication being that “rights are rationally demonstrable,” is somehow a detriment. It is rationally demonstrable that where the detriment is is in Mr. Adask’s mind, where a right floats around “defined” as “rights are a gift from God” means that rights possess some kind of magical element, an undefined aspect, which depends on Mr. Adask’s range of the moment emotive whim.

      • Adask

        April 8, 2014 at 7:19 PM

        Get somebody to translate that text, and maybe I’ll find time to respond to it.

      • J.M.

        April 10, 2014 at 1:56 AM


        @ > A right is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s range of activity in a social environment and this right principle is that a man must never initiate the use of physical force inhuman interactions.

        Is it, inhuman, like in inhumane, or, in human interactions ? I have stuck up for you before. But it’s hard to do when it’s not clear as to what you mean? By the way, CQ, I apologize for wasting your time sending you the messages I did to hopefully encourage you. I promise not to waste your time anymore in that regard. I now know something else about you CQ. You are very selfish. But, I guess it’s better to be selfish & honest rather than selfish & dishonest. I don’t like to make true statements like this because I have shortcomings too. I MUST HAVE. It’s just that nobody “who cares” in a “caring way” will bring this to my attention so can at least TRY to make some changes which makes me think, nobody cares. It seems to me CQ, you don’t want anyone to care for you, or you are going to be selective about who you want to care for you.Thanks for your non response to my prior messages to you, the last ones.

  11. EarlatOregon

    April 8, 2014 at 5:17 PM

    Hillary running against Jeb BUSH,
    is just a Show.

    Daddy Bush wants his son in the US Prez Office.

    Daddy Bush was Head of the CIA,

    The CIA pays Editors and Journalists to run Articles,
    and has done so for Decades.

    Who really thinks the Clinton’s
    can beat the CIA?

  12. EarlatOregon

    April 8, 2014 at 6:00 PM

    Is Hillary a Democrat?
    Guess who else was?

    Book Review:
    “Hitler Democrat”

    What some people think they ‘know’ about Hitler and his era
    is nothing close to the truth.

    In “Hitler Democrat”
    the other side of the story is told,
    as only the great General Leon Degrelle
    of the Waffen-SS could tell it.

    This tremendous work is unlike any other book
    about World War II-and Adolf Hitler-
    available anywhere on the face of the planet today.

    General Degrelle’s remarkable story…

    When this vibrant Warrior for the West
    -a much-decorated survivor of the brutal Eastern Front-
    died in Spain in 1994,
    he was the last surviving major figure of World War II,
    a statesman and soldier
    (at one point the youngest political leader in Europe)
    acquainted with all of the big names of the European arena,
    including Churchill, Mussolini, Franco,
    Laval, Petain and many others,
    including, of course, needless to say,
    Adolf Hitler himself.

    In fact, Hitler once said that,
    if he were to have a son,
    he would want him to be like Leon Degrelle.

    So it’s more than fitting that in his final years,
    the retired Belgian general
    was working relentlessly on the manuscripts
    that today make up the pages of Hitler Democrat.

    “Hitler Democrat” for the first time.
    In the end, this volume is not only a monumental work of history,
    a genuine epic,
    but it is also, in its own fashion,
    a tribute to the man behind it:

    General Leon Degrelle.

  13. Robert

    April 14, 2014 at 12:13 AM

    I think the fix is in. I think Hitlery, I mean Hillary will be the president of USA inc. why do I say this? Because there are too many people getting govt handouts, more people receiving some sort of govt assistance than full time employed. We are done!
    I am not against a woman for president, just not Hillary.
    The people will vote to take from those who have something. Full time workers are out numbered and pay tax to support everyone that doesn’t work. Am I making sense here?
    There is no incentive to work!

    • J.M.

      April 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM


      April 14, 2014 at 12:13 AM

      @ > I think the fix is in.

      Makes sense to me too. Gov-co is allowing “immigrants” IN from Mexico who like 12 year old little girls too. Did you see the lady throw the shoe at Hitlery? Actually, Adolf Hitler had some very well thought out thoughts, SOME, I mean SO does Charles Manson.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s