America Damaged by Fed Economic Policy

18 May

After 100 years, you can't claim this persistent decline in value was an aberration, accident or anomaly.  It's INTENTIONAL and its POLICY. [courtesy Google Images]

After 100 years, you can’t claim this persistent decline in value was an aberration, accident or anomaly. It’s INTENTIONAL and it’s POLICY.
[courtesy Google Images] a subsidiary of The Wall Street Journal recently published an article entitled “American is being damaged by low rates, weak dollar.”   If that argument is true, we might reasonably ask why is the Federal Reserve willing to “damage” America?

According to that article,


“Five years after the beginning of the economic recovery, after rock-bottom interest rates and trillions of dollars of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, the economy is growing about 2%.

No country has attained prosperity by printing money and weakening its currency, and the United States appears to be no different. Monetary stimulus might be useful in the initial stages of a recession and recovery, but zero percent interest ratesfor years on endare a different matter altogether. Under Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his successor, Janet Yellen, the dollar has fallen about 15% against the euro.”


But the euro’s value is also falling, so we’re measuring a falling dollar against a falling euro.  That measurement has to understate the dollar’s actual loss over the past six years.

If we compare the price of gold in 2008 (about $800/ounce) to the price of gold today ($1,300/ounce) we see that the dollar has lost about 62% of its value as compared to gold. That’s an average of about 10% a year.


“According to Columbia University professor Charles Calomiris, . . . if the Fed expands its balance sheet by buying bonds from banks, but those banks simply increase their reserves at the Fed—and fail to increase loans [to consumers] and depositson their balance sheets—thenmonetary policyhas little effect through its traditional channels of expanding deposits and loans.

“Even worse, if the Fed fails to remove liquidity fast enough once the expansion takes hold [i.e., when the recession ends and the “recovery” begins],then aggressive monetary policy [Quantitative Easing] can spark inflation, which slows economic growth.”


In other words, hyper-inflation is both hard to start—and hard to stop.  If Quantitative Easing finally sparks some significant inflation, the Fed will have to work quickly to prevent that inflation from growing at an unreasonably fast level.


“This [inflation] may be happening already. The Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday that theProducer Price Index jumped by 0.6% in April, well above expectations of0.2%.  Core Producer Price Index (CPI), which excludes food and energy, rose 0.5%.Over the past year, the price of food has risen 2.7% — and inflation often starts with increases in food prices.”


Bunk.  I buy groceries every two weeks.  I can see prices rising measurably on a monthly basis.

I wanted to buy a dozen limes last week.  They were 99 cents each at two different stores.  Last year, I could buy limes for 25 cents each.  I won’t argue that the only reason limes are so high is inflation.  But I am arguing that anytime you or I go grocery shopping we can see measurably higher prices than we saw two weeks or a month ago.  Inflation is happening in the grocery stores. Everyone knows it–except the government officials who track inflation.

I might believe that the prices of food rose 2.7% per month for the past year, but there’s no way that I’ll believe that food prices rose by only 2.7% over the past entire year.



“The unemployment rate is 6.3%, 1 percentage point higher than the average rate at this point in the previous four recoveries. Butthe only reason it has declined to 6.3% is because the labor force participation rate has fallen to 1978 levels.

After recoveries are under way, labor force participation gradually increases, as people gain confidence, resume searching for work and eventually find jobs. This has yet to happen [in our current economic “recovery”].  Instead, labor force participation has dropped from 65.7% in June 2009 to 62.8%.

“The share of the unemployed who have been without work for over six months is 35%. In September 2006, this rate was 18%, and it was 16% in January 1996. Compared with past recoveries, the current level of long-term unemployment poses serious problems for the economy.”


Food Stamps

“Food stamps also indicate the quality of recovery. The number of people enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — also known as food stamps — has grown by 37% since the recovery began, from 35 million to almost 46 million (which is 15% of the population). After prior recessions, food stamp usage declined.”


Implication:  The alleged “recovery” did not begin in A.D. 2009 and, in fact, has not yet begun.  Claims to the contrary are mistakes or lies.


Current Fed Policy

“When the Fed took a different policy [in the past], recovery was faster. Between February 1994 and February 1995, the Fed increased interest rates from 3% to 6%, strengthening the dollar.”


When the Fed’s policy is to raise interest rates, it also raises the value of the dollar.  As the value rises, more people want the dollar.   When the Fed lowers interest rates, it also lowers the dollar’s perceived value (purchasing power) and people want to get rid of the dollar by trading it for other currencies, buying gold or other tangible forms of wealth like farmland, tools, etc..

I’ve warned readers for several years that, by reducing interest rates, the Federal Reserve has:

1) Reduced the local banks’ incentive to lend to American consumers.  (Why should banks want to lend to anyone if they only stand to earn 1% or 2% on the loan?  Why risk losing the $100,000 principal in a loan if the only potential reward is $2,000 in interest—especially when the real inflation rate might 5% or more?); and,

2) Increased the banks’ incentive to lend their capital foreign countries that pay higher rates of interest–but thereby reduce the currency supply in this country).

Result?  By lowering interest rates close to zero, the Fed drives capital out of the country.  If you can get a loan, it will be comparatively cheap.  But, for many Americans, getting a loan may be difficult or nearly impossible because there’s less currency available to be loaned.


Q:  If the headline (“America is being damaged by low rates & weak dollars”) is true, why does the Federal Reserve have economic policies conducive to national “damage”?

A:  Because those economic policies—while harmful to the American people—are beneficial to our government and/or the special interests it represents.

First, thanks to low interest rates, government can borrow more money to allegedly “stimulate” the economy without incurring significant interest rate costs.

Second, thanks to a falling value of fiat dollars, the US government can repay some of its enormous national debt with cheaper dollars.

Implication?  The US economy is being run for the benefit of the government and those institutions deemed “too big to fail” rather than for the “general welfare” (as mandated in the Preamble of the Constitution) of the American people.  The people are being intentionally exploited, abandoned and impoverished, while government and its special interests are empowered and/or enriched.

The Federal Reserve’s current economic policy seems ideal for building a police state.  The people grow weaker and increasingly impoverished while government’s powers expand.

These changes aren’t happening by accident or mistake.  These changes are intentional and persistent and therefore evidence of Federal Reserve policy that’s contrary to general welfare of the American people.

They’re not here to help us.


Tags: , , ,

25 responses to “America Damaged by Fed Economic Policy

  1. Toland

    May 18, 2014 at 7:24 PM

    “Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power, but the truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the government of the United States. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will. No man and no body of men is more entrenched in power than the arrogant credit monopoly which operates the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks.”

    — Rep. Lewis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, 1914

    The difference between a United States Note and a Federal Reserve Note is that a United States Note represented a “bill of credit” and was inserted by the Treasury directly into circulation free of interest. Federal Reserve Notes are backed by debt purchased by the Federal Reserve, and thus generate seigniorage, or interest, for the Federal Reserve System, which serves as a lending parent to the Treasury and the public.


      May 18, 2014 at 7:39 PM


      Yes sir. You are correct. I have been trying to explain to people that we “Goyim” buy the paper and ink, pay for the labor to print those ‘notes’ and then GIVE them to that Tribe of Vipers, who loan it back to we the Goyim with interest. What a sweet scam. You do know that the Federal Reserve was created in 1913, and that tribe of Serpents created the A.D.L. the same year.

      That same tribe are the ones that are establishing the N.W.O. with OUR blood sweat and tears, with ‘our’ blessings for the most part, simply because they claim to be Gods Chosen. But I know better.

      HERE are who MOST JEWS™ really are
      “EDOM: The Story Of Jacob And Esau Is Not Just A Story”

      Here are WHO Jacob/ISRAEL really are
      “Why don’t these scriptures fit the so called “Gods Chosen”?

      • Anthony Clifton

        May 19, 2014 at 7:30 AM

        curiously the YIDDISH “FORWARD” has a substitution theology or
        some might call it superinsinuation…theology, wherein the Children of the Devil
        John 8:44 are working hand over fist to make “PROSELYTES” to their dung god
        “religion”…and also print the currency…

        and now with Holocaustianity & the 911 Al QUIDA narrative “JEW” worshippers have
        a veritable buffet of myths to invest their blood sweat & tears….into.

        …even more curious is how the braindeadgoy in Hijacked ZOG territory voluntarily
        contributed 93 million FRN’s over the weekend to the enemies of Jesus, the Messiah
        for the Children of Israel…and all mankind…

        correctomundo Thorn of Edom ?

  2. Mike

    May 18, 2014 at 7:26 PM

    Excellent as usual Mr. Adask. Your writing style is simple for anyone to understand and content makes sense of the world around us in these current times. I hope you promote your site on twitter/facebook and that others share this great piece.
    Be well

  3. prayerwarriorpsychicnot

    May 19, 2014 at 1:26 AM

    Reblogged this on Citizens, not serfs.

  4. genomega1

    May 19, 2014 at 8:42 AM

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    America Damaged by Fed Economic Policy

  5. Adrian

    May 19, 2014 at 12:47 PM

    It is very true that what is happening to America today and the World in general is the work
    of the parasitic jew.
    They got you organized in a myriad of groups aka churches.
    They brainwashed you with their propaganda,religious dogma and they led you towards your own
    Central bank is just a prime tool employed to buy you out.
    Thru it they have an unlimited access to capital.
    The Magi of fiat money bought you dirty cheap.
    The destruction of the American economy is the plan of Agenda 21.
    It was predicted in the Protocols of Zion.
    Back in the early 1920’s Henry Ford warned you about this menace.
    You are not organized,you are divided as hell.
    Get out of those religion books and face the true reality.
    Salvation comes thru knowledge and affirmative action.
    We only succeed in large numbers.
    We the people of this American society have the power.
    We are the real governing body.
    The Nation,not the Corporation is the true Sovereign America.
    Its sovereignty is us the America People.
    We are not corporate slaves,we are sovereign American men.
    We are the true holders of this land called America.
    We shall defend it at any cost.
    Our homes are on this land and nowhere else.
    THEIR fiat money can’t buy us and our rights.

    And as it is said, E Pluribus Unum, we shall act upon THEM.

    • Adask

      May 19, 2014 at 2:34 PM

      I get tired of people bitching about the Jews. In fact, I sometimes wonder if the people who bitch the most about the Jews aren’t Jewish supporters or unwitting pawns.

      If I understand correctly, Jews make up about 0.3% of the world population. Those of you who blame the Jews for everything that’s wrong are essentially saying that each Jew is, on average, sufficiently intelligent, strong or courageous to control 300 non-Jews. Those of you who blame the Jews for everything, thereby make “supermen” out of the Jews.

      If one Jew can control 300 of you, you are so weak, ignorant and unintelligent, you deserve to be controlled. Those of you who bitch about the Jews are like blacks complaining about being oppressed by Whites. Both groups apparently think they’re “entitled” to have something without having to earn it. No one, not whites, blacks or even Jews are “entitled” to nickle they haven’t earned all by themselves. Everything else is charity or theft.

      It may be that the average Jew can control 300 of the kind of people who constantly bitch about the Jews–I don’t know. But I deny that the average Jew can control 300 like me. I’m not here to defend or attack the Jews. I’m not Jewish and I don’t give a damn is someone else is. But I refuse to contribute to any argument from those who love Jews or those who hate Jews that expressly or implicitly treats modern Jews as “supermen”.

      The Jews may be a pain in the ass. The Jews may run the banking system or the mainstream media. But so what? How did they get there given that they are such a tiny percentage of the population? They got there by working hard and working together while most Christians sat on their asses watching Dancing With The Stars and bitching about the Jews. If you want to control the Federal Reserve, you’re the majority–TAKE IT BACK! GET OFF YOUR DEAD ASSES! You are NOT HELPLESS. Same thing with the media. If you must, grab your congressman by the throat and make him understand in no uncertain terms that you want to regain control of this country.

      If you want something, work to get it. If you won’t work to get what you want, learn to do without. But stop blaming other people–especially when they’re a tiny minority–for your own disabilities.

      • Adrian

        May 19, 2014 at 3:14 PM

        Adask you are a jew,what are you bitching about.
        Jews make the majority among the non-colored people in America.
        They sold America to the bankers.
        Make the connection between jews and jesuits.
        You now what they say: you make it and I’ll get it.
        They are full of gimmicks and tricks.
        They brought communism into society.
        Communism and religion work hand in hand,like the cold war.
        Religion is their master trick.
        No wander they call themselves the chosen ones of some phony GOD.
        Your logic is fake.
        Read the Protocols of Zion and the past 100 some year history and you’ll find your answers.
        The jew bible,communist manifesto and the Zionist protocols have the same hand print on them.
        The founding fathers were all jews a group of neo-cons who set up the trap for the conquest
        of America.
        History is what has happened.
        Read Martin Luther opinion on the jews.
        As far as modern history is concerned,from the collapse of the Roman Empire on,the jew
        was the root of all evils in Western Civilization.

      • Adask

        May 19, 2014 at 5:20 PM

        I am not a Jew according to any commonly accepted definition of “Jew”. My parents weren’t Jews, my grandparents weren’t Jews, I’m not a “Jew”. You may have some peculiar definition for “Jews” that virtually no one uses but you, but, if so, your personal definition of Jews only supports my contention that virtually no one knows what “Jew” means and virtually no one has a reliable means of distinguishing between “good” and “bad” Jews. You appear to be defining “Jew” to mean anyone who believes in the God of the Bible. If so, that definition is over-broad.

        “Jew” is like the word “Black”. Can anyone offer a definition that even 70% of us can agree to?


        May 19, 2014 at 3:29 PM

        Al Adask,
        I agree. I am glad I don’t engage in “Bitching” about “THE” JEWS™… I merely point out the FACTS concerning who those lying impostors are. And the fact is, what I have presented both here, and at my web site can not be refuted! It is ignored. It is RIDICULED, as I see you are engaged in here, but no one wants to address these issues, as far as I can see, “For fear of the JEWS” When OUR Messiah points out that EDOM is impersonating TRUE ISRAEL, does any one say that Messiah was “Bitching about the JEWS”? When Church fathers pointed out that EDOM was the JEWS, are they accused of same? BTW those same men said that JACOB equaled Christians. That was said in A.D. 200 to 300 but EDOM has FOOLED the entire world, and they laugh at you! And it is because we are true ISRAEL that EDOM has formed so many tools and weapons to use against us for our enslavement and destruction.

