Will Trump FIGHT while the rest just SUCK?

15 Mar

Leftist Threatens Trump Supporters with Violence [courtesy Google Images]

Leftist Threatens Trump Supporters with Violence
[courtesy Google Images]

Today, March 15th, voters in five states (Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, North Carolina, and Florida) will decide which candidates they’ll support in their State’s primary elections.  The two big primaries—Ohio and Florida—are winner-take-all on the GOP side.  That means whichever Republican wins in those states, wins all of those state’s delegates.

Florida and Ohio are the home states of Marco Rubio and John Kasich.  If they don’t win their home states, their 2016 campaigns and perhaps their entire political careers will be finished.

If Trump wins Florida and/or Ohio, and gains all if their delegates, his path to the 1,237 delegates required to clinch the nomination becomes much easier, Ted Cruz’s chances become less likely and every other Republican candidate’s chances becomes nearly impossible.

But today’s election is about much more than delegate numbers.  After the leftists’ attempt to disrupt last week’s Trump rally in Chicago, there’s also a big question about violence.


•  For example, according to The Washington Times, (“Moveon.Org raising funds from Trump protests, warns more disruptions to come”),


“Moveon.Org is conducting fundraising activities from the Chicago protests against Donald Trump that prompted the Republican presidential front-runner to cancel a rally there Friday, and promises that more disruptions are on the way.” is a left-wing, “progressive” organization which got its start in A.D. 1998 by supporting President Bill Clinton during his impeachment hearings. On Saturday, wrote to members that,


 “We need to double down on our work, showing that America is better than Trump’s bullying, hate-baiting, and incitements to violence. We are committed to nonviolence, but we will not be silent. We will not be invisible.”

“The group detailed its efforts in recent months, highlighting ads it has run against the real estate mogul and the advocacy its done on behalf of refugees [illegal aliens], who it said are ‘under attack’ from the GOP, and the support it gave to Trump protesters in Chicago.”


Apparently, is trying to take credit for having inspired the recent anti-Trump demonstrations in Chicago.  In doing so, MoveOn may only be trying to exploit the Chicago demonstrations in order to exaggerate its leadership role in leftist politics

Given that the influx of illegal aliens favored by the left, Obama and MoveOn will only help to bring more illegals into the country who will take jobs that would otherwise go to Blacks.  So, it’s interesting that many, perhaps most, of the Chicago anti-Trump demonstrators were black.  The left intends to bring more illegal aliens into this country. Trump intends to build a wall between Mexico and the U.S. that will stop the influx of illegal aliens and thereby help blacks get jobs.

So, who do our brilliant black demonstrators support?  The leftists who’ll push blacks deeper into poverty and dependence.

Who do our brilliant black demonstrators despise?  Trump—the only candidate who’s dedicated to stopping illegals from entering the U.S. and thereby helping blacks get jobs that might diminish their poverty.

Either the black anti-Trump demonstrators are stupid, or they’d rather have welfare checks under Hillary than jobs under Trump.

In its email, MoveOn pledged to continue its work:


“So here’s the plan: We’ll support members to call out and nonviolently protest Trump’s racist, bigoted, misogynistic, xenophobic, and violent behavior—and show the world that America rejects Trump’s hate.”

Trump’s being blamed for the Chicago violence—and not only by


•  The Washington Examiner published “Trump campaign enters dangerous new phase”. In that article, they wrote:


“The physical tension at Trump’s enormous rallies has been rising for weeks, as protester after protester has been escorted out, often accompanied by Trump encouraging security to “get him out of here.”

“Yelling escalated into pushing, then punching. On Friday, it boiled over. A black heckler emerged Friday afternoon from a rally with a bloody mouth, and the rest of the night was lost to violence between protesters and the thousands of supporters who came to see the GOP front-runner.

“Trump and his team quickly deflected, and blamed the mob for trying to disrupt a peaceful, scheduled rally.

“Others defended Trump’s point, including some of his rivals. Even Sen. Marco Rubio said protesters had no right to disrupt Trump’s event.

“But Rubio said Trump himself was to blame for the escalation in violence.

“Donald Trump is responsible for his own rhetoric,” Rubio said. “The tone and tenor of Donald Trump’s rally over the last few months has been disturbing to a lot of people.”


In fact, the “tone and tenor” of the last 40 years of American politics has also disturbed a lot of Americans.

The real sources of the violence attributed to Trump are the anger in the body politic caused by:


1)  The export of American industries and jobs to third world countries like China and the consequent loss of American jobs.

