Tag Archives: Government as Gangsters

Trump Declares War On Republican Party Establishment

If you once loved the Republican Party but gave it up because of its treasonous prostitution, here’s some news you might like.

Trump may’ve stopped trying to play “Mr. Nice-Guy”.  He’s going after Hillary (and Bill) “hammer and tong”.


In fact, great.

I don’t know how the upcoming election will work out.  But I despise Hillary and Bill Clinton so much that I lust to see both of them destroyed–not merely beaten, but destroyed– by a public acclamation for Trump and public condemnation for the Clinton gangsters.

video   00:04:01


Tags: , , ,

Hillary’s Plan to Destroy America with Multiculturism

video      00:04:42


Tags: , , , ,

“A Criminal Investigation is being Rigged”

The following video is not “news”.  It’s about two months old.  Still, it raises important insights in the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server to handle her official email–and of President Obama’s determination to shield her from any adverse consequences of that investigation..

According to this video, despite promises or constitutional obligations to the contrary, last April, President Obama was working to rig the Hillary Clinton indictment process.  In essence, Obama achieved this rigging by claiming that Hillary’s use of a private email server had done no harm and should therefore be ignored. (You might try to use a similar defense next you’re stopped for drunk driving.  Just tell the cop that, so far, you hadn’t killed anyone, and therefore should be released to keep driving drunk to your home.)

The key point in this video is that Obama couldn’t have known whether Hillary’s conduct had or had not been harmless unless he’d already conducted his own investigation into the relevant facts. If President Obama had conducted his own investigation of the allegations against Hillary, it becomes apparent that he was not relying on the FBI to conduct the one and only “official” investigation.

It’s unlikely that Obama has any official means to conduct an investigation of his own that preempts and supplants the official investigation conducted by the FBI.  Even if Obama had such means, which investigation’s results should be relied on–those of the political investigation mounted by President Obama–or those of the “official” investigation mounted by the FBI?

Obama’s bias in favor of exonerating Hillary seems apparent.

video    00:07:06


Tags: , ,

Civil Asset Foreclosure in Two Minutes

In essence, if the cop merely suspects that your money might’ve been associated with a crime, he can take it from you without a warrant, without a trial, without a conviction.   It’s an exaggeration to say so, but under civil asset forefeiture laws, if I were a cop and I claimed to “suspect” that you were the gunman on the “grassy knoll” who may’ve killed Kennedy  back in A.D. 1963, I could take whatever money you have without ever proving my suspicions were correct.

video   00:02:07




Tags: , , ,

Emergency Powers

James Turk interviews Lawrence Parks on the subject of “emergency powers”.

Note that, in my opinion, the President’s “emergency powers” only apply within the districts and territories “of the United States”.  They do not apply within the borders of the States of the Union (“The United States of America”).  If my opinion is roughly correct, it implies that your exposure to the President’s “emergency powers” may depend on whether you consent to assent to government’s presumption that you are “in” a territorial state (“this state”) of the singular “United States“.

In theory, if you can establish that 1) you’re a man made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-28); 2) you’re “endowed by your Creator with certain unalienable Rights” (“Declaration of Independence”); 3) are one of the people of a State of the Union (like “The State of Texas”); who 4) is living and working within a State of the Union (a State of “The United States of America“); which 5) is not a “state of emergency”; and who is 6) entitled to “separation of powers”; and 7) therefore does not consent to be subject to administrative law or administrative process; then, 8) you might not be subject to President Obama’s “emergency powers”.

video       00:06:40



Tags: , , , , ,

That Spiteful, Arrogant, Cynical, Narcissistic Piece of Crap

The Spiteful Narcissist [courtesy Google Images]

The Spiteful Narcissist
[courtesy Google Images]

The Washington Times published an article entitled “Obama vows to use executive action on immigration before new GOP Congress is sworn in”.  It wasn’t really news.  We’d all heard that Obama intended to unilaterally grant some sort of immunity to illegal aliens after the election.  But seeing the headline and reading the article simply infuriated me.

We have some sonofabitch in the White House who is going to do what he knows the American people don’t want and what he has no constitutional authority to do.  He—the nation’s chief law enforcement officer—is going to openly, shamelessly, gleefully conspire with millions of illegal aliens and the New World Order to break the law.

According to The Washington Times:


“President Obama vowed Sunday to move forward with an executive order to ease immigration laws before the end of the year, ignoring dire warnings from Republican leaders that the move will poison his relationship with the next Congress.

“The president said he would not wait any longer to address the country’s immigration problems and would grant legal status to most of the estimated 11 million undocumented residents living in the U.S.”


In response to the extreme ass-whipping that Obama brought on the Democrat Party in last week’s election, that spiteful, arrogant, cynical, narcissistic piece of crap is simply using the illegal alien issue as his way to say, “Screw you, America!”  Even when he loses, the narcissist insists that he wins–or at least gets even.

Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on November 10, 2014 in Government as Gangsters, Illegal Aliens, Obama, Treason


Tags: , , , ,

The Bretton Woods Committee

[courtesy Google Images]

[courtesy Google Images]

In A.D. 1944, an international conference was held at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to establish a new monetary system for the post-WWII world.  A fundamental principle of the resulting “Bretton Woods Agreement” was that the US dollar would be backed by gold and would come to be used as the world reserve currency.

In A.D. 1971, President Nixon closed the “gold window” and stopped redeeming foreign-held US dollars with gold.  Some people suppose that when the US dollar became pure fiat and was no longer redeemable in gold, the Bretton Woods Agreement ended.

However, the original Bretton Woods Agreement involved much more than merely promising to redeem foreign-held dollars with gold.  Vestiges of that Agreement continue to function and exert influence under the oversight of The Bretton Woods Committee.

Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , , , , ,