Solving immigration problems for the North American Union

31 Jul

Illegal Aliens expressing their gratitude to be in the USA [courtesy Google Images]

Illegal Aliens expressing their gratitude for being allowed into the USA
[courtesy Google Images]

The Washington Times (“House moves to halt illegal immigration by deploying U.S. forces to Central America”) recently reported,


“House Republicans moved to tackle the border crisis at the source Wednesday, proposing to set up repatriation centers in Central American countries to help send back the wave of unaccompanied illegal immigrant children arriving in the U.S.”

Why build “repatriation centers” in Central America when already have them, right here in the US? They’re called “embassies”.

If a child from Honduras enters the US illegally, we should deliver that child to the Honduras embassy and let Honduras figure out what to do with their child. The child is not an American problem. The child is an Honduran problem. So let Honduras deal with their children and their problems.

Let Honduras decide whether to keep their child at their embassy or ship him home—but do not allow Honduras to release their child from their embassy into the US without a visa. If they do, we’ll understand that release as an effort by the Honduras government to traffic in child across an international border or even an act of war—and see that the responsible Honduras embassy officials are properly prosecuted in US or international courts.

If we find 5,000 Honduran children alone and apparently abandoned in the United States, we’ll deliver all 5,000 to the nearest Honduras embassies and let Honduras figure out what do with their children. Again, they can either keep their Honduran kids in their Honduran embassy or pay to have their Honduran kids shipped back to their home country: Honduras.

Similarly, if children or young men and women enter this country illegally from Mexico, we should simply deliver them to the nearest Mexican embassies and let Mexico figure out what they plan to do with their lost children and/or their illegal aliens.

Again, the Mexican government would have two options:


1) Pay to feed, clothe and provide for their Mexican illegals in their Mexican embassies; or

2) Pay to ship their people back to Mexico.


We keep dealing with the illegal alien problem as if it were America’s problem. It’s not. It’s the problem of the nation from which the illegal aliens emigrated. So why not shift the cost of illegal aliens onto the government of whatever nation that they come from? You can do that by stuffing the illegals’ home embassies with hundreds, even thousands of children and “illegal aliens”. And don’t let them out on the American streets unless they acquire a visa or are being transported back to their home country.

What would happen? Once the embassies of Honduras and Mexico were: 1) filled to over-flowing with their own people who’d entered the US illegally; and 2) their national governments were forced to bear the cost of feeding and clothing their own people in their embassies and of shipping them back to their native country; then 3) those foreign governments might realize that it’s cheaper to prevent their own people from leaving their home country to enter the US illegally than it is absorb the cost of housing them in their embassies and then flying them back to their home countries after they’ve been found in the US and delivered to one of their nation’s embassies.


“The [Republican] plan called for an aggressive public relations campaign in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras to discourage families from sending their children on the long journey to America, as well as establishing border security measures not just in the U.S. but in those Central American countries and Mexico.

“These dramatic steps on foreign soil were part of a $1.5 billion plan drawn up by a House GOP task force.”


Not just a “public relations campaign,” but an “aggressive public relations campaign”. Pretty impressive, hmm?

Actually, how stupid is that proposal?

Well, first, it’s lunacy to suppose that we can solve the illegal alien problem with even an “aggressive public relations campaign”. No one is going to talk those who want to come to the US out of trying to do so.

Therefore, I have to presume the Republicans’ real goal is to create a program in a foreign country that’s funded by US taxpayers but established and operated by special corporate interests close to the Republican Party. The program won’t work, of course, but some corporations will get rich trying to achieve the impossible.

Second, Americans do not need to pay for an “aggressive public relations campaign” in foreign countries. What we need to pay for is an effective border barrier, right here, between Mexico and the United States. Instead of urinating our money away in Central America, we should spend it right here to build an effective barrier between Mexico and the US.

Third, whatever is going on in Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras is no concern of the United States—but it might be the concern of the North American Union which is designed to include Canada, the United States, Mexico and perhaps Central America.

It may be the business of the North American Union to use US dollars to wage a “public relations campaign” in Mexico and Central America because they are all part of the proposed North American Union. But “aggressive publican relations campaigns” in Mexico and Central American are not the business of government of The United States of America because Mexico and Central America are not part of The United States of America. Our rights and legitimate governmental obligations begin and end at our borders. Maintaining those borders is crucial to maintaining our God-given, unalienable Rights.

Insofar as the Republican Party seeks to solve the problem of illegal aliens in the US by going to their home country with an “aggressive public relations campaign,” the Republican Party leadership implies that its real loyalty is not to The United States of America but to the North American Union and/or the New World Order.

The House plan for an “aggressive public relations campaign” in foreign countries indicates that Republican Party leadership:


1) has no interest in establishing and maintaining our national borders;

2) is opposed to protecting The United States of America from invasion by illegal aliens;

3) has no more interest in enforcing existing laws than Barack Obama;

4) is dedicated to establishing a North American Union that allows the unfettered immigration of all people in North America into the United States—even though that unlimited immigration and North American Union will mean the destruction of The United States of America as a viable and independent nation; and

5) is not averse to committing treason against The United States of America in order to establish the North American Union.


•  Don’t suppose that I’m only ragging on the Republicans. The Democrat Party’s leadership is every bit as greedy, self-serving, pro-North American Union, and treasonous.

Leadership of both major political parties has been seized by agents loyal to the North American Union and the New World Order.

Both party’s leadership needs a complete purge.


Posted by on July 31, 2014 in Illegal Aliens



8 responses to “Solving immigration problems for the North American Union

  1. Mladen (aka Mark)

    July 31, 2014 at 9:02 PM

    You guys are racist! Your country was built on slaves owned by your so-called “Founding founders” !