2) Treasonous support for the North American Union and the New World Order by our own government.

3)  Encouragement of the influx of illegal aliens by both political parties—and the consequent lowering of Americans’ wage scale and standard of living.

4) Unending growth in the size and tyranny of our government.

5) Destruction of much of the Middle Class.

6)  Encouragement of “entitlement” thinking whereby people who produce nothing are taught to believe they have a “right” to live as parasites off other people’s productivity.

7)  The growth of a national debt to a size that’s not only unpayable but sure to soon collapse our economy and perhaps destroy our nation.

8) The loss of a constitutional monetary system (gold & silver) that would’ve allowed people to safely save for their futures and retirement rather have their wealth eaten away by inflation.

9) The maintenance of a “national emergency” for over 80 years as a pretext to ignore or suspend the Constitution.


Each of these various atrocities, betrayals, violations of the Constitution and acts of treason have been perpetrated against the productive elements of the people and middle class of The United States of America.  All of these betrayals have generated an anger in much of America that has been profound but also unexpressed.

Trump didn’t make the anger.  The Republican and Democrat leaders of the past two generations made that anger by routinely betraying to general welfare of the American people to support and empower “special interests”..

For the past forty years, the American people—the good ones, the productive ones—tried to suppress the anger that their government has precipitated.

The government, the subsidized rich, and the welfare-entitled poor are blaming Trump for causing that anger.

But, Trump didn’t cause the anger.  He just named it.  He touched the anger that was here long before Trump arrived.  He treated the people who were already angry with enough respect to recognize and legitimize their anger at government’s blatant attempts to destroy The United States of America.  And now he’s being blamed for anger and resulting violence.  That anger may fuel Trump’s political campaign but that anger was not caused by Trump’s campaign.

Now, those who would destroy this nation want to blame Trump for the anger they, themselves, have caused.

Tuesday, March 15th, we’ll see if those destroyers will win or lose.  If Trump wins Ohio, the destroyers will suffer a significant defeat.  People will see that by attempting to use violence to disrupt Trump’s rallies, all the demonstrators achieved will be to motivate Trump supporters to turn out in greater numbers at the primary elections.

On the other hand, if Trump loses big in Ohio, it will signal that violence at political rallies works in American politicians.


  • Democrats have long argued that Trump is a dangerous candidate who launched his campaign by immediately calling for tougher immigration enforcement, which Democrats say raised [recognized?] racial tensions. But now Republicans are saying Trump is dangerous, and with many in the press agreeing, Trump seems to be surrounded.”


First, did Trump actually “raise” racial tensions?  Or was he merely the first candidate to recognize and talk openly about the tensions already surrounding the influx of illegal alien?

Were those “tensions” truly of a “racial” nature between whites and/or blacks and illegal aliens?  Or were those “tensions” between American patriots and the government that refuses to protect our borders and is instead determined to destroy this nation by combining it with Mexico and Canada into a North American Union of the New World Order?

Second, why is it that both Democrats, and now Republicans, agree that “Trump is dangerous”?

Obviously, not every American Republican believes Trump is dangerous.  Instead, most believe Trump is necessary.

Likewise, not every American Democratic believes Trump is dangerous.  Polls have shown that a significant number of “Democrats” will jump parties to support Trump in next November’s election.

If all Democrats don’t fear Trump and all Republicans don’t fear Trump, which ones do?

It strikes me that the poor who vote Democrat fear Trump because they fear that Trump might reduce or cancel their welfare.

It strikes me that the rich Republican “establishment” are those who live on government subsidies and therefore fear and despises Trump.  Why?  Because the Republican “establishment” is not a group of Americans motivated by patriotic ideals so much as a bunch of greedy bastards motivated to grab all the “free money” they can get from government.  They fear and despise Trump because he might reduce or revoke their subsidies and force the “establishment” to actually work for its wealth rather than bribe Congress to pass laws to legalize the exploitation of the productive members of our society.

Surely, government employees may fear and despise Trump since he shows signs of cutting the size of government and perhaps also cutting the pay for government employees.

Even military industries that profit hugely from the sales of weapons to the government, and especially from cost-overruns, may be terrified that Trump will insist on “deal” that force them into less lucrative contracts.

Thus, we have four “special interests” who have reason to fear Mr. Trump:  poor welfare recipients, rich subsidy recipients of the “establishment,” over-paid government employees, and over-paid military industries.