        Al, your ignorance concerning the JEWS and even the word “JEW” in no way should lead you to call exposing the truth, “Bitching”. I do not SPAM your blog, I do however to any opportunity to further expose the people, (OUR KINSMEN) to the truth of our enemy EDOM.

        Furthermore, because what I am pointing out are irrefutable FACTS, it can not be confused with BITCHING! My Biblical and Historical research and OBSERVATIONS are sound. When will Christians, stop running from the truth, or refute it? And if it is not refuted, then STAND IN THE TRUTH?

        Ephesians 6:13-14 “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. STAND therefore, having your loins girt about with TRUTH”… emphasis added. NOTE: OUR first article in our Armor is TRUTH!

      • Adask

        May 19, 2014 at 4:30 PM

        You’re right. I am ignorant about the meaning of the word “Jew”. And, so far as I can see, so are you. I don’t doubt that some of the Jews may be the “chosen people”. I also don’t doubt that some of the purported “Jews” are not really “Jews” but are of the “synagogue of Satan”. But how can I (or you) tell which is which? If I bring a “Jew” to your attention, can you reliably inform me as to whether he is a member of the “chosen people” or “synagogue of Satan”? I know I cannot. I doubt that you can reliably distinguish. And yet, you may choose to bitch about the “Jews” as if they are ALL “synagogue of Satan” and none “chosen people”–even though that’s not true.

        Those who bitch only about “Jews” are throwing the baby (“chosen people”) out with the bathwater (“synagogue of Satan”). If you’re going to bitch about the “synagogue of Satan,” I don’t have a problem with that. If you’re going to bitch about both the “synagogue of Satan” AND the “chosen people,” I cannot join in.

        There’s a parable in the Bible about servants reporting to their master that someone has mixed weed seeds with good crop seeds, and now the field of barley (or whatever) is polluted with weeds. The servant offer to pull out all the weeds. The master says, No–wait until the harvest time because if you pull the weeds out now, it’ll disrupt the roots of the barley crop.

        If that parable can be applied to modern “Jews,” by pulling out the bad weeds (synagogue of Satan) we may damage the good “barley” (“chosen people”). I’m saying that if you have a reliable means of ripping out only the bad weeds (“synagogue”) without damaging the good crop (“chosen people”), go to it. But if you can’t reliably separate the two now, then you’d better wait until the “harvest”. If you want to call the “synagogue” “EDOM,” and thereby distinguish from the “chosen people,” that’s fine with me. But most people bitch about the “Jews” and include both the “synagogue of Satan” and the “chosen people” under that single heading. I can’t go along with that.


        May 19, 2014 at 6:38 PM



        Yes Al, MANY do lump all JEWS together, or are unaware of the facts concerning this issue! Scripture tells us to NEVER bless anti-Christ’s of any kind, yet most do. Please research what I have presented. See the links below.

        I AM “EDOMS THORN”. And my approach to the JEW™ question is from Biblical and Historical facts concerning:
        Genesis 25:25 And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger”

        Those two ‘Nations’ are Christians and JEWS today. And from Genesis to Revelation, I bring to light the True Peoples that God has chosen, for the purpose of ending Satan’s rebellion to God, and those that follow SATAN.

        I don’t do “Bible Thumping” as some will call what an “evangelist” does, because what I am trying to convey is mainly for Christians, that have no need for the “Milk” of Salvation and understanding the grace of God. And lets face it, everyone has heard “Jesus Saves”, and the the field for the Evangelist has been well covered. However, it is my hope that those that are weak in the faith, or have no faith at all, will research what I have presented, and come to see that from the Biblical and Historical perspectives that I have presented, IMHO are “proof of the truth”. I have proven the word of God, with the word of God, as we can clearly see it made manifest in the world.

        The word “ISRAEL” occurs 2568 times in 2294 verses in the KJV, and not one time is ISRAEL called “JEW” The Book of Romans is largely about Gods love for ISRAEL/Jacob and the word “JEW” is used there ten times and not one time is it used for ISRAEL. WHY NOT?
        NEVER in the entire Bible are the so called JEWS called “Gods Chosen”
        The word “JEW” in scripture, NO WHERE denote “FAITH or Religion.
        “JEW” means Judean and is used for one son of Jacob/ISRAEL JUDAH.

        Is GOD A LIAR!? Is The God of Abraham weak, and unable to do ALL HE said concerning ISRAEL?

