Send Illegal Aliens Home to their Nation’s Embassies

21 Jun

Children Crossing the US Border [courtesy Google Images]

Children Crossing the US Border
[courtesy Google Images]

Recently, there’s been influx of children from Mexico and central American countries crossing our border with Mexico and entering this country illegally.

Think about that.  Children.

We’re not talking about desperate adults, hardened criminals or even terrorists entering this country illegally. We’re talking about children.

The US border is so porous that we can’t even prevent children from entering this country. That’s one helluva tribute to our border security, no?

• In the article “Obama talks tough to Mexico: Illegal-immigrant children won’t get to stay,” The Washington Times reports:


President Obama told his Mexican counterpart in a phone call Thursday that immigrants crossing into the U.S. illegally won’t qualify for legalized status or deferred deportation, including children.

“The White House said Mr. Obama and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto discussed ‘a regional strategy to address the surge of unaccompanied children coming from Central America, through Mexico, to the U.S.’”


I’d say, to hell with the “regional strategy”. To hell with the North American “region,” for that matter. I’d say, worry only about The United States of America. Defend the US border.

However, our government will ignore what I say because it’s not an accident that our government won’t defend our border with Mexico.   Our government won’t defend our border because it wants a regional economy and then a regional “nation” that includes Mexico, the U.S. and Canada—all under a single administrative division of the New World Order. Our government won’t defend the US border because it’s dedicated to the destruction of The United States of America and its replacement by the New World Order.

Obama seeks “regional solutions” because he truly represents the “region” of North America rather than the nation called “The United States of America”.


• In any case, here’s my suggestion for dealing with children who enter this country illegally:

I’d take the kids that come from Guatemala and deposit them in the Guatemalan embassies located here in the U.S..

After all, each foreign nation’s embassy in the US is supposed to exist as a patch of that foreign nation’s sovereign territory. Thus, while a child leaving Guatemala without a visa might enter the U.S. illegally, he’d be quite legal so long as he remained on Guatemalan “territory” within a Guatemalan embassy.

How could anyone complain if the US Border Patrol simply returned every “lost” foreign child-immigrant to the “sovereign territory” within the embassy of the child’s native country?

Similarly, I’d take the kids that come from Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico and deposit them in their own country’s embassies located in the US. If we couldn’t discover a kid’s nationality, just deposit him with the Mexican embassy because the kid is certain to have at least come through Mexico.

I’d leave it up to the embassies to either ship their children back home, or feed, clothe and shelter them in the embassies.

If the kids were going to create an “humanitarian crisis,” that crisis would be on the soil of their own country’s embassies rather than in the U.S..

Instead of treating the illegal alien children as a US problem, I’d treat them as a domestic problem of Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico by bringing those kids to their home country’s embassies.

Same thing goes with the adult illegal aliens.

If we catch any , instead of putting them in an American jail or holding facility while we fool around trying to decide in court what to do with ‘em, let’s just deposit them in their countries’ embassies and post guards on the embassies to ensure that none of the illegal aliens escape into this country.

If the officers of employees of any foreign embassy let any of their children or “illegal aliens” enter the US from their embassies, I’d threaten to treat it as an act of war.

If a national embassy grew tired of sharing its facilities with hundreds or thousands of illegal aliens, that embassy and nation can pay to put ‘em on Mexicana Airlines and ship ‘em home. Give the kids a thrill and send ‘em first class.

I’d stuff those embassies like sardine cans. And when there wasn’t space for one more illegal alien in his home country’s embassy, I’d stuff those kids into the homes and apartments of the foreign embassy’s officers and employees. And if the foreign officers and employees couldn’t keep the illegal aliens in their homes or apartments, I’d charge ‘em with acts of war, sedition or some such.

Let Mexico pay to feed, clothe and shelter the Mexican illegal aliens that enter this country. Don’t send illegals to US jails. Send ‘em to their home country’s embassies.

Once Mexico gets stuck with the bill for “deporting” Mexican illegals back to Mexico, we’ll see how long it takes Mexico to prevent illegals from entering this country.