What’s so “special” about  those four “special interests”?  Their common denominator is that they all depend on government to give them money they haven’t really earned.  They’re parasites who fear Trump will reduce or eliminate their access to unearned government funds.


•  Q: If those four special interests are against Trump, who should be for Trump?

A:  The productive elements of our country, the Middle Class and our Children.

After all, who do the four parasitical “special interests” get their welfare, subsidies and overpayments from?

A:  From taxes currently imposed on the productive members of our society and on the Middle Class and from taxes that will be imposed on future generations who are expected to somehow pay our National Debt.

Government has no money of its own to feed its parasitical “special interests”.  It must take money from the currently productive and middle class people and from those people who are untaxable children today, but will presumably become productive when they become adults.

Government is currently destroying America’s productive people in order to support America’s parasites.   Trump might slow or even stop that destruction.  The parasites are afraid and therefore seek to prevent Trump from becoming President.

Trump threatens to diminish or end the “Nanny State” for the poor, the rich “establishment,” government employees and corporations that feed off government.  That’ll make a lot of people mad.  But, in doing so, Trump might restore the Middle Class that we all depend on to produce a high standard of living for all.  That might make a lot of people glad.


•  In broad strokes, the parasites in the Democrat Party view Trump as dangerous to their welfare regime. Likewise, the parasites in the Republican “establishment” also view Trump as dangerous to their subsidy regimes.

The subsidized rich have conspired to derail Trump’s nomination (and keep the subsidy gravy train rolling).  Their attempts to stop Trump have not only failed, but actually inspired more public support for Trump.

Now, the left-wing welfare regime has threatened violent demonstrations against Trump at Trump rallies.  The big question is whether these welfare recipients will diminish or actually increase Trump’s support at the Ohio primary.

Will violent leftists succeed in slowing Trump?  Or, will their attempts to slow Trump boomerang (just as those of the “establishment’s” subsidy recipients have) and actually help insure Trump’s victory in Ohio?

If Kasich wins Ohio by an unexpectedly large margin, will that prove that violent opposition to political candidates now works in US policy?  If so, is that a lesson we want to learn?

If recent left-wing violence fails to stop Trump, but actually helps him win Ohio, won’t that be a good thing insofar as it shows  that violence is lame?


•  Blame who you will for the violence at Trump rallies.  I argue that government treason is primarily responsible for the anger in teh body politic that Trump has tapped into.  I won’t argue that Trump is entirely innocent.

But Trump seems willing to actually fight for America.  All the other candidates seem more willing to slowly (or rapidly) surrender America.  Trump may fight.  The others will surrender/suck.  Trump’s willingness to fight may, by itself, inspire support.

But one thing seems sure:  This is undoubtedly the single most exciting, polarizing and divisive presidential election we’ve had since Richard Nixon ran against Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern in A.D. 1968.  In that tumultuous election year we saw:


 1) the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.;

2) subsequent race riots across the nation;

3)  the assassination of Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy;

4) widespread demonstrations against the Viet Nam War across university campuses;

5) uncompromising factions develop within, and shatter, the Democrat party; and,

6) violent confrontations between police and anti-war protesters at the 1968 Democratic National Convention.


Let’s hope that this year’s election at least doesn’t result in any assassinations.

But the way things are going, that hope may be in vain.


Posted by on March 15, 2016 in 2016 Election, Subsidies, Trump, Violence, Welfare


Tags: , ,

12 responses to “Will Trump FIGHT while the rest just SUCK?

  1. Melva Vallery

    March 15, 2016 at 3:29 AM

    I know you are an intelligent individual, but your racist rhetoric comes from your life of privilege and entitlement and you really don’t know what you are talking about regarding black people. As I still fight American Girl and Mattel and their arrogant mega lawyers, you deem me a welfare face.

    It’s alright that your families stole this America from the natives and stole and used my family to establish the BASE for this America.

    It’s sad that you look from afar and make such harsh judgements. Do you think that I am the first black person that wealthy people have stolen from and just pushed to the side. it happens to all people, but blacks have been harshly treated on a constant and blatant basis.

