23 Jul

It's a MYSTERY!  Who Dunnit? [courtesy Google Images]

It’s a MYSTERY! Who Dunnit?
[courtesy Google Images]

Although there are always conspiracy theories to blame the Jews, Jesuits or the CIA (and I’m not arguing that such theories are necessarily wrong), there’s a global consensus that the primary entity responsible for downing Flight MH17 is either:


1) the Ukrainian rebels supported by Russia;

2) the government of Russia; or

3) the government of Ukraine.

Although the Ukrainian rebels were initially blamed, I’ve argued from the beginning (Who Destroyed Malaysia Flight 17?)  that the rebels were the least likely suspect because they lacked the necessary training, experience and expertise to operate a highly sophisticated weapons system like the Buk SA-11.

Apparently, the Ukraine government now agrees with me.  According to CNN (MH17 Crash: Did Russia pull the trigger?  Ukraine says yes):


“Vitaly Nayda, Ukraine’s director of informational security, told CNN the person who shot down the flight was “absolutely” a Russian. “A Russian-trained, well-equipped, well-educated officer … pushed that button deliberately,” he said.”

Thus, insofar as the Ukraine government claims that a Russian military officer must’ve been at the controls when when the Buk launcher fired the missile at Flight MH17, even the Ukrainian government now implicitly agrees that the Ukraine rebels couldn’t have pulled the trigger on the Buk SA-11 missile .  I.e., the Ukraine government implicitly admits that there’s no way one of the Ukraine rebels could’ve had enough knowledge or training to operate the Buk weapons system.

Therefore, our list of usual suspects can be shortened from three to two:


1) the Ukrainian rebels supported by Russia;

2) the government of Russia; or

3) the government of Ukraine.


•  As I’ve written from the beginning, I can’t see or imagine any reason why the government of Russia would authorize the destruction of Flight MH17.  From the beginning, I’ve doubted that Russia was guilty of firing the missile.

Yesterday, despite the US government’s earlier, frantic efforts to blame the government of Russia (and especially Vladimir Putin) for firing the missile that brought down Flight MH17, the Associated Press reported (US:  No evidence of direct Russian link to plane) that:


“Senior U.S. intelligence officials say they have no evidence of direct Russian government involvement in the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.”


Thus, US intelligence appears to have exonerated the government of Russia from our list of suspects.  The former list of three, then two, is now reduced to one:


1) the Ukrainian rebels supported by Russia;

2) the government of Russia; or

3) the government of Ukraine.

However, according to the Associated Press article, US intelligence still blames the Ukrainian rebels for firing the missile and blames Russia for arming the rebels with the missiles:


“They say the passenger jet was likely felled by an SA-11 surface-to-air missile fired by Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine and that Russia ‘created the conditions’ for the downing by arming the separatists.”


I’m not surprised by those claims.  After all, just last February of this year–while Russia hosted the Winter Olympics–the US government was implicated in the overthrow of previous Ukraine government led by then-President Victor Yanukovych.    Yanukovych’s primary offense was that he and much of the Ukraine wanted closer ties to Russia.

The US wanted to sever the growing relationship between Russia and Ukraine in order to install high-speed, anti-ICBM missiles on Ukraine that would be capable of attacking Russian ICBMs immediately after they were launched in Russia and were lumbering into the air at relatively slow speeds.

Russia was infuriated by the US overthrow of the previous Ukrainian government.  More, Russia knew that if the new Ukraine government (led by new President Petro Poroshenko who was largely installed by and loyal to the US) installed anti-ICBMs on its soil, Russia would be vulnerable to a first-strike nuclear attack by the US and/or Europe.

Russia annexed the Crimea and welcomed the Ukraine rebels who wanted to separate a large piece of eastern Ukraine from control of the Ukraine government and join the eastern Ukraine to Russia.  If Russia could gain any part of eastern Ukraine, it would cause the anti-ICBM missiles to be installed further away from Russian ICBMs and thereby protect Russia’s defense against a first-strike nuclear attack.

My point is that the US intelligence officers who now admit that the Russian government did not fire the missile that destroyed Flight MH17, are still obligated to blame somebody, anybody, other than the Ukraine government that the CIA helped install just five months ago.  Therefore, they blame the rebels even though Ukraine intelligence implicitly admits that the rebels lacked sufficient training to operate a Buk SA-11 weapons system.

All of which reduces our list of three suspects to only one:


1) the Ukrainian rebels supported by Russia;

2) the government of Russia; or

3) the government of Ukraine.


