Don’ Play th’ Fool in Ferguson Mo

16 Aug

Not every black American favors riots.

video   00:06:18


Posted by on August 16, 2014 in Race


Tags: , , ,

35 responses to “Don’ Play th’ Fool in Ferguson Mo

  1. itsmymoney

    August 16, 2014 at 5:17 PM

    Mr Adask,

    Thank you for this forum. If I may, please…

    The man in this video continually asks for black people to ‘change’. Ok, so by his other comments regarding the rioting I presume he means that these people should not riot as a result of incidents such as these. I concur.

    He implies that Thomas Brown was resisting arrest, thereby implying that the police’s action were justified by shooting him. I do not know of any facts published that Brown was resisting arrest (and I might add, for what charges?).

    Blacks ARE targeted more than whites.

    I find it a bit self-serving that many whites attempting to mitigate crimes against blacks are quick to distribute/publish videos of this sort where a black person is denouncing his own race. On the other hand, it is refreshing to hear a black person look objectively at this subject, although in this case I believe the man in the video appears to be looking past the issue as to whether this cop killed a human being in cold blood or not. THAT fact is the material fact in this incident.

    I presume that the man in the video, by his own references, is a Christian. I wonder if he was not, would the author of this site have been more inclined not to publish it, knowing that the author is himself a Christian.

    This incident is now part of a long line of ‘police state’ actions that appear to be proliferating in this country. Look up Benton MacKenzie in Iowa, and Joel Naselroad in Kentucky. These are two very disturbing and despicable outcomes brought about by police impropriety, and by an inhuman and corrupt DA’s office and judges in these cases.

    While I’m on the subject, I also find that many whites hate or despise Obama because he is black, not because he is anti-liberty for Americans or just because he’s a terrible President – because he is a terrible President. But so was George Bush. And I never saw this much outrage from whites for his transgressions as President.

    Our rights are being taken away every day. That is the lesson we must learn from this. Full disclosure: I am a white, middle-aged, Libertarian-leaning man. Before you label me on issues, I do not believe in open borders; I believe people for the most part should carry their own weight; I believe the ‘income’ tax is truly killing this country for everyone, and, no one can still find the law on American Citizens being liable for this tax, and where the ‘powers that be’ also divert you from the actual law that states for WHOM the tax is intended. I believe there is a mandate from, or on the behalf of ‘the State’, to suppress and bring We The People under their authority. This is very disturbing.

    All due respect to Mr Adask and his great work. Thank you.


    • Adask

      August 17, 2014 at 6:09 AM

      It’s not my intent to post a link to that video to justify the cop shooting black teenager, Michael Brown. I don’t know what happened because I wasn’t there to see it, but I’m about 90% confident that the cop had no valid reason to repeatedly shoot and kill Michael Brown.

      My purpose in posting the video is to show my surprise at seeing a black man who is as tired of his race’s BS as I am. I can’t speak on the subject without making the obligatory concession that there are a lot of fine, law-abiding blacks in this country. But there aren’t enough of them to offset what the “niggers” are doing by “actin’ the fool,” playing the “knockout game,” looting, and blaming all their woes on Whitey.

      As a people, African-Americans have become a gross embarrassment to America and, judging by the video, even to some of themselves.

      I am sick and tired of listening to a people who won’t or can’t learn to read, write and “do numbers” bitch that they’re subject to racial discrimination by Whitey. Blacks aren’t being discriminated against because they’re black. They’re being judged according to the intelligence, education, character and tendency to violence–and generally avoided.

      If you listen to some of the videos that were made during the Ferguson riots, you’ll hear blacks laughing, joking and having a “gay old time” as they break into stores, steal and start fires. They’re not rioting because they’re legitimately angry that the cop shot Michael Brown–niggers get shot every day by other niggers and nobody gives a damn. Instead, many of the people rioting in Ferguson are using Michael Brown’s death as a PRETEXT to riot and rob.

      As for blacks being disproportionately targeted by law enforcement for arrest, the popular explanation is that the higher percentage of blacks being arrested and convicted is due to racism. And sometimes, that’s true.

      It’s politically incorrect to say so, but the primary reason blacks are disproportionately subject to arrest, conviction and incarceration is that blacks are disproportionately prone to commit crimes. When Chicago reports several dozen people killed in a single weekend, who were the people killed? Blacks. And who did all that killing? Blacks. Whitey doesn’t make blacks kill blacks. Whitey doesn’t make blacks rob blacks, use drugs, abort half of the babies, or raise perhaps as many as 90% of black children without fathers. And virtually no one in the black community raises serious objections to including “niggers” in the black community who celebrate their “right” to engage in violence and murder.

      We are encouraged to believe that blacks have some special right to be angry and violent because their ancestors were once slaves and Whitey is responsible for that anger because the slave owners were primarily White. Well, classical slavery ended in this country 150 years (7 generations) ago. And yet, I’m supposed to accept the idea that blacks are entitled to “act the fool” today because their great-great-great-great grand parents were slaves 150 years ago. That’s a bunch of BS. The logic behind that argument is stupid and embarrassingly irrational. And yet, we’re all subject to be accused of being “racists” if we deny the idiotic argument that blacks are entitled to special treatment and care because, once upon a time, their ancestors were slaves. So effing what? If that excuse were legitimate, I’d say “get over it”. But it’s not legitimate. It’s a pretext for bad behavior, ignorance and criminality.

      What’s the real reason for niggers “actin’ the fool”?

      Low average IQ.

      Studies indicate that sub-Saharan Africans (Negros) have an average IQ of 70, African-Americans have an IQ of 85, Whites have an average IQ of 100, and Asians have an average IQ of 105. There’s the problem. A lot of blacks don’t become proficient in reading, writing and ‘rithmatic because they lack the intellectual capacity to do so. Where will a people who can’t read, write or count find gainful employment in an increasingly technological society? How will a people who want everything Whites seem to have, get what Whites have if they lack the intelligence to duplicate Whites’ intellectual performance?

      And I’m not suggesting that the average White’s intellect or education is something to brag about. I’m saying that average Blacks are even dumber than average Whites.

      Blacks aren’t being discriminated against because they’re black–they’re discriminated against because they are, on average, significantly less intelligent than Whites.

      When it comes to intellect, studies indicate that Asian are, on average, the most intelligent. Look at how much better Asians do in math, chess and playing the cello than most Whites–and then note that Asians’ average IQs are only FIVE points higher than average Whites.

      Then reflect on the fact that the average White’s IQ (100) is reportedly FIFTEEN points higher than the average African-American’s IQ (85). The intellectual gap between average Blacks and average Whites is THREE times greater than the intellectual difference between the average White and the average Asian.

      Nobody wants to talk about this IQ “problem” in public, but this is the central problem that distinguishes Blacks from Whites. It’s not about skin color or kinky hair. It’s about a genetic predisposition to a lower IQ.

      The main reason that no one wants to talk about this issue is that there’s nothing that can be done about it. The man in the video is screaming that African-Americans must “change” themselves and stop “actin’ the fool”. To some extent, he’s right. Blacks must change their cultural values to respect intellect more than athletics, marriage more than being “players,” and civility more than violence. Blacks can’t continue to both bitch that they’re subject to racial discrimination by the police while Blacks still celebrate the “thug lifestyle” in their music, rap, dress and behavior. The “thug lifestyle” is the one that kills some Blacks and gets lots of other Blacks incarcerated. The “thug lifestyle” that’s celebrated by most niggers could also be called the “incarceration lifestyle” that decried by most Blacks. No one can act like a thug for long without winding up in the slammer. No nigger who celebrates the “thug lifestyle” can be legitimately surprised by the “disproportionate” number of Blacks who wind up incarcerated. The one follows that other as surely as day follows night.

      But the real problem, in my opinion, is that there’s nothing to be done about low Black IQs other than to interbreed with Whites until the average “Black” child is predominately “White”. Look at Obama. He’s more intelligent than the average White. But is he President because he’s “Black” or because he’s half White? Because he was raised “White”?

      And, what, incidentally is the definition of Black? Does the term describe a race or a culture? We can change a culture (a system of learned values), but we can’t change a race (including the ability to learn) without modifying that race to the point where it no longer exists.

      Compare the African Negro race with a reported average IQ of 70 to the African-American “race” with an average IQ of 85. Can we explain that increase in IQ as a consequence of culture (African-Americans being exposed to White values)? Or does it reflect that possibility that most African-Americans (like Obama) are now, to some significant degree, genetically part White?

      The man in the video recognizes that Blacks are too often “actin’ the fool”–and despairs of that predisposition. He is angry and ashamed of his fellow Black’s behavior. I agree with him that the Black race has become an embarrassment for American in general and Blacks in particular. So he screams for “change” in the behavior and CULTURE. But his calls for cultural change may be nearly futile if the real obstacle to “racial equality” is not cultural, but is a genetic predisposition to low IQ.

      People keep hollering “Change, change–but there is no change.” It begins to appear that real change can’t happen at the cultural level until there’s significant change in the genetic level. I understand that opinion is fundamentally “racist”–but increasingly, it appears to be true.

      Sooner or later, Blacks are going to have to admit that their “problems” aren’t caused by Whitey so much as their own genetics. I think the Black community is already at that moment insofar as they routinely kill each other and reportedly abort over 50% of their own children. At the rate Blacks are self-destructing, by the end of this century, there may not be any more African-Americans in this country.

      In the meantime, the Black “problem” will persist and the only question will be whether to keep blaming Whitey (which may be crucial to maintain whatever self-esteem remains among Blacks) or face the possibility that Blacks are as lame at the “game” of civilization as Whites are lame at the game of basketball.

      In other words, (especially after the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency) it becomes increasingly obvious that Blacks aren’t being subjected to a false racial discrimination so much as being objectively judged as incapable of fully participating in the economy and therefore being unworthy of many of the rewards that economy can provide. It’s just like basketball. If you got game, you can play and even slam dunk a few. If you ain’t got game, get off the court.

      As Blacks increasingly recognize that Whitey’s “racism” is more pretext than problem, Blacks may become increasingly depressed and therefore prone to self-destruction or criminal conduct.

      The man in the video exhorts Blacks to change their culture and system of values so they can prosper in this world. But that exhortation has been advanced for several generations without much success. Is the reason that Blacks don’t embrace the White culture because Blacks have “racial pride”–or is it because Blacks, on average, are inherently incapable of embracing that White culture?

      The second answer to that question is politically incorrect and seemingly “racist” but nevertheless appears increasingly to be true.

      How long shall a people (today’s Whites) who’ve never had slaves be held liable to a people (today’s Blacks) who’ve never been slaves, for the crime of “slavery” that ended 150 years ago?

      Not much longer.

      The primary problem isn’t Whitey. The primary problem is Blackie.

      • Roger

        August 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM

        Interesting points, Al.

        See also, from Wikipedia:

        “The history of the race and intelligence controversy concerns the historical development of a debate, concerning possible explanations of group differences encountered in the study of race and intelligence. Since the beginning of IQ testing around the time of World War I there have been observed differences between average scores of different population groups, but there has been no agreement about whether this is mainly due to environmental and cultural factors, or mainly due to some genetic factor, or even if the dichotomy between environmental and genetic factors is a correct approach to the debate.”

        “In 1965 William Shockley, Nobel laureate in physics and professor at Stanford University, made a public statement at the Nobel conference on “Genetics and the Future of Man” about the problems of “genetic deterioration” in humans caused by “evolution in reverse”. He claimed social support systems designed to help the disadvantaged had a regressive effect. Shockley subsequently claimed the most competent American population group were the descendants of original European settlers, because of the extreme selective pressures imposed by the harsh conditions of early colonialism. Speaking of the “genetic enslavement” of African Americans [i.e. “niggers”], owing to an abnormally high birth rate, Shockley discouraged improved education as a remedy, suggesting instead sterilization and birth control.”

        It’s an informative article on the subject, well worth reading.

      • Anthony Clifton

        August 17, 2014 at 8:52 AM

        what a loving rebuke of malicious stupidity…

        in Matthew 24 Jesus describes the Ethnic tensions that will arise…
        and in Isaiah 13:14… it is written that each man will flee to his home country…

        for the record…
        it was not poor Scots & English & Irish & German & French “White”
        boys who OWNED the Slave Ships & the INSURANCE companies that “insured” the
        “human” cargoes….during the time “Slaves” were brought to the NEW WORLD as
        a component of the SUGAR {cane} Plantation/ECONOMIC TERRORISM from the
        “Money Changers” & Pharisees….who today print the currency & OWN the Media
        and legislate “equality” of out come in the…. from SCHOOL TO PRISON system
        operating in “ZOGUSA”…!

        where BRAINDEADGOY “Taxpayer” money goes to a GLOBAL AGENDA of
        Zionist perfidy that ooozes from the Talmud.

        the Old Testament is not about being “Jewish”.

        I was in Memphis in ’68. & also investigated the Mass Murder of the Davidians.

        this little girl did not rob a liquor store…& Wayne Martin had a Law Degree from Harvard
        and who has been prosecuted for their murders ? Tim McVeigh ?

        “Love one another” means…
        tell the truth about the lying Murderers for filthy LUCRE…….FIRST.

        John 8:32.

        Cui Bono

      • itsmymoney

        August 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM

        Mr Adask,

        Your research regarding IQ is very telling and compelling. I agree with most of what you posted overall, and the truth does hurt as they say.

        What I find a little disturbing is your liberal use of the word ‘nigger’ in describing black criminals. I’m not making excuses for this kind of thuggery, but when white people commit similar crimes, what do you call those people? It’s a fair question. And full disclosure, I am not personally immune to using or thinking the n-word at times, but I cringe and question myself after this occurs because it is still inherent to labeling in general. So the conflict continues. Perhaps for some, there is none.

        Regardless, I do not believe the black race is doing itself any favors by also using that term liberally as well, no matter the context or intent.

        Thanks for the chance to express here.

      • pop de adam

        August 18, 2014 at 2:32 AM

        In regards to the charge, concept, idea or definition of “resisting arrest”, when someone arrests someone or something they must overcome resistance. If someone or something is finally arrested this resistance is of no import as the arrest has taken place. If the arrest hasn’t been perfected, how can someone or something be charged as such(resisting a non-event)? A voluntary arrest doesn’t really exist, this is properly termed “a voluntary chaperoning to the police station”. If nobody resisted arrest they would not be arrests.

        Am I obligated to be arrested? a duty or right to be arrested?

        Some thoughts, pop

      • Sally Oh

        August 27, 2014 at 5:40 AM

        Your liberal use of the word “nigger” is so unpalatable, I had to read the article three times to follow. It’s like saying “fuck” all the time… it’s just unpleasant and angry and dilutes the message.

        Why do you have such hostility toward blacks? The libertarian philosophy does not characterize people in groups as all being this or that. We see them as individuals. Some people are bad, most are good. There are truths about cultures, certainly, and the guy in the video hit the nail on the head regarding some facts about today’s black culture, which both races have certainly fostered and encouraged politically.

        I don’t think the powers that be set out to discriminate against blacks. They just use whatever is at hand to keep us divided and conquered. Harry Anslinger promoting the war on drugs because Cannabis made white women want to sleep with black men is a good example. The WOD has certainly been harder on blacks than whites.

        The welfare state has certainly been targeted at blacks — the black matriarchal family, one of the historically strongest institutions on the planet, has been destroyed by the welfare state. I think by design. Not because of skin color but because the opportunity presented itself and the schemers in power jumped on it.

        IMO, the video’s message was spot on. Now we need a Whitey version. Like explaining how the income tax is being fraudulently applied; that the Federal Reserve is neither; that politicians lie and are completely self-serving and not working for the people at all; how corporations own the media and every single thing they “report” is all a pack of lies and distortions… why public schooling is simply indoctrination and nothing more. That’s actually even explained on Wikipedia (purpose of public schooling) and all Americans simply ignore that and choose to believe the propaganda. Do we include black flag events, even the ones that we know are actual truth?

        Whitey’s video would be much longer because Whitey has been asleep at the wheel — we are, after all, driving the bus — for at least 100 years.

        I read your bio and the comments here. It looks to me like your writing and ranting is aimed at changing the world. Mine, too. The liberty movement is still in its infancy… you and I and your readers are clinging to the notion that a return to constitutional values — which has been championed since just after the Constitution was written — is an idea whose time has come. Why do you think whites can change their subservient culture after so many generations and blacks can’t?

      • Adask

        August 27, 2014 at 10:40 AM

        The word “nigger” is emotionally charged simply because saying it is deemed by some to be “taboo”. Just as Blacks riding in the front of a bus was once viewed as “taboo”. Much like Rosa Parks broke the bus “taboo” against Blacks by openly riding in the front of the bus, openly saying the word “nigger” will neuter to power of that word. It’s the people who don’t dare to say “nigger” who make that word powerful. As long as you won’t say “nigger,” it will remain “unpalatable” and “angry”. Use of the word will “dilute” some messages, but use of the word is another, perhaps more powerful, and potentially even more important, message. How will the world be harmed if the taboo is broken?

        Ironically, those who accept the idea that White people can’t say “nigger,” but Black people can, are racists. Those who insist that Whites can’t say “nigger” are helping to support racism. Those Whites who say “nigger” are helping to end racism.

        We live in interesting times.

      • Bob

        November 30, 2014 at 5:42 PM

        You’re right about the IQ differences. However, the sub-continental Indian has an IQ similar to that of the American Black. All of the Indians with which I am familiar are self employed, white-collar or professionals. The major difference is that the Indians have a culture that assures them that they not only can succeed, but must do so, whereas the Blacks of my youth did not have as much opportunity as we Whites, they managed to get by because they knew that they had to sink or swim. Our Liberal White friends originally intended to help the Blacks by making laws to favor them, but not to always hold them to the same standards as we Whites were held. Then after “Civil Rights” of the mid 1960s, the Liberals managed to gradually give the Blacks everything from free or subsidized housing, food, fuel, medical, to such as the current gifts of free cell phones and free diapers! Initially, the intentions were to help them, but quickly the Liberals realized that the Blacks accepted the free-bees, and voted for those who gave them. Today, and for a long time, now, the average Liberals believe that “We must give to them because they cannot help themselves”. Simply put, the Liberals are the true racists. Not only do they keep a majority of the Blacks “down” by the free-bees, but the Liberals have dumbed-down the Nationally subsidized school system to the degree where Blacks cannot be allowed to have the School-Choice that the Conservatives want them to have, but by doing so, they are guaranteed to produce a greater percentage of subsidized


        November 30, 2014 at 9:45 PM

        Why do so many ignore the facts only to allow their “feelings” to rule their intellect?