    If we all live long enough the truth shall rise … wishing you all the best …

  2. Roy Dobbs

    March 15, 2016 at 8:03 AM

    Mr Adask I like your article, I think something that we may both agree on is the fact that many of the people inciting violence etc are felons and can’t vote even if they want to vote. The mentality of many of these type of people just isn’t there, they can’t make a rational decision, too many of them are followers mainly because so many can’t read for themselves so they have to believe whatever anyone that can read tells them. Also far too many do not want jobs and if they did get a job they most likely wouldn’t be able to handle it because it requires work. Lets face it a tick will always be a tick sucking the life blood out of its sponsor, even if they do shut down the borders there’s already enough foreigners etc that will take their jobs anyway. I like Trump but I don’t think the New World Order crew will let him in and that’s a shame we need some new blood and not the business as usual crowd. Have a good day, Roy

  3. Michael

    March 15, 2016 at 10:10 AM


    Your essay rests on the assumption that Trump will do what he says he will do: Build a wall to keep people from crossing from Mexico into the US and fire lots of government employees. To support this assumption, you point out that the Republican establishment opposes Trump, and that means everyone else should support him. I don’t. I am voting Libertarian.



    • Adask

      March 15, 2016 at 11:56 AM

      In A.D. 1992, I ran for the Supreme Court of Texas as a Libertarian. I received 201,000 votes.

      Back then, I liked the Libertarian platform except for two planks that I could not abide: 1) they favored global free trade; and 2) their platform denied or ignored the existence of God.

      I don’t know that their platform still includes those two planks, but if it does, I still don’t feel entirely comfortable with that party.

  4. Adask

    March 15, 2016 at 11:50 AM

    No one knows–not me, not even Trump, himself–what he will actually do, if he’s elected. I don’t trust any politician. But I think that Trump might do some of what he claims he’ll do, and more than that, I think he might even tell the truth (sometimes) if elected. If he actually starts treating the American people as if they were adults and stops government from telling the “kids” lies about “Santa Claus,” that might be enough to justify his election.

    It’s ironic and hard to believe but, despite being a billionaire (?), Trump appears to be antagonistic to the “establishment”. I suppose that some of that appearance is an act, but I also think that most of that appearance may be true. What other candidate is available who’s really opposed to the “establishment”? Bernie Sanders? Do we have to become a communist country to stop the “establishment”? I don’t think so.

    Trump can’t destroy the “establishment,” but he could reduce it’s influence significantly. Again, all by itself, that possibility could be enough to justify his election.

    I’ve been horrified by the people G.W. Bush and Barack Obama turned out to be after they were elected. Perhaps I’ll be horrified by the “real” Donald Trump after he’s elected. But, if Trump turns out to be a fraud, his election will still serve a powerful and undeniably positive purpose: He has validated the anger in the body politic that’s been caused by our own government. He has laid a political foundation that will allow more people to embrace the same ideas as Trump advocates today in the 2018 and 2020 elections. Trump may not ever get elected, but he’s still opened the door for other candidates to speak candidly about a number of subject that have previously been “taboo” and kept out of the spotlight.

    Trump changed the entire tenor of the Republican primaries this year. Without Trump, who would’ve watched the Republican primaries? He’s already stirred things up enough to deserve being elected for he’s already accomplished.

    I’m not arguing that Trump is perfect. I am arguing that he’s completely different from all of the other candidates and that he’s pushed them into positions and opinions that they might previously thought they’d never assume. He may only be our “cleanest dirty shirt”–but even so, he is clearly our “cleanest dirty shirt”. I say, Put him on and hope for the best.

  5. Mike

    March 15, 2016 at 1:30 PM

    As always you share a well thought and well stated piece. I hope anyone reading, talking and thinking about the upcoming selection, remember who really owns the country.

    If you want to see what is coming down the pipe, so to speak, research Agenda 21 which has been changed to Agenda 2030. Globalism, technological tyranny and neo-feudalism are in our future as long as we stay divided and believe the current paradigm.

    In 1936, through The Administrative Procedures Act, the Fed-co govt. ceased to function by the law of the land – formally known as The Constitution for The United States. Ever wonder why they get away with so many “Unconstitutional” act? That is why and this is nothing new. Many reading this already know these facts but we often forget.

    Our nation has been on a path since those days via most presidents and the most recent example is the Strong Cities Network via Obama.

    We could take the nation back and reverse the trend but only if we can unite against the common enemy. It is pretty clear to me the UN, most national treaties and Central Bankers are the real enemy – not Trump, Hillary, Sanders, a white guy, a black woman or whomever they portray as against us.

    Time to get real people, this “election” means nothing in the grand scheme.

  6. Adask

    March 15, 2016 at 1:53 PM

    I generally agree with everything you’ve written–with one exception. So far as I know, the Administrative Procedure Act was not enacted in A.D. 1936. It was A.D. 1946.