The US might not be able to close the border with Mexico, but the Mexicans certainly could.

Whatcha think?

Interesting idea?


Posted by on June 21, 2014 in Illegal Aliens



37 responses to “Send Illegal Aliens Home to their Nation’s Embassies

  1. Joan of Arc

    June 21, 2014 at 10:53 PM

    YESI kept shouting at the news stories: Why don’t we tell the bus drivers to turn around and go home? And who are the bus drivers? Are the toddlers driving the buses? Why is it such a mystery to the media as to whether or not these children are illegal aliens? Why isn’t the media blaming the parents for child abandonment? Ultimately, I ask myself why this story is being broken now if this flood of children has been going on for months.

  2. CC

    June 21, 2014 at 11:29 PM

    BRILLIANT!!!! Absolutely brilliant!!!! Now if we could just get them to do this!!!

  3. CC

    June 21, 2014 at 11:35 PM

    Oh, one more thing …. I also read today that the same militia guys who were at the Bundy ranch are calling for other militia members to join them at the border to form a human fence to keep the illegal aliens from coming across in the first place. This is a nobel endeavor, but how long can they do that? I like the embassy idea better – it’s easier and cheaper, but since that isn’t going to happen, more power to the militia guys.

  4. Gary Lee

    June 22, 2014 at 12:59 AM

    this is an incredible idea, Alfred……IF only “we” lived in “The United States of America”, but, as you point out, in the ‘United States’ (foreign-owned, private corporation located in District of Columbia), their only concern is for diluting ‘Americans’ with foreigners, so we become the ‘minority’ in their ‘democracy’ (mob rule), for those still foolish enough to buy into the whole ‘United States’ and ‘ democracy’ story from GovCo. Nonetheless, extremely brilliant idea…..wish I’d thought of it…..they’ll listen to me, right? right? …anybody out there? OK, maybe not….. ; )

    • Adask

      June 22, 2014 at 1:28 AM

      The nice thing about this idea is that it’s exactly the legal thing to do. I.e., suppose you and your spouse took your 6-year old daughter on a vacation to France, you became separated from your daughter, and she became lost. Suppose the French police found her without any identification or passport. Suppose your daughter didn’t know the name of the hotel where you were staying, but she knew she was from America. What would proper procedure be for the French police? To assume your daughter was there illegally and throw her into a French jail (where the French people could pay to feed and shelter her)? Or send her to the American Embassy, and let the Americans figure out her her parents were and–if the parents were no longer in France–ship the child back to the USA?

      Americans would be furious if the French threw the child into a French jail or French detention camp. The only proper solution to the lost child’s predicament would be to return her to the nearest officers or officials of her own country–those located in one of the embassies of the child’s home country.

      Similarly, if we find any lost foreign children here in the US, why not simply determine their nationality and return them to the nearest embassy of their own country. The solution is fast, inexpensive, legal and just. If their nationality can’t be determined, but we know they crossed into the US from Mexico, let’s just assume they come from Mexico and hand them over to the Mexican embassy–and let them sort it out.

      Besides, what could the child’s national embassy do? Refuse to admit lost children of their own nation into their national embassy? They’d be seen as cold-hearted, despicable villains without compassion for their own country’s children. They couldn’t dare to refuse to accept their own “lost” children into their embassies.

      After that, they’d have no choice to to pay out of their own pockets to send their own children back to their own country. (Makes me laugh!)

      Pretty cool idea, hmm?

      • Henry

        June 22, 2014 at 4:49 PM

        Adask said, “Similarly, if we find any lost foreign children here in the US, why not simply determine their nationality and return them to the nearest embassy of their own country.”

        That’s the standard procedure with foreign children who are genuinely lost and looking to return home.

        But how do you even determine that a child is foreign, much less their country of origin, when the child does not claim to be lost and wants to remain in this country?