        Al Adask said, …” I wasn’t there to see it, but I’m about 90% confident that the cop had no valid reason to repeatedly shoot and kill Michael Brown”….

        AL ADASK from the forensic evidence and the EYE WITNESS testimony (that Negroes finger prints were on the cops hand gun, the Negro was in side of the officers window), and from there, to ignore ALL of the other testimony and make that statement is very confusing! if that Negro was left breathing would have been a deadly error on the part of that officer of the LAW!

        To say you are 90% certain of anything, while ignoring the FACTS that the Grand Jury had access to, is a terrible exhibition of your cognitive ability!


    • Buck

      August 17, 2014 at 11:27 AM

      “I find it a bit self-serving that many whites attempting to mitigate crimes against blacks are quick to distribute/publish videos of this sort where a black person is denouncing his own race”

      Really? That comment really plays into the politically correct narrative of racial division that is being fomented by the communist social engineers. So just because I tend to agree with Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Bill Cosby, or the guy Al posted in this video, you insinuate them as Uncle Toms and attack the guy who agrees with their message? How absurd.

      Here’s the narrative you seem to portray here: A cross section of the black culture acts out in an illegal and violent manner; a white man condemns the behavior and because he’s white and NOT black, he’s therefore racist. Then, a black man condemns that same behavior, and if a white man agrees with what the black guy says, then he’s still therefore racist or as you say, “self serving.” Whatever.

      • Buck

        August 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM

        Furthermore, I’ll condemn Al’s use of the word “nigger” as unequivocally reprehensible when the same weight and condemnation of the word “cracker” or “honkey” is applied with the same criticism and denunciation as the “n” word.

      • itsmymoney

        August 17, 2014 at 11:48 AM

        What I am saying (or meant to say if I was not clear) is that the overall issue with blacks not being accountable for themselves appears to be mitigating or superseding whether this cop shot Brown in cold blood or not. That fact should be first and foremost, not the overall issue, is all I’m trying to convey.

    • Kentucky Free Press

      August 27, 2014 at 5:07 AM

      I found your comment and this website because of your reference to Joel Naselroad — I wrote the articles at, my brother was Joel’s attorney.

      I’m working on an article about police militarization and specifically on whether or not veterans should be allowed to work as peace officers. Thank you for referencing Joel and Benton, who’s case I am also following. We need those stories kept alive.

      • itsmymoney

        August 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM

        Sally Oh,

        Nice to hear from you again. I love your work at KFP and we have had private email correspondence recently. My pleasure bringing to light other Anti-Liberty-For-We-The-People transgressions. The greater the number people who see this crap may indeed get more involved, or at least be aware that they are not living in The Land of Oz anymore.



      • Sally Oh

        August 28, 2014 at 5:08 PM

        Ah, yes, so we have. Funny when you run into the same people around liberty sites…

  2. Toland

    August 17, 2014 at 5:48 AM

    This whole story is probably just a multimedia stress-reaction distraction from the fact that the London Silver Fix closed its doors on August 14th (passing its functions to CME Group and Thomson Reuters).

    As we’ve learned from Al, this development could collapse the silver – or even the entire global – derivatives markets in short order: a major catastrophe.

    Al poignantly phrased it thusly, with a tip of the chapeau to Shakespeare, “Beware the Ides of August”.

    So don’t spend all your worry time on race riots in America’s heartland, make room for the silver fix also:

  3. Adask

    August 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM

    IMM: I use “nigger” in the same sense that comedian Chris Rock used “nigger” in one of his routines about 15 years ago when he was telling an audience about his racially-mixed neighborhood in New York City. He said something like “Whites are getting along . . . and Blacks are getting along . . . but somebody gotta do somethin’ about dese niggers!

    His point was that there are (at least) two classes of African-Americans: 1) Blacks who are self-supporting and reasonable; and 2) “niggers” who are ignorant, unintelligent, impulsive and prone to violence. More, he implied that while “niggers” might be scary to Whites, “niggers” mostly predated on Blacks like Chris Rock.

    Of course, being Black, Chris Rock could make such observations–especially if he did it in a way that was funny. It was still a taboo for Whites to make similar statements in public, no matter who true they might be.

    If I recall correctly, comedian Dick Gregory gave the title “Nigger” to a book (biography?) that he wrote about about the 1970s. His use of “Nigger” was seen as provocative and controversial back then, but I always thought he was doing the right thing.

    The word “nigger” is emotionally charged because nobody–at least no White folk–is supposed to say it. It is taboo. The way you eliminate the emotional connotation of the word “nigger” is to use it openly rather than pussyfoot around with something like the “N-word”. (How can anyone know what the N-word is if nobody says the word “nigger”?)

