RSS

Tag Archives: Government as Gangsters

Clinton Crime Family


YouTube videos critical of Hillary Clinton are erupting en masse.  For the past week, I haven’t been able to open my email without receiving more videos (lots more videos) exposing Hillary for one crime or another.  Some people believe that the “establishment” has turned on Hillary and is allowing her to be destroyed.  I won’t trust and believe such reports unless and until Hillary actually loses the election.

Nevertheless, we’re catching more and more evidence of massive criminality within government–as well as some evidence that some elements of government may be trying to “do the right thing”.  Some of these “do-gooders” are roughly 100 FBI agents who’ve reportedly resigned from the FBI in protest against allowing Hillary to figuratively (and perhaps, literally) “get away with murder”.

I’m not impressed by those FBI resignations.  When these “good guys” silently resign from the racket and run away, they surrender the FBI and other government agencies to the  gangsters of Hilary’s ilk.  It takes far more courage–and deserves far more respect–to stand up, speak out, go public and fight rather than quietly resign.

And why do they quietly resign? Perhaps, because they see no hope in openly battling against the criminals who are entrenched and predominant in government.  Therefore the “good guys” go quietly and cowardly into the night as an admission that they are badly outnumbered by the “bad guys”.

Even so, we’re seeing evidence that there are actually a few “good guys” in the government who care more about their personal integrity than they do about their jobs.  For some of us,that’s a surprise and cause for modest celebration.  For example, the following video alleges that a former FBI assistant director is speaking out against Hillary, Bill and their “crime family”.

Just days before the election, the wheels appear to be coming off the Clinton Campaign.  That doesn’t mean that Hillary still can’t steal the election.  Not enough “good guys” have come forward to expose Hillary’s criminal acts to guarantee that she’ll lose next Tuesday.  But the tide that should’ve turned against Hillary months ago (or even years ago) is turning against her now, just days before the election.  (What incredible drama!)  Will this “turn” be enough to guarantee that Hillary loses?  Or is this astonishing “turn” already too little, too late?

Perhaps the strangest question may be this:  Will Hillary’s criminality surprise everyone(especially Hillary) by serving to reignite American morality?  Could this be the last election when any political party dares to run a gangster for public office?

We shall see . . . in about five days.

 

video     00:02:54

 

Tags: ,

Computerized Vote Rigging


Some of the following video is from A.D. 2010.  It implies that many, most, perhaps all, American elections have been significantly “rigged” for at least the last three election cycles.  It’s virtually certain that this year’s elections will also be rigged–at least, in part.

It’s worse than we’d imagined.  In this video we see evidence that explains how the “elite” and the “establishment” have gained and retained political power. They rig the elections.  We see evidence in this video that suggests why 3rd party and independent candidates almost always do poorly.  They’re not part of the “establishment” that rigs elections.  This video explains why almost the whole damned government seems to act in concert against the State and federal Constitutions and Americans’ rights and liberties.  Apparently, thanks to vote rigging, only establishment candidates are electable.

Except for Trump.   Once you understand the establishment’s reliance on vote rigging, you can understand why Democrat and even Republican “establishment” politicians have reacted so fiercely against Trump’s candidacy.

When you stop to think about it, if there is an “establishment” or “shadow government” that’s taken control of the U.S. government, isn’t it obvious that their first step would be to rig elections to insure their elections and reelections?

One solution:  Force legislators to pass laws that mandate that anyone who participates in election rigging/fraud be tried for treason.  If found guilty, hang ’em. No exceptions, no excuses, no crap. Hang ’em.

One implication:  Any incumbent politician who’s won election two or more times is almost certainly a member of the “establishment” that’s bent on treason.  Any politician.

Another implication:  If the “establishment” has rigged the general elections, they have nevertheless failed to rig the presidential primary elections.  Thus, Trump–perhaps the only non-establishment candidate advanced by either major political party in this year’s primary election–won the Republican nomination for President.   Oooo.  What a blow . . . what a frightening blow . . . to the “establishment”.

video     00:24:49

 

Tags: , , ,

Ammon Bundy & Brother Found “Not Guilty”


Ammon Bundy [courtesy Google Images]

Ammon Bundy
[courtesy Google Images]

Ammon Edward Bundy (born September 1, 1975) is an American car fleet manager who led armed militants in the 2016 occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

He is the son of rancher Cliven Bundy, who was the central figure of the 2014 Bundy standoff regarding unpaid grazing fees on federally-owned public land.