        Why does the Word of God describe the Children of Israel as;
        “The stars of heaven” Gen: 22:17

        “A thousand million” Gen. 24:60, (ONE BILLION)
        “sands of the sea”. Gen. 22:17 Isa.10:22, Hosea 1:10
        The fact that the Jews™ only number around 14 million. Kind of shorts the Bible.
        Also “a company of nations” and “a multitude of nations”, Gen.35:11 Gen 49:19

        And just how many JEW™ nations are there, or have ever been?
        The bible also proclaims that Israel would possess the gate of his enemies. Gen.22:17. Umm, the JEWS™ seem to be SURROUNDED!
        Do you get it? JEW™ Has never applied to Israel in the Bible.

        1 Chronicles 16:13 O ye seed of Israel his servant, ye children of Jacob, his chosen ones.

        Psalm 135:4 For the Lord hath chosen Jacob unto himself, and Israel for his peculiar treasure.

        Isaiah 41:8 But thou, Israel, art my servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham my friend.

        Isaiah 44:1 Yet now hear, O Jacob my servant; and Israel, whom I have chosen:

        Isaiah 45:4 For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.

        AND the “elect” are ISRAEL! Not JEWS!

        HERE are who MOST JEWS™ really are
        “EDOM: The Story Of Jacob And Esau Is Not Just A Story”

        Here are WHO Jacob/ISRAEL really are
        “Why don’t these scriptures fit the so called “Gods Chosen”?


        July 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM



        Al Adask, when you stated the following I believed you. Would you please back it up?
        FROM “It Works the Same in Every Country”…/it-works-the-same-in-every-country/

        …”This blog is intended to be a place where, by reason of using my intellect and by reason of using the intellects of my readers, we can “exercise” our senses so as to develop and “sharpen” our individual capacities to discern between good and evil, right and wrong”…

        The stated goals that Al Adask made, are only able to be achieved through “give and take” as in QUESTION ASKED, QUESTION ANSWERED and Points made and same spoken to. I assume that it is also to “discern” Truth or Lie’s Facts or Fables.

        I find it to be INSULTING and disrespectful when people will not answer a pertinent question on any topic, and pretend that the question was not relevant to the (alleged) conversation at the time, and then I find it insulting, rude and intellectually dishonest when facts are presented and then ignored without being refuted or providing proof of an ERROR!

        The following is from:

        AND the conversation was NOT HAD! So I will try to bring us back to a very iportant topic that is SCARY? Or is it the fear of being found in ERROR? Either way let us be adults and truly have an ADULT conversation, and LEARN from it!
        AL said, …”I get tired of people bitching about the Jews. In fact, I sometimes wonder if the people who bitch the most about the Jews aren’t Jewish supporters or unwitting pawns”…

        I then provided FACTS that were compleatly ignored! I still want to have this topic addressed! Do not miss understand! I do not want to fight or insult you, I am wanting to be treated as you said, as if what I said was worth learning from.

        As you so glibly stated, …:You’re right. I am ignorant about the meaning of the word “Jew”. And, so far as I can see, so are you”…
        BUT I provided the facts that clearly show that it is you AND most Christians that are IGNORant!

        You then stated that, …”Those who bitch only about “Jews” are throwing the baby (“chosen people”) out with the bathwater (“synagogue of Satan”). If you’re going to bitch about the “synagogue of Satan,” I don’t have a problem with that. If you’re going to bitch about both the “synagogue of Satan” AND the “chosen people,” I cannot join in”…
        BUT Mr. Adask, you have ZERO understanding of WHO and what a so called JEW™ is and is NOT. DID you even give ANY thought to my response?
        I have provided HERE and at the links to my irrefutable research into the FACTS but you Ignore IT? OR do you run from it? I responded to your comment with BIBLICAL FACTS and you did not even afford me the courtesy of a response, let alone show me ANY errors, you (just as MOST) continued your ‘attack’ as if I had said nothing.

        And the poster “Adrian” said, … “Al you are a jew”… and your response was full of evidence that you have near ZERO idea of what a JEW™ is and is not. I am certain that Adrian is well aware of what he speaks concerning the JEWS, and Adrian pointed to a few Creations of EDOM, and to Martin Luther, and He actually lived and understood what the so called JEWS were about and doing to WE the GOYIM,(or as GOD calls us ISRAEL).