  5. palani

    June 22, 2014 at 8:01 AM

    There is no ‘illegal’ category for aliens. Of aliens there are only two sorts: friends and enemies. Enemies are identified by a declaration of war. You are free to capture or kill them at your option. Friendly aliens you assist on their journey. Look up ALIEN in Bouviers 1856 Law Dictionary. The Illegal category is a construct intended to cause division and dissent. Minor children of any nationality should be protected from the pedophiles holding offices of power in either the Democratic or Republican parties.

  6. cory

    June 22, 2014 at 8:23 AM

    Great idea…. just one problem.. the President of the United States doesn’t know where he came from…. need to establish that first, and then may we can proceed…

  7. Bill Ford (@thepartswizard)

    June 22, 2014 at 10:47 AM

    Fantastic Idea – near genius I’d say –
    Can we make this go viral?
    Send Illegal Aliens Home to their Nation’s Embassies
    – unite to spread the word

  8. Joan of Arc

    June 22, 2014 at 11:56 AM

    I thought Mexico jailed border crossers. How did the Central Americans get through Mexico?

  9. kanani

    June 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM

    How many coming across the border are of Catholic faith? Probably most.

    Washington D.C. serves Rome. The plan is working well. Who’s to stop it?

  10. henry

    June 22, 2014 at 8:26 PM

    It is very difficult to stop people from coming over the border. When they get here, some of them are not a problem. The easiest way to handle the problem immigrant is to withhold all government assistance to anyone who cannot prove that they were born here or immigrated legally. This would include: using American hospitals (unless they paid for service in advance), education of their children in so called “public education”, driver’s licenses, Social Security, financial aid for college, unemployment, public assistance, WIC, and all other transfer payments that I’ve not mentioned. If you want to support the new comers by donating to a church or civic association, you have this right. If a new-comer commits a crime, he/she and their family is deported. If the crime is violent, they get the lash before they are deported.

    If this approach should not be feasible, fine the company that hires the undocumented Democrats. The person financially responsible for hiring them should be held responsible: legally, financially, and criminally. If you cannot stop the supply, the demand should be focused on. If CEOs of fortune 500 companies were doing the perp walk, the problem would be over quickly.

  11. citizenquasar

    June 23, 2014 at 12:10 AM

    The title of this article made me chuckle very hard. I decided to savor that as a memory and so I did NOT read this article.

  12. citizenquasar

    June 23, 2014 at 12:13 AM

    Is this a re-enactment of ‘The Children’s Crusade?’

  13. Peter

    June 23, 2014 at 8:14 AM

    It’s all about creating the 11th dollar so the debts can be repaid. Lend 10 dollars into existence and demand 11 in return, this is impossible. The influx of the “(IL)legals” is an essential element in a debt based usury system, they have clean balance sheets and can borrow money into existence. They are needed to create money supply in the late stage the establishment is in at present.
    An act of desperation, maybe we should be thankful, the influx of (il)legals may buy you a little more time to buy silver and gold at reasonable prices, and keep debt levels expanding instead of imploding. The lesser of two evils?

  14. immabeliever

    June 23, 2014 at 4:56 PM

    what has/is happened/happening is that the US government can see birth rates declining rapidly due to inflation, common sense, etc.

    since the people are the credit of any country, the US has less money it can create due to the moratorium. no birth certificates being generated, no credit being created.

    so, basically, the ‘undocumented’ NOT illegal men, women, children are being let in to this country so they can/will be documented (registered, certified, and monetized) just like you and i were/are.

    remember, the people that own this world want a secure, pristine, high resource haven. what better way to have the best of both worlds; make conditions unbearable in mexico, central and south america, force the peoples to migrate elsewhere where the ‘owners’ will still be able to receive the ‘pound of flesh’ and have a 1/4 of a hemisphere with great natural resources and very little nuclear waste.

  15. Jay Dee

    June 24, 2014 at 1:52 PM

    You solved the problem in a very diplomatic way, with respect to stopping the flow of illegals and minimizing the expense necessary to do so.

    This is just another example of a planned -crISIS- which begs for intervention by the United Nations peace keeping forces. Tyranny is at the doorstep and wants to take our guns so that we can’t defend ourselves when it kicks-in the door during the homeland invasion in which it will forcibly bind us to the North American UNION.