But if the government of Ukraine is the only remaining suspect, we still have to ask why would Ukraine shoot down a commercial jetliner?  I don’t see any gain possible for Russia to have shot down Flight MH17.  But I also don’t see any gain possible for Ukraine.

In fact, we’ve had unconfirmed reports that, according to an unidentified “whistle blower” within the CIA, US satellite images have confirmed that: 1) the missile was fired from a Buk launcher in territory controlled by the Ukraine government; and 2) the ground around the launch site was littered with beer bottles.

Implication?  A bunch of Ukraine soldiers got drunk and fired a Buk SA-11 for fun.  Thus, although the missile was launched from territory controlled by the US-backed government of Ukraine, the US-backed government of Ukraine can’t be held responsible for the tom-foolery of a bunch of drunken soldiers who were jus’ havin’ some fun.  (Hey, just be glad the Ukrainians don’t have any more ICBMs, or some drunks might fool around, launch, and start WWIII!)

Even the US intelligence officers who recently admitted to the Associated Press that Russia didn’t fire the Buk missile, also declared that “the most likely explanation was the plane was shot down by mistake.”

Well, isn’t that reassuring?  298 people were shot out of the sky because either some drunks got a little too frisky, or some sober guy made a mistake.

Again, let’s hope that the personnel evaluations that determine who gets to control all of the world’s ICBMs are a little more stringent than the Ukraine government’s controls over its drunks and incompetents.

The nice thing about explaining the missile launch as the result of a mistake or drunken intoxication is that, if we accept either of those stories, we don’t have to look further for a cause.  We needn’t wonder about the “why” because there is no “why”.  It just happened by accident or alcohol that 298 people died.  It was an “act of God,” see–or maybe an act of beer.  But there was no deeper reason.  Because it was an “accident,” there was no intent.   And therefore, we need not investigate further.

But, does anyone really believe that some drunk or some incompetent could “accidentally” launch a Buk SA-11 that “accidentally” shot a commercial airliner out of the sky?  Is that likely?  Is that even possible?  You just jump in the cab of the Buk launcher, turn the radio up loud to catch some tunes, hit the red button, a missile fires–Whoosh!  Whatta rush, man!–and then hits any nearby airplane?

Is that what happened?

Or do they design those missiles systems so it takes at least two, perhaps three different people–acting in concert in two or three different vehicles or locations–to launch a Buk SA-11?  Can a Buk SA-11 be fired with just the say-so of one drunk or one incompetent?

I don’t know.  But, if not, can you get two or three people to accidentally–or drunkenly–to act in concert?  Probably not.

So, maybe the destruction of Flight MH17 was not the result of accident or alcohol.  Maybe it was not unintentional.  Maybe somebody fired that missile with the intent to destroy Flight MH17.   If so, the persons responsible should be identified, arrested, charged, tried as mass murderers and, if found guilty, executed.  If so, our investigations should not stop based on claims of “accident”.  Our investigations should continue.


•  Flight MH17 was shot down on Thursday, July 17th.

On Friday, July 18th, I published an article entitled “US imposes unilateral sanctions on Russia?”  In that article, I observed that the US was forced to impose unilateral sanctions on Russia because the European Union was unwilling to follow the US lead.  The EU was instead drawing closer to Russia and further apart from the US.  I pointed out that this growing alliance between Russia and the EU was a victory for Russia and a defeat for the US.

I wrote,


Unilateral US sanctions also imply that Europe realizes that it has more in common with Russian that with the US.  Again, that’s a victory for Russia.

“Unilateral sanctions are admissions that the US has not only lost influence over Europe, but is being ‘divided’ from Europe in the sense of “divide and conquer”.

“The EU/US alliance isn’t broken, but it is eroding.”


Unfortunately, in that article, I did not suggest any relationship between the EU’s growing separation from the US and growing alliance with Russia as providing a basis for the destruction of Flight MH17.

In retrospect, my failure to connect those dots was an oversight. (Wouldn’t I have seemed smart, if I’d made that connection at that time?!)

I certainly can’t prove, but I absolutely suspect that Flight MH17 was intentionally destroyed by a Ukraine government-controlled Buk missile under instructions from the United States government and/or the CIA.

The apparent objective was to frame Russia with responsibility for the disaster in a false flag operation (see, False Flag on Russia? and More Evidence of False Flag against Russia) and thereby drive a wedge between the growing EU/Russian alliance and scare the EU into running back to subservience to the US.

