RSS

Bush almost said “Conspiracy”

30 Mar

George W. Bush is interviewed about the Boston Bombing and 9/11.  His response is kinda hilarious.  He starts to bumbles right into the subject, and then tries to figure out how to gracefully retreat.

Laura Bush doesn’t say anything, but there’s a moment starting around 30 seconds into the video where she narrows her eyes, looks at GW and seems to ask, “How, in God’s name, did I ever manage to marry this moron?”

video    00:00:52

 
11 Comments

Posted by on March 30, 2015 in 911, Humor, Video

 

Tags: , ,

11 responses to “Bush almost said “Conspiracy”

  1. GreatScott

    March 30, 2015 at 8:39 PM

    Bush better start using a teleprompter like his sucessor! Same goofball as always!

     
  2. Colin

    March 31, 2015 at 6:29 AM

    Why would it be unusual if he called 9/11 a “conspiracy”? The consensus view is that it was a plot carried out by multiple people, with material support from individuals other than the direct perpetrators–by any definition, a conspiracy.

     
    • Adask

      March 31, 2015 at 1:07 PM

      I agree. It shouldn’t be unusual for Bush to say “conspiracy”. Nevertheless, Bush start to say “conspiracy” and then stop after saying “cons . . . .”

      So, why is Bush so inhibited about saying “conspiracy”? Maybe it’s because he has a guilty conscience. Maybe it’s because he’s a moron. Maybe it’s both.

      In any case, it’s kinda funny.

      The former President of the United States–who we assume should be a powerful and confident man–is as gawky and insecure as a high school kid on his first date.

      It’s not profound, but it is odd enough to make some of us smirk.

      If Obama holds office until after the next election, we will have had 16 years of two Presidents (Bush and Obama) who, in a rational world, couldn’t qualify for jobs as waiters in the White House dining room. Both of ’em were just front men, spokesmen for some higher powers, who really didn’t have any ideas of their own and didn’t have any real capacity for leadership.

      I doubt that there’s another period in all of American history when America suffered as great a decline in economic and international power as has happened under Bush and then Obama.

      That’s not funny.

      I wonder who’ll be elected to be the head moron in A.D. 2016? I can hardly wait to see if The Powers That Be can elect an even bigger buffoon to sit in the White House. I don’t see how that’s possible. But then, I didn’t think it was possible to elect a President less competent than GW Bush.

      Silly me.

      Imagine my chagrin when Obama was elected.

      So, who knows? The next President may be even less competent that Obama. Hard to believe. Hard to imagine. But not impossible.

       
  3. palani

    March 31, 2015 at 7:23 AM

    I find there is no evidence that a ‘homeland’ is existence. To research this concept I had to research the word on Etymology Online where the following was discovered:

    homeland (n.)
    1660s, from home (n.) + land (n.). Old English hamland meant “enclosed pasture.”

    Seems appropriate.

     
    • Adask

      March 31, 2015 at 12:50 PM

      Isn’t the “pasture” the place where you find all the bull s–t?

       
  4. Henry

    March 31, 2015 at 11:27 AM

    “Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great tasks both of the old parties have turned aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests, which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics, is the first task of the statesmanship of the day. ”

    – Theodore Roosevelt, 1912

     
  5. Jeff D.

    March 31, 2015 at 2:18 PM

    It is undeniable that a conspiracy existed…to hide evidence after the fact. What remains to be examined are the memorials and the new Freedom Tower.

    1.) Consider the bizarre ceremony which took place at the site of the former Twin Towers, where robed individuals walked in a circle, which surrounded the base. This appears very similar to the rituals performed at the Kaaba in Mecca.

    2.) The Flight 93 memorial, Crescent of Embrace, is a crescent moon and points directly towards Mecca.

    3.) The “Tear of Grief” memorial (To the Struggle Against World Terrorism) is a mockery of the lives that were sacrificed that day. It represents the dead sheep (gentiles).

    4.) The Freedom Tower is topped with a minaret, not a spire.

    All of this brings to mind the prophecy where the Anti-Christ will attempt to change the laws and the times. It has been suggested that this will be changing Judeo/Christian Cannon Law to Islamic Sharia Law, as well replacing the Gregorian calendar to some other calendar system.

     
  6. timmy

    April 5, 2015 at 8:36 PM

    What’s bizarre is his grinning and strange contortions, exposing his subconscious guilt/glee about it all.. any student of body language would say this is a guilty party under questioning.

     
  7. tony jones

    April 25, 2015 at 12:24 PM

    I have made a very controversial documentary film that is right up your alley! Here is the link-trailer I can Dropbox you a copy/Best Regards/Anthony Jones Voki Presenter |   | |   |   |   |   |   | | Voki PresenterVoki Presenter | | | | View on http://www.evillaw.tk | Preview by Yahoo | | | |   |

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s