  16. palani

    June 24, 2014 at 6:59 PM

    No need to deport these children to their home countries. They ALL crossed the border from Mexico. The responsibility belongs to Mexico. I admit that would fall into the category of cruel and unnecessary punishment though.

  17. henry

    June 25, 2014 at 5:51 PM

    A modest proposal: On live television that is broadcast to Latin America, kill one of these foreign children. Butcher them. Serve the child-meat to the other foreign children. That might an economical solution to the problem. Note: this could be done with special effects so that no child is actually harmed but the Hollywood produced image of the event might be effective enough.

  18. Adask

    June 25, 2014 at 6:50 PM

    Ohh, that’s not a “modest proposal”–it’s simply brilliant! Then (although we didn’t actually kill a child), our special effects could fool the world into thinking that Americans advocated and practiced child cannibalism. Ohh, yes, indeed! It would be fantastic PR for the USA.

    What a brilliant idea to fool the world into thinking we advocate child cannibalism! Yes, why didn’t I think of that? Must be because I haven’t yet run out of my meds.

    But once we fooled the world into thinking we engaged in child cannibalism, we’d inevitably even fool ourselves into thinking that’s what we do. And, soon, we wouldn’t need special effects to fool anyone. We’d have some looney-tunes crazies who actually DID engage in child cannibalism!

    Yes, Henry, that’s a really fantastic idea . . . but it makes me wonder if you’re not also off your meds.

    (Better get that prescription filled before you have any more brilliant ideas.)

    • henry

      June 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM

      Perhaps you did not get the reference to Jonathan Swift’s satirical hyperbolic 1729 essay called “A Modest Proposal” where he suggest that the Irish could ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food. Perhaps I should be more obvious next time.

      • Adask

        June 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM

        Perhaps so.

      • Roger

        June 25, 2014 at 11:09 PM

        You got gamed, Al. This guy’s not the virtuoso troll that Les Fuchs was, but he clearly studied under the master.

        The cannibalism proposal was just a setup. Your reaction to it was easy to anticipate. Then, the “you mean you haven’t read Swift’s 1729 essay (you silly ignoramus clearly below my level)” follow-up was the payoff.

        In common with Les Fuchs, this “henry” clown is a practitioner of the what-a-clever-boy-am-I method of troll fu, and you’ve just been disrespected.

      • Joan of Arc

        June 26, 2014 at 12:30 AM

        Yes, and such a distraction. Let’s get back to what we can do about it. So now the State of Texas is paying millions to assist at the border. Wonder if this is coming from the rainy day fund.

      • henry

        June 26, 2014 at 12:32 AM

        I don’t know who Les Fuchs is and I’m pretty sure that I’ve never studied under him. Like Swift, I may be a clever clown but I don’t believe that I’m a troll. I wasn’t surprised that someone wouldn’t get my post but I was surprised the reference to a modest proposal wouldn’t be known to Al since I have great respect for his intelligence and integrity.

        The original post proposed a novel solution to the current problem without considering the problems created by the solution. There are many examples of this happening in America:

        Allowing employers to deduct employee’s medical insurance from their taxable income rather than paying the amount to the employee reduced the cost of health care because it was paid with pre-tax dollars but created the problem that employees have a difficult time to switching jobs due to preexisting conditions.

        Social Security solved the problem of impoverished old people but created new problems. For instance, it broke the generational contract where you take care of your children and they take care of you when you can no longer work.

        Public assistance/food stamps fed hungry poor people but reduced charity and caused those receiving aid to not know that they have made poor choices and actually caused more people to be poor because it encourages poor people not to get married.

        Medicare and Medicaid provided health care for those who could not manage it themselves but it destroyed the free market of health care when most of the medical expenses in America are paid by government.

        Guaranteed Student Loans helped young people get a university education but has caused universities to increase tuition and encouraged people who be better off with a trade which has caused $1.2 trillion in student loans to hobble those who fell for the scam.

