Tuesday Night Radio: Racial Tensions, Police Abuse vs Police State, Residence

09 Dec

American Independence Hour hosted by Alfred Adask; 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM Central time, Tuesday nights, on and also on the KU band, free-to-air satellite link at Galaxy 19.  There’ll be call-ins at 1-800-596-8191.


Posted by on December 9, 2014 in American Independence Hour, Radio



33 responses to “Tuesday Night Radio: Racial Tensions, Police Abuse vs Police State, Residence

  1. Rick Donaldson

    December 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM

    Do you have a phone #?

    • Adask

      December 10, 2014 at 12:50 PM

      Nope. I only use Skype. But I’ll use a friend’s phone to give you a call.

  2. russ

    December 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM

    Re: Tuesday Radio Show – Domicile by Operation of Law

    You discussed thoughts on domicile by operation of law as per Blacks 8th. I perceive that to mean your birth certificate (BC), which is a public record that an organization was organized on that certain date, said organization created as a “state agency”, and its name is the name on your BC, and it was “birthed” within “this state” as defined in Texas code Title 3 – Vital Statistics, Chapter 192 – Birth Records. Since that BC is a government issued and government registered agency with a “legal name”, it is their property, similar to the DL and SS#, but it is yours to use and operate in commerce with assigned rights and duties. I have read that the BC is held in the District of Columbia as well as your State of the United States (this state). If that is true, then it truely is domiciled within “this state” by operation of law and not by your intent.

    However, I also believe that one can correct that “operation of law”.

  3. pop deadam

    December 12, 2014 at 1:05 AM

    fuck em AL, they want it a certain way and we will give it to them.

  4. Henry

    December 12, 2014 at 10:44 PM


    Trying to have a discussion with Raymond, a.k.a. Les Fuchs, a.k.a. J.M., a.k.a. Don Bailey, a.k.a. Don, a.k.a. Morningstar, a.k.a. Sparks, a.k.a. Sparky, a.k.a. Ironhead, a.k.a. Phil Lings, a.k.a. Phil, etc. leads to nothing but frustration for yourself and the readers of this blog.

    Why would you expect Les Fuchs to spare you the vain contempt he shows Alfred?

    The many-times-banned Les Fuchs has told Alfred to “f– off”, in so many words, several times already in a couple of ways. 1) Les habitually ignores Alfred’s repeated statements about what the proper subject matter of this blog is: ideas, not people. But you can’t troll ideas, can you? You can only troll people. So Les has re-purposed Alfred’s blog to better suit Les’ own fancies. 2) Les has circumvented multiple bans by Alfred to resume posting here under false pretenses, by employing a long list of aliases.

    You should have noticed by now that every discussion Les gets into follows the same course. As soon as things start going in a direction Les doesn’t like, he either disappears or chokes the thread with nonsense as a smokescreen for his incompetence.

    The many-times-banned Les Fuchs is here to f– around and entertain himself at the expense of Alfred and the readers, not make an honest contribution.

  5. Henry

    December 13, 2014 at 1:01 AM

    Here’s the post by Roger that you’re looking for, Ray, a.k.a. Raymond, a.k.a Les Fuchs, etc., You were trolling as “J.M.” at the time. That is, you were using the moniker “J.M.” to deceive Alfred and the readers of this blog, fraudulently pretending to not be the banned Les Fuchs.

    April 7, 2014 at 1:17 AM


    Why do you suppose a frivolous, low content/high volume commenter such as yourself is allowed so much free rein to degrade the tone of this blog all the way down to the wallowing pen with the swine?

    That is, why does Alfred Adask not stop self-indulgent swine like you, who are a-dime-a-dozen on the internet, from driving out intelligent discussion on his uniquely high-quality blog?

    This post by Roger is a reply to a post where you say: “I, J.M. am the HOG of this Blog.”

    The post is also over 8 months old. You should have long forgotten this argument and moved on, especially since Roger has been trying to be on good terms with you lately (for some strange reason).

    Shall we add piggish vengefulness to your trolling resume, Les?

  6. Roger

    December 14, 2014 at 3:57 AM

    Hold it right there, Henry.

    I protest your oblique reference to the habit of pigs whereby they root around and dig up things which would otherwise stay buried.

    If you’re trying to criticize “Ray”, why don’t you plainly state what you’re getting at.

    • Henry

      December 14, 2014 at 5:06 AM


      Your buddy – using the name Ray at the moment, but first attaining infamy as Les Fuchs – is a self-described “hog” in the comment I quoted earlier. I’m only exploring the implications of Les’ own answer to his recurrent question: “What kind of animal am I?”

      Also, I notice your friendly gestures toward Les Fuchs are not being returned. You’ll soon discover that swine have long memories and, being dedicated wallowers in mud and garbage, stubbornly refuse to rise above old grievances to let bygones be bygones.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s