RSS

Tag Archives: MOOA

Adask Video On MOOA, Sovereignty & Spiritual Warfare


The following is a video of a speech I delivered in A.D. 2012 at a Black church on the South side of Dallas.  I’d forgotten about it.

Today, a friend sent me a current link.  If I say so myself, this video offers a good summary of my fundamental notions on “Man Or Other Animals” (MOOA) laws, individual sovereignty and spiritual warfare.  It may take some effort, but if you can understand this presentation, you’ll understand what this blog is all about.  It’s worth you time.

video    00:42:40

Advertisements
 

Tags: , , ,

People Persons


[courtesy Google Images]

[courtesy Google Images]

‘ll bet that I’ve been listening to debates and arguments about the meaning, nature and possible disabilities of the term “person” for 25 years.  Even after all of that commotion, the meaning and implications of the word “person” is still not precisely clear to me.

However, last night I was reading the Bill of Rights and realized that the key to understanding the constitutional concept of “persons” might be found in the Fourth Amendment to The Constitution of the United States.  That Amendment declares,

 

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

 

Note that the “people” have “persons”.  “Persons” are not “people’.  Instead, “persons” are attributes or capacities of “people”.  “People” are real and primary; “persons” are relational, derivative and/or secondary.

While it’s possible that each of the “people” has only one correlative “person,” I doubt that’s true.

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , ,

MOOA and your Adversaries


MOOA:  A Jury of Your Peers? [courtesy Google Images]

MOOA: A Jury of Your Peers?
[courtesy Google Images]

If you’ve been on this blog before, you probably know that I am to some degree fixated on government laws that expressly define the American people to be “animals” and thereby deprive us of the God-given, unalienable Rights declared in our “Declaration of Independence”.

Over the past eight years, I’ve probably published 30 to 40 articles on this blog that deal with the “MOOA” (“man or other animals”) phenomenon.   You may know that I’ve used this insight and the grace of the Good LORD to stop a lawsuit by the Attorney General of Texas after he’d invested six years and nearly $500,000 in pre-trial investigations and hearings.

But in all of this, I only focused on presenting a freedom of religion argument that would prove that only I or other defendants were “men made in God’s image” and therefore couldn’t be “animals” or subjected to laws that presumed us to be “animals”.  Our status as “men made in God’s image” was protected by the 1st Amendment and our right to freedom of religion.

But I received an email today from “Jeff” that made me realize that the MOOA defense might significantly expanded to include others, even adversaries and jurors as “men made in God’s image” and therefore, not “animals”.

Here’s a copy of Jeff’s email and my reply:

Read the rest of this entry »

 
213 Comments

Posted by on March 28, 2014 in "Man or Other Animals"

 

Tags: ,

Consumers are “animals”?


Endowed by his Creator [courtesy Google Images]

Endowed by his Creator
[courtesy Google Images]

If you’ve read my previous articles on “Man or other Animals” (“MOOA”), you know that Genesis 1:26-28 declares:

“Gen 1:26  And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

“Gen 1:27  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

“Gen 1:28  And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

Given the repetition found in those three verses, there can be no doubt that God created man (mankind) and only mankind in His image and gave man “dominion” over all animals.

Thus, under the Jewish and Christian faiths, every “man” is absolutely distinguished from all “animals” by two facts:  1) man, and only man, is made in our Father YHWH ha Elohiym’s image; and 2) man alone is given dominion over all the animals.

Therefore, a Jew or a Christian can’t be declared to be an “animal” without violating a fundamental principle of his faith.

  Read the rest of this entry »

 
142 Comments

Posted by on March 13, 2014 in "Man or Other Animals"

 

Tags: ,

MOOA Fights the Phantom “Was”


The Phantom "Was" [courtesy Google Images]

The Phantom “Was”
[courtesy Google Images]

As many of you know, back in A.D. 2006, I became the last of seven defendants to be prosecuted in a civil suit by the Attorney General of Texas.  Each defendant was threatened with fines of $25,000 per day ($9 million per year). The case started in A.D. 2001 and continued to be actively prosecuted until A.D. 2007 when, despite having invested six years and nearly $500,000 in pre-trial investigations and pre-trial hearings, the prosecution simply stopped.  We never received an explanation as to why the prosecution stopped—it just did.

I believe and have argued that the Attorney General dropped the case because of the Freedom of Religion defense that I (with the grace of God) presented.  That defense was based on the following facts:

1) Genesis 1:26-28 declares man to be made in the image of God and given dominion over the animals (which were not made in God’s image);

2) no Christian or Jew who based his faith in part on Genesis 1:26-28 could be charged under laws that presumed people to be “animals” without violating his Freedom of Religion; and

3) the drug and medical device laws under which I and the other six defendants were charged presumed us all to be “animals”.

In essence, you can’t define me as an animal without violating a fundamental principle of the Jewish and Christian faiths.  If you try to do so, I have a freedom of religion defense to stop you.

As I’ve described elsewhere, I believe this Man Or Other Animals (MOOA) defense is so politically explosive, that the government had no choice but to drop the case.

Read the rest of this entry »

 
115 Comments

Posted by on February 25, 2014 in "Man or Other Animals", Bible, Lies

 

Tags: , , ,

MOOA meets Ecclesiastes 3:18


The Island of Dr. Moreau MOOA:  Man or Other Animals [courtesy Google Images]

The Island of Dr. Moreau
MOOA: Man or Other Animals
[courtesy Google Images]

If you follow this blog, you know that one of my major focuses (some might say “obsessions”) it the phrase “man or other animals” (“MOOA”) as it appears in a number of state and federal laws.  That phrase indicates that the government perceives us all as animals rather than “men made in in God’s image” (as per Genesis 1:26-28) and who are “endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights” (as per the “Declaration of Independence”). (See Man or Other Animals #1 and the “Category” “Man or Other Animals” which lists all of my articles relevant to that concept.)

By defining us as “animals” the government has achieved what Dr. Moreau attempted with chemistry and genetics in the fiction entitled “The Island of Dr. Moreau”.  By defining us as “animals,” the government has presumably stripped us of virtually all of our most meaningful rights, and relieved itself of the obligation “to secure these [God-given, unalienable] rights” to every man, woman and child (found in the third sentence of the “Declaration of Independence”).

Read the rest of this entry »

 
164 Comments

Posted by on February 13, 2014 in "Man or Other Animals", Bible, Despotism, Fascism, Genocide

 

Tags: , , , , ,