        In light of the FACTS that I presented in that THREAD, I then said this, …””Furthermore, because what I am pointing out are irrefutable FACTS, it can not be confused with BITCHING! My Biblical and Historical research and OBSERVATIONS are sound. When will Christians, stop running from the truth, or refute it? And if it is not refuted, then STAND IN THE TRUTH?”…

        I ASK you again, …”When will Christians, stop running from the truth, or refute it? And if it is not refuted, then STAND IN THE TRUTH?”…

        I like you Al, and do appreciate your efforts! WE are not going to defeat the BEAST if “WE” continue to believe their LIES. WILL you take the time to research my web site, with CAREFUL consideration, void of the preconceived “MYTHS” that have crept in to our Seminaries and Churches, by the ENEMY of ALL of true ISRAEL and ALL of the seed of ADAM? To be deceived is bad enough, but to remain in ignorance is a SIN! “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” MUST be seen as a warning! The VIPERS are at WAR with us, but most do not even know who the vipers are or who we are. And that is why the enemy is winning!
        I ask you Al to go back and afford my the the stated goal of your web site! Lets have that conversation! Let us learn from each other. I did not deceive any one! But my research proves that MANY have been deceived by the enemy of Christ and His Church!

        Ephesians 6:13-14 “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. STAND therefore, having your loins girt about with TRUTH”… emphasis added. NOTE: OUR first article in our Armor is TRUTH!…

      • Adask

        July 3, 2014 at 10:59 PM

        First, when it comes to answering questions, sometimes reality intrudes. Sometimes there’s not enough time or energy to answer all questions. More, sometimes the question has already been answered at some other point in the nearly 1,500 articles and thousands of comments made on this blog. There’s no reason to be burdened with answering the same question fifty different times to 50 different readers.

        Have you read and understood every article on this blog? Can you verify that I haven’t already answered some or all of your questions in some other context?

        What if you ask me a question about nuclear physics and I can’t answer it? Is that an offense? What you ask me a question about “Jews” and I can’t answer? Am I still obligated to waste your time and everyone else’s by trying to provide an answer I don’t have?

        After you read all 1,500 articles and all of the thousands of comments on this blog, get back to me with whatever questions you have about the Jews that I haven’t already answered. If I can answer, I will.

        Second, I know enough about language to know that virtually every word has multiple definitions. Some people subscribe to one definition. Some people subscribe to another. Some people subscribe to one definition in one context but another definition in another.

        Do you have one definition of Jews that everyone can agree to? If anyone disagrees with your definition are they wrong? Are they evil? Are they damned?

        As I’ve said on my radio programs over the years and also (if I recall correctly) on this blog, I shy away from the “Jewish questions” because I don’t know anyone who can say with certainty who is and who is not a “Jew”. Even the “Jews” don’t agree on who the real Jews are. Ashkenazy? Sephardic? Orthodox? Liberal? Practicing? Genetic?

        If you can give me a means to absolutely determine who is and who is not a Jew, I will join your debate. And I’m not talking about some generic description found in the Bible. If I produce ten individuals for a line-up, can you tell me exactly which of those people are Jews and which are not? Can you tell me which had Jewish mothers and Catholic fathers? Can you tell me which are the Protestant ministers who had Jewish grandmothers? Can you tell me if a Jew must be 100% of the Jewish bloodline–or is he still a Jew if he’s only one-eighth derived from Jewish blood and 7/8th “goy”? Is the Jewish genetic “marker” a collection of genes common to all pure Jews? Or is the Jew ultimately marked by a single “Jewish” gene that’s found in no other race? If Jews are 100% Jewish, what do you make of the Ethiopian Jews who are at least partly Negro and who are emigrating into Israel? Are the true Jews all Negros? Or are the Negro-Jews fraudulent and only the Semitic Jews legit?

        If it’s true that people can be Jews who are less than 100% derived from Jewish bloodlines, is it possible that anyone who has even one Jewish ancestor in the past 20 generations is properly deemed a Jew? By that definition, is it possible that you have a Jewish gene or two and you are therefore Jewish? If you say No, what evidence do you have to prove that you have not Jewish heritage?

        Perhaps you can answer some or all of those questions. I cannot. I don’t try to do what I know I can’t do.

        You, on the other hand, do not seem inhibited from dealing with issues which include questions that you can’t answer.

        My point is that I do not know who the real “Jews” are and I doubt that anyone else really knows either. I see no point to dealing with questions about “Jews” when no one can accurately discern who the real Jews are–so I don’t normally deal with those questions. For me, it’s like arguing about how many Jews (or is it angels) can dance on the head of a pin.

        If you can provide a foolproof definition of “Jews” that will work in relation to every man, woman and child on this earth, then I will answer your questions about “Jews” as you’ve defined them. If you want difficult questions answered, include foolproof definitions in your inquiries. If I’m able, I’ll try to answer. If not, I won’t.

        Finally, you took some of my remarks and used them to infer that I’d assumed a personal responsibility for answering everyone’s questions (no matter how dumb or repetitious they might be). Note that the text you quoted referred to “we” (me and the others who read and comment on this blog) to work together to discover truth. If you have a complaint that I haven’t answered your questions, you should also complain to everyone else (including yourself) who reads and/or comments on this blog for refusing to answer your questions.