    I also use the word “nigger” in the same sense that “niggers” use that word in scores of films that focus on the Black “experience”. I’ve watched scores of such films where Blacks routinely call each other “nigger”–sometimes with affection . . . sometimes with contempt. But there is no evidence that the Blacks think that they shouldn’t be allowed to say the word “nigger”–so why should Whites be prohibited from saying “nigger”? Isn’t the idea that Blacks can say “nigger” all the time time and Whites can’t say “nigger” ever a fundamentally racist concept?

    How does the idea that one race can say the word “nigger” while another cannot, differ from the idea that one race can ride at the front of a bus and the other race must ride in the back? Rosa Parks was cheered when she demonstrated that both races can use the seats at the front of the bus. By breaking that bus-rider taboo, Rosa Parks struck a blow against racism. How is it that I should be castigated by claiming that both races can use the word “nigger”? When I use the word “nigger” am I not also striking a blow against racism?

    You should try. Go ahead. Say “nigger”. Did the sky fall? Did the earth stop turning? No?

    Then say it again–and this time say it several times in a row: “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” “nigger,” . . . . If you say the word quickly and repeatedly you may find that the word quickly becomes meaningless. I think there may be a lesson in that repetition. If you say the word a lot, it becomes trivial, almost meaningless. It’s when you don’t say the word, that it takes on the inordinate power of a taboo.

    If you really want to eliminate the power of the word “nigger,” perhaps you should try to use it more often.

    If any Black is truly opposed to racism, he should not insist that Whites can’t say “nigger” simply because they’re White.

    On the other hand, any Black (or White) who insists that Whites shouldn’t be allowed to say “nigger,” demonstrates that they are, themselves, racists.

    • itsmymoney

      August 17, 2014 at 11:59 AM

      Al (if I may please call you by your first name),

      Perhaps you brushed over my comments below of which you replied to. I have and still do at times use the word ‘nigger’. I don’t agree that blacks should be allowed to use it and not whites. I am just saying that I don’t like the word itself, yet I find myself thinking it or saying it privately at times and I have a conflict with myself over it. That’s all. I respect your right to use it and your explanation why you do.

      “And full disclosure, I am not personally immune to using or thinking the n-word at times, but I cringe and question myself after this occurs because it is still inherent to labeling in general. So the conflict continues. Perhaps for some, there is none.”

      • Anthony Clifton

        August 17, 2014 at 12:43 PM

        dude you can only begin to imagine about how I feel about the {abuse} word ” Israel “,
        and the word “Jew”….but in all honesty sometimes I have vivid daydreams about
        opening a can of WA on all the white niggers in my homeland…Texas.

        truth is there is plenty of credit for the entire crop of US CITIZENS in the
        WHAT ME WORRY…dept.

        a swirling whirlpool multicultural stool sculpture deity cult compound
        with miasma…with their hair on fire

  4. Adask

    August 17, 2014 at 11:52 AM

    It’s amazing how hard it is to talk or write about race. Slogans work well, but if you’re trying to convey a personal opinion (not matter what it is) about race, you can’t get it done with just a few words. Once you try to “explain,” your obligation to keep trying to “explain” and clarify becomes almost endless. The endless explanations reflect our unease at touching that “taboo”.

    • Buck

      August 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM

      One further note on the topic is that words themselves are simply meant to convey meaning; whether its textual, or visual, or to create an auditory impact. Words themselves simply convey meaning. So the use of the abbreviation “n word” is really no different than just saying “nigger.” It means exactly the same thing and creates the same picture to the audience, so why differentiate? Its okay for news reporters to make a reference to “n word” but not nigger? Its ridiculous.

  5. Buck

    August 17, 2014 at 12:28 PM

    Regarding reparations and what Whitey owes the black community for slavery, our revisionist history always neglects the fact that European slave traders didn’t run over to Africa and collect all those slaves by themselves. They bought them from other black African-Africans who had gone out and “collected” them by ran-sacking the villages and tribes of their own peers. It was blacks who sold other blacks to white Europeans that even made the slave trade possible in the colonial era.

    “Where did the supply of slaves come from? First, the Portuguese themselves kidnapped some Africans. But the bulk of the supply came from the Nigerians. These Nigerian middlemen moved to the interior where they captured other Nigerians who belonged to other communities. The middlemen also purchased many of the slaves from the people in the interior . . . . Many Nigerian middlemen began to depend totally on the slave trade and neglected every other business and occupation. The result was that when the trade was abolished [by England in 1807] these Nigerians began to protest. As years went by and the trade collapsed such Nigerians lost their sources of income and became impoverished.” — Michael Omolewa, Certificate History of Nigeria (Lagos, Nigeria: Longman Group, 1991), 96–103, cited in Dana Lindaman and Kyle Ward, History Lessons: How Textbooks around the World Portray U.S. History (New York: New Press, 2004), 79-83. – See more at:

    So if whitey owes reparations, by the same judgement the black community should pay half. And if both sides pay half, then we may as well just cancel out the “debt” and declare that nobody owes anybody shit for reparations.