        The Federal Reserve was sold as a solution to unstable banks but caused many new, worse, problems.

        FDIC solves the problem of Americans loosing money in risky banks but cause people to no longer consider the risks that their banks were taking which will, eventually, cause many more people to lose money as the FDIC fails.

        The banker bail-outs five years ago saved poorly run banks but has caused insolvent banks to get bigger.

        Raising the minimum wage from $5/hr to $10/hr might be beneficial for some but why not raise to $100/hr? The answer is that when government corrupts the free market, no matter how good their intentions are, it ends up helping insiders who can take advantage of the bureaucracy and hurting the people they are saying they are helping.

        Each of these solutions are not well thought out. Cannibalism of children is just a little more obvious.

  19. Anthony Clifton

    June 26, 2014 at 4:10 PM

    I don’t think Jesus would be too impressed with the level of discourse,
    in fact ignoring the command in Matthew 13 to bundle the tares is tantamount
    to blasphemy what with the HARVEST in full swing and all

    • Joan of Arc

      June 26, 2014 at 7:06 PM

      I think what we’re seeing is righteous anger. “Thou shalt not steal” the country.

  20. Anthony Clifton

    June 27, 2014 at 6:13 AM

    did Jesus open a can of WA on the “Money Changers”…?

    Define : Nation.

  21. Anthony Clifton

    June 27, 2014 at 9:42 AM

    Better yet…imagine a PERFECT STORM.

    see all those Children…they are to be used as human shields
    but whatever you do don’t believe me, find out for yourself how
    JEWISH this insane nonsense is…

    eventually the LANGUAGE MUST BE MADE PURE….! {Zeph. 3:9}

    please don’t believe me…find out for yourself..

    if the Zionist Terrorists “KIDNAPPED” these three “JEWISH” teenagers in the “JEWISH”
    controlled area where they were “Hitch HIKING”…seriously.

    YERUSHALAYIM – The monthly Erev Yom Kippur Kattan tefillos were attended by tens of thousands more than usual in communities across Eretz Yisrael, as people heeded the call of Gedolei Yisrael to beseech Hashem in the eis ratzon of Erev Rosh Chodesh on behalf of the three kidnapped teenagers, Eyal ben Iris Teshurah Yifrah (19), Yaakov Naftali ben Rachel Devorah Frankel (16), and Gilad Michael ben Bat Galim Shaar (16).
    Anxiety over the wellbeing of the three is increasing as the
    ZIONIST TERRORIST “JEW” saga entered its third week….in production.

    A large-scale army operation hasn’t revealed the location where the three are being held.
    Sefarim say that Erev Rosh Chodesh is an auspicious time, and the moving tefillos of Yom Kippur Kattan — “small Yom Kippur” — are accompanied by fasting for many.
    In a month when Rosh Chodesh is Shabbos or Sunday,
    when we don’t fast on Friday, the tefillos are moved up to Thursday.


    find out for yourself

  22. Jay Dee

    June 27, 2014 at 8:17 PM

    On second thought, this artificially created and induced illegal immigrant crISIS is even worse than we may realize.

    It allows the government to turn the FEMA CAMPS LIVE, all the while, “UNDER THE RADAR”!!!!!

    The immigrants needs for housing, medical, transportation, etc., will lay the groundworks, and set in-place the manpower, essential contracts and logistical network necessary for the switch-over to Americans.

    Any unforeseen problems in the operations plans will have been worked out just in time for the UN to take over with the multi-national forces, which have finished their training in Colorado last year.

  23. Susan Gelfand

    June 29, 2014 at 8:31 PM

    Fantastic idea. Send them home!

  24. Cody

    July 11, 2014 at 9:46 AM

    As long as We the People refuse to live “in” America, there is none.

  25. h1sw1ll1am

    October 12, 2014 at 4:44 PM

    I have a question. Does anyone know if any of these illegal immigrants are ever asked why don’t they stay in their home country and fight for change? I’m interested in hearing their reasonings for running rather than staying and fighting for change.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s