    And, the non-United States of America are touted to be a “Melting Pot,” a multi-cultural potpourri.

    And, all this in the allegedly “Land of the Free,” which has more people in prison per capita than your average Yogi Bear fictional sovereignty. So, I don’t get it. Where is the love man?

  2. Adask

    July 31, 2014 at 11:44 PM

    Where’s the love in Mexico? Can Americans simply cross over into Mexico and be welcomed regardless of whether they have a visa or or legal documentation? Can I just stroll across the Mexican border and buy a car, house or business without being legally admitted into Mexico?

    How ’bout the people who live in Central America? Can they legally just stroll into Mexico and pitch their tents wherever they please?

    Mexican’s aren’t entitled to any more “love” in this country than they give in their own.

    Incidentally, the Whites who are here today are generally not the sons and daughters of slave owners–they mostly the sons and daughters of people who’ve never had slaves or participated in slavery, or they’re the descendants of the Whites who fought the free the slaves. The slaves didn’t free themselves. They were freed by Whites. Do today’s Whites get any respect for descending from those who freed slaves? Or is it more convenient (and racist) for minorities to blame all Whites for slavery that ended nearly 150 years ago.

    The race card isn’t going to work much longer. If you’re Black, Brown or even White and you can’t cut it, that’s not evidence of racism. It’s evidence of your own intellectual, educational, cultural and/or energy inferiority. You’re not being discriminated against because of the color of your skin. You’re being discriminated against because you’re dumb or lazy.

    In his moving and profound “I Have A Dream” speech, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. declared in part that “I have a dream that one day my children will be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.” Note that Rev. King did not dream that one day minorities would not be judged. He dreamed that they would be judged, but according to the content of their character instead of by the color of their skin.

    Today’s minorities often object to being “judged” by any standards but their own. They object to being judged by the value of a culture that they can’t produce but whose benefits they seek to acquire. They get a lot of mileage out of claiming that anytime they’re “judged,” that judgement must be the result of racism.

    But they’re not being judged by their race. They’re being judged by their intelligence, culture, values, abilities, motivation, impulsiveness, and even predisposition to engage in violence or crime. When the judgement goes against their interests or desires, they claim the person judging was racist.

    That claim’s not likely to work much longer. Like the little boy who repeatedly cried “wolf!,” people are going to stop listening and when he finally runs into a real “wolf” (or “racist”) and cries out for help, nobody’s going to pay any attention.

    • dejure

      August 1, 2014 at 12:26 AM

      Uh huh (couldn’t find the Like button.

      And the boat is sinking.

  3. Anna von Reitz

    August 1, 2014 at 12:26 AM

    Hello and WTF? WHAT “North American Union”—-did G.W. have a senior moment and think he was GOD? It’s time we all woke up and worked up. Time for that clammy bastard to be arrested and sent somewhere like North Korea where people still have common sense and the will to do something about insane tyrants. We NEVER authorized any “North American Union” whatsoever, nor did we grant Mr. Bush any authority to enter into any such contract in our behalf, which brings us back to the question of when are we going to kick the asses of every ASS in Congress and re-assert our sovereignty and our contract for SERVICES from these runaway maids and butlers?

  4. prayerwarriorpsychicnot

    August 1, 2014 at 5:05 AM

    You are quite right the alien children are the responsibility of their respective embassies. But a sensible govt would not have permitted the situation in the first place. My view is the Trojan Horse theory is right. The only point of the exercise is to promote chaos. At the expense of the American citizen. The authorities can then argue that in order to deal with the chaos, which they created, to deal with it they need to crack down on American citizens. Are gangsters running the country?

  5. palani

    August 1, 2014 at 7:02 AM

    In law (common law) there is a concept called ‘settlement’. It means if you have lived someplace for several years you have been accepted into that community. Sailors whose ship came into port several counties from their home must first visit a magistrate for permission to travel through those several counties to get home. If a wanderer appeared in your community the general procedure was to flog them in the pillory and escort them to the place they came from and they generally got flogged at each place a different escort was provided. If the wanderer happened to venture in from a county not his home or his home was not known he was escorted to that county. The U.S. need have no obligation to return migrants to their home. They return them to where they came from (Mexico). That is what Mexico did recently. Several Guatemalans had been working in Denver in the food industry. Work dried up so they wanted to return home. Their bus crossed into Mexico and they were returned to the U.S. to be held several months for deportation. They had achieved settlement in the U.S. even though it was not a legal settlement and Mexico did not see a need to grant them entry.

    Several terms of law art are ‘aghenhine’ and ‘levant et couchant’. Aghenhine refers to a status. A stranger might spend the night in your home (or barn) as a stranger. The second night he becomes a guest. On the third or succeeding nights that he stays he is a part of the household (or aghenhine). Levant et couchant is a term that determines when a trespass has occurred for a neighbors domestic animals. If you happen to lie down and witness the morning sun upon rising your status is levant et couchant. Looking from the viewpoint of the animal … he has achieved some from of natural right by his act.

    Possession is (as it were) the position of the foot.

  6. henry

    August 1, 2014 at 12:57 PM

    The owners of the planet (the oligarchs) want to bring back the divine right of kings. The Declaration of Independence is in their way so it must be discarded. By destroying the foundations of America, they can become kings on Earth. The Latin immigrants are pawns who have no idea that they are pawns. The Republican party is bought and paid for just like the Democrat party. It gives you the illusion of a choice — The Republicans are not as bad as the Democrats so I’ll vote for them. Any politician that does not see government’s only role is to secure the unalienable rights of each American should not get your vote.

  7. EarlatOregon

    August 5, 2014 at 7:09 PM

    Are those young Illegal Aliens,
    RunAways or Abandoned?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s