  6. Henry

    August 17, 2014 at 1:15 PM

    Regarding the term “nigger”, in my opinion it’s never wise to presume to degrade your fellow man’s dignity and humanity (e.g. “beast”, “subhuman”, etc.), regardless of what your and his respective races are.

    Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.

    Romans 2:1 You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things. 2 Now we know that God’s judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. 3 So when you, a mere human being, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God’s judgment? 4 Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness is intended to lead you to repentance?

  7. Peg-Powers

    August 18, 2014 at 12:21 PM

    Tolerance and diversity breed compromise, and will provide no nation with salvation and righteousness. Why do you think this particular concept is daily thrust upon us except to promote compromise? (Also I would suggest you study and know the difference between a “man” and a “human”. The two words actually are not interchangeable in most cases.) What we need is the true message—repentance and entry into the kingdom of our Savior and King. All must turn away from SIN. In the kingdom we have a duty to warn and teach our “brothers” in love, and that requires communicating a judgement or a particular idea.

    God’s wrath WILL be exhibited upon all transgressors who fail to FEAR Him; the tares WILL be gathered and burned. Give us MEN now who will shout a warning regarding SIN–all SIN. Christ set the example. He was hated for being intolerant. Broad (and tolerant) is the way that leads to destruction, narrow is the path which we must follow. It is imperative to think, to discern, and to judge. Disaster is waiting for those who refuse to judge between good or rotten fruit!

    The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom….and the path to His approval and blessings.

  8. Anthony Clifton

    August 19, 2014 at 3:49 AM

    who will teach the difference between the Holy & Profane…

    if no one knows anything but what they saw on the ‘history” channel on


    who will buy their merchandise…

    For Israel hath forgotten his Maker, and buildeth temples;
    and Judah hath multiplied fenced cities:
    but I will send a fire upon his cities,
    and it shall devour the palaces thereof.

  9. Buck

    August 19, 2014 at 9:19 AM

    More to the IQ (or lack thereof) mentioned in Alfred’s thread above:

    “I’m proud of us. We deserve this, and this is what’s supposed to happen when there’s injustice in your community — DeAndre Smith, black looter of the QuikTrip in Ferguson Missouri

  10. Peter

    August 20, 2014 at 12:35 PM

    There exists the possibility that the “Law of Yahweh” Is not written upon their hearts (Jeremiah 31:33), therefore, there should be no surprise to anyone of the actions being perpetrated in the territory of “this state” of MO.

  11. Roger

    August 27, 2014 at 4:47 PM

    Since, as is often pointed out in this blog, the dictionary is an indispensable reference…


    Word Origin

    Usage alert

    The term nigger is now probably the most offensive word in English. Its degree of offensiveness has increased markedly in recent years, although it has been used in a derogatory manner since at least the Revolutionary War. The senses labeled Extremely Disparaging and Offensive represent meanings that are deeply insulting and are used when the speaker deliberately wishes to cause great offense. It is so profoundly offensive that a euphemism has developed for those occasions when the word itself must be discussed, as in court or in a newspaper editorial: “the n-word.”

    Despite this, the sense referring to a “black person” is sometimes used among African Americans in a neutral or familiar way. The sense referring to other victims of prejudice, especially when used descriptively, as to denounce that prejudice, is not normally considered disparaging—as in “The Irish are the niggers of Europe” from Roddy Doyle’s The Commitments—but the other uses are considered contemptuous and hostile.


    1. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.

    a. a contemptuous term used to refer to a black person.
    b. a contemptuous term used to refer to a member of any dark-skinned people.

    2. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.

    a contemptuous term used to refer to a person of any race or origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc.

    3. a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by blacks; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.


    French, Spanish – 1640


  12. Sally Oh

    August 28, 2014 at 8:35 AM

    I would have replied directly to your reply but there is no link to do so.

    I never mentioned racism and whether or not the use of the word nigger is or is not racist. The word itself is unpalatable and distracting, like saying fuck or shit all the time. Too much noise, not enough signal.

    I get the idea behind your use of it. I disagree that using it a lot takes away its power. Not in our lifetimes. Fuck and shit still pack a punch and they’ve been used for far longer.

    I also think nigger belongs to the black culture like queer belongs to the gay, dyke to the lesbian. When those of us who aren’t use those words, we end up diluting the message.