        In the alternative, you might consider the possibility that when you pose a question and no one answers, maybe your question is defective.

        Finally (finally) what makes you think that I even have time to not only write articles for this blog but also read every comment and answer every question? Do you think I’m your slave, your bondman, and whenever you pose a question, I must answer your question? Is it OK if I ignore the other people’s and answer only your questions? If you’ll “permit” me to read and respond to other people’s questions, what makes you think that I’m not so busy answering their questions, that I haven’t yet found time to read and consider your questions?

        Could the solution to your complaint be patience? If you’ll just wait a few more years, do you think I’ll find time to answer your questions?

        Is there a limit on how much time I can spend on each question? Ten minutes max? 30 minutes? Five days? Would it be OK if I spent just 30 seconds on everyone else’s questions and five days on yours?

        Are there any rules about how we (or I) should answer questions? Do you know those rules? Can you provide us with a list of those rules?

        And, finally (for the third time), just to give you the answers, recognition and respect you seem to crave, I will answer all of your previous questions that may have previously seemed unanswered. This same definitive answer will also stand as my default response to all of your future questions (unless I decide to answer otherwise).

        So, I give you my universal answer to all questions, past, present and future: Maybe.

        So, from now on, anytime you pose a question and I don’t give you an answer that is express and prompt, feel free to presume that my unspoken answer is “maybe“.


      May 19, 2014 at 3:34 PM



      My research proves that the so called JEWS™ did not write the Bible, or are the even the people of ISRAEL> They did infiltrate the Seminaries and Churches to aide in deceiving true ISRAEL so that they would not see who they (WE) really are.

    • richard

      November 30, 2014 at 3:49 PM

      perfect to the non brainwashed

  6. Roger

    May 19, 2014 at 6:53 PM

    Adask wrote: “If you want to control the Federal Reserve, you’re the majority–TAKE IT BACK! GET OFF YOUR DEAD ASSES! You are NOT HELPLESS.”

    I say something similar to people who sit around and bitch about the US Government as the situation they’re bitching about only gets worse for their INACTION. Meanwhile they, in their overwhelming numbers, could quickly restore their lawful government by DOING SOMETHING to make it happen.

    On the “chosen people”, etc., the Bible has your answer:

    Romans 2:28-29 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

    Galatians 3:28-29 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

    On the question of who is “Israel”, also see the Bible:

    Galatians 6:15-16 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.

    That is, the Christian church is Israel, according to God.



      May 19, 2014 at 8:29 PM



      I get those scriptures thrown out at me all of the time. They do not “Spiritualize” ISRAEL out of existence nor do they prevent or keep those promise’s and BLESSINGS that God said concerning ISRAEL/Jacob and his descendants. They have been fulfilled in only one people. Many are confused by what I say, as being “PRIDEFUL” or that is out of a “RACIST” view point. But facts are FACTS, and EDOM is still here among true ISRAEL, and has never stopped hating or trying to regain the ‘birthright’. This is a message of Warning.

      By using those scriptures in that way, is what is called “Replacement Theology” A typical definition of “Replacement Theology” can be paraphrased as such: “Israel has been replaced by the Christian Church, so the promises and prominent position once held by God’s chosen people are now held exclusively by the Church.” Such a view is false. The majority of Christians today and through the years see “Gentile” believers as grafted in to the vine of Israel. (Rom 11:17-21) There is no replacement. Hence, the term “Replacement Theology” is inaccurate and ought not to be used. God said Israel would be called by a NEW NAME, and that name is CHRISTIAN. And where the word “Gentile” is used in scripture, it is many times Israel that it is about.

      As I said, my research and observations are sound.

      God is not very happy with “our” preachers! EDOM has deceived them. This is from EDOMS “Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion”

      PROTOCOL No. 11:4 …”The GOYIM are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? ….

      Ezekiel 34:6-10 My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them. Therefore, ye shepherds, hear the word of the Lord; As I live, saith the Lord God, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock; Therefore, O ye shepherds, hear the word of the Lord; Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my flock at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock; neither shall the shepherds feed themselves any more; for I will deliver my flock from their mouth, that they may not be meat for them.

  7. Adrian

    May 21, 2014 at 1:21 PM

    A short comment about the word “jew”.
    It derives from the word ” Hebrew” thru Latin and other European languages.
    H becomes i or j ,b is v, w is u.
    There you have the word ievreu or short jew like in Germano/Anglo lexicon.
    The Arabs calls him jidan.
    The jewry of today are so mixt up as race that is hard to tell who’s who unless
    you have some knowledge.
    As character a jew is a parasite.
    Thru out history he is portrayed like that.
    One simple thing to noticed ,he does not like manual labor.
    They live in organized groups,they are clannish.
    They invaded western society thru their fake dogmatic religion.
    They claim to be the chosen people of a fake GOD.
    They are hiding behind this mask.
    Religion is an old disease from ancient times.