Unfortunately for the perpetrators of this purported false flag operation, it’s now generally agreed that Russia did not destroy Flight MH17.  The false flag operation (if there was one) has failed.  The intended patsy (Russia) has been exonerated.   The other intended patsy (the Ukraine rebels) almost certainly lacked the requried training, experience and expertise to launch the missile and hit the target.

The only other plausible perpetrator at this time is the government of Ukraine.  If the world leans on them, they must either tell us why they intentionally shot down Flight MH17 or they must admit that they accidentally or drunkenly shot down Flight MH17.

In order to avoid Ukraine governmental responsibility for downing Flight MH17, some individual Ukrainians soldiers will have to admit that they fired the missile by accident or by alcoholic misadventure.  Whoever admits to having accidentally or drunkenly fired that missile will either be executed or spend the rest of their lives in prison for mass murder. It’s going to be hard for the Ukraine government to find some men who will voluntarily take the rap for firing the missile.  It’s going to be hard to identify several men responsible for the accident and/or drunken idiocy who can keep their stories straight and their mouths shut.  If they’re lying, they’ll be exposed.

Ideally, the Ukraine government could identify just one man (the “lone rocketeer theory”) as being responsible.  He could be found dead after committing suicide and then–darn it!–we would never know what drove him to fire that missile.

But I’m extremely skeptical that a Buk missile can be launched by just one man.  I’ll bet it takes at least two, maybe three, maybe more.  If so, the “lone rocketeer theory” won’t work.  That means several men must not only be blamed for firing the missile but be willing to accept responsibility, life imprisonment and/or execution for their acts.  It won’t be easy to find several Ukrainians who can 1) keep their stories straight; and 2) willingly die, if necessary, for the greater glory of an Ukrainian government that was installed by the United States just five months ago.

I admit that the real explanation for the destruction of Flight MH17 may be “accident” or “alcoholic misadventure”.  But I don’t believe that’s true. If it was, the US should have satellite images of where the missile was fired from.  Once the location of the missile launcher is known, it should be fairly easy to identify the men who were in control of that particular launcher.  Once their identities are known, they should be arrested, interrogated, tried, etc.–and most of, paraded before the world as the only guilty perpetrators of the Flight MH17 disaster.

However, so far as I know, the US has not yet released its satellite images of the missile launch and strike.  So far as I know, we don’t yet know for sure where the missile launcher was located when if fired the missile.

I wonder why not.

In fact, it seems almost as strange to me that the missile launcher’s location has not yet been revealed as it once seemed strange that Jack Ruby could shoot Lee Harvey Oswald in a police station–and then later die in prison from cancer.

If the government of Ukraine can’t find some chumps willing to take the rap for Flight MH17, the “accident” and “drunkenness” theories are going to fall apart.  If those theories fail, we’re back to looking for the why.  We’re back to looking for the intent.  We’re back to looking for the real, though shadowy figures, who had both the power and the reason to cause a Buk missile to destroy Flight MH17.

The Ukraine rebels had neither the power nor reason.

Russia had such power, but no reason.

The Ukraine government had power, but no reason.

The only people who I can see who might’ve had both power and reason to bring down Flight MH17 is the United States government.  I believe the US government had the power to pull the strings of its puppets in the Ukraine government to cause the missile to be launched.  The US government also had reason to create a false flag event to vilify Russia and Putin and thereby prevent the EU from leaving the US to join a more profitable alliance with Russia.

In crime dramas, they call that “opportunity” and “motive”. The fact that the US had both opportunity and motive (power and reason) to destroy Flight MH17 does not prove that the US is guilty.  Without more evidence, all I can offer you is a conspiracy theory.

But I’ll bet that before this is done, more evidence will emerge–especially from whoever is blamed for operating the missile launcher.  Those who dismiss my conspiracy theory as absurd today will soon come to at least admit that my theory is plausible.


Posted by on July 23, 2014 in Conspiracy theories, False Flag, Flight MH 17, War


Tags: , ,

15 responses to “Whodunnit?

  1. mikeck44

    July 23, 2014 at 9:39 AM

    Good analysis Al,

    One question, are we sure it was taken down by a Buk missile? There are other possibilities…one thing that I heard about is that there was a Ukraine fighter jet near Flight MH17 at the time. It was in a youtube video, so maybe a big grain of salt is warranted.


