I haven’t been to a movie in years, but I’m goin’ to this one.
I haven’t been to a movie in years, but I’m goin’ to this one.
The following video implies that elements of government are dumping guns into Black neighborhoods in order to create violence and civil strife. Maybe that’s true, maybe not. I’m inclined to think those allegations could be true.
However, this video also alleges some significant number of guns dumped into Black neighborhoods are full-automatic weapons able to fire hundreds of bullets per minute. Maybe that’s true; maybe not. I was disinclined to believe the “full-automatic” allegations because, if that were true, the MainStream Media should report instances where scores of rounds were fired at a victim, leaving scores of casings on the ground. I haven’t heard those MSM reports so I wonder if full-auto weapons are being dumped into Black neighborhoods.
But then, as I thought back to about 20 years ago, I remembered a New Years Eve TV newscast from the Cotton Bowl at Fair Park at Dallas, Texas. The Cotton Bowl is located on the South side of Dallas in a Black neighborhood. That New Years Eve, the stadium was empty except for the TV crew. No lights except those provided by the TV crew.
There was a female reporter. The clock ticked down to midnight and gunfire began to erupt from the surrounding Black community. People were firing their weapons into the air. You could hear all different size calibers. But it wasn’t just the sounds of various pistols or rifles going Bang! [pause] Bang! [pause] Bang!
Repeatedly, even predominantly, I heard the chatter of full-automatic weapons. I guessed I was hearing AK-47s, M-16s, and Uzis. Not one or two, but lots of ’em. I remember thinking that it sounded like a civil war in Beirut, Lebanon. The Blacks in South Dallas had some serious firepower.
The lady TV reporter started making her report in a professional, detached manner. The purpose of her broadcast was to report on the gun fire in the South side of Dallas. She apparently expected to hear a few gunshots.
However, she was not prepared to hear the noise of a civil war. Her eyes went wide when she realized that scores of guns were being fired, and perhaps a dozen of them were full-automatic. A lot of bullets were being fired up into the air. Those bullets had to come back down somewhere. The TV lady and her crew were standing at the 50-yard line of the Cotton Bowl with nothing over their heads. She involuntarily hunched over to make a smaller target. The TV lady was clearly afraid.
My point is that I saw that live TV news report back in the mid-1990s. I knew then that Blacks had a good number of fully-automatic weapons. That’s consistent with claims made in the following video.
Maybe government is dumping full-auto weapons into the ‘Hood.
Imagine finding a crate of guns in your back alley.
What would you do?
It’s hard to believe that 15 years have passed since some Muslim terrorists allegedly hijacked four airplanes and used them to attack the World Trade Center and Pentagon. It seems like it happened just two or three years ago.
We all have good reason to know that Bush, Cheney, Bush administration officials, the Saudi government and the National Institute of Standards and Technology all lied in order to cover-up and conceal the real culprits behind the 9/11 attack. We all have good reason to know that the real purpose behind the 9/11 attacks was to precipitate a unjustified invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and perhaps destabilize the entire Middle East.
The following video report doesn’t offer any new information. It won’t tell you anything that you don’t already know about the implosion of World Trade Center Building #7. But it’s a good summary of the evidence that implies that 9/11 could not have been perpetrated by a rag-tag band of Muslims and therefore had to have been perpetrated–and subsequently concealed–by our own government. This video is a memorial to 9/11 that deserves to be posted on this blog as reminder to all that our government is willing to murder thousands (millions?) or Americans to expand its power.
How many millions of Muslims have died as retribution for the 9/11 attacks that were blamed on Muslims but which the Muslims could not have actually caused? I.e., Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. There is no credible reason for it’s sudden, 7-second collapse, other than implosion. It would take weeks or months to wire Building 7 to implode. The Muslims could not have spent months sneaking into Building 7 to plant explosives. The wiring of Building 7 was an inside job that could not have been achieved or concealed without the complicity of our own government.
Some might say, Well, that was the Bush administration. Today’s government isn’t like that.
Bunk. There’s no statute of limitations on murder. 3,000 Americans were murdered in 9/11. If today’s congressmen, senators or presidents don’t seek to expose and prosecute the true perpetrators, then today’s politicians are accomplices after the fact to mass murder. They’re just as guilty as the Bush administrations’ fascists and psychopaths.
And, incidentally, how’d the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq work out? You could make a good case that those unjustified invasions have badly diminished Americans’ previous faith in government, caused the U.S. military to be badly weakened, triggered enormous instability in the Middle East, and (since Afghanistan and Iraq were not quickly subdued by our “shock and awe”) even caused serious damage to the New World Order.
Although perpetrators like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have gone free, the lies surrounding 9/11 are still coming home to roost. There’s an ironic justice in all that.
There were over 100 casualties. This implies that at least 100 bullets had been fired. This implies that even if the gunman had 30-round ammunition clips for his semi-automatic rifle and he had one clip in the rifle when he arrived–he still had to change clips at least three more times during the massacre.
Why didn’t one or more of the Pulse crowd try to jump the “single gunman” when he changed clips?
Some people have speculated that one man couldn’t have caused over 100 casualties all by himself. That speculation leads to the conclusion that the “lone gunman” must’ve had one or more accomplices who have, so far, remained unidentified.
Judge Andrew Napolitano was recently interviewed by Fox News and offered an implicit answer to how the “lone gunman” caused so many casualties: He had help, alright, but it wasn’t from some accomplices–it was the government.
Both of the following videos are extraordinary and appalling. They record an A.D. 2010 shooting of Jeff Weinhaus by FBI and police officers.
First, the video is appalling in that law enforcement lured Weinhaus to a meeting and then tried to murder him for no apparent reason other than willful failure to kiss ass.
Second, it’s appalling that if government shoots a black man, all hell breaks loose, but when government shoots a white man, nobody seems to care.
Third, it’s appalling that this video was posted on February 14th, A.D. 2016, and, so far (after nearly two months on YouTube), it’s reportedly received only 36,063 views. Maybe that’s because the shooting took place almost six years ago. Still, this video should go viral. Public indifference to this shooting is scarier than the shooting itself.
One of the best things you can do to prevent future murders or attempted murders by government thugs is to send a link to this video to everyone on your email list. If we can make the video go viral, we can slow the government down. If we ignore the video and don’t “push it” to others, our indifference will encourage government to shoot even more Americans.
If you don’t care enough to protest when others get shot, don’t expect others to protest when you get shot.
Florida and Ohio are the home states of Marco Rubio and John Kasich. If they don’t win their home states, their 2016 campaigns and perhaps their entire political careers will be finished.
If Trump wins Florida and/or Ohio, and gains all if their delegates, his path to the 1,237 delegates required to clinch the nomination becomes much easier, Ted Cruz’s chances become less likely and every other Republican candidate’s chances becomes nearly impossible.
But today’s election is about much more than delegate numbers. After the leftists’ attempt to disrupt last week’s Trump rally in Chicago, there’s also a big question about violence.
• For example, according to The Washington Times, (“Moveon.Org raising funds from Trump protests, warns more disruptions to come”),
“Moveon.Org is conducting fundraising activities from the Chicago protests against Donald Trump that prompted the Republican presidential front-runner to cancel a rally there Friday, and promises that more disruptions are on the way.”