    Salvation does not mean preservation at origins but departure.
    Today religion fools people,the dupes that they will live again.
    Any living thing,is born,lives and dies only once.
    Life in general is perpetual.
    GOD in general is a concept of the mind.
    One good measure of reality is the maxim: what does not appear does not exist.

  8. Adask

    May 21, 2014 at 1:44 PM

    Another good maxim is, Just because you haven’t seen something, does not prove that it does not exist.

    Have you personally seen the Great Wall of China? How ’bout the “dark side of the Moon”? Do those entities not exist because they haven’t appeared to you?

    Most of us believe in an innumerable amount of things that we’ve never actually seen. Why is a belief in a God that most people haven’t seen or directly sensed any more ridiculous than an belief in craters on the dark side of the Moon, that have not been directly seen by 99.999% of the people of the Earth?

    The truth is that most of our “knowledge” is actually “belief”. For example, what’s the boiling point of water? 212 degrees (at sea level)? How do you know? Have you personally conducted experiments to confirm the boiling point or do you merely believe what other people have told you? The same is true for virtually all of our “scientific knowledge”. At bottom, most our “knowledge” is based on belief, on faith in someone, some source other than ourselves.

    More, we choose what to believe as individuals, as cultures, and as nations. Why is the choice to believe in God any more ridiculous than the scientists’ choice to believe that 90% of the universe is composed of “dark matter” and “dark energy” that has not yet been seen, but is inferred to exist in order to support the atheistic theory of creation called the “big bang”?

    • Adrian

      May 21, 2014 at 2:26 PM

      Belief comes after thinking and perception of reality.
      A belief can be real or imaginary.
      Factual reality can change in time with new discoveries.
      The danger of some believes is that it can represents a false reality.
      An action thru a false belief can cause damages.
      Dogmatic religion is a good example of that.
      The purpose of religion is not to do good on others but to prey on them.
      The promoter of any form of religion it is a parasite.
      I give more credence to those who believe only that man is the result
      of some sort of genetic manipulation.
      It makes more sense this way than bringing some phony GOD into equation.
      Religion has had a very bad history so far.
      IT brought only death and destruction to humanity.
      To preach salvation to a mortal man is like asking the blind to see the light.

      • Adask

        May 21, 2014 at 8:03 PM

        “Belief” is defined at law as hearsay. Such “belief” is not based on direct personal perception, but is instead based on what you’ve been told by others and therefore only presumed to be true. Belief is not normally admissible as evidence in court (except, perhaps, as evidence of a defendant’s state of mind). Witnesses can testify to whatever they’ve actually and directly seen, heard, tasted, smelled, or felt in relation to the case at issue–but are usually prevented from testifying to what they believe happened–especially when that testimony/belief is based on the observations or opinions of some third-party.

        Belief is not based on personal perception of reality. Belief is based on one’s confidence in a third-party source of information.

        So far as I know, no child has ever actually seen the “real” Santa Claus. Nevertheless, most children “believe” in Santa Claus because their mothers and fathers tell them about Santa.

        Adults “believe” in the official economic indicators because government claims that they are true.

        Some adults even “believe” that government is fundamentally honest and honorable (rather than deceitful and criminal) in nature, even though there’s been virtually no evidence to support that “belief” for most of my lifetime.

        Most “Creationists” who “believe”in God have never actually seen God. No atheist who believes in the “big bang” theory of cosmology have never actually seen the “big bang”. Both groups’ systems of belief are mostly based on what they’ve been told by others. While atheists claim to have a system of values based on reason and logic, most of their “facts” are ultimately based on “beliefs” that are at least as hard to prove as that existence of God.

        This doesn’t mean that the atheists are wrong. It merely means that they usually fail to recognize the extent of their own “beliefs” while ridiculing the “beliefs” of others such as Hebrews, Creationists, Christians, etc.

  9. EarlatOregon

    May 23, 2014 at 3:59 PM

    A simple little thing of a Blade of Grass,
    a Blade of Grass is Designed,
    Proof of Design is the DNA.
    Man can make a 747 Jet Aircraft,
    but can Not create just a Blade of Grass.

    Proof of Design is the DNA,
    Proof of Design is Proof of a Designer.


  10. Adrian

    May 23, 2014 at 4:46 PM

    The nucleic acids,such as DNA are designed either thru a synthetic process or a natural one.
    The theory of Intelligent Design has some credible points.
    It could be an evolutionary process,a genetic manipulation or both.
    The GOD theory is preposterous.Only religious people accept it.
    As for a blade of grass,man cannot create one, just perpetuate it.
    The seeds of life are everywhere ,we can only preserve life or destroy it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s