    My husband, Mr., reads you all the time. He knows you are not racist and enjoys your intellectual perspective. As the mother of a black man and a liberty activist fighting against police militarization (among other things), I found the video right on target.

  13. A Mom

    August 28, 2014 at 5:20 PM


    I certainly understand your resistance to political correctness but your argument gets lost in the choice of words. Case in point, the OJ Simpson trial. Instead of the focus being on OJ it turned into the detective who used the “N” word.

    You may not be aware but National Geographic did a study on DNA called the Genographic study by Doctor Wells. They took DNA from people all over the world and discovered we are all related. That we all come from one set of parents. Therefore we are all related on this planet. There is no separation based on race. The differences come from where different small groups went, some south, some north. Gradually there was a change in our bodies based on climate. Now if we could just treat each other like we are family what a different world this would be. Makes one think that the bible does have the corner on truth with the story of Adam and Eve. You can look up the genographic study on line if there is a question.

    I agree that riots and looting is very wrong behavior. If people use incidents like the Fergeson shooting to steal they are crushing their point. Just as people do who use the “N” word. Because many can’t read beyond that to see the point of the argument.

    Sincerely, a Mom


      November 30, 2014 at 10:06 PM

      I find blatant racism abhorrent, and yet, when examined through anthropological, historical, and societal research, we must admit that there exists undeniable difference’s between all race’s! Is it RACIST to point out those facts? IT is racist, to use those difference to promote hatred and the idea of superiority, based on those difference’s! In my opinion, this is why we have forced multiculturalism only in the ‘white nations’.! It is an AGENDA DRIVEN subversion, based on ‘acceptable opinions’ that, upon examination of the facts, we can see that multiculturalism is a disastrous failure, BY DESIGN. There was a reason God divided the nations! NO race should rule over another race. It is NOT natural! IT only leads to strife and turmoil, that is not natural or beneficial to either people!

      Deut. 32:8, ” When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the number of the Children of Israel”.( “bounds of the people” are all but Jacobs seed) Note: The ‘Native American’s were a nomadic people, that found their way here. They left the land God set aside for them. but God had reserved this land for ISRAEL.The treatment they, and the African Slaves received was a calculated evil that was perpetrated by OUR (True Israel) enemies, the EDOMITES!

      God created ALL of Mankind, with each race serving a purpose, and each race benefiting from each others different purpose. All men are not created equal, but rather, ALL men are equally created for GODS purpose!



    November 30, 2014 at 10:03 PM



    Wake the hell up! This has been a part of the plan for OUR destruction for MANY years!

    Booker T. Washington (NEGRO), 1911<- Note the date, the NAACP was formed in 1909

    Quote: "There is (a) class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs… "

    Is Plan for Racial Strife Another Hoax?

    This from "Israel Cohen", a Communist JEW that MYRON FAGAN knew and outed as such wrote this;
    “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” Written in 1912 by Israel Cohen. He is from that TRIBE of EDOM (JEW)

    Rep. Thomas Abernathy read this passage into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.)

    WE are being played! Learn who is playing you!

    What TRIBE has been establishing the Western Nations Foreign and Domestic Policies for decades. That Tribe hates WE the Goyim and are implementing the New World Order with 'our' blessings and blood!
    The so call JEWS, have been the biggest 'racists' and promoters of 'hate in all of history. Hollywood from the beginning was promoting racial stereo types, and tensions. The treatment that the Arabs, Negroes, and American Indians received from Hollywood was to divide and foster hate!
    In many cases, the charge of “antisemitism” and “hate” are devious attempts to outlaw opposition to Tyranny. Let’s not kid ourselves. We are facing a diabolical Evil, ruthless, vicious and cunning as well!

    GOD hates JEWS! JESUS HATES JEWS! (I can and have proven that!) Why people will not see the truth is because the so called JEWS have made them believe JEWISH FABLES!

  15. Bob

    February 27, 2015 at 9:18 PM

    It’s not, nor has it ever been, the Jews who are the enemies of mankind. It’s not them who demand to dominate the entire world, who preach to kill the non-believer, who teach their young children to hate,to torture, then to kill everyone who believes differently than them. The Jews aren’t cruel to their women. Jews contribute positively to the society. Jews are very successful, partly because they believe that they have a responsibility to succeed, and partly because they understood that an excellent education would provide greater possibilities of succeeding in life.

    Notice this: When those who harbor extreme hatred of others, voice or put into writing their hatred of others, most often they seem to be of the lower spectrum of intelligence. Their speech is most often limited and frequently unappealing. When they use the written method, it’s frequently also of a limited vocabulary, the spelling erroneous, and it oozes with venom.

    Making an Internet search of the “Accomplishments and Contributions of the Jewish People” would amaze most of the world. Using them as examples would benefit us all.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s