    • Adask

      July 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM

      As I said in my first article, it might not have been a missile at all, but may have been a bomb on board the plane. But whether the plane was brought down with a Buk or a bomb, it’s a virtual certainty that it was not brought down by Russia or the rebels, but was brought down by some elements of the Ukraine government acting by accident or acting intentionally on behalf of the United States/CIA. Are we to believe that anyone can launch a Buck missile like a bottle rocket on the 4th of July? Are we to believe that such accidents are possible or that a bunch of drunks could fire a Buk? If we don’t believe in accidents or drunks, somebody launched a missile (maybe a Buk, but maybe not) by intent. Who really had a reason to down Flight MH17? Not Russia, not rebels, not even Ukraine government. Who then stood to benefit if Flight MH17 were destroyed and that destruction could be blamed on the Russians? So far, I see only one suspect who might stand to benefit–the US government. There may be other, more plausible explanations. I’m not saying this theory is true. I am saying it seems logical and plausible.

  2. Judy Kay

    July 23, 2014 at 12:10 PM

    The youtube channel and blog site Abel Danger provides the most thorough, “insider” information on the 2 (he says there will be a 3rd) downings of Malaysian planes….and, this particular piece is lengthy and thorough:
    …book-length but full of details…
    By limiting our question to only 3 choices for the WHODUNNIT? question, we can never see the whole picture.
    Abel Danger (Field McConnell) produces 1-1/2 hour youtubes on Mon. Wed. and Friday @ 1:30 pm CSTwhich are uploaded after that….you can ask to be on the livestream / chat board by simply emailing Field Mcconnell fieldmcc at

    Field is a former Northwest Airlines captain that was forced out of flying because he was insisting the pilots union inform their members about the Boeing-Honeywell-Uninterruptable-Auto-Pilot (BHUAP) system (and also, a tranquilizer device) installed on every Boeing jet …. Pilots don’t even know where these 2 devices are located on their planes….and it is their duty to know all onboard systems. If the flying public only knew….they would NOT get on an airplane…

  3. Judy Kay

    July 23, 2014 at 12:21 PM

    And, Jim Stone is current on details…..the story is gruesome….the truth needs to come out….when is the International investigation to take place?

    • Mr. Smarter Than the Rest

      July 23, 2014 at 7:25 PM

      Way to go Judy Kay! You’re on it!
      EVERYONE needs to check on Jim’s
      site every day.

      And chip in with an occasional donation
      when they can.


  4. Anthony Clifton

    July 23, 2014 at 1:29 PM

    couple of extra dots from the waybackmachine…

    Joel C. Rosenberg, – 18 Aug. 01…reported :

    ” The President’s missile defense strategy is under intense fire by Congressional Democrats who praise John F. Kennedy’s vision of sending an American to the moon but can’t seem to stomach the idea of protecting Americans from an ayatollah launching a nuclear rocket at us. Now a group of conservative leaders in Washington, D.C., Americans for Missile Defense, are building a defense strategy of their own. Organized by David Keene of the American Conservative Union, the group seeks to gather one million signatures in favor of the President’s plan and to unleash a torrent of e-mails, faxes, phone calls, and letters to wavering, wobbling Congressmen in an attempt to persuade them to support the Bush plan.

    A group of American business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media “war room” in Washington, D.C. The group will be called “Emet”—which in Hebrew means “truth.” Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important, pales in comparison to the larger geo-strategic threat posed to the United States and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction. Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion. Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited; Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram’s; and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of Israel’s largest banks. Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp.
    while means MOTIVE and opportunity are under consideration…

    Then there is Dov Zakheim who while also a Rabbi was allegedly also the
    COMPTROLLER at the Pentagon prior to 9/11 when some huge pile of cash
    went missing, not actually cash, just credit entries…or filthy lucre to start wars
    with to make more filthy lucre….to start more wars…

    apparently that is how “They” make “money”…
    besides just printing it and loaning into circulation…

    and who can forget the Israeli’s bragging about all the arms & Materiel
    recovered from their incursion into Lebanon in 1982…

    The Last Straw
    The final provocation occurred in June 1982 when a Palestinian terrorist group led by Abu Nidal attempted to assassinate Israel’s Ambassador to Great Britain, Shlomo Argov. The IDF subsequently attacked Lebanon again on June 4-5, 1982. The PLO responded with a massive artillery and mortar attack on the Israeli population of the Galilee. On June 6, the IDF moved into Lebanon to drive out the terrorists in “Operation Peace for Galilee.”
    Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger defended the Israeli operation:
    “No sovereign state can tolerate indefinitely the buildup along its borders of a military force dedicated to its destruction and implementing its objectives by periodic shellings and raids” (Washington Post, June 16, 1982)
    when the convoys were delivering huge amounts to be stockpiled for resale..
    .for future….CONFLICTS…