Ammon Bundy, his brother Ryan, and five other defendants were charged by the federal government for conspiracy and weapons violations in the “occupation”.

According to the October 27th New York Times,

.

“PORTLAND, Ore. — Armed antigovernment protesters led by Ammon and Ryan Bundy, charged in the takeover of a federally owned Oregon wildlife sanctuary in January, were acquitted Thursday of federal conspiracy and weapons charges.

“The surprise verdict in Federal District Court was a blow to the government, which had argued that the group used force and threats of violence to occupy the reserve, impeding the federal workers there. But the jury appeared swayed by the occupiers’ contention that they were protesting government overreach and posed no threat.

“In a sign of the high tensions throughout the trial, Ammon Bundy’s lawyer, Marcus R. Mumford, was restrained by four United States Marshals in courtroom tussle after the verdict on Thursday. He was enraged that the Bundys were not being immediately released.”

.

Defense attorney Marcus Mumford was not merely “restrained,” he was tased.  Judging from his video interview (below) he was not enraged.  He was merely asking by what authority the U.S. Marshals might continue to detain the defendants after they’d been found Not Guilty.  He was reportedly surrounded by U.S. Marshals, threatened with charges of “resisting arrest,” knocked to the floor and then tased.  In court.

What a circus.  What a story.  What a movie (I’m thinking Brad Pitt with a beard).

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , ,

Trump Declares War On Republican Party Establishment


If you once loved the Republican Party but gave it up because of its treasonous prostitution, here’s some news you might like.

Trump may’ve stopped trying to play “Mr. Nice-Guy”.  He’s going after Hillary (and Bill) “hammer and tong”.

Good.

In fact, great.

I don’t know how the upcoming election will work out.  But I despise Hillary and Bill Clinton so much that I lust to see both of them destroyed–not merely beaten, but destroyed– by a public acclamation for Trump and public condemnation for the Clinton gangsters.

video   00:04:01

 

Tags: , , ,

Hillary’s Plan to Destroy America with Multiculturism


video      00:04:42

 

Tags: , , , ,

“A Criminal Investigation is being Rigged”


The following video is not “news”.  It’s about two months old.  Still, it raises important insights in the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server to handle her official email–and of President Obama’s determination to shield her from any adverse consequences of that investigation..

According to this video, despite promises or constitutional obligations to the contrary, last April, President Obama was working to rig the Hillary Clinton indictment process.  In essence, Obama achieved this rigging by claiming that Hillary’s use of a private email server had done no harm and should therefore be ignored. (You might try to use a similar defense next you’re stopped for drunk driving.  Just tell the cop that, so far, you hadn’t killed anyone, and therefore should be released to keep driving drunk to your home.)

The key point in this video is that Obama couldn’t have known whether Hillary’s conduct had or had not been harmless unless he’d already conducted his own investigation into the relevant facts. If President Obama had conducted his own investigation of the allegations against Hillary, it becomes apparent that he was not relying on the FBI to conduct the one and only “official” investigation.

It’s unlikely that Obama has any official means to conduct an investigation of his own that preempts and supplants the official investigation conducted by the FBI.  Even if Obama had such means, which investigation’s results should be relied on–those of the political investigation mounted by President Obama–or those of the “official” investigation mounted by the FBI?

Obama’s bias in favor of exonerating Hillary seems apparent.

video    00:07:06

 

Tags: , ,

Civil Asset Foreclosure in Two Minutes


In essence, if the cop merely suspects that your money might’ve been associated with a crime, he can take it from you without a warrant, without a trial, without a conviction.   It’s an exaggeration to say so, but under civil asset forefeiture laws, if I were a cop and I claimed to “suspect” that you were the gunman on the “grassy knoll” who may’ve killed Kennedy  back in A.D. 1963, I could take whatever money you have without ever proving my suspicions were correct.

video   00:02:07

 

 

 
 

Tags: , , ,