  7. todreigus

    March 16, 2016 at 2:57 AM

    I don’t have a “legal knowledge bone” in my body, so for the most part I don’t have anything to offer & don’t say much… So I just try to read & soak up what I can…
    I tried to make a post last night, on a subject that most people today don’t want to hear… Most just roll their eyes, shove fingers in their ears, while humming nah nah nah &/or giggle… I’ve notice while frequenting Mr. Adask’s blog the last couple years, that a lot of the Patrons on here are Christians. So it was my intent to pass on some knowledge that I’ve been researching the last few years… I’ve had this vexatious feeling for the last decade, that something monstrous is coming… This last week, everything has just kind of suddenly fell together, so that I could see the essentials clearly, almost making me nauseated… So I came here to share, what I felt was important knowledge for other Christians to hear… I to tried to post my results, mainly just the important pieces of proof that I’m going off of, in direct relation to Revelations 17, broken down, with links verifying such… Not sure what went wrong (maybe too big, or didn’t like the links & such?) but it obviously didn’t take… So I’ll just leave y’all with this;

    Believe what you want, BUT, we are NOT going to get Obumer out of Office! He IS our last President & exactly what or Whom was foretold of over two thousand years ago! He’s going to suspend the elections & enact Martial Law… The time line for this is late this fall “Sept. – Oct.” Our (Oligarchy) does not want TRUMP in the Oval Office! He would win if they didn’t intervene. So they are going to make a deal with Obumer, to start all of this^, & then lead us into the NWO!!

    Lets think about it… Think like a General… if you were going to attempt this in America, how would you start? 1st you take control of the Media, right!? Where would you start?… The toughest region right!? Strategically, with the largest concentration of “gun toting” conservatives right!? Got to hit them 1st, so not to let them unite & bunker down anymore than possible, right!? Deploy tools & equipment using patsy’s with a cover… something like Jade Helm, slowly desensitizing the public to their presence…

    I know, y’all think I’m a nut right? Get in line! Something tells me I’m going to get better at this, once it’s underway? I have to finish getting my house & things in order & then Yeshua will make my path & his plans for me more clear!

    Thank you, Mr. Adask for all the knowledge you’ve passed on & may Yeshua enlighten you & your Patrons paths, & guide everyone thru all the turmoil ahead, so that we may finally meet & enjoy a great feast on the other side, with our Lord & Savior, Jesus Christ! Amen!

    • Adask

      March 16, 2016 at 7:20 AM

      Thanks for reading this blog.

      Thanks for your blessing. Much appreciated.

  8. timmy

    March 17, 2016 at 7:58 PM

    Look, Trump has been a moderate NYC semi-liberal Democrat his entire life, until suddenly now he’s the ultimate right wing conservative. Seriously? And you’re buying it?? He’s long time big buddies with Hilary whom with Bill has attended his kids weddings, etc. And his precious daughter married into a prominent tribe.

    You can never be sure what the real agendas are with these people (they’re ALL 1%ers) but I’m guessing his actual purpose is to get Hilary elected, because in the general presidential election, she will seem like the ‘rational choice’. He’s also doing a fantastic job of vilifying right/white/conservatives to the larger public. (Making them look ‘racist/jingoistic/ignorant/violent, etc.) He’s also literally shattering the republican party into pieces. Which also favors Hillary.

    These elections are now dominated by the combo of soccer moms (mostly liberal dems) and the ever growing minority block (80%+ liberal dems.) How do you think Obama got elected?

    The game is over. Just demographics alone mean the US is on a continuous inevitable course of decline. (Check the stats. In less than 20 years it’s minority majority. And you can see how they like things- i.e., California…)

    Not that I disagree with most of what he’s saying or proposing policy wise. It’s just not going to happen. Most of the main elements in the establishment trend toward cultural, and eventually economic, Marxism. Read your protocols again people.

    I assume at some point, when this all becomes obvious enough, the trump base and tea party people will forcibly resist or rebel. It’s that or be exterminated economically and culturally, if not physically.

    Interesting times indeed.

    Make like a boy scout and be prepared. Or at least like a girl scout and stash some nice cookies someplace….

  9. peg-powers

    March 21, 2016 at 7:58 PM

    Todreigus warns (above) “something monstrous is coming” and we can all agree with that. We feel it in our bones. How can the office of U.S. President be more monstrous than it is? Well, there’s some speculation that Mrs. Clinton is planning to move Bill out of the White House and make room for Huma Weiner, Hilary’s confidant and lesbian friend.

  10. gloria

    March 21, 2016 at 8:51 PM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s