    please remember however that most so-called “Jews” have no say whatsoever
    just as 100% of the braindeadgoy have no say so over how these things happen to
    to enrich the Money Changers & Pharisees and all their highly compartmentalized
    two legged zombie widgets…er um mind slaves…who seemingly worship
    pretend authority sorta as a reflex…or a conditioned response..
    like when the Synagogue of Satan Zionist Terrorist GOG & MAGOG “Jews”
    blew those four children to bits on the beach last week…and claimed they were
    an unfortunate consequence of the “Jewish” self Defense ploy…bombing
    people huddled in a concentration camp for 66 years…
    or when the ADL/FBI mass Murdered the Davidians and claimed
    they committed Suicide…same thing.
    same snake hole

    • Dr. Richard Welser

      July 23, 2014 at 8:58 PM

      one of the more comprehensive and articulate descriptions of events…. I attempted a smallish sort of recap the other day and got lambasted by someone who apparently did not like what was to him, antisemtiism… the old hackneyed assail…. Let me assert, a good portion of my family is Jewish. That is NOT equivalent to being zionist. khazars. But my family has to deal with shifting levels of awareness regarding Jewishness, vs Khazar, vs semitism vs Zionism. They are still trying to sort that out. And I don’t mess with that too much. I.e., I love my family. They are very good people.
      But, I, as not being involved in that – other than being a brother who is clearly Christian, has to figure out how to point out the perfidy of Israel, of the Khazars, of the ‘Big Lie’. Also the Big Lie concerning the United States Fed Corp and its usurpation by Zionist interests. (e.g., Federal Reserve Rothschild perfidy). Clearly, whether the Protocols of Zion were ever written by a Jew, Khazar or a whatever, the writings are erily prescient of just what is going on. Including descriptors for just how dealing with such nusances as real semites/palestinians is to be handled. And just how the United States (speaking here of the original DOC) shall be subverted. But anyway, addressing merely the ‘who done it’, has to include those powers within Ukraine who are dual nationals…. and whose loyalty is obvious via dual national status. (Just like in the United States!) And add that to the list of probable cui bono motives. And don’t forget the cadavers, the diseases, and the effect of spreading them around. Conflicting issues here, I know, but … this was never meant to be easy. eh?

  5. Pingback: Whodunnit? |
  6. citizenquasar

    July 23, 2014 at 10:21 PM

    Although I do NOT always agree with him, Dr. Joseph P. Farrell continues to keep open the option that maybe NOBODY knows what happened to MH17. Perhaps it just went poof; “Perhaps.” Though Farrell presents other possibilities in his self-styled “high octane speculation,” he does NOT rule out this option.

    Dr. Paul LaViolette, suspecting a galactic core eruption is pending and extra-terrestrial civilizations may be trying to warn us of this, proffers that, perhaps, they disappeared it with a giant transporter beam in order to get our attention.

    So there you have a pair-o’-docs. That’s MY two cents worth.

    • citizenquasar

      July 24, 2014 at 9:58 PM

      CORRECTION: I had two hours of sleep in two days. So I confused two planes in two different geographic regions on two different dates under two entirely different circumstances. My bad. I apologize. However, my above comment still does involve a pair-‘o-docs. ;)

      • citizenquasar

        July 24, 2014 at 9:58 PM

        And so it is STILL worth about 2 cents.

  7. Anthony Clifton

    July 24, 2014 at 8:10 AM

    like a thief in the night,
    in a twinkling of an eye…
    when did the children of Israel turn into Gog & Magog “Jews” ?

    the words “Jew” and “Israel” are antonyms…
    is it written…a “Proverb” a “byword”….
    “So Israel will become a proverb and a byword among all peoples.”

    Jesus said…” Know the Truth.”

  8. Lex Mercatoria

    August 12, 2014 at 5:06 AM

    Flight MH17 is most likely yet more media fakery. I find no reason to believe anything about it has a basis in reality. They can sell just about any story if it’s labelled “news.”

  9. mark west

    February 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM

    It occurs to me that an international flight was authorized (or directed) to fly over a combat zone, where rocket and missile systems are being fired at Ukrainian government planes. Neither Russia nor the rebels could have performed this act. Only the the Ukrainian aviation authorities could have issued this clearance.

    Perhaps the U.S. is complicit, but this is a major cause of the tragic event that seems self-evident. Ultimately, one individual can be found who approved this authorization, then the string can be followed up.

    In summary, if the flight were not authorized to fly the path it did, then the event could not have occurred. Any ongoing commercial flights over this area?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s