Now, for something completely different . . . .

18 Dec

I’ll bet you haven’t seen this before.

video   00:00:35


Posted by on December 18, 2014 in Video



17 responses to “Now, for something completely different . . . .

  1. Roger

    December 18, 2014 at 4:16 AM

    Whee! That was fun.

    Goes to show that grab-and-jerk-you sensationalism on YouTube need not always conceal a political agenda.

    Thanks for posting.

    • Toland

      December 18, 2014 at 8:20 AM

      Also absent is the undisclosed conflict of interest often found in Youtube reportage featuring FEAR or DANGER (which hucksters use to drum up sales for the “safety” and “security” that they, by coincidence, happen to be selling).

      So this video really is different. Yay!

  2. BMan

    December 18, 2014 at 5:04 AM

    I wonder how many times he tried that before he got it right.

  3. My3Suns

    December 18, 2014 at 8:57 AM

    Do you see what looks to be a cross enter the screen from the left just as the motorcycle rider lands on the roof of the car :16 sec?

  4. Adask

    December 18, 2014 at 9:06 AM

    I didn’t see it before, but I do now. It’s only there for a couple of frames. I think that cross may have been hanging from rear view mirror or some such within the cab of the vehicle that had the video camera. The motorcycle hit the car in front, the driver of the car with the video probably hit the brakes, the cross probably swung about. We caught a glimpse of it.

    Maybe that’s the explanation.

    But it was an interesting, largely unnoticed element of the video.


  5. Buck

    December 18, 2014 at 12:29 PM

    I don’t really see what all the excitement is about in this vid. As a roofer, I do stuff like this everyday; on the roof, driving to and from work, tending the kids at home. Just another day at the office for me

    • Henry

      December 18, 2014 at 9:36 PM

      I’m impressed. Props to you, sir.

  6. Bruce

    December 18, 2014 at 12:32 PM

    Who says there is no G*d?

  7. dog-move

    December 19, 2014 at 10:27 AM

    I bet Evel Knievel could apprieciate a move like that!

  8. dog-move

    December 19, 2014 at 10:52 AM

    Your known by your God-given name, it is the cloak that covers your soul. In may learning process in the last several years I’m grateful to understand this and grateful to understanding the ALL CAPS APPEARANCE NAME TOO. Mr Terteltge covered this very well before the Three Forks Court hearing.

  9. dog-move

    December 19, 2014 at 2:39 PM

    Ray, there are probably a lot of men and women that enter this blog that have been thrown in jail.
    That may be part of the process of confronting the system and learning. This blog is as far as I understand is for learning and interacting for all. Those taking baby steps and those that are very wise and learned. I am in the early stages in this learning process and try to participate on the comment section to learn. My comments are simple and brief and I,m open for suggestions. My point with bringing up Ernie was that his instructional on the all caps on the steps of the courthouse that day with his cardboard poster is worth watching.

    All my comments are always submitted respectfully and at peace.

  10. dog-move

    December 19, 2014 at 3:18 PM

    My comments are presented respectfully, thanks-you Raymond.

  11. ankhwere

    December 19, 2014 at 5:16 PM

    Reblogged this on Ankhwere and commented:
    Forgotten Instincts

  12. dog-move

    December 22, 2014 at 3:26 PM

    Yes Ray, now I understand the difference between submit and present. Submit is not a good word to use when you present something. SUBMIT yield: to accept somebody else’s authority or will, especially, reluctantly or under pressure——- I read other definitions of submit, present is a better choice of words.

    The rat race in the real world wears me down to a frazzle big time as well , the fictional wilderness has a lot to do with it.

    I have noticed in my actual interactions with actual people lately, they seen more perceptive to the info I possess and speak of. People, I believe are losing confidence overall and looking for someone to tell them some truth. Thanks for the lesson, Ray your great!

  13. dog-move

    December 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM

    For understanding I ask, when dealing with the corporation it would seems imperitve to define who or what you are to dispel any presumption that the corporation has determined and/of defined you to be? Say like your employer or the entity in which one is a workman.Can a person/corporation recognise the living?

  14. dog-move

    December 27, 2014 at 9:43 AM

    Simple questions I have, which may help those who lack understanding and are here to learn from men and women of understanding on these importand matters.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s